Andrew Leaming

A friend was knocked out from behind by a group of black teenagers. My friend never fully recovered and none of the black guys were even charged. My white friend was told to just get over it. Fuck people like Gomez, he wants you hurt, he thinks you deserve it.

"These are men who lust for a world where the powerful do what they can and the rest of us suffer what we must." Unimaginably based. It's long past time for these people to suffer. After everything Leftists have done to us, our country, and our civilization, I have absolutely no sympathy left for these people. Progressive moralizing means nothing anymore because we've seen the final results of where it leads us. These people can stand there and morally condemn us, speak truth to power, quote the Bible, throw around Reddit-tier insults, and wave their hands in the air all they want. None of it matters anymore. The game is up. We know what they stand for, and we hate them as much as they hate us.

This is true by the way… Many nations throughout history have survived periods of population decline. No nation has ever survived the mass demographic replacement of their people.

all of their ideas now are like “should we dissolve the government, imprison our opponents, and seize every lever of power in the country? we’re the good guys remember, if we don’t do this the bad guys will win (an election)” like they don’t even talk about healthcare anymore lol

The most popular sitting governor in the United States is calling for the repeal of the Hart-Celler act. We are going to reverse the 20th century.

I would lay this out in fairly simple and straightforward terms: * There are very clearly differences between men and women. * It’s perfectly sane, reasonable, and coherent to describe some modes of interaction as primarily masculine and other modes of interaction as primarily feminine. * In fact, nobody bats an eye if you criticize behavior that’s widely understood to be masculine in those exact terms. * If, however, you dare to notice that there’s something negative about a stereotypically feminine mode of interaction, then you will be accused of having some kind of psychosexual personality disorder. I think this is not tenable!

Most appreciation of "great art" is a performance. People are very, very susceptible to "if you didn't appreciate it, it went over your head". Whether that something is a $100K bottle of wine that tastes like Two-Buck Chuck, improvisational jazz that sounds like someone turned on an orchestra and walked away, or the... unique... style of David Foster Wallace doesn't make much of a difference. These sorts of "refined" tastes are actually just unusual tastes. They are in the same category as really, really liking model trains, or birdwatching. Except people who like birdwatching don't run elaborate psyops to convince everyone that birdwatchers are intellectually superior and more sophisticated. They just buy expensive binoculars and get on with doing what they like to do. But some people with niche tastes in art seem to need to proselytize them to others. And a lot of weak-willed people go along with it. They wouldn't want to look dumb, now would they? Well, I don't go for that. I think that the greatest obstacle to learning is the fear of looking stupid. And I'm particularly not impressed by things that have a reputation as "great literature", but are dull and opaque to the average reader. Writing is my thing, see, and that means I have an easy time remembering that the purpose of writing is to communicate. Not everything is going to appeal to 100% of everyone, but if your writing is opaque or boring to all but a few, you cannot, by definition, be a great writer, because you just failed the basics of craftsmanship. Great woodworkers don't make sturdy furniture that's rough on the surface and full of splinters. They make chairs that are not only durable, but comfortable AND beautiful. Because if they are great, they can do all these things at once. If a book is boring, I set it down, instead of pretending that I had a hands-free orgasm because I am so super-duper-uber sophisticated that I can read the hidden messages in gibberish. Maybe there are hidden messages. Maybe I'm smart enough to see them if I bothered to look. But I don't. Because I don't care about any hidden message from a man too unskilled to wrap his message in an interesting story, or too contemptuous of his audience to try. So, no, I don't dislike Monet, I might even hang a print of something he did on my wall. But it's not a big deal to me, and not only can I probably not tell the difference between Monet and a good enough AI imitation, I don't even care enough to try. Which is an approach I highly recommend to others, unless they need to tape a banana to a wall for tax purposes.

He explicitly said "we have to get the fraudsters out of this country and send them to prison" and the Kamala HQ people think he's talking about Democrats lmfao. Never change, guys

I’m case you needed an update, Democrats are going to “protect democracy” by: 1) Removing Supreme Court justices and stacking the court. 2) Eliminating the way we’ve selected presidents since the founding. 3) Adding states, but only states that favor them.

In undergrad, I called Obama an idiot in front of a professor...citing the fact that he was the only editor of the Harvard Law Review to never publish a law review. She literally screamed at me while frothing at the mouth. Never said how I was wrong though!

Not sure how I am only just now hearing this*, but in case you had not heard it, that POS dirtbag with the AR that went on a shooting rampage in Cambridge, MA the other day, he was stopped by an armed civilian who was joined by a cop, they worked as a team, and stopped the suspect. You know, ALL of the stuff that the antigun crowd says NEVER happens. In fact, this one incident is the perfect example of how every relevant democrat policy is dead wrong. - Democrat soft on crime policies put a multiple time convicted felon and attempted cop killer back on the street in the blink of an eye. - MA strict gun laws (rated an A by Giffords) did absolutely nothing to prevent a convicted felon from getting a gun. - An armed private citizen actually engaged the suspect. - When the cops arrived, despite what antigun Dems love to say, the cop was immediately able to tell the difference between the armed civilian and the armed shitbag. - The cops did not shoot the wrong person. - The armed civilian did not shoot a bunch of random innocent people. - The armed civilian and the cop worked together to end the situation, saving innocent lives. Guns Save Lives! Practice your ABC's - Always Be Carrying! (* Actually, I do know why it took so long to come out, the MSM doesn't like it when armed civilians save the day.)

Brad Pitt is still alive by the way. They could have just asked him to play the ghost of Achilles and his signs of ageing would have just worked for him to show his decayed essence as a spirit in the underworld. The movie would have instantly become far more watchable. Ana de Armas as Athena. Henry Cavil as Odysseus. You could even get an AI to turn the Fagles translation into a screenplay. It's so freaking easy if they actually wanted to make a good movie and had 300 million dollars to do it!! AHHhhhh this makes me so mad.

Christopher Nolan asked the Oracle of Delphi, "Will audiences love my adaptation of the Odyssey?" And the Pythia replied, "They will discuss it non-stop for months before it even premieres." And away he went, glad in this heart, poor fool.

The Right loses to the left so often because the left will never, ever disavow any of the most heinous things they’ve done. In fact they’ll defend it, and openly support it and say they want to do it again. If they could do it over, they’d torture Louis XVII and the Romanov children to death and they’d be even more brutal this time. Rightists are obsessed with garnering approval and denouncing certain parts of RW history, or purity-spiraling about taking good ideas from “bad” people, and leftists, instead of offering apology, say they’re glad it happened, and threaten to do it again. They want to torture your children to death, and many of you are concerned about appearing “cruel.” In fact, they’ll take historical events that aren’t entirely “left vs Right,” like the French Revolution, and coopt them just because they like the idea of torturing your children so much.

I've received a lot of vitriol regarding my post about @ChudTheBuilder, so I would like to clarify a few things: 1. I am 100% correct on every single point. 2. Dozens of people have commented saying that Chud walks up to random people and antagonizes them for no reason. Every time I ask for even one video of him antagonizing people who are not already misbehaving in public, these commenters disappear. 3. Dozens more are whining about the fact that he doesn't just turn his head and walk away. This seems to be their answer to everything, because they are cowards. 4. Many more continue accidentally proving our point. "Go around using the N-word and you are going to get murdered". Yeah. That's the point. We are being forced to live with violent an unstable people. There is no name you can call me that will make me murder you. 5. "Your boy is going to jail". Meh, I doubt that. He was hit first, and had reasonable grounds to believe that he was in serious danger due to the violent history of the man who attacked him. This is the same man who was charged with domestic assault and attempting to burn down an apartment building when he was mad at his wife. Seems like this will be a pretty simple case of "Stand Your Ground" in TN, as these two elements would seemingly meet the burden to justify the shooting. 6. That post really brought out the degenerates. Pray that God would save them, or spare us of their presence.

A full breakdown of Chud the Bulders self defense, compared to other black violence and incitement.

My family recently tried to enjoy a city event. In ONE evening we experienced homeless black men making gun gestures as they pretend killed my family. Another black man followed my TEENAGE DAUGHTER into ladies room. This was one evening being around black people. 4 hours. This is what is considered standard black behavior and we all have to put up with it. At an event with hoards of other races and cultures, it was only multiple black men that behaved in God-awful ways, repeatedly. Not one other race terrorized my kids. But on ONE evening, my kids got to experience multiple threatening black men. Chud documenting black behavior isn't the problem here. Black behavior IS the problem.

You can tell these people are spiritually liberal because they only call of "decency laws" after a White boy gets a little quirky and starts calling monkey people by the magic word. Not when drug addicts shit on the side of the road. Not when homeless people scream at young women walking by. Not when blacks do "teen takeovers" No, the line is when a White boy gets a little quirky.

I'll be real with you chief, I have a morbid curiosity of picking the brains of blacks that are near average IQ to understand their reasoning. I understand you might be sheepish to engage with someone who has a penchant to verbally raping people online, but it's in good faith. The geneticist view is the only one that fills the gaps, all socioeconomic theories don't hold water under study. If you had any decency you'd see a nation founded explicitly for and by whites in its founding documents, built by whites, who has given you every leg up and more community outreach than any group has received in history, doesn't deserve to out our children and stability as a whole at risk for a handful of you spiteful mutants that can barely measure to the average white. You should understand you have a moral imperative to put your money where your mouth is and bring your motherlands out of the dark and into the light through self deportation if you think you're truly that capable.

You missed the fact that school officials deceived this young girl and her parents, promising them that boys and girls would sleep on separate floors. It wasn’t until this 11-year-old girl was on the trip—far from home—that she discovered her expected bedmate was a boy. She was then forced to stand up against school authorities and defend her own privacy in the moment, late at night. They initially treated her as if her concerns were not legitimate, moving her to a different bed in the room. This backfired when the other roommates wanted the boy to move beds too. So this little girl had to muster the courage to voice her concerns a second time. The school finally relented and moved her to another room, but told her to lie about the reason why. Any reasonable person can see how outrageous this is. No child should have to defend her own privacy against a school policy that puts her in jeopardy. And no school district should make it a policy to deceive parents. Furthermore: not all kids have the ability or opportunity to stand up for themselves. Another family in our lawsuit has a son whose sleeping arrangements and showers were supervised by a female (identifying as non-binary) at a week-long school camp. Several of the boys were so uncomfortable that they skipped showers and changed their clothes inside their sleeping bags. This is inexcusable. It is adults’ responsibility to stand up for children—not children’s responsibility to stand up for themselves. This could easily be avoided with a commonsense policy that allows parents to stay informed and opt their children out of mixed-sex sleeping arrangements ahead of time—protecting the privacy of ALL children involved. But despite our requests, the school district repeatedly refused to do this. So yes, we sued. In fact, let me put every district in America on notice right now: if you treat students and parents this way, prepare for a lawsuit.