Andries Kerpestein

945 posts

Andries Kerpestein banner
Andries Kerpestein

Andries Kerpestein

@AndriesKerp

Radical capitalist and zionist goy. Founder taking on the university cartel

Katılım Ocak 2021
1.7K Takip Edilen430 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Andries Kerpestein
Andries Kerpestein@AndriesKerp·
Happy to announce that my book, The Proprietary State, is now available! free-cities.org/the-proprietar… This might be the most radical economics book you'll ever read. It argues for governments with shareholders instead of voters, and shatters many established ideas in economics. Starting with an entirely new foundation for economics, it takes on many established ideas in economics and political thought to explain why governments (or most of them, at least), should be for-profit corporations. It explains the costs and benefits of privatising a government, how it can be done, what variants of the proprietary government are possible and what must be done to get the benefits while minimising the costs and risks. It challenges the Coase theorem, provides a new praxeological theory of entrepreneurship that challenges the idea of laissez-faire, provides a new perspective on public choice, explains why Spencer Heath's idea of proprietary administration is fatally flawed, and much more. For readers who are knowledgeable about economics, it contains ideas that will significantly change the way they look at economics, governance and political systems. It's a must-read for anyone interested in economics and political science. Get it now, you won't regret it! amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B0F2Z9…
English
11
8
54
10.1K
Daniel Ch
Daniel Ch@chddaniel·
Introducing Claude for Cloning Clone any website or app with pixel perfect accuracy. One-shots Nike, Amazon, X, Instagram, Uber and more!
English
24
11
218
17.6K
Andries Kerpestein retweetledi
Beff (e/acc)
Beff (e/acc)@beffjezos·
Sometimes a descent into hell and a dark night of the soul is necessary to reignite the fire and ensure it burns brighter than ever.
English
10
17
223
9.1K
Andries Kerpestein retweetledi
Naval
Naval@naval·
Don’t sell anything you wouldn’t want your children to buy.
English
804
2.8K
30.5K
1.8M
Andries Kerpestein retweetledi
Carlos Abadi
Carlos Abadi@NewSamawal·
This is exceptional
English
26
69
641
54.4K
Andries Kerpestein
Andries Kerpestein@AndriesKerp·
It wouldn't work anyway, because of the unconstitutionality. I remember speaking with the organisers of ZuVillage Georgia about this when we were there. They wanted to explore the possibility of getting some special jurisdiction and invited government representatives to speak. I asked one question to the representative, which was enough to know that it wouldn't be possible because Georgia's constitution is modelled after the German one. Something the organisers hadn't even bothered looking into. And the political situation at the time (or probably any time in the future) wouldn't allow for any useful constitutional amendment.
English
0
0
1
16
Anatoly Karlin 🧲💯
@AndriesKerp @ProsperaGlobal That's the point. They largely don't bother with jurisdictional lobbying, presumably as a waste of time and energy at network states' current scale. I'm not sure it's worth it until $TOTAL2 is at least 10x higher than what it is now. @RokoMijic
English
1
0
1
73
Andries Kerpestein
Andries Kerpestein@AndriesKerp·
Legal autonomy, the crucial element that everyone keeps getting wrong. What we call 'rights of government': the right to make and enforce laws, and levy taxes, in lieu of the host state. There are two ways to get it: 1. A charter: what @ProsperaGlobal has—an explicit bundle of rights of government over a defined territory. 2. Cessation of authority: when a government explicitly cedes certain rights of government over a territory, which thereby land in the hands of landowners. Own the land, own the rights of government. What Praxis and the Network State crowd keep getting wrong: that you can just 'make a deal' with a host government. In reality, these governments have to change their constitutions to make it possible. Charters and cessations of authority are UNCONSTITUTIONAL almost everywhere, and definitely every country worth building a special jurisdiction in. Changing the constitution requires multiple successive parliaments to vote in favour, often with a supermajority. Many years of political dealmaking and legislative work. The common attitude is "we'll figure that out later". Well, good luck. Better to drive the legislative process first in a number of countries in parallel, to pave the way for special jurisdictions later. Then, you'll probably find you'll need very little community building if any. The jurisdiction attracts investors who create jobs and the jobs attract people. Get the jurisdiction first. It takes many years, but otherwise you won't make it.
Imran@lmrankhan

Heard the unfortunate news about Network School. I’m not sure moving countries solves the underlying issue. It changes your sovereign dependency but doesn’t remove it, and for Balaji’s vision to come to life, it needs to own everything end to end. From a software analogy perspective, you need to own the full stack: land, laws, infrastructure, economy, and citizen experience. Otherwise, you’re an app running on someone else’s operating system, and they can change the rules or shut you down. I get that it’s a chicken and egg problem get users and citizens, build a community temporarily, then reestablish elsewhere once you have momentum. But you’re not competing with typical competitors you’re competing with nation states. And your users aren’t just dealing with a specific niche problem you’re solving, like shopping or payments. It’s all of it, from things like healthcare to where citizens stay, how they transport themselves, and more. So if you get too powerful, nation states will cut you off. Getting users acclimated to a new city is also extremely hard and will likely face adverse selection. Founders who want to get to PMF quickly will tap into Silicon Valley, NYC, or other global cities with established network effects. Praxis showed how hard this is. They built the network and raised capital but still struggled to secure land, legal autonomy, funding, and enough residents to build the actual city. I do believe in what Balaji is doing, and it is the ultimate fail safe plan. But I think it requires an Elon Musk level, Herculean effort, with large corporate partners or billions of dollars in capital to get it off the ground.

English
3
2
7
1.1K
Andries Kerpestein retweetledi
Beff (e/acc)
Beff (e/acc)@beffjezos·
Mamdani is an ideological Trojan horse for Islamo-Communist extremism to tear this country apart and burn it to ashes
English
88
81
1.5K
45.8K
Andries Kerpestein
Andries Kerpestein@AndriesKerp·
People fall into either of two categories: - Forward-looking builders who want win-win solutions, peace and prosperity for all. Harmony between the nations. - Resentful losers who identify as victims to protect their egos. Hate jews/the rich/etc. Want them to lose more than they want their own groups to win. Mamdani and his supprters are in the latter category. Poisonous energy.
📟 רחמים@rahamimX

>mfw I’m elected Class President and can’t actually make recess last all day long

English
1
1
10
1.5K
Anatoly Karlin 🧲💯
@AndriesKerp @ProsperaGlobal Yeah. Also network states as they exist today are SMALL. One thing for poor countries to make SEZs for First World multinationals bringing a ton of jobs and tech transfer. Another for... at this scale, larpers. (Sorry). Zuzalu is most prospective approach at those stage.
English
1
0
5
173
Andries Kerpestein
Andries Kerpestein@AndriesKerp·
@Gonzohall @ProsperaGlobal @ns I'm not saying integration isn't helpful or even community building. Just that community building isn't necessary and that it should come second to getting a jurisdiction. Maybe you're right about the talent part, but it still doesn't translate into getting a jurisdiction.
English
1
0
1
37
Gonçalo Hall
Gonçalo Hall@Gonzohall·
I respect your opinion and find it an interesting thought process. Personally I believe you are deeply wrong in a couple of points: "2. Community building isn't and shouldn't be necessary." Community building and integration is what protects you from changing political parties in power. It's also the main attraction either for Hondurans and foreigners. Also I know ou are wrong on this one: "3. Politicians aren't interested in attracting or keeping migrants unless they expect those migrants to vote for them.", I work with several government that focus on attracting qualified tech immigrants, many successfully. The best examples being very obvious like Dubai and Singapore, but its true for over 65 countries that created visas to attract these people. More than that, in the Foreign Direct Investment World, attracting talent is as important as attracting the companies nowadays, that's why several Investment Agencies managed by governments now manage both FDI and talent attraction to the countries. I worked with over 10 governments in the last 5 years, all with the same goal: Attracting talent to attract FDI.
English
1
0
2
73
Andries Kerpestein
Andries Kerpestein@AndriesKerp·
I'm very skeptical of Balaji's approach (which Praxis also has) because: 1. The legal aspect of it makes negotiating futile. Especially when you've already invested a lot in your presence in a country, giving the host country a lot of leverage. 2. Community building isn't and shouldn't be necessary. Most migration happens within countries, and before LIBRE got voted in there were companies taking steps to invest tens of millions into manufacturing in Próspera. Workers would mostly be Hondurans migrating to the ZEDE. 3. Politicians aren't interested in attracting or keeping migrants unless they expect those migrants to vote for them. That's why Europe hasn't made legislation to attract a tech community. The same applies to the network state crowd. The common reaction from Silicon Valley types is to say "it's worth trying anyway" because the lean startup method is all they use. To a man with only a hammer, everything looks like a nail. But that just doesn't apply here. It's not about trying a bunch of things and finding out. That only leads to a waste of time and money. There's no reason to try anything that you can rule out a priori using sound reasoning.
English
1
0
3
83
Gonçalo Hall
Gonçalo Hall@Gonzohall·
Fair point. @ProsperaGlobal and @ns are approaching from different angles, ehich gives the whole movement a lot of information to work with. @ns built community first, fast setup, low upfront investment, attracted thousands of founders during the last year. The core belief seems to be, community first, build a great experience for founders, then negociate with governments with the leverage. Próspera is building slowly, attracting a few dozen people, it has to build almost all infrastructure from scratch and doesn’t focus on experience. Yet they have the most freedom and the biggest potencial exactly because of the rule of the ZEDE Honduran law (although, as we know, stability is never guaranteed). It’s the frontier, we are all learning and both have interesting approaches that work almost as oposite.
English
2
0
2
128
nothing
nothing@KUROBNR·
@AndriesKerp @dorkambivert Still need permit. Tf you talk about other people country while didn't know anything about other people laws? You think your country laws have the same as other? Keep barking inside your own pants
English
1
0
0
91
dorkambivert
dorkambivert@dorkambivert·
@AndriesKerp Doesn't have educational permit to open the school. Doesn't even pay taxes in Malaysia. Get f out from Malaysia.
English
1
0
6
283