Bradley C Hughes

75.7K posts

Bradley C Hughes banner
Bradley C Hughes

Bradley C Hughes

@AngelsInTheAI

Creator/builder @NeuralCommander. I stand for fair markets, permaculture, local democracy, the beautiful economy, social safety nets, power of prayer. ♒️🚴🏖️⛵️

Sydney, New South Wales Katılım Temmuz 2007
10.4K Takip Edilen9.4K Takipçiler
Bradley C Hughes retweetledi
Artur Nadolny
Artur Nadolny@ArturNadol7566·
SHE DOCUMENTED ELECTION FRAUD IN 25 COUNTRIES Sophie Zhang @szhang_ds was a low-level data scientist at Facebook @Meta. Her actual job was removing fake likes and bot accounts. Routine stuff. Except she kept finding something much worse. From 2018 to 2020, she uncovered political manipulation and opposition harassment networks across 25 countries. Governments using fake accounts to drown out critics. Politicians manufacturing fake approval. Real elections. Fake numbers. Real consequences. Honduras. Azerbaijan. India. Ukraine. Spain. Brazil. Bolivia. Ecuador. And more. She documented all of it. She raised it internally. She pushed. She escalated. Facebook's response? Everyone agreed it was terrible. Nobody could agree who should be responsible, or even what should be done. She was fired in September 2020. Then she was offered a $64,000 severance package tied to a non-disparagement agreement. She turned it down. On her last day, she posted a 7,800-word memo on the internal message board. It was later leaked to BuzzFeed @BuzzFeedNews. The world finally read what Facebook had been sitting on for years. Facebook's priority, she wrote, was PR. Issues got bumped up the queue when someone threatened to go to the press. Not because they were serious. Because they were embarrassing. She testified before the British Parliament in October 2021. She shared documents with US law enforcement. She said she has blood on her hands. She meant it literally. Countries she chose not to prioritise later descended into civil unrest. One data scientist. Holding back election interference across half the planet in her spare time while her employer calculated the reputational math. The platform that connects the world couldn't connect the dots. Or wouldn't. Sources: BuzzFeed News @BuzzFeedNews, September 2020 | The Guardian @guardian, April 2021 | MIT Technology Review @techreview, July 2021
Artur Nadolny tweet media
English
4
116
166
1.9K
Bradley C Hughes retweetledi
Bradley C Hughes retweetledi
Ben Norton
Ben Norton@BenjaminNorton·
Corruption is nothing new in US politics, but the billionaire Trump has taken it to a whole new, extreme level. Trump was forced to disclose 3,700 financial transactions conducted in 3 months, from January through March. The value of his trades was between $220 million and $750 million. Up to $750,000,000 in one quarter! The sitting US president is using insider information to speculate in the stock market, in trades worth hundreds of millions of dollars every quarter. If you don't think the government policies Trump implements are influenced by his financial interests, you are extremely naive. This is as corrupt as it gets.
Ben Norton tweet mediaBen Norton tweet media
English
226
2.8K
5.1K
110.5K
Bradley C Hughes retweetledi
James Tate
James Tate@JamesTate121·
In August 2010, Jane Mayer published a long article in The New Yorker called "Covert Operations." It introduced most Americans, for the first time, to two brothers — Charles and David Koch — and the quiet network of foundations, think tanks, and political organizations they had spent decades building to reshape American politics from behind the scenes. The article was meticulously sourced. It named names. It followed the money. A few months later, Mayer started getting strange messages. A blogger asked her how she felt about the private investigator who was looking into her. She thought it was a joke. Then a former reporter told her, at a Christmas party, that he'd been approached and asked to help dig up damaging information on a journalist who had written something two billionaires didn't like. Then, in January 2011, her editor at The New Yorker, David Remnick, forwarded her a query from the New York Post. The Post had been handed material claiming Mayer was a serial plagiarist. The "evidence" was being shopped to multiple outlets at once. It wasn't true. The reporters she had supposedly stolen from confirmed she had cited them properly or asked permission. The Post dropped the story. But the campaign had been real — and Mayer eventually traced it to a firm called Vigilant Resources International, run by Howard Safir, the former NYPD commissioner. The firm had been hired, she would later document, by people connected to Koch business interests. The dirt didn't exist. So someone had tried to manufacture it. That moment told Mayer something about her own work that she has never forgotten. She wasn't being attacked because her reporting was sloppy. She was being attacked because it was accurate. Mayer has spent more than three decades doing this. Before Dark Money, she wrote The Dark Side, the definitive account of how the United States adopted torture as policy after September 11. After Dark Money, she investigated dark money behind Supreme Court confirmations, the network funding election-denial campaigns, and the secret political work of a Supreme Court justice's spouse. Each story has followed the same arc. Reporting comes out. Power responds — not by disputing the facts, but by going after the reporter. Lawyers get involved. Personal information gets leaked. Old colleagues get phone calls. The accusation is always the same in spirit, even when the words change: she went too far. But "too far" has never meant inaccurate. It has meant inconvenient. That's the quiet education buried in Jane Mayer's career: powerful institutions rarely correct the record. They reach for the messenger. They make the cost of telling the truth so high that the next person thinks twice. It only works if it works. Mayer is still reporting. The stories are still landing. The lines, it turns out, were never where we were told they were. Someone just had to be willing to walk past them, and write down what was on the other side.
James Tate tweet media
English
27
935
1.7K
41.2K
Bradley C Hughes retweetledi
Craig Kelly:🇦🇺Foundation for Economic Education
If you are earning less than $45,000 your marginal tax rate is zero for $0 – $18,200 and 16% for $18,201 – $45,000. However if you’ve bought a few shares, or maybe invested in a few antiques - that have had a capital gain, sneaky Albanese now wants to tax that not at your marginal rate, but at 30%. Its a direct attack on low income earners and pensioner.
PoliticalPilot@PilotPoli

The 30% minimum tax on capital gains is the worst tax policy change in Australian political history. It's effectively saying to the average punter, don't save, don't invest, and don't try to make your money work for you. I've been a Labor member and voter since my first election, that ended tonight.

English
133
254
2K
112.4K
Bradley C Hughes retweetledi
Bradley C Hughes retweetledi
Sony Thăng
Sony Thăng@nxt888·
The most subversive document in American political history is not the Declaration of Independence. It is Hồ Chí Minh's letter to Truman. Because it takes the Declaration at its word. It says: you said these things. Self-evident truths. Unalienable rights. The consent of the governed. The right of a people to determine their political future. We are a people. We are determining our future. We are asking you to apply your own stated principles to our situation. The letter is a trap built entirely out of American rhetoric. And Truman could not answer it. Because to answer it honestly would be to admit that the principles were never universal. That "all men" had always meant something narrower than it said. That the freedom they were exporting was a product, not a principle, and like all products it came with terms of service that the marketing materials didn't mention. The letter still sits in the National Archives. Still unanswered. Still the clearest possible X-ray of the gap between the American idea and the American reality. Hồ Chí Minh understood America better than America understood itself. He always had.
Sony Thăng tweet media
Petre Solheim@PetreSolheim

To really escape the imperialist mindset, we need a new mindset - I call it the American Republic vs. the American Empire. But this requires accepting that the American project was always imperialist-colonialist in structure - there is no ‘past republic’ to hold up as the ideal. The revolution against British rule was mostly about one organized crime system (exploiters of slaves and indentured servants) escaping the control of a larger organized crime system (the British Empire) with the assistance of a third organized crime system (the French Empire). Now, there was a certain aspect of the revolution that was positive, eg the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, but the real power structure remained resolutely capitalist. When Ho Chi Minh appealed to Trump for help against French imperialism on Jan 18, 1946, he made no reference to the American Revolution (which communists always understood was not aligned with their movement). Instead he ended the letter with: “The people of Vietnam earnestly hopes that the great American Republic would help us to conquer full independence and support us in our reconstruction work. Thus, with the assistance of China and the United States, both in capital and technique, our Vietnam Republic will be able to bring her share in the building-up of World Peace and World Prosperity.” Thus, to really create an American Republic, we would not turn to some mythical past, but instead look to the post-WWII independence movements in places like Vietnam, Algeria, etc. as inspiration.

English
76
1.7K
4.8K
137.2K
Bradley C Hughes retweetledi
Max Blumenthal
Max Blumenthal@MaxBlumenthal·
Repressive restrictions have just been lifted, allowing British media to report what we did a month ago: Judge Jeremy Johnson can now sentence Palestine Action defendants as “terrorists” on the grounds they attempted to “influence” the Israeli govt by vandalizing their weapons factories in the UK This was kept secret from the jury, who believed they were deciding a criminal case
The Grayzone@TheGrayzoneNews

EXCLUSIVE: UK seeks to jail Palestine Action for ‘terrorism’ amid UK media blackout 6 activists could be sentenced as terrorists, facing long prison terms But the jury has not been notified about the 'terror' designation, and UK media can't report on it thegrayzone.com/2026/04/12/uk-…

English
30
941
2.1K
47.1K
Bradley C Hughes retweetledi
Captain Insight
Captain Insight@CaptainInsightX·
Spotify wanted one Swedish coder so badly, they bought his 300KB masterpiece just to get him. You’ve used his code your whole life. You’ve never heard his name. 🤯 Meet Ludvig Strigeus 🇸🇪 > Swedish software engineer. Born January 1981. Goes by "Ludde" online. > Studied Computer Science at Chalmers University in Gothenburg. > 2001 ~ at age 20, fell in love with old LucasArts adventure games. > Problem: those games only ran on ancient PCs. > So he reverse-engineered them ~ took apart their code, line by line. > Built ScummVM ~ a free tool that runs Monkey Island, Indiana Jones, and 100+ retro games on any modern device. > 2004 ~ did the same with Transport Tycoon Deluxe. > Built OpenTTD ~ a free clone, still played by millions today. > 2005 ~ at age 24, hated how bloated existing BitTorrent apps were. > Built µTorrent. Alone. In under 300 KB ~ smaller than a single high-res photo. > Rapidly became the most popular file-sharing client on Earth ~ over 150 million users at peak. > 2006 ~ Daniel Ek and Martin Lorentzon were starting a music app called Spotify. > They wanted one programmer to build their streaming engine ~ him. > They didn't just recruit him. They bought µTorrent in late 2006 just to get him on the team. > Two months later, they sold µTorrent to BitTorrent Inc. and kept Ludde. > "Spotify bought µTorrent, but what we really wanted was Ludvig Strigeus," former Spotify CTO Andreas Ehn later said. > He led the development of Spotify's core streaming engine ~ the technology that lets songs play instantly with zero buffer. > Lives with a rare muscular disease. Uses a wheelchair. Has done so for years. > Codes from his apartment in Gothenburg. > Won 5 prestigious Swedish honors between 2006 and 2023 ~ including the Polhem Prize, Sweden's highest technology award, and an honorary doctorate from Chalmers. 🚀 > Elected fellow of the Royal Swedish Academy of Engineering Sciences in 2023. > 2026 ~ left Spotify after nearly 2 decades. Joined Nordan AI ~ a Stockholm AI lab building Europe's answer to Palantir. > Never founded a company. Never gave a TED talk. Never sought equity. > No Twitter. No interviews. He built the era of file-sharing. Then built the era of streaming. Now quietly building the era of AI. No fame. No equity. Nothing in his name. Software GOAT. 🐐
Captain Insight tweet mediaCaptain Insight tweet media
English
38
147
1.6K
101.2K
Bradley C Hughes retweetledi
Emelia
Emelia@wasalive22·
France gathered 400 Muslim scholars and beheaded them. In 1917 AD, during the occupation of Chad. In 1852, when France entered the city of Laghouat in Algeria, it killed two-thirds of its population in a single night and burned them alive. France occupied Algeria for 132 years. In the first 7 years after their arrival, the French eliminated 1 million Muslims, and in the last 7 years before their departure, they eliminated 1.5 million Muslims. The French historian Jacques Gorky estimated that the total number of Muslims killed in Algeria from France's arrival in 1830 to its departure in 1962 was 10 million. France occupied Tunisia for 75 years, Algeria for 132 years, Morocco for 44 years, and Mauritania for 60 years. When France entered Egypt during its famous campaign, French soldiers on horseback entered mosques and raped free women in front of their families. They drank wine in the mosques and turned them into stables for their horses. It is strange to see some people boasting about and defending French civilization, forgetting all its dark history. This is France; remind them of its history. 🔻 When France entered the city of Aghwat (Laghouat) in Algeria in 1852, it burned two-thirds of its inhabitants to death in just one night. 🔻 France conducted 17 nuclear tests in Algeria between 1960 and 1966, resulting in an unknown number of deaths estimated between 27,000 and 100,000 and the effects persist to this day. 🔻 When France left Algeria in 1962, it left behind 11 million landmines more than the total population of Algeria at the time. 🔻 France occupied Algeria for 132 years. In just the first seven years of their occupation, they massacred one million Muslims, and in the last seven years, they martyred another 1.5 million Muslims. 🔻 France is the fourth largest holder of gold reserves in the world, with 2,436 tons of gold stored at the Bank of France, even though France has no active gold mines. 🔻 In contrast, Mali one of the world's largest gold producers with 14 official gold mines has no gold reserves of its own. 🔻 Similarly, the Republic of Congo, which ranks seventh among gold-producing countries, also has no gold reserves in its central bank.
Emelia tweet mediaEmelia tweet mediaEmelia tweet media
English
505
9.8K
15.8K
479K
Bradley C Hughes retweetledi
Dr Rahmeh Aladwan
Dr Rahmeh Aladwan@doctor_rahmeh·
Dr Ellen Kriesels (@EllenKriesels) has just been arrested by the london met police on behalf of the 'israeli' jewish lobby for two X posts. Ellen is a senior consultant paediatrician with an unblemished record. The lobby began hunting her in September because of her sign at a Palestine national demonstration. They doxxed her and smeared her in the press. 3000+ zionist jews and pro-'israelis' complained to her hospital (that she had worked in for 15 years) She was suspended from the Whittington Hospital within 4 days. They (UKLFI and CAA) reported her to the medical board (GMC) and then to the tribunal (MPTS) where she had her licence suspended for 9 months. And now they've had her arrested. Her crimes: - Opposing the Holocaust in Gaza - Naming and criticising jewish supremacy. Britain is doing this to our NHS doctors for 'israel'. Britain is occupied.
Dr Rahmeh Aladwan tweet media
English
547
6.3K
9.7K
218.7K
Bradley C Hughes retweetledi
Mir Mohammad Alikhan
Mir Mohammad Alikhan@MirMAKOfficial·
I know 10 minutes is a bit long on the social media for a video but I request you to please watch it. Zionism and the Israeli citizens have never been exposed like this ever.
English
22
803
1.6K
22.8K
Bradley C Hughes
Bradley C Hughes@AngelsInTheAI·
Privacy GOAT. 🐐
Captain Insight@CaptainInsightX

The NSA spent billions trying to break encryption. One German programmer beat them. He earned only $25k a year. 🤯 Meet Werner Koch 🇩🇪 > German free software developer. Born 1961 in Düsseldorf. > 1997 ~ Richard Stallman called for a free encryption tool. > Only option then: closed-source, US-restricted PGP. > Werner answered. He built GnuPG (GPG) alone — free software to encrypt files, sign software, and verify identity. > 1999 ~ Released GPG 1.0. Fully open source. No restrictions. > Today his code verifies every Linux server update, every Debian package, every Tor Browser download on Earth. > Every signed Linux release depends on it. > Used by activists, dissidents, and security pros worldwide to stay untracked. > Edward Snowden used GPG in 2013 to leak NSA documents. It held up against the world’s most powerful spy agency. 🚀 > 2001 ~ Founded g10code with his brother to work full-time on GPG. > Earned $25,000/year for 14 years while supporting his wife and daughter. > 2012 ~ Funding ended. He had to let go of his only programmer. > 2013 ~ He was the sole maintainer and nearly quit. > 2015 ~ ProPublica story dropped. Internet donated $137k in 24 hours. > Facebook + Stripe pledged $50k/year each. Linux Foundation gave $60k. > Won FSF Award for the Advancement of Free Software. > Today he still maintains GPG from his home in Erkrath, Germany. One man kept the internet’s secrets, secret. The world almost lost him in 2013. His code still protects yours. Privacy GOAT. 🐐

English
0
0
1
33
Bradley C Hughes retweetledi
Holden Culotta
Holden Culotta@Holden_Culotta·
Thomas Massie: “The Epstein class is above party.” “They don’t associate as Republicans or Democrats.” “They’re above judges.” “They’ve got visa waivers.” “They fly private planes.” “They don’t mingle with the public.” “John Paulson, one of the three billionaires who’ve [funded my opponent], was in Epstein’s phone book.” “He also was implicated in these files as … reaching out to Jeffrey Epstein to get money from him to honor Howard Lutnick.” “It’s a really small world when you get into the billionaires.” “And they’re not partisans.” “My hat’s off to Marjorie Taylor Greene for taking on those threats.” “Lauren Boebert … they took her into the situation room and tried to whip her into taking her name off of the discharge petition.” “And then the President vetoed a bill that would’ve brought water to a large portion of Colorado over Epstein.” “It’s not just about Lauren Boebert.” “Why are people in Colorado deprived of water because their representative wants to expose a sex trafficking ring?” Tucker Carlson: “Why do you think Epstein, of all issues, is the one that Donald Trump was willing to destroy his presidency over?” Massie: “The people who are funding the ballroom, the people who are funding the arch, the people who are funding the rebranding of the Kennedy Center, these are the people who are also funding my opponent.” “These are the people who have the ear of the President.” “These are the people who are dominating our foreign policy decisions.” “And these are also the same people who are in the Epstein files, by large part, or their friends are.” This is the issue that pushed Trump and the Epstein class to spend $10 million desperately trying to defeat Massie. And the race is closer than you think. His campaign needs all of our help right now to survive. @RepThomasMassie @MassieforKY @TuckerCarlson
English
255
4.5K
15.3K
368.9K
Bradley C Hughes retweetledi
🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉
China Will Eliminate Our Ability to Sanction Countries Col. Lawrence Wilkerson: And that means the renminbi being substituted for the dollar — in everything from oil sales to you name it — it will become the transactional and reserve currency. Already is, to a great extent, for about 40% of the world. They’re going to shoot for 60 to 70% of the world. They’re going to drive the Bretton Woods system back where it came from. They’re going to eliminate SWIFT. They’re going to eliminate our ability to sanction countries. That’s one of their major purposes. And that’s an altruistic purpose for them. They think eliminating our ability to put sanctions on other countries in the world — through which, since the turn of this century, we have killed 38 million people, mostly men, women, and children. China looks at us this way: as having done that damage in the world with our financial system, which allowed us to put primary and secondary sanctions on 30% of the world. Go to OFAC and see how many countries we have under sanction. It’s incredible. And these sanctions kill men, women, and children over time. We killed 500,000 in Saddam Hussein’s Iraq when we had the sanctions on him. Madeleine Albright said, when she was confronted with that statistic, “So what? It was worth it.” She wanted to join Hillary in the world of credence — and she did. This is a serious issue for China, and they want to stop it.
English
47
492
1.3K
65.3K
Bradley C Hughes
Bradley C Hughes@AngelsInTheAI·
Is it just me, or is Opus 4.7 materially worse than Opus 4.6? My experience of the past two weeks has been that it is substantially inferior. It's making serious errors regarding reference project knowledge and project instructions that 4.6 did not make. I'm paying $200 USD per month for an 'upgrade' that is now performing quite poorly even in well briefed fresh sessions, when it was generally smooth and consistent at 4.6 Extended even well into heavy context sessions. What's going on with Opus 4.7 at @AnthropicAI ?
Bradley C Hughes tweet media
English
0
0
0
43
Bradley C Hughes retweetledi
Artur Nadolny
Artur Nadolny@ArturNadol7566·
NHS HAS A STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE FOR DESTROYING WHISTLEBLOWERS. THEY JUST NEVER WROTE IT DOWN. UNTIL NOW. Peter Gooderham was an academic lawyer and former doctor. He spent most of his working life trying to understand why @NHS staff who raised patient safety concerns kept ending up bankrupt, mentally broken, or both. Before he died in 2011, he sat down with Private Eye (@PrivateEyeNews) and documented the playbook in full. It goes like this. First, cut their secretarial support. Block their merit awards. Briefing against them informally. Tell colleagues they have attitude problems and can't move on. None of this is illegal. All of it is deliberate. Then dig up dirt. Real or invented. Allege mental illness. The stress of the process makes this self-fulfilling, which is convenient. Refuse to disclose documents. Claim it's a local employment matter. The Department of Health will back this up because they always do. Then apply to the Treasury for public money to pay them off and shut them up. Some gagging agreements require the whistleblower to sign statements saying all their concerns have been addressed. Even when they haven't. Even when people are still dying. If they refuse the money, send the lawyers. Threaten libel. Throw public funds at employment tribunals, where NHS trusts are seasoned professionals and the whistleblower is walking in alone. If the trust loses, appeal. Keep appealing until the whistleblower runs out of money. The public purse is unlimited. Their savings are not. And if none of that works, don't worry. Public inquiries are, in Gooderham's own words, belated exercises in grief management that seldom change anything. By the time one arrives, the people responsible have moved on and the problems are dismissed as historical. The Gooderham playbook was not a historical curiosity. A @Channel4 investigation found gagging clauses in 55 of 64 NHS compromise agreements sampled. Over 40 NHS organisations refused to provide information on how many they had signed. One trust wanted over £10,000 just to produce the information. Another argued you couldn't even publish their reasons for refusing. This is a system that was designed, iteratively, over decades, to neutralise whistleblowers. The public funds the mechanism. The mechanism silences the people trying to protect the public. And then a public inquiry happens 15 years later and describes the culture as disappointing. Source: Private Eye (@PrivateEyeNews) Shoot the Messenger, Dr Phil Hammond (@drphilhammond) and Andrew Bousfield
Artur Nadolny tweet media
English
84
1.9K
2.7K
42.7K