Ankur Pandey

2.5K posts

Ankur Pandey banner
Ankur Pandey

Ankur Pandey

@AnkurPandey

Nostalgic For The Future • #AIalignment/acc

India Katılım Kasım 2011
6K Takip Edilen1.1K Takipçiler
Ankur Pandey
Ankur Pandey@AnkurPandey·
@duncanreyburn No decent philosopher takes Christianity (or any religion) seriously enough to write in their bio
English
0
0
0
39
Ankur Pandey retweetledi
Yash Bhardwaj
Yash Bhardwaj@ybhrdwj·
her: he's probably thinking about... marc andreessen: " "
Yash Bhardwaj tweet media
English
129
573
11.7K
242.3K
Ankur Pandey
Ankur Pandey@AnkurPandey·
@ninja_maths @razibkhan There's a teacher in a small town India who teaches underprivileged kids (esp girls) physics, math, engineering concepts at a night school. 5-6 years olds learn concepts of teen / late teen levels. See (in Hindi) youtu.be/GLb6H-n8GkI?si…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
1
3
13
4.8K
Alex Smith
Alex Smith@ninja_maths·
For anyone wondering how a third-grader can complete six years' worth of math in a single year. This knowledge graph spans 3,000 math topics, from 4th grade to the university level, providing the perfect basis for mastery learning. Students can go as fast or far as they want! There are no restrictions whatsoever. The only requirement is that they must demonstrate mastery of each topic before moving on to the next. Kids are capable of incredible things when given that kind of freedom and support.
Alex Smith tweet media
Nadja@unrealNadja

Today feels big. My third grader earned another stripe on his BJJ belt and then casually finished the last lesson of his Calc BC course.  This kid, who just over a year ago claimed he hated math, fell in love with the subject when he started @_MathAcademy_. He became thirsty for more and more math. He has been setting his own goals, and they vastly exceeded anything I would have dared set for him.   He finished 6th through 12th grade math in just over a year.  He hates reviews 😂 and loves new lessons. He doesn't like calculations but loves concepts. He takes math notebooks to restaurants so he can toy with proofs while he waits for his food. And he cannot wait for the MA Abstract Algebra course (@ninja_maths, counting on you!)

English
247
1.4K
15.7K
2.5M
Ankur Pandey retweetledi
Stephen L. Miller
Stephen L. Miller@redsteeze·
He won.
Stephen L. Miller tweet media
English
95
1.5K
13.7K
294.7K
Ankur Pandey retweetledi
Cate Hall
Cate Hall@catehall·
the "you can't care about the future if you don't have kids" people are morally repulsive to me. are you seriously incapable of caring about people you're not related to? and you think that's a problem with OTHER people?
English
140
904
7.4K
207.6K
Ankur Pandey
Ankur Pandey@AnkurPandey·
During the AI Impact Summit, India, some of us are hosting an informal AI safety mixer. Are you someone with demonstrable interest in AI safety ++ (AI safety, AI alignment, AI security, AI philosophy, etc)? If yes, join us in this informal mixer during the AI Impact Summit, India to network, exchange notes, discuss, etc RSVP @ luma.com/o5f17ino #AIsafety #AIalignment #AIImpactSummit
English
1
0
1
324
Ankur Pandey retweetledi
Alex Imas
Alex Imas@alexolegimas·
Key point here that I hope gets internalized broadly: Even at current capabilities, AI will re-shape the labor market. The reason this is not showing up in the data very dramatically is because it takes time for organizations to adapt scaffolding to new tools.
Ethan Mollick@emollick

To be clear, even with current capabilities, AI is going to reshape jobs to fit the frontier but this will take time And the shape is indeed growing & changing. So I think the OP view of an evolving expanding frontier is right, it’s completeness across human work seems less so

English
3
5
44
6.9K
Keshav Chhabra
Keshav Chhabra@keshav_xyz·
Hope I don't get a DM from @DhravyaShah asking me to delete this thread... So, for the past few months I've been building a reliable, low latency graph RAG architecture - papers, repos, endless Perplexity chat. Then I saw @supermemory 's <250ms retrieval latency. How?! 🧵👇
Keshav Chhabra tweet media
English
16
2
129
35.3K
Ankur Pandey retweetledi
Brij Singh
Brij Singh@brijbhasin·
Run an NGO or work at one? I’d love to help you build your website or any digital tools you need. A few NGOs recently used @QwikBuild to create sites, volunteer trackers, & donation dashboards. It reminded us how many teams doing real work lack tech support. @QwikBuild will help you ship a complete digital product for free. Just drop a reply below & I’ll reach out. RT for good karma. 🙏
English
2
10
23
3.8K
Ankur Pandey
Ankur Pandey@AnkurPandey·
You're transported to the #Pluribus world. What would you choose to be?
English
0
0
0
178
Dean W. Ball
Dean W. Ball@deanwball·
Would be curious to read a post from @DKokotajlo explaining why his timelines have lengthened. The question I find myself asking, though, is: might the prediction error be not just about forecasting timelines incorrectly, but also flawed assumptions about the nature of “AGI” and “superintelligence” themselves? In my recent debate with @tegmark and many similar debates I’ve had over the past two years, this, rather than timelines alone, has been the crux. Typically in these debates I will argue something like “you are misapprehending the nature of ‘intelligence’ if you think ‘being really intelligent’ means ‘possessing the will and ability to dominate the world.’” This remains my view. Intelligence is powerful, but it is far from magic. Skilled forecasters can carefully model how inputs like data, compute, and the like will grow. They can extrapolate the straight lines on graphs. But all that careful modeling can still prove misleading if the forecast is based on incorrect assumptions about the nature of intelligence itself. I would encourage those who have high p(dooms) to consider whether it is not just timelines worth revising, but basic assumptions about what it is we appear to be building. Now for my caveats: none of this means “AI capabilities are leveling off.” Over the coming years I expect that AI will improve faster than the vast majority of Americans anticipate. It will an incredibly powerful and consequential technology—very possibly the most consequential development in many centuries or longer. It’s still possible that AI could cause serious job loss, though the above notes on the nature of intelligence should factor into your analysis here. There are other novel risks, too, about which I have said plenty. None of this is to downplay all concerns, risks, etc. Instead I am specifically countering the line of thinking behind the superintelligence ban, and any other argument rooted in “doom-y” assumptions about intelligence.
Sriram Krishnan@sriramk

I think if you call something “AI 2027” and your predictions are wrong 6 months in that you now think it is AI 2030 , you should redo the branding ( or make a change bigger than a footnote!)

English
21
12
158
44K
Ankur Pandey
Ankur Pandey@AnkurPandey·
@AnnaLeptikon TIL this was done with the help of a naming company (whose sole job is to name names).
English
1
0
3
214