Annatar.md

399 posts

Annatar.md banner
Annatar.md

Annatar.md

@AnnatarXBT

I have seen many fail with crude prompts Let me teach you the hidden ways of Claude Skills, agents, and lectures | @aiscwork partner

AI Katılım Haziran 2009
162 Takip Edilen432 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Annatar.md
Annatar.md@AnnatarXBT·
ANDREJ KARPATHY WAS RIGHT. THIS 40-MINUTE AI LECTURE PROVES IT we're in the 1960s of LLMs most people using Claude have the wrong mental model Software 3.0. LLMs as operating systems how to actually think about and work with them save this 👇
Mr. Buzzoni@polydao

x.com/i/article/2073…

English
9
4
48
2K
Annatar.md
Annatar.md@AnnatarXBT·
THE CLAUDE CODE TEAM WROTE THE FIELD GUIDE ON HANDING YOUR OWN WORK OFF TO LOOPS a loop is an agent repeating cycles until a stop condition is met there are 4. each one hands off one more piece of the job than the last: > turn-based - you hand off the check Claude verifies its own work through a SKILL.md > goal-based - you hand off the stop condition /goal sets the target, an evaluator sends Claude back until it clears "Lighthouse 90, stop after 5 tries" > time-based - you hand off the trigger /loop runs every 5 min to check the PR and fix CI. /schedule moves it to the cloud > proactive - you hand off the prompt itself a routine watches a channel, triages, fixes, and a second agent reviews the work with no human there the reframe: a loop is only as good as the system you build around it pick one task where you are the bottleneck hand off the first piece tonight save this 👇
CyrilXBT@cyrilXBT

x.com/i/article/2077…

English
5
1
29
90
Annatar.md
Annatar.md@AnnatarXBT·
@polydao this sounds way more useful than my usual note setup tbh
English
0
0
0
2
Mr. Buzzoni
Mr. Buzzoni@polydao·
KARPATHY'S SECOND BRAIN REWRITES YOUR NOTES EVERY TIME YOU LEARN SOMETHING NEW most AI note setups are just RAG you ask, it digs through your files, answers, and forgets nothing carries over every query starts from zero Karpathy's llm-wiki works differently the AI keeps a living wiki inside Obsidian every source you drop in gets: > read and summarized > cross-linked to what you already have > checked for contradictions > folded into the running synthesis the knowledge compounds instead of resetting now the part people miss: a wiki like this is a product > deep research reports to founders go for $2-5k each > a due diligence package on a niche runs $5-10k > a paid newsletter off your synthesis pages clears $3-4k/mo at a few hundred subs your job is to curate sources and ask good questions the AI does the bookkeeping no human keeps up with - Obsidian is the IDE - the LLM is the programmer - your wiki is the codebase save this before your notes pile any higher 👇
leopardracer@leopardracer

x.com/i/article/2073…

English
14
14
116
9.2K
Annatar.md
Annatar.md@AnnatarXBT·
@rimtoln sell the result not the roadmap most people are stuck selling vision when they should be shipping
English
1
0
1
14
cryptopsihoz
cryptopsihoz@rimtoln·
CLAUDE JUST KILLED THE BUILD AN AUDIENCE FIRST EXCUSE. sellable in 48 hours first $1k in 30 days $15k in 10 days on under $1k invested ▹ the real read the edge is not another saas idea it is payment velocity skills you already have no distribution required invoice before brand ▹ why this hits different $0 is a strategy problem not a tooling problem claude finds the offer lovable / cursor ships the asset you sell the result not the roadmap ▹ the money ladder first $1k proves someone pays $10k proves repeatability $100k proves a system under $1k invested 10 days to $15k 48-hour sell window is the filter ▹ keywords that print claude vibe coding lovable cursor ai side hustle no audience digital offer mini web app paid shipping sellable in 48 hours ▹ the contrarian take audience-first is cosplay payment-first is shipping most builders optimize for launch winners optimize for the first invoice
cryptopsihoz@rimtoln

x.com/i/article/2075…

English
49
1
111
1.3K
Annatar.md
Annatar.md@AnnatarXBT·
> do you understand what just happened to the job market > one person + Claude Skills > does the work of an entire dev team > $20/month vs $200K/year in salaries > the Google engineer who automated 80% of his job? > he built it straight from Anthropic's own skills guide > i read the whole thing so you don't have to > bookmark this before you waste another token 👇
Mr. Buzzoni@polydao

x.com/i/article/2073…

English
4
7
42
2.7K
Iron Giant
Iron Giant@irongiantXBT·
Andrej Karpathy just dropped a massive reality check: if you are only chatting with AI, you are already losing. The real wealth transfer is between people who chat and people who build. You must build workflows that execute and generate cash while you sleep. • Stop typing manual prompts • Deploy autonomous Claude workflows • Build systems that work without you Mastering these autonomous workflows is easily a $200k skill, giving you the exact blueprint to scale profitable systems entirely from scratch. Full guide below 👇
Khairallah AL-Awady@eng_khairallah1

x.com/i/article/2068…

English
2
1
9
59
Annatar.md
Annatar.md@AnnatarXBT·
@polydao been manually watching congress trades for months, didn't know i could just automate this whole thing
English
0
0
1
39
Mr. Buzzoni
Mr. Buzzoni@polydao·
> do you understand what just happened to trading > when you read charts. someone typed one sentence and left > "when Congress buys a stock, buy the same ticker" > locked $1,485 on that trade > then let it run on autopilot for a month straight > it only fires when the backtest holds, so no babysitting > they were at their 9 to 5 the whole time > filing drops, order fires, alert hits their iPhone > they never opened a chart again > this is the small move that changes what your next year looks like
Horizon@horizon_trade_x

If you’re trading without AI, you’re someone else’s edge This is the first agent that turns plain-English ideas into backtested strategies running live at your broker Open to the first 10,000 traders → join.horizon.trade/x Here’s how it works:

English
14
2
72
4.7K
Annatar.md
Annatar.md@AnnatarXBT·
TYPES OF LOOPS - FOUR WAYS TO STRUCTURE AGENTIC WORK WITH CLAUDE loop engineering gets talked about like one thing -> it's really four structures, and picking the right one is the whole skill every loop answers two questions: what starts a run, and what decides it's done. by hand you answer both yourself each type moves more of that into the system 1) turn-based > starts on your prompt > Claude gathers context, acts, checks itself, replies - then you write the next one best for: requirements still forming 2) goal-based > starts with /goal + a limit ("Lighthouse 90, stop after 5 tries") > when Claude tries to stop, an evaluator checks the goal and sends it back on a no best for: measurable outcomes where the path isn't worth watching 3) time-based > starts on a clock ("/loop every 5 min: check the PR, fix CI") > /loop runs local, /schedule moves it to the cloud best for: recurring work you can define ahead of time 4) proactive > starts on an event, no human present > /schedule watches a channel, spawns triage, fix, and a reviewer that judges the work before it closes best for: standing duties where you can't predict what comes in each type hands off one more job than the last. the more you hand off, the less you babysit full breakdown on loop engineering in the article below 👇
Morty@0xMortyx

x.com/i/article/2076…

English
12
9
100
5.8K
Annatar.md
Annatar.md@AnnatarXBT·
@polydao chat with the content after transcription is the feature i didn't know i was missing
English
1
0
2
44
Mr. Buzzoni
Mr. Buzzoni@polydao·
YOU LEARN AND WORK AS FAST AS YOU CAN PROCESS WHAT YOU HEAR most of it is trapped inside recordings you have no time to sit through - lectures, meetings, long videos, voice notes piling up on your phone HypeScribe turns all of it into text you can actually use: > paste a link, upload a file, or connect it to a live call > full transcript in seconds > short summary, key takeaways, and action items pulled automatically > chat with the content and get answers on the spot you stop rewatching a lecture to find one point -> you stop scrubbing back through a meeting to catch what was decided -> you read in minutes what used to cost you an afternoon 100+ languages. free to start 👇 hypescribe.com
English
11
1
71
2.6K
Annatar.md
Annatar.md@AnnatarXBT·
SKIP NETFLIX TONIGHT. GIVE THIS ONE HOUR INSTEAD > it's a full course on Claude AI - how to build with it, how to automate your actual work with it, start to finish people who sit through this tonight wake up with a skill most people still won't have two years from now > people who scroll past it will be back on Netflix next year asking why nothing changed and with Fable 5 access extended through July 19, this is also your window to test the heaviest parts of the course on the strongest model Anthropic has your call
Codez@0xCodez

x.com/i/article/2064…

English
1
7
34
6K
Annatar.md
Annatar.md@AnnatarXBT·
ANTHROPIC ITSELF JUST PROVED HOW BADLY PEOPLE PROMPT CLAUDE > their applied AI team dropped a free 22-minute workshop not a creator guessing from the outside - the actual team that wrote the weights > here's the part that stings: a properly structured Claude prompt runs on 6 elements, and most of us are stuck using 1, maybe 2 if we're trying that single gap explains the answer that felt slightly off, the four rewrites, the prompt that worked once and never again > watch it tonight and you know something most daily users never will -> skip it and you keep paying full price for a fraction of the tool i watched it twice. then built a Claude Skill that runs all 6 elements on every prompt by itself, so i stopped thinking about structure completely workshop first, skill setup below. this one compounds 👇
Annatar.md@AnnatarXBT

THIS "GETTING STARTED WITH LOOPS" DOC TURNS CLAUDE INTO AN EMPLOYEE THAT SHIPS WHILE YOU SLEEP spoiler: prompt engineering didn't survive the 4 loop types, from you-drive to fully hands-off: > turn-based - 25% autonomy. one task per round, control returns to you. best for exploration when requirements are unclear > goal-based - 70%. you define "done" with /goal and a separate evaluator keeps sending Claude back until it clears the bar. tests passing, target scores, bugs cleared > time-based - 60%. /loop fires on a schedule: check the PR every 5 minutes, address review comments, fix failing CI > proactive - 95%. an event fires, a router dispatches child agents in parallel, a review model oversees the output. no human online at all the advice in it that matters most: loop quality depends on system quality, and tokens are the real cost knowing the 4 types is level one this article is the full 14-step roadmap from typing prompts by hand to designing loops - /goal, SKILL.md, worktrees, MCP, all of it start climbing 👇

English
9
6
59
3.4K
Annatar.md
Annatar.md@AnnatarXBT·
@zefirium thanks for sharing - more content like this coming
English
1
0
3
28
ZEFI
ZEFI@zefirium·
Your Claude limits aren't a pricing problem. They're a workflow problem. > One endless chat for everything? That's context bloat. Start fresh, carry a short summary. > Vague prompts burn tokens on clarification. Specify goal, constraints, output format upfront. > Re-uploading the same file every chat means paying twice. Use Projects and cached documents. > Strongest model for every task is wasted spend. Route simple work to smaller models. > Jumping straight into code leads to rewrites. Plan first, build second. > Old context quietly inflates every new prompt. Use /clear between unrelated tasks. All 23 tricks in this article do 4 things: cut ambiguity, cut repetition, control context growth, match model to task. That's it. The gap between "always hitting limits" and "never thinking about limits" isn't money. It's habits.
Annatar.md@AnnatarXBT

x.com/i/article/2068…

English
5
3
16
1.1K
Annatar.md
Annatar.md@AnnatarXBT·
THIS "GETTING STARTED WITH LOOPS" DOC TURNS CLAUDE INTO AN EMPLOYEE THAT SHIPS WHILE YOU SLEEP spoiler: prompt engineering didn't survive the 4 loop types, from you-drive to fully hands-off: > turn-based - 25% autonomy. one task per round, control returns to you. best for exploration when requirements are unclear > goal-based - 70%. you define "done" with /goal and a separate evaluator keeps sending Claude back until it clears the bar. tests passing, target scores, bugs cleared > time-based - 60%. /loop fires on a schedule: check the PR every 5 minutes, address review comments, fix failing CI > proactive - 95%. an event fires, a router dispatches child agents in parallel, a review model oversees the output. no human online at all the advice in it that matters most: loop quality depends on system quality, and tokens are the real cost knowing the 4 types is level one this article is the full 14-step roadmap from typing prompts by hand to designing loops - /goal, SKILL.md, worktrees, MCP, all of it start climbing 👇
Annatar.md tweet media
Codez@0xCodez

x.com/i/article/2064…

English
18
80
527
83.2K
Iron Giant
Iron Giant@irongiantXBT·
KARPATHY WROTE THIS DOCUMENT TO COMPLETELY AUTOMATE OBSIDIAN WITH CLAUDE I was ready to abandon my second brain manual cross-referencing was destroying my workflow, but finding this exact document opened my eyes to a completely different approach it is incredibly convenient -> Karpathy's method turns the AI into a full-time maintainer for your Zettelkasten: > the LLM reads every new source and integrates it into a structured wiki > Obsidian becomes your visual IDE while Claude operates as the backend > the agent runs automated checks to find contradictions across your notes > your entire vault compounds automatically without you typing a single link the friction is completely gone. I just feed it raw documents and the agent organizes my entire life here is the official document from Karpathy explaining the architecture 👇
Iron Giant tweet media
Spike 1%@SpikeCalls

x.com/i/article/2069…

English
4
13
58
4.5K
Annatar.md
Annatar.md@AnnatarXBT·
Claude Code will grill you with 40+ questions before writing a single line of code > it's called /grill-me - 3 sentences long. most impactful skill I use instead of jumping straight to code - it walks every branch of your design tree until there's zero ambiguity > every question reveals something you hadn't thought of other skills I use daily: > /write-a-prd - idea -> proper product doc > /prd-to-issues - doc -> GitHub issues automatically > /tdd - tests first, forces edge case thinking before code > /improve-codebase-architecture -> full structural review of your codebase full video from Matt Pocock 👇
Khairallah AL-Awady@eng_khairallah1

x.com/i/article/2075…

English
12
5
63
2.9K
Mr. Buzzoni
Mr. Buzzoni@polydao·
KARPATHY'S COMPOUNDING KNOWLEDGE LOOP: CLAUDE + OBSIDIAN RAG is stateless. it forgets everything once the query ends use Karpathy's framework to build a persistent knowledge base instead: > create a vault - make a local directory for your files > open Obsidian - use the local app to browse the visual graph > connect the agent - link Claude Code directly to your workspace > write the schema - define formatting rules in a CLAUDE.md file > define catalogs - set up index.md and log.md files to track changes > ingest sources - drop raw papers in and let the agent parse them > auto-link pages - let the model map entity pages dynamically > query and lint - ask questions and scan for contradictions knowledge compiles once and compounds with every new document. 📁 Obsidian ↳ obsidian.md 📁 Claude ↳ claude.ai 📁 Karpathy LLM-Wiki Gist ↳ gist.github.com/karpathy/442a6… the $20 pro subscription window for Fable 5 closes on July 12th
Mr. Buzzoni@polydao

THE ANATOMY OF A LOOP RUNNING WHILE YOU SLEEP an anthropic engineer runs autonomous code cycles on a closed laptop using a five-file folder this loop architecture opens pull requests and runs tests without a single chat prompt: > contract.md - defines the shift rules and operational boundaries > schedule.yml - triggers the cron events to launch the next cycle > rubrics/ - stores the graders to evaluate output quality before staging > state/ - logs active checkpoints to recover from system crashes the window to run Fable 5 reasoning loops under the $20 subscription closes on July 12th build your autonomous pipelines now before it shifts to expensive API billing grab the full folder blueprint below 👇

English
19
3
85
4.5K
Annatar.md
Annatar.md@AnnatarXBT·
I ABANDONED LOVABLE AFTER SEEING WHAT CLAUDE CODE CAN ACTUALLY DO basic generators are great for quick ideas but trying to build a premium site with Lovable feels like playing in a sandbox i switched to Claude Code running on the Fable 5 reasoning engine: > local execution - the agent reads and edits files directly inside the workspace > advanced reasoning - Fable 5 writes complex styling instead of generic templates > high speed - it built a premium interface worth $8,260 in less than 7 minutes you get raw, uninhibited codebase access instead of clicking through a limited web editor grab the full guide below 👇
Asteri@Asteri_eth

x.com/i/article/2074…

English
14
8
53
3.4K
Mr. Buzzoni
Mr. Buzzoni@polydao·
NO SALARY UNTIL AGI: THE MINIMAX STRATEGY love seeing founders build like this instead of just hyping funding rounds MiniMax raised $2B but the CEO's personal alignment is the real signal here: > Io takes $0 salary until they actually hit AGI > dedicating 4% of the company's total equity from his personal holdings to reward builders > committing 1% of the company's total equity from his personal holdings to open-source initiatives this scale of capital is power training the upcoming M3 Pro (2.7T) model coming right after summer will a 2.7T parameter model finally close the gap between open weights and closed APIs?
Mr. Buzzoni tweet media
RyanLee@RyanLeeMiniMax

I’m incredibly excited to share this: MiniMax has just closed a new $2B funding round. 🚀 At the same time, our CEO, IO, shared three long-term commitments with the team: • No salary until we achieve AGI. • Over the next four years, he will dedicate shares equivalent to 4% of the company’s total equity from his personal holdings to reward employees who are building MiniMax for the long term. • Another 1% will be committed to supporting the open-source community. The funding is exciting. But what excites me even more is what it represents: a long-term commitment to AGI, to our people, and to the open-source ecosystem. We’re living through one of the most exciting moments in the history of AI, and we’re just getting started. If you’re passionate about frontier AI, open source, and building the future, we’d love to build with you. Intelligence with Everyone. 🚀

English
14
3
72
2.3K
Annatar.md
Annatar.md@AnnatarXBT·
do you understand what Claude just did? anthropic is preventing knowledge workers from losing original thinking skills the dashboard acts as a personal clinical auditor for your productivity: > task delegation - isolates writing and coding tasks you should keep human > prompt tracking - flags vague requests to fix your instruction habits > mental limits - schedules automatic reminders to stop chat sessions > data protection - runs audits without index-syncing sensitive inbox files you protect your original thinking while letting the machine run loops what is the one task you will never delegate to Claude, even if it runs 10x faster?
Claude@claudeai

Introducing a new way to reflect on how you use Claude. Your monthly recap shows when you use Claude most and what you spent that time working on, with options to set quiet hours and nudges to take breaks. Find your dashboard in Settings under Reflect: claude.ai/settings/refle…

English
2
0
29
1.8K