Ant

3K posts

Ant

Ant

@Anttheseer

Autistic. ADHD. Seek truth no matter where it lies. Free speech! Matthew 24:11 "many false prophets will arise & will lead many astray". Restore Britain.

Earth! Katılım Aralık 2024
954 Takip Edilen632 Takipçiler
Ant
Ant@Anttheseer·
The west is being bought. Qatari royal family, Al-Thani family, now owns more property in London than King Charles, with holdings including a quarter of northwest Mayfair, Harrods, & a 95% of The Shard. Real estate portfolio estimated 1.8 million square feet, surpassing the King
Ant tweet media
English
2
0
2
111
Ant
Ant@Anttheseer·
😆 Emily was preparing to take a walk with her daughter last week when she changed into freshly washed clothes she had taken off the line the day before. However, on closer inspection, she said the spot began moving. 'It turned out to be a spider & it was in a pouch full of eggs'
Ant tweet media
English
0
0
0
11
Ant
Ant@Anttheseer·
Ant tweet media
ZXX
0
0
0
15
Ant
Ant@Anttheseer·
I blame mice n rats. "The First Minister (of Scotland) was told that he should be 'ashamed' of himself as he blamed Russia invading Ukraine for the SNP's failure to deliver on 21 manifesto promises it made five years ago - including free laptops and bikes for every pupil".
Ant tweet media
English
0
0
0
50
Ant
Ant@Anttheseer·
Ant tweet media
ZXX
0
0
1
25
Ant
Ant@Anttheseer·
Ant tweet media
ZXX
0
0
0
5
Ant
Ant@Anttheseer·
Is this what the rich are doing by importing poor people?
Ant tweet media
English
0
0
0
4
Ant
Ant@Anttheseer·
British Healthcare consultant forced to spend night in Qatari police cell after posting negative TripAdvisor review. Craig Barratt from York, wrote on TripAdvisor that the Ritz-Carlton was "not safe for western women" following what his wife Sarah described as sexual harassment.
Ant tweet media
English
0
0
0
34
Ant
Ant@Anttheseer·
There's hope for some. Buy why they destroying our world as they go? TOI-1452 b might be a true water world. This super-Earth exoplanet is 100 light years away & could be covered by an ocean deeper than Earth’s crust is thick. No land. No continents. Just endless water.
Ant tweet media
English
0
0
0
7
Ant
Ant@Anttheseer·
@NotFarLeftAtAll Why should he wish that? This is his pregnant fiancé ⬇️
Ant tweet media
English
0
0
3
484
Ant
Ant@Anttheseer·
@MarioNawfal Wow, she's gone all ghetto as well, innit "motherf*ckers". She's so cool, not. But hey, she's now down with the farm, so isn't likely to receive a home invasion anytime soon right? Appeasement is weak, yet survival is strong, dilemma.
English
0
0
1
31
Mario Nawfal
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal·
🇺🇸 Charlize Theron climbed an actual billboard in Times Square to promote her Netflix movie. "Motherf*ckers! Don't make me climb a wall for nothing!" Netflix really said: forget the trailer, just send the Oscar winner up the side of a building. x.com/OliLondonTV/st…
English
450
581
6.3K
2M
Ant
Ant@Anttheseer·
@TheNorfolkLion Understandable, if you have 151.6k followers. The new changes will likely affect accounts with 100's or 1000's & communities more. But from what I've read some big accounts will go as no money to be made due to the changes. & I don't get the impression you're here for the money.
English
1
0
1
77
Queen Natalie
Queen Natalie@TheNorfolkLion·
No matter what goes on with this platform, I’m not leaving. I’ve been here over 10 years, screaming about what’s happening to our country through Brexit, Covid, the Tory failures, shouting and screaming about mass immigration and Islam long before it was fashionable. As long as I still have a voice here, I’ll keep using it for Britain and to wake people up. This isn’t just a social media platform. It’s one of the last places left where we can still speak freely.
Queen Natalie tweet media
English
28
31
198
3.3K
Ant
Ant@Anttheseer·
@ianmiles You say don't blame @elonmusk for the nasty changes to X, like soon the removing of communities that smaller accounts depend on, yet presidents & prime ministers are ultimately responsible for what government departments are doing, so the buck stops at the top, elon musk.
English
0
0
1
100
Ian Miles Cheong
Ian Miles Cheong@ianmiles·
You can probably get a decent payout from X by making video commentary instead of text-based commentary. This counts as "original content" whilst written posts do not. Totally defeats X as a text-based platform to get the news.
English
50
16
179
15.9K
Ant
Ant@Anttheseer·
Ian Miles Cheong@ianmiles

Post too much on X and the algorithm will kill your account. Post too little? Same result. It's not a bug in the design. It's the design. Scroll through your timeline and look at what's missing. Verified accounts with millions of followers like OANN, The Guardian, Forbes, legacy outlets you actively follow. They haven't surfaced on your feed in months. It's not because they stopped posting. They post constantly. That's the problem. X's algorithm doesn't care how many followers you have. It cares how your recent posts performed. When accounts post at high volume and most of those posts don't hit engagement thresholds, the algorithm flags them as low quality. From that point forward, everything you publish is penalized for the posts that underperformed before it. The model has already decided you don't deserve reach. Followers don't matter on X. Your followers don't see your posts unless they go out of their way to find them, interact with your account repeatedly, or happen to be in someone else's engagement orbit. Who you follow doesn't matter either. The algorithm assigns zero weight to the follow graph. You could have a million followers or a hundred but if your posts don't hit the thresholds, the reach is the same. Try this: interact with a non-follower a couple of times. Like their posts, reply, maybe quote-tweet them. Within an hour, they'll show up on your feed more often than anyone you've actually chosen to follow. Maybe even sooner than that. The accounts you explicitly follow matter less than strangers you've clicked on twice. That's the hierarchy. That's what the algorithm is optimizing for. Imagine opening YouTube, subscribing to a stack of woodworking channels, and getting fed nothing but Skibidi Toilet fan videos because the algorithm decided to spaz out that day. YouTube doesn't work like that because it wasn't designed to. X's algorithm does, because it was. It doesn't care what you follow. It cares what will most likely produce engagement, from anyone, for any reason. And there's a massive audience for the worst possible content. AI-generated footage of children trapped in warzones. Police bodycam shootings. Clips of Clavicular getting mogged by a homeless bum. This is the slop, and it dominates the feed not because most users love it but because enough users can't stop looking. The accounts posting this content are almost all automated. Not hundreds. There are tens of thousands of them. You don't see the ones that flop. You only see the one that hit. And the hit is statistically inevitable: when you have ten thousand accounts posting variations of the same engagement bait every hour, one of them will go viral. Law of large numbers. The algorithm doesn't have to choose slop. It just has to reward whatever wins. And slop wins by volume. Behind these accounts are literal factories. Warehouses of Android phones running jailbroken software that emulates different devices, posting on rotation, manufacturing the engagement signals the algorithm is designed to chase. It's real. And it's scaling. Creators who post real work — who don't run device farms, who don't chain-post engagement bait, who actually care about what they publish — get buried underneath the slop. They don't lose to better content. They lose to volume. And once the algorithm has formed an opinion about your account, there's no way out. The model is predictive. Your recent history determines your future reach. If your last ten posts underperformed, your eleventh starts with a reach penalty regardless of how good it is. You could write the best thing you've ever written. If the algorithm has flagged you, nobody will see it. "Bangers" don't exist for demoted accounts. They die in silence like everything else. This is the death spiral. If you have a small friend circle, or you post across a range of topics, or your content happened to take a bad statistical week, you can end up permanently throttled. No notification. No path to appeal. You just disappear. Most of your followers won't even notice you stopped showing up. Between the death spiral and the factory farms, X isn't just failing its creators. It's training its users to expect worse content and its best posters to give up and leave. You can feel it already. The for-you feed is trending toward a lowest common denominator nobody actively chose. The algorithm is eating the platform. This kills accounts. And eventually, it kills X.

English
0
0
0
47
Queen Natalie
Queen Natalie@TheNorfolkLion·
@catturd2 I agree! I’m not going anywhere, I’ve been on here for over 10 years! I’m trying to find a home for my community 😞
English
5
2
34
927
Catturd ™
Catturd ™@catturd2·
Because of the ever-changing algorithm, I’m seeing a bunch of creators saying they’re moving to other platforms. Not me. X is my home, and you’re my family. I like it here. Hopefully, they’ll figure out this crushing algorithm soon and let us see each other again.
English
1.2K
2K
19K
230.7K
Ant retweetledi
Ian Miles Cheong
Ian Miles Cheong@ianmiles·
Post too much on X and the algorithm will kill your account. Post too little? Same result. It's not a bug in the design. It's the design. Scroll through your timeline and look at what's missing. Verified accounts with millions of followers like OANN, The Guardian, Forbes, legacy outlets you actively follow. They haven't surfaced on your feed in months. It's not because they stopped posting. They post constantly. That's the problem. X's algorithm doesn't care how many followers you have. It cares how your recent posts performed. When accounts post at high volume and most of those posts don't hit engagement thresholds, the algorithm flags them as low quality. From that point forward, everything you publish is penalized for the posts that underperformed before it. The model has already decided you don't deserve reach. Followers don't matter on X. Your followers don't see your posts unless they go out of their way to find them, interact with your account repeatedly, or happen to be in someone else's engagement orbit. Who you follow doesn't matter either. The algorithm assigns zero weight to the follow graph. You could have a million followers or a hundred but if your posts don't hit the thresholds, the reach is the same. Try this: interact with a non-follower a couple of times. Like their posts, reply, maybe quote-tweet them. Within an hour, they'll show up on your feed more often than anyone you've actually chosen to follow. Maybe even sooner than that. The accounts you explicitly follow matter less than strangers you've clicked on twice. That's the hierarchy. That's what the algorithm is optimizing for. Imagine opening YouTube, subscribing to a stack of woodworking channels, and getting fed nothing but Skibidi Toilet fan videos because the algorithm decided to spaz out that day. YouTube doesn't work like that because it wasn't designed to. X's algorithm does, because it was. It doesn't care what you follow. It cares what will most likely produce engagement, from anyone, for any reason. And there's a massive audience for the worst possible content. AI-generated footage of children trapped in warzones. Police bodycam shootings. Clips of Clavicular getting mogged by a homeless bum. This is the slop, and it dominates the feed not because most users love it but because enough users can't stop looking. The accounts posting this content are almost all automated. Not hundreds. There are tens of thousands of them. You don't see the ones that flop. You only see the one that hit. And the hit is statistically inevitable: when you have ten thousand accounts posting variations of the same engagement bait every hour, one of them will go viral. Law of large numbers. The algorithm doesn't have to choose slop. It just has to reward whatever wins. And slop wins by volume. Behind these accounts are literal factories. Warehouses of Android phones running jailbroken software that emulates different devices, posting on rotation, manufacturing the engagement signals the algorithm is designed to chase. It's real. And it's scaling. Creators who post real work — who don't run device farms, who don't chain-post engagement bait, who actually care about what they publish — get buried underneath the slop. They don't lose to better content. They lose to volume. And once the algorithm has formed an opinion about your account, there's no way out. The model is predictive. Your recent history determines your future reach. If your last ten posts underperformed, your eleventh starts with a reach penalty regardless of how good it is. You could write the best thing you've ever written. If the algorithm has flagged you, nobody will see it. "Bangers" don't exist for demoted accounts. They die in silence like everything else. This is the death spiral. If you have a small friend circle, or you post across a range of topics, or your content happened to take a bad statistical week, you can end up permanently throttled. No notification. No path to appeal. You just disappear. Most of your followers won't even notice you stopped showing up. Between the death spiral and the factory farms, X isn't just failing its creators. It's training its users to expect worse content and its best posters to give up and leave. You can feel it already. The for-you feed is trending toward a lowest common denominator nobody actively chose. The algorithm is eating the platform. This kills accounts. And eventually, it kills X.
Ian Miles Cheong tweet media
English
86
79
339
24.9K
Ant
Ant@Anttheseer·
@ValentinaForUSA @Pontifex There are billions too many people on Earth, the planet cannot sustain humans as we are, let alone importing the third world to breed like rabbits on welfare. What's the point is praising and protecting life, when it means living in a real life hell for the majority?
English
0
0
0
99
Valentina Gomez
Valentina Gomez@ValentinaForUSA·
@Pontifex You want to end the death penalty but you refuse to talk about the death penalty that Christians in Nigeria are facing Worse pope in history
English
141
228
2.5K
25K
Pope Leo XIV
Pope Leo XIV@Pontifex·
The Catholic Church has consistently taught that each human life, from the moment of conception until natural death, is sacred and deserves to be protected. Indeed, the right to life is the very foundation of every other human right. For this reason, only when a society safeguards the sanctity of human life will it flourish and prosper.
English
2K
5.2K
36.3K
885.4K
Ant
Ant@Anttheseer·
Proposed in Canada 2026, Hitler 1939 to 1945. "Hitler authorized the systematic killing of mentally & physically disabled children. This program was a precursor to the broader Nazi euthanasia actions & resulted in the deaths of at least 5,000 children." x.com/JacquiDeevoy1/…
Jacqui Deevoy@JacquiDeevoy1

Canada to consider killing babies born with disabilities. (I can’t believe I’ve just written that sentence: have I somehow slipped into an alternate universe where horror is the order of the day, EVERY day?) Murder in plain sight. righttolife.org.uk/news/doctors-i…

English
0
0
0
20
Ant
Ant@Anttheseer·
@BasilTheGreat People should support and vote Reform in Scotland, to get rid of the snp, and to leave the ECHR and 1951 refugee convention alone, which lays groundwork for Restore Britain at the next general election.
English
0
0
1
173
Basil the Great
Basil the Great@BasilTheGreat·
🚨REFORM UK SCOTLAND LEADER ADMITS THEY HAVE SEPARATIST CANDIDATES YOU HAD ONE JOB BE PATRIOTIC And Reform UK can't even do that They are actively running people DETERMINED to destroy the United Kingdom WHY ARE PEOPLE SUPPORTING THIS SHAM OF A PARTY?
English
39
136
730
32.9K