Paul J. Katz

3K posts

Paul J. Katz banner
Paul J. Katz

Paul J. Katz

@AppealsInBrief

CA Bar Certified Appellate Law Specialist. World traveler. Art lover.

Oakland, CA Katılım Haziran 2013
193 Takip Edilen856 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Paul J. Katz
Paul J. Katz@AppealsInBrief·
Quick thread about the secret sauce of appeals - the thing that matters most but that is the hardest to teach - the art of persuasion. /1
English
3
21
96
0
Paul J. Katz
Paul J. Katz@AppealsInBrief·
@OrinKerr @qjurecic Why did DOJ gamble with having Cannon preside? Was losing a venue motion in DC fait accompli?
English
0
0
3
68
Orin Kerr
Orin Kerr@OrinKerr·
Normally @qjurecic would be spot on here. But with Cannon presiding, I would guess Trump can bluster his way through court rather beautifully. It will be the perfect bluster, believe me. (Quinta raises the Cannon q near the end, I suspect it's big.) theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…
English
16
18
88
30.1K
Orin Kerr
Orin Kerr@OrinKerr·
SCOTUS has not decided a 4th Amendment case since OT2020. I had hoped that the cert petition below would change that, but unfortunately it did not. The Court denied cert this morning. supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?fi…
Orin Kerr@OrinKerr

My co-counsel from @wilsonsonsini and I have filed a new cert petition. We're asking the Supreme Court to answer whether probable cause that a person is home is needed to execute an arrest warrant. Here's the petition, with the QP below. supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/2…

English
7
8
47
32K
Paul J. Katz
Paul J. Katz@AppealsInBrief·
Perhaps because I love art, I found the back and forth in this Warhol case between the three opinions to be fascinating. And it makes me wish more opinions were illustrated. supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf…
English
0
0
0
90
Dan Epps
Dan Epps@danepps·
This is quite the disposition line in Nat'l Pork Producers v. Ross.
Dan Epps tweet media
English
4
2
25
15.6K
Paul J. Katz
Paul J. Katz@AppealsInBrief·
Without fail, me when I read opposing counsel’s brief for the first time.
Paul J. Katz tweet media
English
0
0
1
203
Paul J. Katz
Paul J. Katz@AppealsInBrief·
@CecereCarl This reminds of the challenge to the Muslim ban where Trump repeatedly said he was trying to ban Muslims and his counsel argued the court must ignore that expressed intent. Kind of a tough sell IMO.
English
0
0
2
61
Kannon Shanmugam
Kannon Shanmugam@KannonShanmugam·
It may be 10:45 a.m. in the Bay Area, but (as my associates can attest) it’s never too early for this…
Kannon Shanmugam tweet media
Redwood City, CA 🇺🇸 English
2
0
43
8.2K
Paul J. Katz
Paul J. Katz@AppealsInBrief·
@JacklynWille With all the Romeo and Juliet remakes, making the adverse families part of the same HOA would really add some sizzle...
English
0
0
0
67
Jacklyn Wille
Jacklyn Wille@JacklynWille·
an analogous question
Jacklyn Wille tweet media
Français
3
3
39
5.7K
John Elwood
John Elwood@johnpelwood·
With 983 votes, using contractions narrowly wins, 51.8% to 48.2% Another senior lawyer whose judgment I respect said her take was: Contractions will annoy some judges, but even contraction-using judges are unlikely to be annoyed by briefs that don't use contractions. FWIW.
John Elwood@johnpelwood

Hey #AppellateTwitter. What do you think about using contractions in appellate briefs? (Taking advantage before this option is reserved for paid subscribers.)

English
7
4
15
14.6K
Paul J. Katz
Paul J. Katz@AppealsInBrief·
@CecereCarl @johnpelwood Although that’s the logical conclusion, my urge is to resist. The more the holdout judges see contractions, the more they’ll get acclimated.
GIF
English
1
0
3
274
Carl Cecere
Carl Cecere@CecereCarl·
@johnpelwood I'm with her. My thinking is that using contractions will never gain me votes and might occasionally cost me votes. So why bother?
English
2
0
3
6.7K
Paul J. Katz
Paul J. Katz@AppealsInBrief·
Eating shelled pistachios feels like cheating.
English
0
0
1
99
Paul J. Katz
Paul J. Katz@AppealsInBrief·
@RMFifthCircuit Lawyers don’t understand that an appeal is a total deconstruction of the trial court proceedings. While the former derives from the latter, an appeal’s purpose and focus are very distinct.
English
0
0
5
816
Raffi Melkonian
Raffi Melkonian@RMFifthCircuit·
Ah, the “I’m gonna tell the court of appeals a blow by blow story of the trial court proceedings” style of oral argument, never change.
English
9
5
112
28.7K
Paul J. Katz
Paul J. Katz@AppealsInBrief·
@GeneVorobyov Bon voyage. Walk the high line, which wasn’t there 20 years ago.
English
0
0
0
17
Paul J. Katz
Paul J. Katz@AppealsInBrief·
@LeahLitman My 5 year old daughter loves listening to the Encanto soundtrack in different languages on Spotify. Japanese is a favorite.
English
0
0
0
68
Paul J. Katz
Paul J. Katz@AppealsInBrief·
@OrinKerr “Dump everything out” means ransack, which is defined as “to look through thoroughly in often a rough way.” I’m not saying that threatening to ransack is per se coercive, but that point is wrong.
English
0
0
0
62
Orin Kerr
Orin Kerr@OrinKerr·
6th Circuit, per Thapar, overturns Judge Marbley's order suppressing confession on grounds that it was coerced. Agent's threat to get a warrant and search dad's house for evidence if needed didn't render the confession coerced. opn.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/2… #N
Orin Kerr tweet media
English
6
7
17
13.6K