𝐀𝐫𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐧

Here you go: @Bybit_Official 3 predictions. 3 wins. While others hesitate, I read the game differently Canada draw, South Korea winner, Mexico winner… Saw it all before everyone else. They don't call that luck. They call that talent. #Bybit #Football #Predictions $MNT

@elonmusk yooo elon

$SPCX

@vxylily long hair in the nose

MEN: be brutally honest, what really makes a woman instantly UNATTRACTIVE

This week’s @variational_io Points are out. We have now successfully crossed 70K points, total points now 71K+ with 1,300+ new points this week. We are still maintaining the #2 spot on the points leaderboard This week, only 27K+ accounts were given points, making it slightly lower than last week. Our total traded volume still sits at $1.3B+ in total volume. Our core strategy remains: - Maintaining a healthy Open Interest - Trading majors and RWA: $BTC, $HYPE, $ZEC, $ETH, $XAU and RWA - Strong risk management We are still aiming for 100K points before TGE gVAR.

@_gvan 👀

if you have farmed even 1 point on any perp DEX, drop a reply here testing something

@imperooterxbt 😂

I decided to counter this bet when the spurs were up by 29 at halftime. I took a nap figured I would wake up to free money and somehow to my surprise the Knicks hit a buzzer beater with one second left and I am now down 50k. I truly hate sports betting I hate it there is nothing more painful then watching nothing go my way once I enter a bet. I’m so done with sports betting right after I make it back on the next finals game.

@variational_io to the moon

How Two Things Can Be True At Once - Hyperliquid I find myself in a weird place with Hyperliquid. I am incredibly bullish on the hyperliquid:native token. But I am becoming increasingly bearish on Hyperliquid as a trader-facing exchange. For many months now, I’ve talked about how much I wish Hyperliquid would spend real time improving its user interface and overall user experience. Because traders live and work inside these products. The interface matters. The flow matters. Intuitive design matters. The small things that reduce friction matter a lot when real money is on the line. And yet, for over a year, Hyperliquid has failed to ship any meaningful improvements in those areas. As one of the largest revenue-generating protocols in all of crypto, at some point you have to ask: why? The answer seems pretty clear. They chose to be an infrastructure company. They chose to build the rails. The engine. The backend. The liquidity layer. The thing other people can build on top of. And to be fair, they have done that incredibly well. For a while, I wondered if I was just a lone voice in the wilderness. Maybe the things I wanted only mattered to me. Maybe most traders were perfectly happy with the experience as-is. But $82 million generated by builder codes tells me I’m not alone. Over 20,000 unique traders connect to Hyperliquid through another interface every single day. That is not a rounding error. That is the market speaking. That is traders saying, “We like the liquidity. We like the engine. But we want a better cockpit.” Companies like Based, Insilico, and even wallet apps have listened to what active traders actually want. They have focused on smoother trading interfaces, better workflows, simpler execution, and features that make the experience feel less like you're fighting the product and more like using it. That revenue exists only because the demand exists. And that’s the part I don’t think should be ignored. It is entirely possible to focus on infrastructure while also improving the customer experience. I understand Hyperliquid runs an incredibly lean team. I understand the desire to pick a lane and stay focused. A lot of infrastructure companies don’t try to be everything to everyone. They focus on becoming the best infrastructure layer possible. There is nothing fundamentally wrong with that. But that is much closer to a B2B business model. And my personal passion is B2C. It's where I've spent much of my adult life. And I am a consumer of these products, after all. I am a trader. I care about what it actually feels like to use them every day. And from that perspective, Hyperliquid has become a strange contradiction inside my own mind. As infrastructure, I think Hyperliquid will continue to dominate. As the "AWS of perps", it may become one of the most important companies in the entire industry. And because so much revenue flows back toward HYPE, I believe the token has some of the best potential in crypto. I fully expect HYPE to be one of the darling runners of the next cycle. In fact, it already has been - in a bear market no less. But as a trader? I keep feeling disappointed. Because it could be so much better. That is the frustrating part. The trader experience still feels like an afterthought. And the data shows I'm not alone in feeling that. So yes, two things can be true at once. HYPE can be one of the best tokens in crypto. And Hyperliquid can still be leaving a massive amount of trader love, loyalty, and user experience on the table. 🫡 From the depths — The White Whale 🐋

@btc_charlie 1-3 Senegal win

Big win if it comes in. Saudi to win tomorrow. $100 to someone who guesses the right score as normal 🤝

Addressing Common Questions & Misconceptions About @variational_io As one of the Top Perp Traders, I have done over $1.3B in Volume on Variational, Accumulated over 69K VAR points, and did over +1300 $BTC PnL on my $BTC trades on @BitMEX ranking us No16 on All Time Notional I will have to address some common questions and misconceptions about Variational. Most people are still looking at Variational the wrong way, I have seen this play out during the early days of @HyperliquidX for $HYPE airdrop. Some think Variational "is just another random perp DEX, "Others believe it's too early because RWA is still in beta, and many are waiting for everyone else to validate it before paying attention. Here's what people keep getting wrong about Variational: 1. It's just another Random perp DEX, No! Not at all, Variational is not just another Random PerpDex Most perp exchanges compete on the same assets: $BTC, $ETH, $SOL, and a few majors. Variational is taking a different route by bringing traditional financial markets onchain through RWAs: Gold $XAU, Silver $XAG, Oil $CL, and more are already live, with plans to expand further. The opportunity isn't just crypto traders trading crypto anymore, It's creating a market where crypto and traditional assets can trade side by side. 2. Nobody is using it. The numbers suggest otherwise. Variational has already crossed $1B+ in Open Interest recently, although it dropped abit, but this will make it one of the few tokenless protocols to achieve that milestone. Volume continues to grow, and activity remains strong despite RWA still being in beta. Protocols don't reach those numbers without real users. 3. I'll wait until the token launches. This mindset has cost people some of the biggest opportunities in crypto. The largest rewards often go to users who participate before the token exists, not after. By the time a token launches, much of the early positioning has already happened. 4. Beta means risky. Beta means the product is still evolving. But it also means users are helping shape the platform during its earliest stages. Historically, some of the most rewarding opportunities in crypto came from protocols that were still refining their products while attracting active users. 5. The competition is too strong. Perpetual trading isn't a winner-takes-all market. The success of one exchange doesn't prevent another from succeeding. We've already seen multiple exchanges grow into multi-billion-dollar ecosystems by focusing on different user segments and market opportunities. Variational's focus on RWAs and capital efficient trading gives it a unique angle in an increasingly crowded market. The biggest misconception about Variational is that people judge it based on what it is today. The better question is: What could a protocol with $60M in funding, $1B+ Open Interest, growing RWA markets, and a tokenless ecosystem become in the next cycle? Most opportunities look obvious only after everyone agrees they're valuable.

Try it now → app.pacifica.fi/?referral=arde… refferal code: ardenn If you use Pacifica, you have a chance of being eligible for a future airdrop. So it's best to position yourself early.

Up to 50x leverage, tons of pairs, advanced orders (post-only, stop-limit, etc.) and a clean UX built for serious traders. And they keep shipping hard If you trade perps on Solana, Pacifica is currently the best choice for performance, liquidity, and innovation.

Why you should trade on @pacifica_fi Pacifica is quickly becoming the go-to Perp DEX on Solana. Here’s why you should switch: CEX speed + real decentralization, Ultra-fast execution , real-time orderbook and on-chain settlement.

@0xjay @pacifica_fi Ref code : ardenn

moved my funds out of hyperliquid I'm ready to embrace solana perps, what should I use?

What's the opposite of gravedancing? Because so many were quick to tell me I was dumb for this. Trade still alive and well with trailing stop loss locking me in profits.

The SL is the maximum I'm willing to lose, not the target. What i need to do concretely: Keep a trading journal... why I entered, why I exited Set my TP and SL before every trade, and never touch them Judge myself on the quality of execution of my plan, not the outcome

2-/ Letting my losers run to the stop loss I know the trade is bad but I keep hoping for a reversal. That's loss aversion... the pain of realizing a loss feels stronger than logic. The rule is simple: if my analysis is invalidated before the SL, I get out.

The 2 mistakes that are killing my trading. And how i plan to fix them 1-/ Cutting my winners too early. It's the fear of giving back profits. I exit quickly but leave 80% of the move on the table. The solution: define my exit plan before entering the trade fixed TP and SL