Flash Quicker

@call_me_sephy I feel anybody sane enough should be terrified of being a liability.

yooo, wsg

TUPAC SHAKUR DIED IN 1996 AT THE AGE OF 25 AND HE WAS NOT WRONG WHEN HE SAID; • Stay single if you love hard because people don’t value that kind of love anymore. • They have money but can’t feed the poor. • Just because you lost me as a friend doesn’t mean you gained as an enemy, I’m bigger than that, I still wanna see you eat, just not at my table. • Sometimes the person you’d take a bullet for ends up being the one behind the gun. • Don’t sit at the table where they talk about others, because when you get up you’re the next topic. • A woman brought you into this world. So you have no right to disrespect one. • You can’t control nobody’s action, loyalty comes from the heart. • No matter how hard it gets, stick your chest out, keep your head up and handle it.

You aren't going to get lucky repeating the same day. You need to go on more side quests. Weekly. Daily if you can. Even one tiny new decision can substantially increase your chances at luck.

🚨NEW: Andrew Tate on how manifestation TRULY works

I learnt this late. Planning & focusing too far into the future forces you to make mistakes in the present. The best move is to - set a big goal, break it down to what you need to do daily then focus on just the daily tasks. Do not worry about the big goal anymore. The more you obsess about the daily activity the closer you get to the goal, but the more you obsess about the big goal alone the more LIKELY it may overwhelm you into not making a move at all

GOT and The Last of Us is up there for me

Omo! If you’re big on this app you ghas mind as you go dey follow women word for DM o. Watin be this yam pepper scatter scatter💔

Omo, I don almost use all my time for lunch break search for the genesis of the whole saga wey dey TL I still can’t find it. I figured since David imposed upon me the indignity of exclusion, the provenance of this imbroglio, must be approached by paths somewhat sinuous and protracted. However, if you’re feeling generous, kindly help make things easier for me by tagging me to the lady whose original act gave rise to the present concatenation Thank u🙂

I never see person obsess over skirt and scarf like this for my life

😭😭😭😭

It's better to be sick of life than not have a life

'Nurses'?

After you finish tying me take another silk scarf and threten to tie my pen!x cap.... If I refuse to confess What if I mistakenly release a thick load of... Struggle well to loosen and do mmmmmmmmpph well Can you imagine it going in this direction? Sir David Beretetetete, tabi Joe Goldberg, tabi David BentBerg, Erotic ghostwriter fẹ́ kí kókun rẹ̀, kì í ṣe gígùn nìkan, ṣùgbọ́n kí ó bọ́rọ̀ 😂😂

Omo

I’ve been watching the Sir David situation closely, and I’ve tried to stay neutral. But the more screenshots I see, the harder that balance becomes. So I’m going to say this as honestly as I can — toggling between both sides. From Sir David’s side: ●He says no one was coerced. ●He says they were adults. ●He says it was fictional writing exercises. ●He says he didn’t break any laws. ●If that’s truly how he sees it, then in his mind he’s defending his name. ●And I understand defending your name. But here’s where my mind struggles. If the job description is “personal assistant,” how does explicit s3xual roleplay become part of the screening process? Even if you’re an erotic writer. ○Editing? Fine. ○Formatting drafts? Fine. ○Brainstorming plots? Fine. ○Participating in s3xual fantasies as a “test”? That’s where it starts to feel wild. And I keep asking myself: If this was purely professional, why weren’t *men* part of the applicants? Why only women? That question alone makes neutrality harder for me. Then there’s the marriage aspect. The “my wife won’t check my phone, you can be free” line. That doesn’t sound like creative structure. That sounds like secrecy. And secrecy doesn’t strengthen the defense — it weakens it. Now let me be fair again. Legal innocence and ethical judgment are not the same thing. It is possible he didn’t see himself as doing anything wrong. It is possible he thought: “They can say no.” It is possible this was naivety. Or poor judgment. Or ego. Not necessarily criminal intent. But this has apparently been happening since 2024. If that’s true, then it feels less like a one-time lapse and more like a pattern. And patterns are harder to excuse as ignorance. Also — and this part bothers me deeply — In a world where men constantly say false allegations can destroy reputations… why would you knowingly blur professional and s3xual boundaries like this? That feels reckless at best. At the same time, I don’t like mob dragging. The internet can curate outrage. Screenshots can be arranged to tilt perception. Masses can move faster than facts. So I’m cautious. But I also can’t ignore what’s plainly visible. Threatening lawsuits and blocking critics doesn’t automatically mean guilt. But it doesn’t communicate *reflection* either. If the goal is clarity, the stronger move isn’t “I’ll sue.” It’s: “I see how this crossed professional boundaries.” Here’s where I stand, honestly: I don’t know if this is predatory. I don’t know if this is stupidity. I don’t know if this is ego disguised as artistry. But I do know this: Mixing employment opportunity with explicit personal fantasy is a line that should not be blurred. An apology wouldn’t be an admission of crime. It would be an admission of poor judgment. And sometimes that’s the first step toward dissolving chaos instead of escalating it. I’m not interested in destroying anyone. I’m interested in clarity. Because if this is just “creative writing,” then explain why it required secrecy, gender selection, and job leverage. If it’s something else, then say that too. But pretending this is normal professional screening? That’s the part I can’t intellectually reconcile.

Nothing like having a bed to sleep on, with a roof over your head. The little things we just might take for granted. Good morning!

Once I hear Vampz say : "Come and take your coke ooh" "Straight line here" "VIP here 💺 💺💺💺💺" "Regular here 🪑🪑🪑🪑" I legit get so giddy. The gist fit no start for there ooh. Even though — naso I go dey trace from one post after another to get the full story. She's so cool!!!

I would always respect how you can be talking to someone now, they'll reply you within a minute, then you reply. Then they ghost you. Until you say 'Hi' again another day, then they reply, and it goes on and on. Sometimes, they'll call you out of the blue, and you'll think they care. You get pulled back in, and the cycle repeats. All while being professional, coherent, articulate, poised like you do not know the effect of what you are doing. Fairs

I might be getting borderline obsessive with this content creating of a thing. It's like that 60-minutes Eminem interview. I walk around with a pen and paper Will soon upgrade to having a small notepad. I'm not playing around.