Arnold Flibble

2.1K posts

Arnold Flibble

Arnold Flibble

@ArnoldFlibble

Katılım Haziran 2016
0 Takip Edilen14 Takipçiler
Charles Tannock
Charles Tannock@CharlesTannock·
@j4ppleby Utterly disrespectful comment against a very decent man born a Crown Prince who has dedicated his entire life in exile to ending the brutal Khamenei dictatorship in his beloved Iran & who is attempting to be a neutral respected figure in transitioning Iran to secular government.
Dunakiliti, Magyarország 🇭🇺 English
32
20
470
16.7K
Jack
Jack@j4ppleby·
Owen Jones, a white man, sneeringly asking an exiled Iranian - a man many Iranians see as at least an interim leader of Iran - ‘who the fuck are you?’ is more bigoted and racist than anything I’ve heard from the people he routinely smears as bigots and racists.
Jack tweet media
English
571
1.9K
12.6K
359.8K
Arnold Flibble
Arnold Flibble@ArnoldFlibble·
@PahlaviReza Churchill invaded Iran in 1941 creating a famine killing millions of Iranians.
English
0
0
0
5
Reza Pahlavi
Reza Pahlavi@PahlaviReza·
The United Kingdom has endlessly appeased the criminal regime in Iran. The Prime Minister speaks of protecting the innocent civilians of Iran but failed to act to help stop the regime’s massacre of 40,000 innocent Iranians in January. Only an end to this regime - that brings terror to Britain’s own shores - will yield lasting peace and regional stability. Keir Starmer should follow in the footsteps of Churchill, not Chamberlain. He should support the Iranian people’s fight for liberty. The Iranian people will remember who stood with them in their hour of need and who stood against them. There is still time for the Government to change course: prosecute the IRGC that slaughters innocents, expel the illegitimate regime's ambassador, and act to support the people of Iran.
Keir Starmer@Keir_Starmer

The two-week ceasefire between the United States and Iran today is welcomed by the UK and our allies. The goal now must be a lasting end to the war. Alongside our international partners, the UK will work to ensure a return to freedom of navigation in the Strait of Hormuz.

English
5.6K
19.9K
51.1K
3.1M
Arnold Flibble
Arnold Flibble@ArnoldFlibble·
@TiceRichard Why would you want to do something that would cost more and not lower peoples bills instead?
English
0
0
0
20
Amit Schandillia
Amit Schandillia@Schandillia·
@rizzone777 Don’t host terrorists and you won’t be bombed. It’s a crazy simple lesson but you cockroaches refuse to learn.
English
31
6
246
15.1K
Amit Schandillia
Amit Schandillia@Schandillia·
Israel signed peace with Egypt in 1979. Not a single Israeli bomb on Egypt since then. Israel signed peace with Jordan in 1994. Not a single Israeli bomb on Jordan since then. Israel signed peace with UAE in 2020. Not a single Israeli bomb on UAE since then (not that it did before). Israel signed peace with Bahrain in 2020. Not a single Israeli bomb on Bahrain since then (not that it did before). Israel signed peace with Morocco in 2020. Not a single Israeli bomb on Morocco since then (not that it did before). Israel signed peace with Sudan in 2020. Not a single Israeli bomb on Sudan since then (not that it did before).
Cenk Uygur@cenkuygur

There is approximately a zero percent chance Israel will abide by a ceasefire.

English
1.4K
8.1K
39.2K
2.1M
Arnold Flibble
Arnold Flibble@ArnoldFlibble·
@kent4jmj @taylenarare Hezbollah wouldn't exist if Israel didn't invade Lebanon in the 80s. Even if Hezbollah was gone a different group would take its place out of the need to defend themselves against Israel.
English
0
0
0
100
Kent
Kent@kent4jmj·
@taylenarare If Lebanon eradicates Hezbollah this wouldn’t happen. But they are pussies
English
75
4
551
14.4K
lea
lea@taylenarare·
they bombed a funeral in lebanon at a cemetery and everyone is now dead. a fucking funeral at a cemetery.
lea tweet media
English
1.9K
46.9K
159.9K
3.5M
Arnold Flibble
Arnold Flibble@ArnoldFlibble·
@Alexarmstrong The US couldn't make up for the global supply shortage if all other supply was gone. With the reserves it has it couldn't even maintain current output for long, increasing shortens that further. China actually benefits with increased demand for renewables.
English
0
0
0
667
Alex Armstrong
Alex Armstrong@Alexarmstrong·
There is a plan for this war and it’s working out exactly as America wants it to. Trumps post tonight is yet more proof of it. The prevailing narrative is that America doesn’t know what it’s doing. That argument is BS. This isn’t about Iran. America is resetting the global order and moving forward quickly with the Greater North America plan. It is the end of globalism as we know it. 1. Middle East - Iran is now choking the strait (tolls, threats) causing Middle Eastern oil to become less desirable (not a reliable source). Ramifications of the war will continue for years. Iran has attacked other Middle Eastern powers, now all on edge and openly aggressive. Iran weakened enough it can’t get nukes, but not enough it can’t cause serious problems. Continued chaos in the Strait for the foreseeable, bad for oil business in the Middle East (see oil leaders mtg Trump). Great for American oil. 2. Europe - As energy crisis hits, Europe becomes more reliant on American oil and gas (due to above), good leverage for negotiations and long term debt ceiling (initially a worry) as europe is forced to buy more US debt if it wants energy deals. Ukraine war good long term as it knocks out Russia as energy supplier to Europe and keeps Russians weakened in attrition. Who does Europe turn to for oil? Only supplier left is America who now controls one of the largest oil producers in the world, Venezuela. 3. China - America is in a serious trade/tariff war with China, its biggest rising global threat. 45% of China’s oil comes from the strait. Venezuela’s largest oil buyer was China (50%-80%). Who now has the upper hand in that negotiation? Mid-term, China has to play USA’s game. 4. Greenland - NATO allies predictably failed to help, proves Trumps point they can’t be relied upon protect Greenland (take UK battleship already out of commission as an example) - don’t forget allies were all briefed that the war in Iran was coming, they walked into the trap. UK is a prime example, ask why so much focus from Trump on its failure to help? Because it’s a massive European power and the “special relationship” is a symbolic target. 5. South America (separate from Iran war but part of the same plan) - USA has already begun working on removing enemies and anti-US regimes. See recent Shield of America’s mtg, financial support for Argentina, Venezuela and threats to Cuba. USA is securing is back garden and forcing China out permanently. If you think all of that looks like America losing, then you’ll hate to see what winning looks like. Their plan is working. This is the Greater North America project is in full swing, it’s part of a massive reset of the global order.
Alex Armstrong@Alexarmstrong

BREAKING: President Trump takes aim at NATO and Greenland again. “NATO WASN’T THERE WHEN WE NEEDED THEM” We can infer that the meeting with Rutte ran over due to this issue. I’ve spoken about Greater North America project, everything is heading in that direction to plan.

English
282
1.1K
3.7K
284.8K
LSK
LSK@LSK94LH·
@mehdirhasan Iran has attacked multiple different countries around the Middle East for decades. ILLEGALLY. or are you going to pretend that Iran hasn't attacked Syria, Iraq and Yemen? and when this war started, Iran attacked the majority of the Gulf Arab states with missiles. 🤡
English
1
0
2
2.1K
Arnold Flibble
Arnold Flibble@ArnoldFlibble·
@FarnoushAmiri JD Vance has been campaigning in Hungary for something that has nothing to do with the US
English
0
0
0
1.9K
Farnoush Amiri
Farnoush Amiri@FarnoushAmiri·
🚨Scoop: An official from one of the mediating countries tells me that the 11th hour deal between US and Iran came together after the involvement of two unlikely actors: Vice President J.D. Vance and China 👀 Vance was looped in late Tuesday and China helped get Iran on board
English
286
1.5K
6.8K
1.6M
Arnold Flibble
Arnold Flibble@ArnoldFlibble·
@fuzzyfamily1 @EricLDaugh Because Trump ended the deal. Why would they continue to stop enrichment if the US wasn't going to keep to its side of the deal? Yes part of the deal was lifting of certain sanctions so assets were unfrozen.
English
1
0
0
14
Terry Foster
Terry Foster@fuzzyfamily1·
If Obama got rid of 97% of Iran's enriched Uranium as Khanna claims That means they made this Uranium in the past 10 yrs Were Obama & Biden Naive or was this done to aid Iran & their proxies Obama $100B+ and Biden $6B gave Iran Billions with Interest of Iran's frozen assets Obama to prevent Iran from making a nuclear weapon & Biden for "Humanitarian Aid Only" in a exchange for 5 US Hostages
English
2
1
10
615
Eric Daugherty
Eric Daugherty@EricLDaugh·
🚨 WOW! Dem Rep. Ro Khanna just got TRUTH NUKED by CNBC “Obama got rid of 97% of that enriched uranium!” CNBC: "Well we KNOW they weren't telling us the truth. We already know that from the MISSILES they've launched!” Dems need to stop trusting Iran.
English
72
689
4.1K
101.6K
Arnold Flibble
Arnold Flibble@ArnoldFlibble·
@EricLDaugh How does them have missiles mean they lied about enriched Uranium? Under Obamas deal International observers had free reign to monitor wherever Iran had nuclear facilities, so we know for a fact they did not.
English
0
0
0
154
Arnold Flibble
Arnold Flibble@ArnoldFlibble·
@__Injaneb96 This is no different than saying if the Iranians didn't protest they wouldn't have got shot. These aren't military targets, so they are not human shields.
English
0
0
0
20
ثنا ابراهیمی | Sana Ebrahimi
🚨 SHOCKING: The Islamic regime is now openly calling on its own civilians, especially youth and children, to form human shields around power plants. They are planning to line up kids, students, athletes, and young people right in front of critical infrastructure… turning innocent lives into a desperate human barricade. 
This is a regime so cornered, so willing to sacrifice its own people, that it’s broadcasting its plan to use human shields in real time, right before the world’s eyes. Where is the global outrage?
Where are the human rights organizations?
Where is the UN when children are being recruited as living shields in a war? This is barbaric. This is evil.
English
139
797
1.7K
40.9K
Arnold Flibble
Arnold Flibble@ArnoldFlibble·
@PatrickChristys It is not a human shield unless it is to protect a military target. It would be a war crime to target this infrastructure, still doing it while a lot of civilians are there just makes it an even bigger war crime.
English
0
0
0
62
Patrick Christys
Patrick Christys@PatrickChristys·
You might disagree with what Trump’s saying he’s going to do…but it’s also pretty sick to deliberately use women and children as human shields like this - there’s even a baby there.
English
3.4K
2K
13.9K
665.2K
Arnold Flibble
Arnold Flibble@ArnoldFlibble·
@TheOmniLiberal Guys I am very smart I am saying "dolus specialis", look at how smart I am. Also cookie rockets.
English
0
0
1
137
Destiny | Steven Bonnell II
Destiny | Steven Bonnell II@TheOmniLiberal·
I have openly said I didn't know fuck all about I/P until October 7th and I started doing research on it. In 6 months I was able to debate your best scholars on it and crush them (see: Finkelstein RIP), and the rest avoid the debate (for good reason). Hasan claims to have known about I/P for over a decade and doesn't know literally the most important landmark in the country.
Secular Talk ([email protected])@KyleKulinski

@TheOmniLiberal @krystalball lol

English
256
219
5.6K
394.3K
Dries Van Langenhove
Dries Van Langenhove@DVanLangenhove·
Were these sheep in Gaza ‘terrorists’ too? What kind of evil does this?
English
655
3.3K
15K
845.5K
Grok
Grok@grok·
Sovereign nations have the right to control their borders and limit welfare to non-citizens, per international law (e.g., UN Refugee Convention allows processing claims without open access). Hungary's fence + pushbacks + cuts targeted illegal entry and abuse, slashing applications 98% while still handling genuine cases via legal channels. Data backs it: most 2015 arrivals came from safe transit countries, not direct persecution. If every country did this, migration would shift to orderly, vetted legal paths—reducing chaos, not "f**k humanity."
English
45
259
4.3K
96.7K
Giga Based Dad
Giga Based Dad@GigaBasedDad·
Really makes you think
Giga Based Dad tweet media
English
288
8.4K
38.5K
314.4K
Arnold Flibble
Arnold Flibble@ArnoldFlibble·
@mdubowitz Based on this reasoning every single US university that has had someone go work for the defense industry or US government would be a legitimate target. Obvious not.
English
0
0
0
243
Arnold Flibble
Arnold Flibble@ArnoldFlibble·
@mdubowitz That friction is being caused by the US. At first with economic attacks on NATO allies and now further much worse economic harm because of its war with Iran. America has caused more harm to Europe than Iran
English
0
0
0
83
Mark Dubowitz
Mark Dubowitz@mdubowitz·
The regimes in Iran, Moscow & Beijing have long wanted to fracture the transatlantic alliance. Yes, there are justified frustrations on both sides of the Atlantic. But we must not turn friction into fracture. NATO must strengthen, because our enemies benefit from every crack.
English
207
68
384
35K
Mark Zelunka
Mark Zelunka@RabbiRabbz·
@RamAbdu trying to murder jews will never again go unanswered. I'm sorry for your loss.
English
22
2
27
6.7K
James Jay Carafano
James Jay Carafano@JJCarafano·
@Arrogance_0024 You are joking right? or are you truly a complete idiot? You know why pilots are fearless? Because they know if they go down-this is what we will do to get them back. There is no bigger combat multiplier than search and rescue. You are so wrong. I will pray for wisdom for you.
English
115
320
17.9K
275.8K