Arsenal Accessed

913 posts

Arsenal Accessed banner
Arsenal Accessed

Arsenal Accessed

@ArsenalAxessed

Live and breathe Arsenal. Live in-game updates and analysis. Here to make you excited about our club beyond 90mins, how about we do it together! Gunnersforlife

By every Gooner Katılım Mart 2024
18 Takip Edilen9 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Arsenal Accessed
Arsenal Accessed@ArsenalAxessed·
Three questions and answers for Bayern vs Arsenal This is where we ask three pertinent questions concerning the upcoming game and maybe/ maybe not answer them, we’ll surely get our answers after the game won’t we😉 Let’s dive right in {{THREAD}}
English
1
0
0
315
Arsenal Accessed
Arsenal Accessed@ArsenalAxessed·
@fawogyimiiko_ Crazy how no one got the tweet, everyone talking how we're gonna beat West ham but that's not the context OP is pointing out that whether Totteringham relegates or not is in our hands, for the next round at least. We beat West ham and Spurs stay outside relegation zone
English
0
0
0
374
Arsenal Chizzy
Arsenal Chizzy@ArsenalChizzy·
Name one Arsenal player without Letter “E” in their full name. YOU CAN’T!!!
Arsenal Chizzy tweet media
English
846
87
705
117.6K
Genius
Genius@WizardMartian·
@UTDTrey I was there, Arsenal's only goal was as usual scrappy and scored from a corner that looked like a rugby game
Genius tweet media
English
13
0
6
2.6K
(fan) Trey
(fan) Trey@UTDTrey·
I just came back from the future Arsenal 1-2 Fulham
(fan) Trey tweet media
English
1.1K
348
6.1K
383.2K
`
`@Pxxdwskiii·
Lewandowski sent Dortmund to a UCL Final, won them two league titles. Then he went to Bayern, scored 300+ goals, won numerous trophies including a sextuple while also having two Ballon d’Or seasons. Then he went to Barcelona, while being past his prime and went on to score 120 goals in 4 seasons, while also winning 7 trophies. And also his goalscoring stats for Poland are very impressive. This is the best striker of this generation and a top 3 of all time. If you think otherwise, you simply don’t know ball.
English
130
910
10.6K
446.3K
Mr.Page™
Mr.Page™@mfc_mrpage·
Rice- Eze-Myles what a weak midfield, they are dropping points.
English
1.8K
637
6.3K
726K
Ryan
Ryan@WeareManC1ty·
Games played: Arsenal - 46 Bayern - 44 Psg - 48 Minutes played: Arsenal - 4,140 Bayern - 3,960 Psg - 4,320. Bayern has played similar amount of minutes to Arsenal, Psg have actually played more. Stop the excuses for your terrible style of football.
Sky Sports News@SkySportsNews

"Bayern PSG was probably the best game I've ever witnessed, but when I look at the amount of minutes I'm not surprised" 🤔 Mikel Arteta says it's "night and day" when it comes to the freshness of his players compared to Bayern Munich and PSG.

English
356
207
1.4K
373.9K
Arsenal Accessed
Arsenal Accessed@ArsenalAxessed·
@ESPNUK Also the way Gyok pointed at Trossard as soon as he scored even though it was a difficult finish. All ❤️
English
0
0
21
615
ESPN UK
ESPN UK@ESPNUK·
The way Gabriel celebrated Viktor Gyökeres's brace with him 🥹
ESPN UK tweet media
79
1.5K
20.4K
97.7K
Arsenal Accessed
Arsenal Accessed@ArsenalAxessed·
@heis_fede These willingly naive people will start bringing up games played as if Nottingham forest won't seal UCL qualification in the MW29 in any of those leagues
English
0
0
0
392
Arsenal Accessed
Arsenal Accessed@ArsenalAxessed·
@stayEminent @UtdStiles He was an injury prone waste of space before we nurtured him into the player he became. Yea we did plenty for him alright
English
0
0
0
4
Bayern & Germany
Bayern & Germany@iMiaSanMia·
Mikel Arteta asked if Premier League teams were capable of producing such an exciting game as PSG vs Bayern: "Well, there is something that when I look at that game, Bayern v PSG is probably the best game I have ever witnessed on the quality of two teams, and especially the individual quality that the players deliver. I’ve never seen something like this. But when I look at the amount of minutes and the freshness of those players, then I’m not surprised. To deliver those moments of quality, you have to be very fresh and the difference in the leagues and the way they’re competing is night and day.  “And you just have to see a lot of stats that have been recently around it. So we are competing in two different worlds, so you cannot compare one part of that without giving any context to the other. I don’t think it’s fair." [via @HaytersTV]
Bayern & Germany tweet media
English
147
72
1.7K
359.8K
alex
alex@berrybrown25·
@ArsenalAxessed @SIDYfe4r @ArsenalChizzy I actually wrote Odgaard. So auto correct corrected my mistake lol. I'm following accessed for understanding. Sidy you can choke on one.
English
2
0
1
19
ISMAEEL
ISMAEEL@Banjy47·
@Charleydonny What makes it crazier is that he rebuilt title winning teams multiple times and still stayed on top. That level of longevity may never happen again in modern football.
English
2
0
1
9
ISMAEEL
ISMAEEL@Banjy47·
🏆Top Football’s Greatest Managerial Milestones Which of these records do you think is the hardest to break? 👇 01 | Sir Alex Ferguson: 13 Premier League Titles 02 | Zinedine Zidane: 3 UEFA Champions League Titles (The Historic 3-Peat) 03 | Carlo Ancelotti: 5 Champions League Titles 04 | Pep Guardiola: 100 Points Season 05 | Arsène Wenger: 49 Unbeaten League Games (The Invincibles) 06 | José Mourinho: 9 Year Home Unbeaten Run 07 | Mikel Arteta: 3 Straight Title Races (2nd Place Finishes)
ISMAEEL tweet media
English
3
10
18
584
Gsewen
Gsewen@Gsewen197998·
@AlanRenner7 If you can’t or don’t see the difference in the intensity of the games then pointless explaining to you. The bottom half of the French league is a walk in the park so it’s easy to rotate. Try doing that in the bottom half of the prem…
English
2
0
1
647
Alan Renner
Alan Renner@AlanRenner7·
We can give you a whole year to prepare to stay “fresh” and you still wouldn’t be half as good as PSG or Bayern, put the current PSG in the Prem and Enrique would still rotate the squad because of last season and the injuries. Look at this, FIVE PSG players and we won the quadruple (unlike the London bottlers) Why didn’t Arsenal or anyone else win it? They played less games and less minutes than PSG so they’re “fresher” WHY didn’t they win the UCL?
Alan Renner tweet media
Football Tweet ⚽@Footballtweet

🗣️ Mikel Arteta on Bayern Munich vs. PSG: "Bayern vs. PSG was probably the best game I have ever watched. The quality of two teams, and especially the individual quality that the players delivered." "I've never seen something like this. But when I look at the amount of minutes and the freshness of those players, then I'm not surprised." "To deliver those moments of quality, you have to be very fresh. The difference in the leagues and the way they're competing, it is night and day." "We are competing in two different worlds, so you cannot compare one part of that without giving any context to the other."

English
24
43
428
39.8K
O1
O1@Olisa85513366·
@yaygha Jim's statement definitely possesses enough ambiguity to have an alternative interpretation to "may we not commit to hoz". As 'hoz' are not the sole target of condom wielders. Chaste women are also met with the predatory gaze of condom folk. They are on the same hunting grounds
English
3
0
1
693
Yehgha
Yehgha@yaygha·
P.1: Thank you P.2: "At a certain point in life, the things you choose to amplify..." For starters, the best possible response to what a person says, focuses on what the person said Not on the person. I cannot think of a situation where someone can give an objective, rational rebuttal to what another says by mostly ignoring the message and instead attacking the messenger. The meat of your argument spans 7 paragraphs, only one attempts to address what he said. The best contentions target rationale, not character. Failure to do that evinces the viscerallness of your response This logical principle is so fundamental to productive discourse that its violation has a copious literature of its own: Ad hominem. But I understand this is too high a standard for most to meet and usually, I excuse/ignore it, but when you highlight a man's (lack of) 'wit' yet fail to demonstrate wit yourself in the criticism, you do not only undermine your argument, you invalidate it. Which is to say, you have made a fundamental error in your criticism by focusing on Jim Iyke, instead of what Jim Iyke said. Errors like that fly in the wild but I like to think that you and I hold ourselves to much higher discursive standards. As a result, almost everything else you said, crumbles from here, but I'll go on for the heck of it. P.3: This whole paragraph is rhetorical fluff. It is a bunch of words that when you cut through the verbiage tries to say everything and sound profound but ends up saying nothing plus sounds... palpably artificial. And I say this with utmost respect. Look at the text - there's no substance there relative to the bone of contention. The only part where it says something concrete and therefore falsifiable is "not everything is reduced to sex" But everything is about sex, so there is no reduction to speak of. Think about it. practically everything human beings do is about sex BECAUSE the cardinal evolutionary imperative for us and by extension, animals is the propagation of genes through (survival and) reproduction. And everything else we do, whether its education, hustle, jobs, clout chasing, status seeking, this bloody threads we're writing etc, are mechanisms that evolved/have been designed in service of that broader imperative. When the abstractions, posturing, moralising, social theatrics and masks are stripped away, the underying motivations for practically everything we do, is sex. P.4: This is beautiful, flowery language, but like flowers, has no substance to it. First of, his statement does not position emotional intention as foolish and physical pursuit as superior. That is a (motivated) misinterpretation. "May we not go with flowers and chocolate where others go with lubricant and condoms" When decompressed means "'may we not commit to hoz" Simple it does not no mean "May we not commit" it does not mean "not commiting is superior to committing" It means "may we not commit to slvts, harlots and such-like women of the low quality variety" And given our modern reality, that is arguably THE MOST important prayer any man can make You have not only strawmanned him, you also fail to appreciate the gravity of the peril he prays against. P.5: Another strawman. There is no version of the english langurage, whether literal or figurative, old, middle, or modern where "May we not go with flowers and chocolate where others go with lubricant and condoms" can, by any reasonable stretch of english linguistic interpretation, be construed as shaming those who choose differently. That is an untenable interpretive leap *BUT* let us assume it was shaming... let me steelman that misinterpretation and agree that it is shaming - it would be justified shaming. Shaming a man who commits to a woman other men slept with for less is not only good for the man (as it substantially reduces the odds of him being a cautionary tale and crying on podcasts) it is good for society as it enforces female chastity - and female chastity benefits us all. If you need me to explain how, let me know. Paragraphs 6 & 7: Another ad hominem. Another combination of beautiful sounding words that DO NOT say anything See, I understand the pushback - I get it. Because when I saw it, the first thing that came to my mind too is "this n!ga is too old for this sht" But then I caught myself and thought about what I just thought about and realised I did not in fact, think about it - I felt it. My reaction was visceral and thus wasn't a product of reasoned or analytic process. Which is why the main/default focus was on him "he's too old for this", rather than the merits (or lack thereof) of what he said And the ability to make that distinction is what separates a kneejerk reaction from reasoned engagement even if that impulsive response may be retrofited with sophistry upon examination Which is what it appears (by design or deficit) you have done here
Yehgha tweet media
Lukas Not Podolski@OtitoNosike

Good question, Yegha. And I’ll be using this response to answer to everyone who asked the same question. At a certain point in life, the things you choose to amplify say more about your orientation than your wit. A line like that may pass as edgy banter in your twenties, when everything is still framed as conquest, performance, and the endless proving of masculinity. But nearing fifty, it stops reading as clever and begins to read as arrested. There is a difference between experience and maturity. Experience gives you stories; maturity refines what you choose to glorify. When a man has lived long enough, seen enough, lost enough, and understood enough, his words begin to carry weight, restraint, and perspective. Not everything is reduced to sex, not everything is framed as a competition between warmth and lust, not everything needs to be said for applause, for validation. What his statement is really doing is this: it positions emotional intention as foolish and physical pursuit as superior. It suggests that depth is naivety and that calculated indulgence is wisdom. And that is a posture you expect from someone still trying to figure himself out, not from someone who should already understand that human connection is not a binary of flowers versus flesh. Yes, while it is true that as a man, you should know the particular type of women to date, to have sex with, and to commit to long term, as that decision can be life defining, it still does not justify shaming those who choose differently, those who come with flowers where others would rather come with desire. At the end of the day, it is a personal choice, one no one is obligated to respect, but a personal choice nonetheless, one shaped by intention, by values, by what a person believes connection should look like. And for someone like Jim Iyke, who is old enough to understand that nuance, however uncomfortable, however distasteful it may seem, it was somewhat beneath him to say that. At the stage he is, you would expect a man to have outgrown the need to trivialize sincerity for effect. You would expect him to recognize that people move through life at different depths, and that not every situation is reduced to desire and gratification. You would expect a certain level of evolution in thought, in tone, in what he chooses to put forward. That is the point. It is not about policing humor, age-shaming, or denying people their voice. It is about alignment. When your age, your experiences, and your platform suggest depth, but your words reflect something far more shallow, it stands out. And people like me will question it.

English
31
98
258
15.3K
RohanJivan
RohanJivan@RohanJivanAFC·
Right, another one for the tactical nerds!!! So, Declan Rice on Wednesday was given slightly different responsibilities without the ball. In the high press, you would have noticed Zubimendi positioned higher, on the left. When Madueke pressed the LCB, Odegaard and Zubimendi marked the two Atletico nominal pivot players, Koke and Cardoso. Typically, you would expect Rice to be pressing high, instead of Zubimendi. However, roles were reversed: Rice was deeper. Why? To control loose balls and provide our CBs with a more reliable presence. One of the big reasons why Rice is the one to press high is because he’s the best in the world at it, hands down. But, Atletico weren’t going to play through our M2M press. They were always going to look for balls over the top, where Griezmann and Alvarez would rotate and either stay high or predominantly drop into midfield spaces. As a result, fashioning chances via our press from Atletico GKs wasn’t going to happen. So using Rice deeper in the press increases our propensity for second balls, which is what happened. He was a hoover, just like Zubimendi. It’s worth mentioning when Odegaard pressed the LCB, Rice would back up the pressure and jump to one of the pivot players, when necessary. But the salient point is that he was deeper, relative to Zubimendi for second ball and transition coverage. This isn’t the first time he’s been used like this… Leeds (A) (as mentioned in my Substack, see pictures below) was another instance where Rice was deepest in the press amongst our three midfielders. And similarly to Atletico, it was about second ball coverage, which was very important at Elland Road as DCL led the line, who is a handful and gives his side a solid platform for loose balls.
RohanJivan tweet mediaRohanJivan tweet media
English
6
14
265
14.2K