Asadullah.Afg.pinetwork.GCV

It seems ironic that a platform ignoring the outcome of a community-driven vote is now requesting questions from the community. Why was there no official statement regarding the Pi Network vote, where 86% voted in favor? Transparency and trust are values that must be upheld consistently — not just during campaigns. So here’s the real question: Is Binance truly ready to listen to its community?

**GCV COMMUNITY EMERGENCY WARNING!** We have observed that many GCV pioneers and GCV Ambassadors have been influenced by misleading information, often referred to as "sugar-coated bullets." This issue seems to have originated with Indonesian pioneer Dimas, who exploits those seeking reassurance about Pi GCV. He uses Github codes to give pioneers false hope and make unrealistic promises. The term "sugar-coated bullets" refers to the idea that someone may use enticing words to make you feel happy and excited, but in reality, you may be left disappointed or harmed in the end. If CT can provide us with promises, it should come directly from CT, not from him. If CT can give us hope and a timeline for the release of the open source code (OM), then CT will announce. He is not an official representative of CT, All code explanations should come from CT authorities not from him. he is only a pioneer as you. While it’s understandable that many pioneers are waiting CT complete OM by themselves , it is important to recognize that this mindset can hinder our progress to OM. I would like to share some insights on why it will have bad consequences if all pioneers inactive. The code itself is correct but it needs condition to activate. The condition is compliance with all countries regulations. Now Pi has been listed on the exchange market, it must satisfy all cryptocurrency regulations which means PCT cannot announce price. The stable coin price must come from the market. However, Dimas's approach to discouraging engagement with the exchange market is misguided. He calls on pioneers to simply wait for OM and do nothing. As I have mentioned previously, CT cannot announce prices in the exchange market due to regulatory constraints. His request for pioneers to ignore the exchange market and anticipate the arrival of DApps overlooks the need for a healthy commercial environment for merchants. Without a stable exchange price, merchants will not adopt Pi as a payment option. If this situation remains unstable, it could deter merchants from joining our ecosystem. Actually it happened already. Many Chinese merchants choose not to accept Pi payment until the price fixed. Moreover, companies cannot operate their accounting systems effectively with a dual pricing system. As a former CPA in the USA and currently a certified IRS Enrolled Agent, I can assure you that having two prices is impossible. For those eager to see the emergence of DApps to decide price cannot realized, it's essential to understand that hope that the exchange market will change to GCV after DApps start is unrealistic. Merchants and service providers risk bankruptcy if a dual pricing system is in place. Please note that CT is not allowed to interfere with exchange market prices. Our timeline is crucial; missing key opportunities in the coming months could significantly delay our progress to activate source code. CT's KYB only lists five exchanges without any other ecosystem, indicating a need for price stabilization to kickstart the ecosystem. We often emphasize that Pi operates differently from traditional cryptocurrencies due to our community-driven consensus. However, we need to critically assess whether we are effectively demonstrating this consensus on exchange market? If we don’t support GCV on the exchange market by stopping sales and advocating for repurchasing at low prices, is that truly community-driven support? No! This would make Pi resemble traditional cryptocurrencies, which means a lack of community support, akin to shifting sands on the beach. Our efforts should be like a sword that protects our GCV ecosystem merchants, as they are concerned about exchange market prices. They need fiat to restock. If the exchange cannot demonstrate stable pricing, merchants will be reluctant to join the ecosystem. Even if they attempt to join and use GCV but can only receive $0.70 for their $314,159 products or service value, they could still opt out. Additionally, if they do accept GCV but the exchange rate is $0.70, they face substantial losses. Such losses could lead to bankruptcy overnight, leaving them without the fiat needed to pay a significant amount of tax. Furthermore, if they intentionally evade taxes, they risk facing criminal charges in some countries. It's important not to expect banks to use GCV for merchant conversions. Bank money doesn't come from thin air. Having previously worked in a bank and conducted internal audits, I can confirm when bank use client funds to facilitate conversions when the exchange market shows a lower price. The bank can be bankrupt! Please pay attention, all the code write needs us to make exchange market shows stable coin GCV, then the code can be activated. We need to understand that the code can represent community planning but cannot surpass the business laws and regulations of different countries. For the plan to succeed, we need pioneers to lead the way. Dimas's advice to remain passive could undermine our collective efforts. It might be worth considering why he is opposing active engagement in the exchange market. Our 11 strategy has no any risk. We never advocate pioneers to buy a lot. We just ask those pioneers who has no wallet to buy 10 Pi so that they can enjoy OM sooner. We have undertaken significant outreach to encourage both our 60 million pioneers without wallets and external companies to participate in our ecosystem. No need to worry wallets, CT can give you opportunity to have special wallet to transfer your Pi from exchange market .This initiative aligns with CT's guidance for widely used and held Pi. We would like to foster collaboration for mutual benefit for pioneers themselves and for GCV Pi Network. Even though I may be conservative in my approach, but there is no negative consequences. It's time to take a bold step forward and embrace the opportunities that lie ahead. But it is much better than loss due to negligence. It will benefit those pioneers and outside companies and individuals. The strategy we have, which includes "not selling and buying back", will not yield any negative results. It will strengthen our GCV, and the market will recognize our unity and strength. However, if you follow Dimas and do nothing while CT waits for us, we risk losing all our dreams and plans when the delay result in failure. During this time, lying down and doing nothing will not help you relax. Waiting day after day without any successful outcomes will only lead to anxiety, as you’ll complain CT why not do as they promise. Unfortunately, CT never makes promises, but Dimas does. They always need pioneers to do our job. However, if the Pi Network fails due to his negative influence, he cannot compensate you. It is crucial for us to approach these important decisions with caution and thorough consideration. We must ensure that we have backup plans in place to protect our collective interests as we navigate this journey together for 6 years. I also expect CT has everything arrange already. But it proves they cannot get exchange market done by themselves. And if they can do, they have done already on 2/20/25 Open Network day. CT never tells us that "pioneers should just wait and not go to the exchange." In reality, the exchange market is arranged by CT. They cannot instruct us to buy back Pi, nor can they tell us to stop selling. Their control is managing migration speed and reducing supply, as well as announcing auctions to attract more buyers. They also provide special wallets for those who do not have Pi. It is clear that CT needs us to make the exchange market appear stable. They cannot guide the community on pricing or value. These are the rules of the game, and it is basic knowledge that pioneers should understand. We will work diligently and support all CT advocacy efforts. We will not stop working until the source code is activated. Our work will only cease if CT asks us to stop. Otherwise, we should not listen to anyone who may mislead us. Let us remember that all CT members are bound by non-disclosure agreements. They are not permitted to share plans outside of authorized channels. Let’s collaborate to create a unified and successful future for all members of the GCV community. Please block Dimas on all social media and leave his group, as he is stealing your dreams. Never give your fate to a person who cannot afford to pay your loss. Doris Yin 🪷🪷🪷 Founder, Global GCV Movement April. 2nd, 2025