
Austin
977 posts


@solaristasol @jakeshieldsajj zionism depends on central banking for their power.. take it away, and their power crumbles.. easy concept to understand if you can think
English

@AustinBL85 @jakeshieldsajj What a retarded thing to say.
Free market capitalism will save us from Jewish supremacism?
English


@PeterSchiff @neet2riches_2 a homeland that was stolen through genocide? you support that?
English

@neet2riches_2 Given the history of the Jewish people, I think it's very important that there be a Jewish homeland, just in case history repeats.
English

@cornflakes359 @jakeshieldsajj read more zionist material from your zionist colleges? lol.. you make a lot of sense.. you should try use common sense and basic logic to see past the zionist trap that you fell into that gives them control over your currency..
English

@cornflakes359 @jakeshieldsajj still ignoring basic english to push a narrative i see.. you will always be on the wrong side.. free trade vs state controlled trade isnt rocket science.. but go ahead and stay in denial..
English

@AustinBL85 @jakeshieldsajj Central banking isn’t Marxism , it’s how capitalist economies manage money. Marxism is about production.
English

@AustinBL85 @jakeshieldsajj There is no Zionist economic system. Zionism is colonialism, Jewish supremacy and exploitation, oppression.
English

@cornflakes359 @jakeshieldsajj ok.. but you still support zionist systems like central banking.. so maybe you should rethink your economic views..
English

@AustinBL85 @jakeshieldsajj Theyre going to lose. Iran is kicking their ass. As soon as it gets rid of American bases in all of ME, isrsel will fall as a consequence. Iran is literally saving us all from Zionist control. I’m praying it happens soon.
English

@cornflakes359 @jakeshieldsajj and they are bombing the shit out of each other for the powrt to define the currency used to trade through that straight. smh
. wake up. they will kill you if you try to bypass their govt currency.
English

@AustinBL85 @jakeshieldsajj Europe trades in euros
•China trades in yuan
•Countries do bilateral deals in local currencies
The dollar is losing its hegemony in real time. The Straight of Hormuz has opened a genie, with ships having to pay in Yuan. This has set off a domino effect.
English

@cornflakes359 @jakeshieldsajj you keep saying "change the currency" i never used those words.. im not saying "change" a currency, im saying stop using laws that define currency.
English

@AustinBL85 @jakeshieldsajj Not all trade is in dollars but even if it was, that’s just the medium, not the power. Owning the assets is what matters. Changing the currency doesn’t change who owns everything.
English

@cornflakes359 @jakeshieldsajj all of that is traded with dollars.. have you ever heard of a "world trade currency" all international trade is done with 1 currency and they pay to use that forced currency. you are confused
English

@AustinBL85 @jakeshieldsajj People already can trade in other things crypto, gold, foreign currencies.
Do rich people lose power because of that? No.
Because wealth isn’t just “currency.”
It’s:
•companies
•land
•assets
•infrastructure
U can’t “bypass” someone who owns the system you depend on.
English

@cornflakes359 @jakeshieldsajj "allowing competing currencies" i should be allowed to buy a piece of property with pokeman cards if i want to.. if i did, i would bypass the whole system. if the system starts to hoard pokeman, then il trade with something else.
English

@AustinBL85 @jakeshieldsajj People already trade in different currencies and assets and the rich still dominate. Wealth isn’t just money, it’s ownership.
You can’t bypass that, and you don’t need one currency to hoard it
English

@cornflakes359 @jakeshieldsajj if people can trade with whatever they want they can always baypass the system.. commom sense.. if you cant define wealth, you cant hoard it can you!?!?!
English

@AustinBL85 @jakeshieldsajj U think removing rules removes power. It doesn’t, it just removes limits. The people with the most money win even faster. Big corporations aren’t powerful because of currency or rules, they’re powerful because they already control money, supply chains, and markets.
English

@cornflakes359 @jakeshieldsajj lol. im done. go listen to some Ron Paul videos.
English

@AustinBL85 @jakeshieldsajj 4) Even the system ur imagining still needs stabilisation
Institutions like the Federal Reserve exist because unrestrained markets repeatedly crash.
Remove structure entirely, and you don’t get fairness, you get instability + faster concentration.
English

@cornflakes359 @jakeshieldsajj our govt defines capital with 1 forced currency. big corporations dominate because they are subsidized with that forced currency and the little guys are regulated and taxed. allowing competing currencies erases corrupt capital. logic
English

@AustinBL85 @jakeshieldsajj 1) Power comes from capital, not currency
Big corporations don’t dominate because of the dollar.
They dominate because they control:
•supply chains
•data
•infrastructure
•massive capital reserves
Changing currency rules doesn’t touch any of that.
English

@cornflakes359 @jakeshieldsajj @profwolff zionist university, zionist university, zionist university.. lol. they all preach the same propaganda to make you scared of freedom..
English

@AustinBL85 @jakeshieldsajj Follow @profwolff . Professor
•Harvard University (BA)
•Stanford University (MA)
•Yale University (MA, MA, PhD)
Economics
English

@cornflakes359 @jakeshieldsajj @profwolff stick to the topic and try 1 comment at a time.. you might get taken a little more seriously
English

@cornflakes359 @jakeshieldsajj you act like companies will have the power they have today.. with competing currencies, wealth will be much harder to hoard and when there are no corporate subsidies, or regulations to stop the little guy, big corporations will fall quickly under a true free trade system
English

@AustinBL85 @jakeshieldsajj The US currently has a debt of over $138 Trillion. Let that sink in.
English


@AustinBL85 @jakeshieldsajj By ur definition:
•The entire modern world = “not capitalist”
•Every economy in history with a national currency = “socialist”
That’s not logic…that’s a definition so extreme it makes the word useless.
English

@cornflakes359 @jakeshieldsajj no. i define it as "allowing competing currencies". Capitalism is "free trade". if im not able to freely trade with the currency of my choice, its not capitalist trade.
English

@AustinBL85 @jakeshieldsajj U redefined capitalism to mean ‘multiple currencies’ because the real definition doesn’t fit your argument. Capitalism is private ownership and profit, the U.S. is dominated by both. 1 currency doesn’t change that.
English
