BLASH_DAIKO
8.1K posts








Historically we never have a straight down to target (5600-5700 for me in July, mb Oct). 1973 2000 08 23 we all bounced to at least 50%. For the worst local low I see, I see the bounce back to 6575 to 6710 range.

SPACEX HAS OFFICIALLY FILED FOR AN IPO. SpaceX Revenue — $15B, targeting a $1.75T valuation $META Revenue — $200B, currently at a $1.45T valuation Are you buying the SpaceX IPO?


🚨 NEW: The U.S. and Iran are discussing a potential deal that would involve a ceasefire in exchange for Iran reopening the Strait of Hormuz, three U.S. officials tell Axios. axios.com/2026/04/01/tru…





Levels are certainly respecting well. There is nothing to do but hold runner in #ES_F. 6592 was support given at 8am. It held almost exact for low of day. Targets given were 6624 (hit), 6638 (hit), 6647 (we've been here 1hr, holding almost exact). There is just 6672 left above




$NQ Clean bounce off the harmonic support level at 23013. This bounce should retest the next higher harmonic at 24240 or the white magic level at 24480.



Doing a video on what I was looking for down there (on top of the weekend video) and will share here if interested

$ES_F $SPY $NQ_F $QQQ Week 14 Plan Complete and Paid. 820 points NQ 202 points ES Yesterday’s plan was to get higher and test the daily EMA9. That worked and completed the plan for this week. Called in real time, here's the proof: barkworth17.substack.com/p/markets-at-f… Are markets tough? I typically see people quit their trading career when market is this difficult, but I offer a simple framework with an entry model, and teach with the use of video shorts every single day via my newsletter. One plan. One edge. One Newsletter - Every single day!

$NQ_F - so how did my system nail the exact day the market broke down after I gave you reversal setups for 4 months in a row? This market has been extremely rewarding for me and my group, simply because the system defines when a trend ends and from that moment we are only allowed to buy/sell reversals. This signal came late November last year, when the daily EMA9 uptrend ended, and then sellers failed to break her down. So both buyers and sellers failed to establish an EMA9 trend after a strong advance. That principle alone defines neutralisation of a trend. From that moment, you buy/sell EMA9 reversals and trail until the EMA9 trend ends. I've done a short video on the current market status and explain this simple concept that for some reason so many are oblivious to. What is the logic? - Price action is binary, there are only two groups: buyers and sellers. - At the end of an advance, both groups get only one shot at continuation. - When the break out and the breakdown both have failed, the trend is neutralised and we have to zoom out to the EMA9 trend on the related timeframe above. This is a peek into my methodology. The Discord is full of educational videos like this, and my daily video guidance teaches the principles before we take our trades.




@EtherRawl @grok what does "valid if this year we do not respect the four-year cycle, as most expect. If we do respect it, we have a clear invalidation point" mean?








