Liz

No black, red, or blue pill here Like millions, I’m just a pure red blooded, pissed off American taxpayer who holds Christ in high regard I’ve had enough of the politically segregated factions We define our own individuality. We’re tired of the judgmental ‘fucksicle’ looking to slap a metaphoric label on self directed thinkers like myself. We love our country as much as they do The real fight is against common enemies—media titans, wealthy pedophiles, and corrupt autocrats Can I get an amen? 🙋🏽‍♀️

I can make it simple for you, boiling down years of reporting: Corruption is the story. The whole story. Arranging it, hiding it, banking the profits, and directing large shares of the untraceable funds to black projects in the military and intel worlds. By far the richest form of corruption is health care and social services fraud. Beats narcotics, beats human trafficking. "Politics" is a sideshow -- the distraction that allows the robbers into the bank and keeps people looking in all the wrong directions.

Nicole Shanahan (RFK Jr.’s former running mate) just said something that every European and American needs to hear right now: “Progressives spend so much time turning conservatives and Christians into the enemy that we forget to think critically… and when we finally do, we discover we actually have a TON in common.” Then she issued a chilling warning that hits Berlin, Paris, London, and Warsaw, and Washington equally hard: Today’s young progressives — full of genuine compassion and hope for a better world — are being manipulated in the exact same way her mother experienced during the rise of communism in China, and millions saw in Russia before totalitarianism took over. They believed they were fighting for freedom and justice. Instead, their empathy was weaponized to pave the way for authoritarian control. Her exact words: “Their empathy and compassion is being used for a fascist takeover… and they’ve been trained to see it as the exact opposite.” This isn’t just an American problem. From cancel culture to mass migration debates to digital censorship — the same playbook that divides people into warring tribes is running on both sides of the Atlantic. The people aren’t the enemy. The script that makes us hate each other is. Watch the full clip. If you care about real freedom — anywhere in the West — this will stop you in your tracks.

Seriously, why does any thinking person still own a television?

The main problem isn't corrupt individuals. It is a corrupt system. Most (but not all!) the scientists, doctors, and public officials in our agencies are honest and caring, trying to serve the public in spite of a system of broken incentives. President Trump and I are going to change that, so that the 90% who are dedicated public servants can do their jobs free of conflicts of interest and industry pressure. I'm speaking of the public health agencies, but the same principle applies across the board.

@KoganMike @elonmusk What? It’s late and I’m never at my best this time of night, so I’m really disappointed to find myself one degree of separation from Thomas Massie (whom I greatly admire) via a comment that makes no sense to me. Does arguing with Elon make me a Karen?

@BOACA2024 @elonmusk Are you sure you're not Karen?

The most likely outcome is that AI and robots make everyone wealthy. In fact, far wealthier than the richest person on Earth 👀 By this, I mean that people will have access to everything from medical care that is superhuman to games that are far more fun that what exists today. We do need to make sure that AI cares deeply about truth and beauty for this to be the probable future.

@elonmusk Bullshit. Poverty is a greed problem, Elon. Even your usual ass kissers on here see through this one. Do better. Think better. Or piss off.

Poverty is an engineering problem

Wow, would he really only be that old? Considering how much our politics have degraded, it seems it should be twice that. Please, sir, keep fighting that fight no matter what comes and no matter who brings it. We see you, we know you, we’ve got you. We’re with you—the real you. Do NOT let them water you down. It’s not worth it anymore.

Remembering my dad, his 100th birthday

Bingo.

No Kings! Instead, we want pharmaceutical companies, military contractors, financial elites, housing developers, and many other large industrial interests to control administrative agencies, media, and academia in order to game the system against the interests of small businesses and regular people trying to live their lives.

Just a reminder that social media isn’t a place to express yourself, it’s a data-collection tool for elitists to track and collect your likes, political views, possible dissident opinions, etc., and hand them over to whoever will pay the highest price (government). Every tapped heart is recorded. And they know how you’ve evolved over the years. Probably better than you know yourself. It’s unclear to me how we resist digital ID while participating in this necessary algorithmic foundation daily.

Today's announcement on Autism comes on the heels of Charlie Kirk's assassination for speaking the truth. When RFK Jr. accurately credited the emergence of the MAHA-MAGA coalition to Charlie last week, everything changed. The movement reignited. Truth begets Truth. Courage begets Courage. Honor begets Honor. Today was incredibly bold. @POTUS you have exceeded my expectations in truth telling - we were only expecting to hear about the published work on Acetaminophen (pronounced AH-SEE-TOE-MET-O-FIN — you killed it btw). Instead, you channeled Charlie and spoke the truth that haunts millions of us on a daily basis: our nation's approach to childhood vaccinations is reckless and is causing immense suffering. @RobertKennedyJr you have exceeded my expectations in juggling snakes in a den of vipers, and rolling through the chaos. @DrJBhattacharya you've been a North Star, a sound voice of faith and dignity every step of the way. @DrOz after meeting you and your incredible wife, I knew we had a peace maker in the Oval Office. Keep it up, team! This is only the beginning. 🫡🇺🇸

I’m seeing a lot of posts from self-identified Democrats and progressives who’ve recently gone down the rabbit hole of binge-watching Charlie Kirk videos—curious to understand who he really is beyond the headlines. Their reactions are remarkably similar. They’re often shocked to realize that the version of Charlie they were conditioned to believe in bears little resemblance to reality. What they find instead isn’t a caricature, but a thoughtful, articulate young man—firm in his convictions, yet respectful in how he expresses them. He’s not the villain they were told to expect. He’s curious, honest, and often gracious in debate, even with those who strongly disagree with him. His greatest “crime” appears to be his willingness to engage in civil discourse. If you’re one of the millions beginning to realize you’ve been misled about Charlie Kirk—don’t let the awakening stop there. Start questioning everything you’ve been told about the issues that divide us. Because, like the narrative about Charlie, many of those stories are built on outright lies. Keep digging, and you’ll eventually discover that your true enemy is big media and those who fund and control the narrative. Not your fellow American. Share if you care…

I’m close with someone who is the most content, happiest person I know. He’s very active always has been. He’s very active, (rock climbing, sailing, hiking), and treats his body right. Healthy & happy. Living his best life. Last week, he asked me: “Did you hear about some young Ukrainian girl who was killed on public transit?” This was DAYS after it happened. His friend had just told him. “And who’s Charlie Kirk? I guess something happened to him too?” He had ZERO CLUE about any of it. Then it hit me: He doesn’t know about any of this because he’s never, ever online. He’s outside and not buried in social media timelines. That explains a lot.

🔥 "I had a friend of mine, sent me a text the day after Charlie was killed, really distraught and she said, "What do we do now? I know the answer should be love. The answer should be peace, but Charlie tried that and it didn't work." And my response to her was, "No, it did work. That's why they killed him."'

Wait until the haters of Charlie Kirk find out their anger is based entirely on quotes taken out of context and flat-out lies about what he said. Cognitive dissonance will glue most of the haters to their original positions, with word-salad explanations of how they have been proven wrong yet they are really right. But some will experience unbearable sadness and deep shame over their actions this week. That's coming.

Charlie followed me on X. We never interacted. A year ago I thought he was just another conservative dunking on libs. I had only started really understanding his worldview a few weeks ago. I suspected we might collaborate one day. Today it really hit me: that can't happen. I feel lonelier in the world and my mission with his passing. I didn't expect to feel that way about someone I didn't know. I'm saddened. Many people have reached out to me since his passing. They want to start speaking up. People are galvanized. People are waking up. We will make something good from this evil.

An excerpt from the intro to Vaccines, Amen: Ever hear someone say, “I believe in cars” or “I believe in tools”? I cannot recall ever hearing anyone say they believe in a certain product. But I hear people say, “I believe in vaccines” all the time, especially in response to evidence regarding vaccines. The expression “I believe in vaccines” carries a truism. The properties often attributed to vaccines require faith. Belief. This is because most claims about vaccines are not grounded in evidence. They are beliefs. It is why challenging claims about vaccines—meaning challenging beliefs—often results in an emotional, not logical, reaction. This is also why wading into this topic is not for the faint of heart. Nor is it for anyone seeking to avoid controversy. Just the word “vaccines” evokes emotions for many. Falling Into Vaccine Law For this reason, among many others, I likely would have laughed if someone had told me eighteen years ago that I would be managing a law firm, with over 100 professionals, working on vaccine injury, exemptions, and policy. Back then, I was working on high-stakes, multi-billion-dollar lawsuits at one of the country’s premier law firms. Even after starting my own law firm over a decade ago, I continued to handle mostly high-stakes business litigation matters. Then, one fateful day, I learned something I could not unlearn: of all the corporations I was defending, I would likely never have to defend a pharmaceutical company against claims that children were seriously injured or killed by a vaccine. Why? Because in 1986, Congress granted these companies financial immunity for injuries caused by childhood vaccines in a law titled the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (the 1986 Act). I learned that, because of the 1986 Act, parents of seriously injured or deceased children must sue the federal government’s health department, instead of the company that profited from the product that harmed their children. From that one data point, my journey regarding vaccines began. What I have uncovered along the way has frequently been unbelievable. This journey, spanning over a decade of litigating vaccine lawsuits of all stripes across the country, has been unique. This is partly because, unlike doctors, who can appeal to their credentials, I do not get to just say, “trust me.” I need to prove claims I assert with real data. Real proof. Something that will hold up in court. Non-authoritative science will not do. Unreliable data will not do. This means my vaccine litigation work requires me to study the primary sources and carefully review and scrutinize the studies and data that support each claim. In the course of that legal work, I have worked with well over a hundred immunologists, infectious disease doctors, pediatricians, and other medical professionals. I have deposed these specialists as well, including the world’s leading vaccinologists. This work requires an understanding of vaccinology, immunology, infectious disease, and pediatrics, among other disciplines, with regard to these products. Want to talk about any other drug, medical procedure, etc.? I am not your man. But vaccines, those I know. Incredibly, most of the information needed to understand vaccine safety is freely available on federal government websites and public databases. Most doctors and parents never bother to look or don’t know it exists. Those who do know and look often learn things they cannot unlearn. Parents Who Do Not Vaccinate According to the CDC and public health authorities, parents who choose not to vaccinate their children are typically highly educated. CDC data reflect that half of American children are not fully vaccinated, and at least 1 in 88 toddlers in America are completely unvaccinated. Why would the parents of these children, constituting a large part of the nation’s brain trust, choose not to vaccinate their children? After all, parents who choose not to vaccinate are, as the CDC laments, typically very highly educated. They are often scientifically literate. Many are medical professionals. Leading scientists. What is it that they have learned or experienced that convinced them to forgo what many believe is the greatest medical achievement of all time? The answer, I have found, is that they often have had an experience which caused them to scratch below the surface of common conclusory statements about vaccines. They seek the substance that underpins these statements. What they then learn, they cannot unlearn. Cannot unsee. As an ardent vaccine promoter, Emily K. Brunson, MPH, PhD, explains about those who choose not to vaccinate: “I think we need to avoid the trap of thinking that information or knowledge is enough, because for a lot of the people, and when you look at hesitancy and parental vaccine hesitancy in the US, the group who is most likely to purposefully choose to not vaccinate are highly educated. In speaking with them, these are people who have read the primary literature themselves, and they’re correctly interpreting it, so it’s not a misunderstanding.” Keep in mind that for those who choose not to vaccinate, that choice often comes with serious consequences. Including expulsion from school. Exclusion from social circles. Being labeled anti-science or worse. It also requires overcoming powerful, almost crushing societal pressure to vaccinate one’s child, and rejecting the near-universal advice of public health agencies. Choosing not to vaccinate is not for the faint of heart and, in my experience, is rarely a decision made lightly. Meaning whatever these parents learned, it must have been powerful enough to overcome incredible social pressures and penalties. This also comports with my experience that in many cases, parents do not choose to not vaccinate. They choose to stop vaccinating. Their completely unvaccinated children often have an older sibling who is partially vaccinated. But, even among those with a personal experience, it is those who carefully investigate vaccine products who typically reach the conclusion to not vaccinate with sufficient intellectual rigor and confidence to overcome the powerful societal pressures and penalties of not vaccinating. Other than knowledge and experience, I have found that those choosing to not vaccinate hail from nearly every demographic, race, ethnicity, religion, and walk of life. They are scattered almost haphazardly across all verticals and horizontals of American life, with the only real predictive clustering being around those who use their intellect to research these products. Vaccine Zealots There is something else I found surprising in my journey regarding vaccines. The popular conception is that those who do not vaccinate are fanatics. Anti-science. Irrational. Emotional. Zealots. But my experience has generally been the opposite. To be sure, there are some who take issue with vaccines who meet the foregoing description. They are also the ones who can often be the loudest. But they are, in my experience, the very tiny but vocal tip of the iceberg. The remainder—submerged silently and quietly under the water, not wanting any publicity of any kind, and who do not dare speak their views in mixed company—make up the vast majority of those who choose not to vaccinate. These folks, as a group, are highly knowledgeable and educated about these products. They can speak rationally about them. They are typically science-literate and put that ability to good use in researching these products. They are far from zealots. They are just parents seeking to make good decisions for their children. As for parents who do vaccinate, almost all such parents I have met appear to have never really thought much about these products, nor have they viewed this as a decision to be made. They just go with the flow. They have never encountered any issue with their children that they have associated with vaccination. They often do what the media typically says good parents are expected to do—trust their doctors. That is not to say they do not hold orthodox views about vaccines, but those views are susceptible to change upon presentation of actual evidence. Then there is what I call the “Vaccines Amen” crowd. This is the group of parents, doctors, and public health professionals I have dealt with—a small army of them—who have a fervent belief in vaccines. This group is often impervious to reason or data, even when it is provided from their oracle, the CDC. This group attributes properties to one or more vaccines that simply do not exist. They overstate the benefits and cannot accept even official government data showing that many of their core beliefs regarding vaccines are false. When these beliefs are challenged, this crowd gets angry. They often entrench and, instead of addressing the evidence or accepting the clear reality, demand instead that everyone must adopt their beliefs. And for those who refuse to adopt their beliefs, they demand that the refusers be censored, have their rights taken away, and be mandated to be injected. This is the “Vaccines Amen” crowd. Let me put it this way: the fanatics are not those who choose not to vaccinate. The fanatics are those who think everyone must be vaccinated whether or not they want to engage in this medical procedure. Let me also state that I think most pediatricians, doctors, and public health authorities mean well. They believe they are engaging in God’s work. And that is often the problem that makes them blind to reality. The title of this book, Vaccines, Amen, comes from this ironic and strange reality I live in every day in which the so-called “antivaxxers” I encounter are often very knowledgeable about the primary sources underpinning the purported safety and efficacy of these products. They often can discuss the literature, pre- and post-licensure, calmly and rationally. They can certainly be upset that their child has been excluded from school, but they are not emotional about the actual products they have chosen not to give their child. Discussing those, these parents are rational. On the flip side, I have found the opposite to be the case among the Vaccines Amen crowd, including a significant proportion of medical professionals. When challenged about vaccines, they are often emotional about the products themselves. They lack an understanding of the pre- and post-licensure literature and much else about these products. They regurgitate canned answers they have never researched—essentially mantras. When these mantras are challenged with evidence, it causes cognitive dissonance that often results in anger or a similar emotional response, not a logical response. Most critically, their beliefs in these products persist despite clear, unequivocal evidence to the contrary. This is why I call them “beliefs”—because that is what they are. Choosing to vaccinate is an important decision that should not be made based on dogma. It should be based on evidence. And you are more likely to receive factual, evidence-based information about vaccines from someone who has been required to litigate and prove or disprove claims made about vaccines with evidence, than you will from someone who just repeats mantras about these products. It is also why the claims in this book are supported by citation to primary sources or reliable evidence. Parents will spend hours researching before choosing to buy or lease a car or a house. Stress over car seats and stroller purchases. Research which foods are healthiest. It similarly behooves all parents to give the same level of attention to understanding the dozens of products—and they are products—pharmaceutical companies and the CDC seek to inject into their children. Whatever you choose, let me suggest doing so from a place of knowledge. My Bias My personal ideological position regarding vaccines is that vaccines should not be mandated. Everyone should be able to get a vaccine, any vaccine, and get as many as they want. But civil and individual rights demand that no one should be coerced into receiving an unwanted medical product or procedure, including a vaccine. In fact, my rule of thumb is that the more a product needs to be coerced, the more one should be concerned about that product. Parents who make the often socially ostracizing, rights-crushing decision to not vaccinate often have a good reason. Yet, it is these same parents, and their children, who vaccine mandates adversely impact. Do some vaccines have potential benefits? Yes. Virtually every drug has some benefit. That is even true of most drugs withdrawn from the market due to serious safety or efficacy issues. That does not mean every drug makes sense for every person. It does not mean the potential benefits outweigh the risks. It does not mean that reasonable minds cannot differ on this calculus. They can. Some may choose a speculative benefit even where there is a known harm, and vice versa. The point is that there must be liberty to choose. The right to choose is certainly my bias, and I tried to keep that bias in mind as I drafted and presented the facts and information in this book. Meaning I sought to be as objective as possible. For that reason, and because there is skepticism regarding any statements made regarding vaccines, as noted, the proof to support each material assertion is included within this book. Now, I would love to jump into vaccine safety because it is probably the most interesting part of this book, but I know many cannot hear anything about vaccine safety without yelling or wanting to yell, “we must trust the experts!” or “we would all be dead without vaccines!” So, the first three parts of this book will address those claims before we get to vaccine safety in Part IV. With that—hold on tight. You are about to learn things you can never unlearn. Amazon: a.co/d/0iBcU60

I continue this week with deep sense of my helplessness overall. I turned to reading Marcus Aurelius: “If it is not right, do not do it, if it is not true, do not say it," and "Waste no more time arguing what a good man should be. Be one".