Brandon Rogers

11.9K posts

Brandon Rogers banner
Brandon Rogers

Brandon Rogers

@B_rogers8

#UGA 🐶 #Titans ⚔️ #Braves 🪓

Nashville, TN Katılım Ocak 2017
411 Takip Edilen199 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Brandon Rogers
Brandon Rogers@B_rogers8·
@BrooksAustinSI was gracious enough to give me the down-low on why he has been so successful in the world of Sports Journalism. Thanks for your time bro! I really enjoyed it! Interview with Brooks Austin youtu.be/voby9eLS3Q0 via @YouTube
YouTube video
YouTube
English
0
1
15
0
Brandon Rogers
Brandon Rogers@B_rogers8·
@azizkavish This is not even news. Spain and China have been trade partners for over 400 years Click bait posts are for the weak minded.
English
0
0
0
18
Kavish aziz
Kavish aziz@azizkavish·
At 2 pm 🇺🇸 Trump - I will cut off all trade and cooperation with Spain because of its refusal to support Israel. After 2 hours 😂 At 4 pm - 🇪🇦 Spanish Prime Minister arrived in China with a clear message to Trump, there is an alternative.
English
3.4K
20K
112.5K
3.3M
Brandon Rogers
Brandon Rogers@B_rogers8·
The Apostle Paul tells to speak up about Convictions but do it with Compassion. I’ve missed that second part so many times in my life…
English
0
0
0
5
DebateDave
DebateDave@DebatingDavid·
You’re not an idiot and I do t know everything. Invoking international law was idiotic BR lol sorry. 🤷‍♂️ just like arguing on the side of Saddam having WMDs is idiotic this far down the road. Those idiotic statements don’t make you an idiot at all. Again, I didn’t do this.. you’ve always look foolish making the argument you’re making. We can be fools. It’s not the worst thing man. We’ve all been foolish before and will be again.. the internet audience can decide for themselves what they think but if your comfy being public be comfy publicly defending your position even if I take a couple friendly jabs. It is all love. You know that.
English
1
0
0
27
DebateDave
DebateDave@DebatingDavid·
What’s international law say about aiding a country that’s committing a genocide. Since we are now going to act like international law isn’t fake af lmao Israel is invaded Leb the same way Russia did Ukraine… with our approval.. lol but hey iNtErNaTioNaL LaW SaYs lol 😂
Brandon Rogers@B_rogers8

@DebatingDavid @mattvanswol There’s been no confirmation they are going to charge a toll for the straight. International law prohibits it because it’s an international waterway. So unless the law is changed that’s not going to happen.

English
1
0
0
57
Brandon Rogers
Brandon Rogers@B_rogers8·
@DebatingDavid Cool. You’re right. I’m an idiot and you know everything. What was I thinking. Next time I try to make my friends look foolish in front of an audience, I’ll make sure they know it’s all love.
English
1
0
0
16
DebateDave
DebateDave@DebatingDavid·
Bro.. you brought up international law as a point for you like international law isn’t defied daily… lol What does international law say about kidnapping the leader of Venezuela. lol It’s not disrespect. It’s all in jest and good faith.. you’ve always been comfortable telling me if I’m doing something or saying something dumb and I wouldn’t get offended. You’ve taught me things before. It’s just my turn to teach you now brother. It’s all love. I promise.
English
1
0
0
19
Brandon Rogers
Brandon Rogers@B_rogers8·
@DebatingDavid @mattvanswol Personally, I wouldn’t want Iran and Russia working on Urainium together. Wouldn’t you rather have the Atomic Energy over seeing that rather than Russia? Which, I’ll pause and say that has been reported as a point. Not confirmed in negotiations yet.
English
1
0
0
20
DebateDave
DebateDave@DebatingDavid·
So let me get this straight… it’s your position that the new ayatollah.. that’s apart of the same oppressive regime.. who’s family we killed.. does not want “death to us” anymore? We will not hear about death to America anymore according to you? What a relief. lol Yes.. we are potentially sharing resources that *checks notes* we didn’t have to share before.. like passage through the SoH. Financial negotiations. lol I despise Obama.. Obama gave them 1.7 billion in cash and got them in the JCPOA which had them shipping out uranium to Russia for reprocessing and they stayed in that deal till *checks notes* Trump tore that deal up that had them under the nuclear threshold. Early numbers of this deal are 2 mil per tanker to Iran as a toll.. that’s roughly 280 mil a day.. that’s 500 bil in 5 years. THAT as a result would not be a good start. That’s again why I said, make the case we are better off from where we were before we launched the war. SoH was open and Iran wasn’t potentially tolling it.. lol
English
2
0
0
12
Matt Van Swol
Matt Van Swol@mattvanswol·
The most predictable script in American politics: >Trump does something strong >Democrats and the media freak out >Everything Trump did works >Everyone moves on >No one gives him credit Every. Single. Time.
English
2.8K
3.1K
19.4K
467.8K
Brandon Rogers
Brandon Rogers@B_rogers8·
@DebatingDavid @mattvanswol There’s been no confirmation they are going to charge a toll for the straight. International law prohibits it because it’s an international waterway. So unless the law is changed that’s not going to happen.
English
1
0
0
70
Brandon Rogers
Brandon Rogers@B_rogers8·
@DebatingDavid @mattvanswol We went materials to Iraq that had both civilian and military use. Not actual weapons. They were developed by the Iraqi government. They turned those into Mustard Gas, Sarin and Tabun. Then used it on their own people. By definition, these are WMDs.
English
1
0
0
13
DebateDave
DebateDave@DebatingDavid·
What was Saddam guilty of? Using chemical weapons (that we gave him) against his own people and invaded Kuwait (with our support). Lol Do you know anything about any of that? lol the whole pretense for going to war was *checks notes* WMD.. “can’t have a the warning be on the shape of a mushroom cloud” and all that jazz.
English
1
0
0
17
Brandon Rogers
Brandon Rogers@B_rogers8·
@DebatingDavid @mattvanswol Wanting death to us to talks of coexisting. Potentially even sharing resources, depending on how the final negotiations go. I’d look at that as a good start.
English
1
0
0
13
DebateDave
DebateDave@DebatingDavid·
BR.. it’s not a deflection. You asking me if he was good was a deflection from what I asked and I still addressed your point lol. Like.. that’s retarded bro. YOU answered with the deflection. Lmao The subject was making things up to be upset about.. YOU changed the subject to “was Saddam good or evil” Did we lie about WMDs or not.. lol silly ass. Haha. (It’s a rhetorical question). I’m actually not trying to win a debate. I’m pursing truth.. that’s why I’m fairing better lol we are friends. You know I mean this all in good faith. I even agreed with parts of what you said. It’s YOUR narrative of these world leaders being “good or bad” that wasn’t fitting. Lol You want to fr debate the topic? I’ll gladly eat your lunch dude. Let’s stay on topic then to avoid deflection accusations. Like I originally said, You’re correct, we have to wait and see what is actually agreed upon.. but you’d be really hard pressed to make a case we have came out better than before we launched the war. Especially if you look at what we stated the goal was day 1. Would you like to make the case?
English
2
0
0
21
Brandon Rogers
Brandon Rogers@B_rogers8·
@DebatingDavid @mattvanswol The original point was people constantly find things wrong with Trump. No matter what he does. Answering your last question, I think it’d be smart to see where the negotiations land to see if we are truly in a better place. The parts I’m relieved of, a regime went from…
English
0
0
0
12
Brandon Rogers
Brandon Rogers@B_rogers8·
@DebatingDavid @mattvanswol But to your point, no. But in my eyes there’s no one good. Everyone has their faults. Saddam was actually guilty of the things everyone said Trump wanted to do but you overlook that cause there was no WMDs? Please…
English
1
0
0
13
DebateDave
DebateDave@DebatingDavid·
Don’t do that. Is Trump a good person?We do business with bad men daily. Dont be foolish. I didn’t say they lied about him being good dude BR.. you will get eatin alive in that game so let’s not play the good guys vs bad guys. We fucking funded bin Laden.. arm Al Qaeda.. coup other countries. We fund terrorism just like everyone else.. Miss me with “is he good or evil” bro. That’s a losing battle for you my friend. I don’t see anyone other than the people who wanted us to annihilate Iran disappointed in a ceasefire. Then you have people like me, happy it’s over, and smart enough to evaluate “what did we accomplish”. The majority of the public don’t want this so the majority will be happy with a ceasefire. You’re correct, we have to wait and see what is actually agreed upon.. but you’d be really hard pressed to make a case we have came out better than before we launched the war. Especially if you look at what we stated the goal was day 1.
English
2
0
0
22
Brandon Rogers
Brandon Rogers@B_rogers8·
@DebatingDavid @mattvanswol Was Saddam evil person or a good person? There’s no clear win for anyone until negotiations have been completed. But in this case… to start immediately complaining about a ceasefire right after complaining about missiles being thrown by us seems…inconsistent
English
1
0
0
40
DebateDave
DebateDave@DebatingDavid·
Oh no… not you BR… lol You think people are just finding things to complain about? Is that how you feel about WMDs? lol people were just finding stuff to complain about when they said Saddam doesn’t have actually have WMDs. Lol I’ll ask you honestly.. will you point to the *win* here?
Drop Site@DropSiteNews

🚨 REPORT | Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, the Islamic Republic’s top security decision-making body, announced that “negotiations will begin with complete distrust of the American side on Friday, April 10, in Islamabad,” with 2 weeks allocated for talks to finalize the details of its 10-point demands and codify them into a binding UN Security Council resolution — which the Council says would make the agreements “binding international law.” The council released a statement Wednesday morning outlining what it claims are the terms America has accepted in principle, and what Iran is formally emphasizing. Trump, in a post on Truth social, wrote that Iran’s 10-point proposal constitutes “a workable basis on which to negotiate.” 💢 Here is what Iran’s Supreme National Security Council claims the U.S. has “fundamentally committed to”: 🔸 Guaranteeing non-aggression against Iran 🔸 Continued Iranian control over the Strait of Hormuz 🔸 Accepting Iranian uranium enrichment 🔸 Lifting all primary and secondary sanctions 🔸 Ending all UN Security Council and IAEA Board of Governors resolutions 🔸 Paying war reparations to Iran 🔸 Withdrawing all U.S. combat forces from the region 🔸 Halting the war on all resistance fronts, “including against the heroic Islamic resistance of Lebanon” (Hezbollah) 💢 Later in the text, the document states that Iran’s formal 10-point demands, submitted via Pakistan, “emphasized”: 🔸 Controlled Hormuz passage coordinated with Iran’s armed forces, which it notes would grant Iran a “unique economic and geopolitical position” 🔸 The “necessity to end the war” against all Resistance axis factions – fronts listed in the document include Lebanon, Iraq, Yemen, Palestine (occupied territories) – described as the “historic defeat of the child-killing Israeli regime’s aggression” 🔸 Full withdrawal of U.S. combat forces from “all bases and deployment points in the region” 🔸 The establishment of a Strait of Hormuz safe-passage protocol “guaranteeing Iran’s control according to the agreed protocol” 🔸 “Full compensation to Iran according to assessments” of war damage 🔸 Lifting of all primary and secondary sanctions, and resolutions of the IAEA Board of Governors and Security Council 🔸 Release of “all blocked Iranian assets abroad” 🔸 Finally, all the terms above codified in a “binding Security Council resolution” — which the document says would turn the agreements into “binding international law” and “an important diplomatic victory for the Iranian nation”​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ 📌 The Council states that if the “enemy’s battlefield submission” is not translated into a “decisive political achievement” in negotiations, Iran will resume fighting “until all demands of the Iranian nation are met” — adding: “our hands are on the trigger, and the moment the slightest error is made by the enemy, it will be answered with full force.“

English
1
0
0
33
Brandon Rogers
Brandon Rogers@B_rogers8·
@realnikohouse After sending all those missiles and taking out all that leadership….this is your thought? You’re hilarious.
English
0
0
0
7
Duopoly Destroyer
Duopoly Destroyer@realnikohouse·
I TOLD YALL TRUMP WAS GONNA BITCH OUT 🤣🤣🤣
English
696
655
12.9K
267.6K
Brandon Rogers retweetledi
Lee 🦅 🇺🇸
Lee 🦅 🇺🇸@leeeeee_1985·
Oh look liberals freaking out over Trump today. Just like every other day for the last 10 years. YAWNNNNNN
English
33
29
331
4K
Mike Sperrazza
Mike Sperrazza@MikeASperrazza·
What do the democrats want? They hate a ceasefire deal while also hating a war. Make up your mind.
English
19
8
61
1.6K
Brandon Rogers
Brandon Rogers@B_rogers8·
@RepRashida I can’t help but laugh when I see these posts. Played yall so hard. 😂😂
English
0
0
0
1
Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib
After bombing a school and massacring young girls, the war criminal in the White House is threatening genocide. It's time to invoke the 25th Amendment. This maniac should be removed from office.
Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib tweet media
English
6K
21K
75.5K
1.4M