Harrfun

we spend 10x compute to gain every 10 percent progress so All in pretrain scaling law can't stand financially. The golden age has gone,but it will hold on. Why?Because the knowledge is from pre trian,you still need more compute to make the model have the ability *for* resoning

Tip to all AI reporters: you're all following the coordinated misinformation campaign re PF, AI safety, Anthropic. I've been thinking about this.... Some is LTF, for sure, but.... A speculation: this is the first wave of the $100 MM "Innovation Council Action," the c4 praised by Sacks who is yet to show any public face. My guess - just that - is that some or maybe more than some of this laughable stuff is this new group's handiwork.

95% of the money in the AI “policy” space is aligned with CCP goals. But sure. Report on the other 5%.

@cattycatblk @AlexanderMcCoy4 Click on your homepage and you'll know that you're a bought bot

@AlexanderMcCoy4 China's government is not "very bad", you're in a US propaganda bubble.

I know everyone is focused on the primary point here, but I want to make a secondary point that it is extremely gross that American politics is awash with the absolutely unexamined idea that a country with one billion human beings advancing economically and technologically is inherently bad, suspect, and zero-sum to our own prosperity. China’s government is very bad but a lot of countries have very bad governments. OUR government is very bad!

@AlexanderMcCoy4 In other words, technological progress in East Asia has not brought a larger market and more spending power, but has brought more competitors to a pool and a smaller pool

@AlexanderMcCoy4 The truly untested view is to blindly believe that all technological advances are essentially the same. The technological progress of all East Asian countries is based on globalization, especially the opening of the US. This has led to decades of deindustrialization in the US

A post of mine on industrial policy from last July is having a second life, so let me rewrite it more clearly now that I have more experience with X. Can industrial policy work? Yes. The East Asian experience shows it can, at least partially. But its success rests on a key condition: labor control. Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan industrialized rapidly under authoritarian (e.g., Park’s South Korea) or semi-authoritarian regimes (e.g., Japan). Wages and labor rights were systematically repressed to favor capital accumulation and export competitiveness. This was especially stark in South Korea during the 1980s and 1990s, when unions clashed with the state and big business. China’s recent experience basically follows the same pattern. Authoritarianism in East Asia was not incidental to the success of industrial policy. It was functional. No labor repression, no successful industrial policy. Let me be careful about what I am NOT claiming: 1) I am not claiming labor repression is sufficient for industrial policy to succeed. You need many other ingredients. Best counterexample? Brazil under import substitution: labor repression, but without the other key pieces, such as aggressive export orientation. Labor repression is a necessary condition. If you do not get the difference between necessary and sufficient, you have more important priorities than reading about industrial policy. 2) I am not claiming the only path to growth is industrial policy. Many countries have grown without it, or with pretty lousy and ineffectual versions of it. Best example? Spain. 3) I am not saying labor repression means wages do not grow. It means they grow less than they otherwise would have. Think counterfactuals. 4) I am not saying democracies cannot repress labor. They sometimes do. It just happens far less often, and often less effectively. Continental Western Europe after WWII was not an example of industrial policy. France and, to some degree, Italy used some, but the mainstream view is that postwar growth was not driven by it. What many of these countries used was a form of “coordinated capitalism,” in which unions accepted slower wage growth in exchange for higher investment and faster growth. That has a flavor similar to my argument. As far as I can tell, there is no clean example of large-scale industrial policy that has succeeded without labor repression. Why so many people on the left are in love with industrial policy is a mystery to me. More generally, why so many people on the left admire China, given that its economic policy is 100% contrary to what they support (low taxes, little industrial regulation, little concern for the environment, labor repression, as little economic and political power to women and minorities as possible) is even more of a mystery except for some infantile contrarian positioning (“since this is not what The Economist like, I support it”) Alexander Gerschenkron made this point better than anyone. But it was also Marx’s point about “primitive accumulation,” and Stalin’s logic in the five-year plans, which were all about repressing labor (mostly agricultural, but to a lesser degree in manufacturing too). I am not going to praise Stalin in public, but he understood economics better than the average poster on X. Read Gerschenkron. Seriously. The original post: x.com/JesusFerna7026…

@yecheng641299 @yantanzhang 不是男的别烦，和她主动找男人有什么矛盾吗？她不希望男人主动来找她，看上的他自己会去找 这不很正常？

@yantanzhang 这种在dy，xhs见得多了，经典左右脑互搏，一边厌男一边看到洋人就跪着舔，实在让人恶心至极！

简介：男的别烦。 遇见白男：十指相扣。

@q9853610369511 @yantanzhang 急了指的是那些整天骂你妈了个逼的人吧😂不管喜欢帅哥就光明正大地喜欢 丑是你的事儿

@yantanzhang 评论区已经有马桶急了捏🥺🥺🥺

@lly142847 @yantanzhang 笑死，那还不是因为集帅一关注，广告投送商就纷纷撤退的原因？一堆男的关注，除了打不开的后台私信消息以外，没有任何经济上的好处

@yantanzhang 这种主页挂男的别烦男的滚男的关注发不了财一系列的婊子 都是最贱最骚的贱婢母狗

@htf200587 @ccc143375 @yantanzhang 不是男的别烦，和她主动找男人有什么矛盾吗？她不希望男人主动来找她，看上的他自己会去找 这不很正常？

@ccc143375 @yantanzhang 那就别打厌男标签，说白了不就歧视丑人嘛，有些事心里想想可以，说出来被骂了不也是活该吗？资本家剥削你，也不敢说自己是天经地义的吧？也得给你画一下饼吧

@mt816014323620 @yantanzhang 不是男的别烦，和她主动找男人有什么矛盾吗？她不希望男人主动来找她，看上的她自己会去找 这不很正常？

@yantanzhang 不想被骚扰完全可以关私信，主页加这个有啥用？不就是想给自己立个人设吗？喜欢好看的没问题，但是别又当又立，这边建议改成“丑男别烦”，就这还有龟男舔😂

@Michaelxi282 @yantanzhang 不是男的别烦，和她主动找男人有什么矛盾吗？她不希望男人主动来找她，看上的他自己会去找 这不很正常？

@yantanzhang 简介改一改，丑的别烦就行了…婊子还装逼

@Reagan_sks @huan_li20322 @yantanzhang 急了

@huan_li20322 @yantanzhang 你妈了个逼的

@polynoamial I hope so, But How about this?

After 100 million tokens, performance was still going up. What we're seeing here is not the capability ceiling. From the report: "Performance on TLO continues to scale with the amount of inference compute spent, and we have not yet observed a plateau with the best models."

@hairlesschest69 @pourteaux lol it's the future of 2000s

@pourteaux China is the future

new york city: - most cosmopolitan city in the world and it’s not even close - best culture in the world - best art, museums, fashion, food - top research hospitals - Mecca for capital markets - infrastructure of a Chinese Tier 4 city - also, best infrastructure in America

The Information: "Importantly, OpenAI’s recently-released GPT-5.2 isn’t based on the full-blown Garlic model, but rather, an early checkpoint of the model, according to a person with knowledge of the model, so we’ll likely see more improvement there still."

@SweetMelAZ @thewiggerofoz @kangminlee @gayguycandleco and you admit you are irrational bitch 😂😂😂

@BaFiyALaAz7271 @thewiggerofoz @kangminlee @gayguycandleco Also, you just admitted it 🙄🙄😂😂

😂😂😂 The most performative woman who ever lived.

@SweetMelAZ @thewiggerofoz @kangminlee @gayguycandleco look like a stupid hoe

@BaFiyALaAz7271 @thewiggerofoz @kangminlee @gayguycandleco That’s not even good English 😂😂

@BREAKINGNEWTZ @MrLeadslinger Supporting one thing morally does not mean having to do it yourself. The specific way to go depends on the actual conditions itself. It's as if the pro-poor leftists usually live in luxury apartments rather than slum kilns

@MrLeadslinger Mr. Leadslinger here in his own post is using a grill made in communist china while claiming to be an American patriot

Young socialist Mamdani supporter posing in fur coat and Chanel bag making fun of a woman for buying a Temu dress. Typical socialist behavior. Socialism for thee, not for me.

@Denicio If decolonization has to force everyone to live in a uglier world, then colonization is a good thing. Is this what you designed? Admitting that it is ugly is difficult for you

Sure, the Victorians were able to build monuments to house everyday utilities because they employed children in factories, went to war to sell drugs to foreigners, and murdered & pillaged across the world, but *but they had nice things* [dril tweet about drink-driving]