Seku

Ek mard ki mardangi usi din hi khatam ho jaati h jb vo Kuch lakh Dahej ke liye khud ko bech deta h✍️

Do you still want to get married ?

Dowry is like saying, “Pay me to marry your daughter.” Alimony is support after divorce if one partner is economically dependent or has sacrificed career, income, or time for the relationship/family. Dowry = illegal demand. Alimony = legal right. A fair statement is: I won’t take dowry, and I believe alimony should only be given when truly needed.

To determine the Rs 70 lakh figure, the court used a forward-looking calculation based on life expectancy. It noted that the wife is currently 32 years old and computed her likely financial needs for the next 38 years, using India’s average female life expectancy of around 70 years. Because she must rely solely on this capital and the returns it generates, the court held that the amount must protect her against inflation and help preserve the standard of living she experienced during the marriage. The dispute arose from a marriage solemnized in November 2019 under Hindu rites. Shortly after the wedding, the couple moved to Pune, where the husband worked as a senior software engineer. Their relationship soon deteriorated amid allegations made by both sides, eventually leading to a divorce. The husband claimed that from January 2020, his wife subjected him to mental harassment and filed false accusations involving alleged relationships with colleagues. He also stated that he suffered clinical depression and trauma due to threats from his wife and mother-in-law to falsely implicate him in dowry and sexual harassment cases, which led him to leave the marital home. In contrast, the wife alleged that her husband was involved in an adulterous relationship with a married woman in Pune and that he tried to force her into involvement with that woman’s husband. She further described him as being of loose character, alleging he had physical relationships with multiple women, and claimed he attempted to kill her causing her severe physical and mental distress. The husband filed for divorce in 2023 on grounds of cruelty, and the family court issued a divorce decree in 2024. advocate Ranjan Kumar Singh submitted that the appeal was filed because the original Rs 40 lakh alimony was allegedly excessive. He argued that the husband earns Rs 2.24 lakh per month, lives in rented accommodation in Pune, faces high expenses, and is responsible for supporting his aging parents therefore he could not set aside significant savings. After considering the submissions, the High Court concluded that the husband’s stable income was sufficient to support the enhanced alimony, emphasizing the wife’s right to live with dignity and reasonable comfort.

My husband can wear shorts and a ganji baniyan but only at home and behind closed doors with me. Outside, he should dress properly and modestly in front of family and society. It’s for his own safety. I won’t entertain arguments.

Maulana Sajid Rashidi: 🗣️ “Hindus are killing their children in the WOMB, that is why their population is decreasing. — In Islam, this is haram, so Muslims do not do this.” Another highly provocative population-related remark

OMG, do you know how much of a flex this is?? 😭

The internet has created a smart and informed class of people who bang their heads against walls for the fun of it instead of trying to find a door. The idea that women are somehow more evil cannot be the basis of all thought when trying to solve a problem that has the potential to affect half the Hindu population. The women who are targeted to be converted are targeted with very specific intent. These are not the strong independent types that “internet trads” rave against - these are women who have spent most of their time dependent upon family for the basics, with zero exposure to life beyond family dynamics that are built to keep them undereducated and definitely otherises them on the basis of gender. Their parents are hardworking but not as educated about religion and strife. Discussing excesses like maal-e-ghanimat and other excesses with someone not aware of basic Hindu wisdom, not practicing a sadhana, not allowed to socialise with Hindu men even as friends, constantly told about jaati in the same breath as religion is only going to find the claims of excesses of determined Islamists a tall tale. When she meets a Muslim man who is nice to her, all she will find is attention that is never offered to her within her family and no sign of the excesses they are associated with, making it easy to dismiss wholesale. Regular people do not understand or care for statistics, as is obvious with the discourse on even such platforms. It isn’t that there is no recourse. However, anyone thinking of it, even with the best of protective intentions, cannot afford to start with Hindu women as the problem. It is cowardly. No one in the intellectual classes addresses the jihadi first. It is so taken for granted that they just wish to foist that desensitisation upon anyone in the discourse. Thank goodness for the Bajrang Dal and Arya Samaji and other on-ground workers who provide tangible support. If one has to look outside, the Sikhs in the UK and elsewhere have regular discourses in their gurudwaras about grooming and immediately rehabilitate any victim. The discourses are very considerate of age and exposure. Not a single religious place or ashram has taken this up with volunteer pracharaks preaching to the regular populations at scale. Victim blaming is easy. It is not a solution.