fishyfishygumdrop

The best logical fallacy to give an atheist when discussing morals is to ask them why it's morally wrong to have intercourse with roadkill It's dead it will not feel anything, nobody will know and there are no victims If you ask a Christian or Buddhist why it's morally wrong, they will tell you it's because the body retains inherent dignity as part of God's creation (or the sacred flow of life), and desecrating it violates divine/natural order, harms your soul/karma, and shows disrespect, even if no one feels it or knows An atheistic worldview of this question taken to its extreme, concludes that intercourse with roadkill is tantamount to masturbation and nothing more

Very true honestly

My dog knows it's wrong to bite and even when he accidentally hurts me by jumping on me he immediately jumps into my lap to apologize because he knew it was wrong Is my dog a Christian?

Here's my insanely hot take. A 25yd zero is probably good enough for most close range applications, it's especially useful to use if you only have access to indoor ranges for zeroing. Now a 100yd zero is easier to remember and work with but not everyone has easy access to longer ranges. But you know what the real hot take is? Train with whatever zero you have. The best choice you can make is to pick one and learn it. Chasing min-maxes endlessly is an ouroboros of wasted time and money and this industry is full of people selling it.

They don’t make games like this anymore.

Richard Nixon in the crowd at Evil-Con in the Minion Movie

Parking enforcement is getting a heartwarming upgrade: in several U.S. communities—most notably Muncie, Indiana—police departments have allowed residents to settle certain parking tickets by donating cat food, kitten food, or litter to local animal shelters instead of paying cash fines. The Muncie Police Department launched this creative initiative (called "Citations for Supplies") as a short-term program. It was inspired by officers touring the Muncie Animal Care & Services Shelter, which was overwhelmed during peak "kitten season" and struggling to feed and care for more than 350 cats and kittens due to low supplies. Eligible violators with minor, non-moving parking violations could bring donations equivalent in value to their fine (e.g., up to $25 worth of supplies for a $25 ticket) to the Clerk's Office to clear the citation. The program ran for just a few days excluding serious violations like handicap parking or court-mandated ones. The response was overwhelmingly positive: donation rooms filled up quickly, and many people contributed even without tickets to clear—proving the idea sparked genuine community generosity beyond simple compliance. Similar short-term efforts have appeared in other places (including mentions of Michigan departments), turning routine fines into direct support for shelter animals and building goodwill between law enforcement and residents. This paws-itive approach shows how small, compassionate innovations can create win-win outcomes: clearing administrative backlogs while helping vulnerable pets and strengthening community ties.