Parth Bakare

Definite integrals - everyone's favourite high school math topic! I've compiled some crazy, thought-provoking questions in my 😎 DEFINITE INTEGRALS COLLECTION 💪 Get in-depth access to how I think 🧠 + idiotproof ways to avoid silly mistakes + much more! Link in comments 👇

@komal_42 Happy Birthday 🥳🥳🥳

it’s my birthday. I want a gift from you all. I want you to do a workout and dedicate it to me. It can be any form of movement. Strength training, run, yoga asana practice, dance, calisthenics.. whatever you want.

@AanchalXIV I do GHD single leg version right after seated leg curl, truly humbling for me 🙏

Hyperextension vs GHD - most people pick one randomly. Here’s how to actually choose 👇

@a_hahahahad 😂😂

@ambuj_2032 Crazy 🔥

@BakareParth nice unrelated but my calf is bigger than you 😗

i do this once a week on pull days [ using small wala barbell , gym doesnt have this machine ] but it gives crazy fatigue to lower back, i havent felt more muscle mind connection ever lol

@ambuj_2032 Wow 😮😮 I do something similar too

cc @BakareParth

@talksports45 Haha thanks 😂

@BakareParth Also none of your queries were silly, you are always free to question buddy.

Calculated Bradman peaks for the top 20 scorers (and Sir Don Bradman), in 80 consecutive test innings, which were the number of innings Sir Don Bradman, batted in his career. We then compare the average of the batsman, to the top 7 batsmen (position wise and both teams) in those games. The top 7 Avg doesn't include the batsmen's average here.

@talksports45 😁😁

@BakareParth Maybe I will try, just with the respective sides, like not including the top 7 of the other side, and see what results I get.

@talksports45 Thanks!

No not silly at all, in fact it's a good query, but someone's peak corresponds to maybe a better batting era. That's why I take both in consideration. Take Lara's example, his peak had a fair amount of high scoring games, though the players he batted alongside weren't that great, but that peak basically corresponds to an era, where the pitches were batting friendly.

Why won't we get a measure of the matches (if we use same team top 7)? If we consider same team top 7, we ensure the same set of opposition bowlers , and also ensure the same set of conditions. Like day 1 vs day 3 conditions can be different and other team batters may find it easier/harder to score. I'm new to understanding advanced stats, sorry if this sounds silly 😅

@BakareParth Then you won't exactly get a measure of the matches. Also Ponting's average in his 80 innings peak is actually higher than that of his contemporaries. Had he had an average in the late 60s or 60s, his ratio would have been a bit lower.

@AmanHasNoName_2 😂😂

@BakareParth Raina was 87(25) , Gayle was 83(25) , then hit 2 sixes to reach 95 (27) Still intact 😂😂

Aah had the chance to beat 87 off 25 but hardik didn't let him take strike

@AmanHasNoName_2 @himganj153 yeah same doubt 🤔

@himganj153 Is 2020 an outlier coz all matches were in UAE? Surprised, I remember Sharjah pitch was so dry and slow.

IPL pitches are giving lesser assistance for spinners as the years go on.

@ambuj_2032 @a_hahahahad 😢😢

@BakareParth @a_hahahahad aapki galti toh maine hi dhund di uncle 😆😆😆

discussed very interesting probability problem with a collegue in locker room of gym - n balls, n different colours. you draw a pair, and paint one ball with colour of other ball. what's expected number of steps to make all ball's color same.

As IPL has completed 18 years, here is an underrated memory and one my favourite moments 1. Rahul Chahar dropped Watson off his bowling - He just smiled. 2. Consoled QDK after his keeping error cost 4 byes Spoke volumes about his character and his calmness under pressure. ❤️

Understood, thanks! This aligns with what I heard recently on one of @ajarrodkimber's podcasts In the last few years, Kohli has been starting off quickly in the powerplay and then slows down a bit in the middle overs Like in the recent MI vs RCB match, he was 20* off 11 balls but reached his 50 in 37 balls

During first 15 balls of batters innings: Rohit: 669 runs / 479 balls (140 SR) Kohli: 896 runs / 583 balls (154 SR) On balls after the 15th ball of batters innings: Rohit: 498 runs / 329 balls ( 151 SR) Kohli: 1141 runs / 807 balls ( 141 SR) Overall SR is similar (you can add the above)

Lets break this down. Here's a chart of "strike rate" at "different numbers of balls faced" for Kohli and Rohit after 2023. Rohit doesn't "achieve Kohli's strike rate" in fewer balls. Rohit is actually much slower during the start of his innings. When is Rohit faster than Kohli? -- When Rohit lasts > 22 balls. But Rohit has only survived 22 balls in less than 40% of the matches since impact rule started. This number is more than 60% for Kohli. The start in the OP's tweet says "Rohit reaches Kohli's strike rate in 13 fewer balls" can be misleading, because the "total strike rate" is skewed by innings when Rohit played much more balls. When Rohit actually plays his average number of balls, he is not faster than Kohli.

@AmanHasNoName_2 Just looking at the graph, it seems unlikely that final strike rate (146-147) will be similar for both the players, given how ahead Kohli is till the 10 balls mark 🤔

Not trying to contest what you conclude, just want to understand the plot better x axis = no. of balls faced in an innings y axis 1 = mean strike rate after facing x balls in an innings y axis 2 = percentage of no. of innings where batter lasts >= x balls Is this correct? There's a stark difference between the batters around x = 0 Does that mean Kohli usually starts with boundaries and Rohit mostly plays dots during the first few balls?