Benjamin S

I think about this often:

@Matt18548209 @cbcwatcher That's the stupid thing that's been refuted.

@BenjaminiteMD @cbcwatcher There is no error If CSIS had evidence of MPs committing treason against Canada on behalf of China there would be charges. There are no charges because CSIS doesn't have the evidence for it

Maybe Supriya could listen to an actual former leader of the opposition about the security clearance red herring Mulcair "I would never have accepted to read it either. Never." "I would never want to be told that I can't ask all the questions I want of the government." Remember that old line about how Liberals “would of course line up all kinds of people to write op-eds saying that" to sell a story @ThomasMulcair

@Matt18548209 @cbcwatcher You keep repeating your error, and you don't dare try to address the correction.

@BenjaminiteMD @cbcwatcher It's ok, you can get help for your delusion. Just stay calm and make the call to a professional If CSIS had evidence of MPs committing treason against Canada on behalf of China there would be charges. There are no charges because CSIS doesn't have the evidence for it

@Matt18548209 @cbcwatcher Can't you read?

@Matt18548209 @cbcwatcher No. We've been over why that isn't a correct assumption. Seriously, this is evidence of your Brian being damaged, or more likely you being too proud to admit you're completely wrong.

@BenjaminiteMD @cbcwatcher Lmao We already went over this you have a damaged Wernicke's Area that's why you can't understand that if CSIS had evidence of MPs committing treason against Canada on behalf of China there would be charges. There are no charges because CSIS doesn't have the evidence for it

@CartoonsHateHer There's also the difference between natural breasts and implants.

Getting breast implants specifically to attract rich men is just not a sound strategy. In fact, breast size ranks low on the list *even of physical attributes* for men making over $200K, and they usually cite average/above average as the preferred size. cartoonshateher.com/p/she-told-wom…

A husband-hunting expert released a guide for how women can look sexier to find a rich, handsome husband--but it was light on proof. I have the proof to back up (and refute) some of her claims. Link in replies.

@Matt18548209 @cbcwatcher LOL!!! Now you're just saying you can't read.

@BenjaminiteMD @cbcwatcher There's no admissibility argument. If CSIS had evidence of MPs committing treason against Canada on behalf of China there would be charges. There are no charges because CSIS doesn't have the evidence for it

@Ruesavatar @iTheWolfman @avjohnsilver I can hear the silly sound effects.

@iTheWolfman @avjohnsilver Street fighter in dreamland

My daughters' sleeping positions change every time I see them; I never get tired of watching them 🤣

@Matt18548209 @cbcwatcher Why keep proving you can't address the argument about admissibililty? I already know it.

@BenjaminiteMD @cbcwatcher You will take L after L because of your paranoid delusion conspiracy theory that isn't true. If CSIS had evidence of MPs committing treason against Canada on behalf of China there would be charges. There are no charges because CSIS doesn't have the evidence for it

@Matt18548209 @cbcwatcher I see you can't address the issue of admissibility that destroys your argument. Big L.

@BenjaminiteMD @cbcwatcher Your conspiracy theory is a massive L, it's never proven to be true. It only exists in your imagination. if CSIS had evidence of MPs committing treason against Canada on behalf of China there would be charges. There are no charges because CSIS doesn't have the evidence for it

@Matt18548209 @cbcwatcher There very specifically was - it was the issue of admissibility. Refute that, or just take the L.

@BenjaminiteMD @cbcwatcher There was no debunking of the fact that if CSIS had evidence of MPs committing treason against Canada on behalf of China there would be charges. There are no charges because CSIS doesn't have the evidence for it

@RodKahx I love seeing you flail so hard.

Poilievre on Rogan is a personal farewell, not a comeback. Bye Pierre.

The appeal of polyamory, for many journalists, lies in the thought of having more than one guaranteed reader. x.com/KeithNHumphrey…

@funtomvids I love to see you flailing so hard.

🟥 WOW... This is the most awkward, CRINGIEST two minutes in the history of the political internet. 🤦🏻‍♂️ Pierre Poilievre, reduced to a gushing fanboy who finally meets his HERO, Joe Rogan... 😬 This clip alone is DISQUALIFYING – this guy is completely unfit to be the Leader of the Official Opposition in Canada, let alone Prime Minister of our proud nation! 🤷🏻‍♂️ Pierre is an embarrassing abomination and needs to resign as SOON as he sets foot back in Canada. He should be freed to pursue his obvious REAL passion – fitness videos. 🏋🏻‍♂️

@eris_nerung Even then, I'm surprised.

@BenjaminiteMD x.com/i/status/20348…

sometimes i remember being online at age 16 and concluding my life was as good as over because the consensus was that 15 was the absolute oldest a girl could be i suppose "hitting the wall at 30" is something of an improvement

@Matt18548209 @cbcwatcher No, that's specifically what has been debunked. If you want to try to address how it's been debunked, you can try. But you won't, because you can't.

@BenjaminiteMD @cbcwatcher It hasn't been debunked which we know is true because if CSIS had evidence of MPs committing treason against Canada on behalf of China there would be charges. There are no charges because CSIS doesn't have the evidence for it

@Matt18548209 @cbcwatcher Why are you repeating something so stupid? You can't address how that's been debunked over and over.

@BenjaminiteMD @cbcwatcher No it wasn't. The conspiracy is only real in your imaginary paranoid delusional world If CSIS had evidence of MPs committing treason against Canada on behalf of China there would be charges. There are no charges because CSIS doesn't have the evidence for it

@Matt18548209 @cbcwatcher Again. That's been debunked completely. What is wrong with you?

@BenjaminiteMD @cbcwatcher No it hasn't If CSIS had evidence of MPs committing treason against Canada on behalf of China there would be charges. There are no charges because CSIS doesn't have the evidence for it

@Matt18548209 @cbcwatcher No, the premise has been refuted over a dozen times. Liberals are pretty slow.

@BenjaminiteMD @cbcwatcher It's not false If CSIS had evidence of MPs committing treason against Canada on behalf of China there would be charges. There are no charges because CSIS doesn't have the evidence for it

@Matt18548209 @cbcwatcher As I literally just explained, that's clearly false. Take the L.

@BenjaminiteMD @cbcwatcher If CSIS had evidence of MPs committing treason against Canada on behalf of China there would be charges. There are no charges because CSIS doesn't have the evidence for it