@Tiggersdad2 @Malone_Wealth Weird you been screaming into the void non stop for three years yet all of a sudden you DGAF..🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
English
BAGGY Ben
19.3K posts
The reason frauds like @Malone_Wealth block me is because of how easy it is to point out how clueless they are. First off, owning synthetic shares is NOT owning the company. Next, options require margin. $GME doesn’t have enough cash for “control” regardless. Eating the pieces.
English
BAGGY Ben retweetledi
WOW! Massie right in the middle of the #MMTLP crime!
Yass, Thiel, Israel, Jane Street, Epstein, SIG
@annvandersteel
@EscanorReloaded
Michael A.M.E.@MindandEmotion7
Massie referring to his penis as "pinecone" is weird, but what he is doing covering for Wall Street corruption is criminal! Market Makers like Massie's biggest donor SIG, and where his daughter-in-law works, Jane Street, steal money every day from everyone that has a 401k or invests in the stock market through front-running and counterfeiting. They got more greedy and blatant with their crime and with the help of FINRA, the FIF and the SEC, Friday, December 9, 2022 and illegally halted the stock #MMTLP so that they wouldn't have to settle all the counterfeit shares they sold which pocketed them billion. In 2023 #MMTLP shareholders wrote a letter and ask senators and congressmen to sign it. Signing simply means they support a share count to be made to discover IF a crime occurred. Massie was well aware of this, and in December 2023 his fellow congresswoman Victoria Spartz signed the MMTLP letter. Even after dating someone he met through her advocacy for MMTLP, he still didn't sign the letter. Why?? It is because his biggest donor Jeff Yass' company SIG(the designated market maker for MMTLP) and the company his daughter-in-law works for Jane Street very likely sold the lion's share of counterfeit MMTLP shares. So Jeff Yas pays people like Thomas Massie to do what he can to prevent his crimes being exposed. Coincidentally those same companies have been attacking many other stocks like DJT media. This is currently being investigated as part of a RICO case. As Irony would have it, guess who else owned shares of the stock that would become MMTLP? Jeffrey Epstein. This is because shorted shares were not traceable, and Epstein and George Soros were using those shorted shares to launder money for the global black market, the same global black market we saw exposed in the Iran Contra affair. When there is an audited share count of MMTLP it will reveal exactly where that money went and the whole criminal network will be exposed!
English
@krassenstein How’s your stock portfolio..Nice having the goat back in ha Brian
English
Trump: "2% of the population creates 91% of the crime
FACT: This is true for US Presidents too. 2% of all presidents commit 100% of all the presidential crime.
English
BAGGY Ben retweetledi
👋👋BYE BYE HESTER PEIRCE🙉🙈
Hester Peirce is finally leaving the SEC.
Her term ended June 2025 but Commissioners can stay 18 months after their term expires.
In November 2026 Hester will teach at Regent University.
Do nothing Hester has failed to protect investors.
WE ARE VERY HAPPY TO SEE YOU GO 🥳🥳
English
BAGGY Ben retweetledi
@WallStreetJoke @SECPaulSAtkins @realDonaldTrump @SecScottBessent Finra is back posting on X..Maybe we could ask them..Nope they turned off the comments
x.com/FINRA/status/2…
FINRA@FINRA
Thank you @ChairmanSelig for sharing your perspective on key regulatory priorities and the financial services landscape at the 2026 FINRA Annual Conference. #FINRAAC
English
How did a dividend stock $MMTLP formerly $TRCH become tradable after the merger with Meta Materials when it had a 6 month freeze ?
3 months after the merger it traded... Who APPROVED the trading while FROZEN ⁉️
@SECPaulSAtkins @realDonaldTrump @SecScottBessent
🤬🤬🤬🤬
English
@politico @melmason Can't even imagine living here in L.A. that ANYONE LIBTARD or not, would vote for such a TERRIBLE, WORTHLESS person like KAREN DUMB ASS BASS. The Eaton & Palisades fires should be proof of that, then fixing the TEETH OF CRACK & METH HEADS on the taxpayer dime. UNBELIEVABLE LOSERS
English
@kshaughnessy2 The fact that no major News agencies or major financial journalists report this blatant financial corruption just proves we’re not a serious democracy..Billions are stolen daily “crickets”
English
These FINRA fines are a joke.
Pictet - $610,000 fine
Blue Ocean - $550,000
For $300 Million in transactions and more than $150 Million Shares.
FINRA never says what companies’ were impacted or by how much.
“According to FINRA, between February 2022 and March 2023, Pictet executed approximately US$300 million worth of transactions, involving over 150 million shares.
Those transactions included US$30 million in over-the-counter (OTC) securities — with more than 70% of these trades being executed through an affiliate’s omnibus account, which was used by some clients that were financial firms based in jurisdictions known for financial secrecy…..”
kristen shaughnessy@kshaughnessy2
Blue Ocean Trades Billions Overnight But Can’t Spot 270,000 Sketchy Orders? And a $550,000 Fine for Missing That Much Manipulation? Regulators waved the red flag on this suspicious trading pattern but didn’t say -Who placed the trades? -How many shares included in those 270,000 orders? -How much money was made off those trades? -Which companies/stocks/investors impacted?? “….One example indicates that a significant number of buy-side orders for the same security were placed within half a second or less of the previous order by the same subscriber at least 270,000 times between November 2023 and December 2024, which was not picked up by the firm. …” @Hamnakedshorts @FlyEaglesFly529
English
@udontknowjack99 @johnbrda I maybe wrong , but I believe the SEC, Finra and others want to come to the table..They just don’t want the full disclosure “share count”because this could have a ripple effect causing a mass exodus from US Markets..they want to pay minus exposing their crime
English
MMTLP
@johnbrda
John, can you please clear something up for the community. drew has repeatedly tried to use you agreeing with him/vouching for him in order to validate what he is saying at any given time.
Normally I'd be going on and on about how drew is a scumbag and a pathological liar etc etc, but I'm not going to do that.
I'm actually going to take a page out of his book and ask you, on behalf of a significant portion of the community, if you think he's right or wrong when he opens his trap and talks about not needing a sharecount and doing so in a condescending and patronizing way because he thinks he's smarter than he actually is. jorl shares his opinions because of course she does, she doesn't have any of her own. Well, at least none that aren't half-baked.
Considering you've said back in January of this year, (HEY drew, JANUARY OF THIS YEAR IS FIVE MONTHS AGO, WHICH IS SIGNIFICANTLY LESS THAN TWO YEARS AGO), that ANY resolution STARTS with a sharecount, will you please respond to this post and confirm whether or not you still hold this opinion or you agree with drew.
His M.O. is known to all of us by now, and your response here will make it impossible for him to yet again lie about what he's said or try to give Symone Biles a run for her money when in comes to (mental) gymnastics.
So, John, do you still believe that any resolution STARTS with a sharecount, or do you agree with drew that it is absolutely not necessary.
I'm hopeful that the engagement on this post will serve as proof that the community wants to know just as much as I do.
Please and thank you, sir.
English
BAGGY Ben retweetledi
Clip of SEC Chair Paul Atkins talking $MMTLP on Making Money with Charles Payne! Thank You @cvpayne!
English
@johnnaarintl @xanderhamilthon @SarioNiki @realDonaldTrump @FHFA @RepThomasMassie Rumors swirling that Massie’s daughter works at notorious criminal enterprise JANE STREET..Coincidence I think not
English
MEET WITH MMTLP INVESTORS! Veteran's, First Responders, teachers, honest hard working families that need HELP! 65K+ INVESTORS HAVE BEEN ASKING FOR OVER 3 YEARS FOR CONGRESSIONAL HELP!
CYNTHIA WEST
WAS ONE OF THOSE VULNERABLE INVESTORS ASKING FOR HELP!
@RepThomasMassie @MassieforKY did NOT help!
TRANSPARENCY FOR MMTLP!
MMTLPRESOURCES.COM
MMTLPSTUDIOS.COM
MMTLP.COM
@RepThomasMassie you're fired!
English
Hey @realDonaldTrump, the only people who have been bigger victims of a witch hunt than even you? The $fnma $fmcc shareholders. In 2008, a socialist @fhfa theft seized our assets, violated our rights, and robbed us for 17 years and counting.
English
@CGasparino Ah oh Chucky, could this be why you deleted all your MMTLP posts
x.com/palikaras/stat…
George Palikaras@palikaras
🚨Breaking news: 🦋 @Nasdaq just LOST its Motion to Quash. Read that again s l o w l y . . . The Bankruptcy Court in Nevada has now ordered Nasdaq to produce extensive $MMAT/TRCH trading data under Rule 2004, including RASH and CORE data, order attributes, cancellations, replaces, executions, and related transaction records covering nearly FOUR YEARS. The Court was NOT persuaded by the ‘undue burden’ argument, noting that producing ~15GB of spreadsheet data is not exactly impossible for… Nasdaq. (One $10 usb stick) Even more important, the Court explicitly recognized the Trustee’s AUTHORITY to investigate whether wrongdoing occurred on behalf of the estate, including potential claims tied to stock trading activity. Translation: This investigation is very much ALIVE. For months, some people mocked and undermined the Trustee’s efforts, claimed discovery would never happen, and acted like every subpoena didn’t get served initially and that it would be crushed before daylight. Instead, the wall keeps cracking. FINRA discovery. Now Nasdaq discovery. And the Court explicitly referenced separate pending motions involving Citadel, Virtu, and Anson. Interesting times ahead. Turns out Rule 2004 is not just a decorative suggestion. To the Trustee and legal teams, incredible respect. It takes courage to walk into rooms filled with institutions that have virtually unlimited resources and say: ‘Produce the data’ And to the echo chambers already warming up their spin machines tonight… You may want to read the actual order first. 🤝 Blessings to all.
English
My defense of Andrew Left from back in 2023. I cant tell you what a jury will decide now that he's on trial for stock manipulation, but the case is scary because it shows how short selling in of itself is being labeled a crime when the biggest rip offs occur on the long side with the pumping of stocks that turn out to be worthless nypost.com/2023/07/15/how…
English
BAGGY Ben retweetledi
$MMAT / $TRCH / $MMTLP 🦋
Case: In re Meta Materials Inc., Bankruptcy Court, District of Nevada
DOC: 2806
Date Entered: May 19, 2026
⚠️ Not Legal Advice
What happened in plain English:
🎣 Rule 2004 = Bankruptcy’s “fishing expedition” (yes, the judge basically says that)
The judge reiterated what he’s hinted at before: Rule 2004 discovery is VERY broad.
Translation:
A bankruptcy trustee gets wide latitude to investigate:
✅ what happened to the debtor
✅ possible wrongdoing
✅ transactions involving third parties
✅ whether there are claims worth bringing for the estate
This is not normal narrow civil discovery. It’s intentionally broad.
⸻
📉 Nasdaq’s argument: “This is too burdensome”
Nasdaq argued:
🛑 The trustee wants too much data
🛑 It would require custom/expert work
🛑 About 4 years of data is too much
🛑 Producing “order type” information would require creating special work product
🛑 Rule 2004 is being used as a pre-lawsuit litigation weapon
⸻
👨⚖️ Judge’s response: Not buying most of it
The judge was blunt.
Big takeaway quote:
“The court is not persuaded that in modern times, producing roughly fifteen gigabytes of data in spreadsheet form is unduly burdensome for any entity, let alone one as sophisticated as Nasdaq.”
That’s a pretty direct rejection. 💥
Translation:
“Nasdaq, you’re a major market operator. Don’t tell me 15GB is impossible.”
⸻
📂 Trustee’s clarification mattered
Judge noted trustee said:
❌ She is NOT asking Nasdaq to create a brand new custom “order type” field
✅ She IS asking Nasdaq to produce existing trade data and identify how order type can be determined from existing fields
That distinction appears to have helped.
⸻
🧱 Nasdaq’s Rule 45 procedural argument failed
Nasdaq argued the subpoena process was improper.
Judge said essentially:
❌ Nope.
Nevada bankruptcy local rules explicitly allow Rule 45 subpoenas in this context.
So that argument went nowhere.
⸻
🎯 Standing / scope argument also failed
Nasdaq argued:
“Third-party stock trades aren’t Meta’s property.”
Judge’s answer:
The trustee presented evidence Meta was issuing stock during the relevant time.
AND…
The trustee identified possible estate claims like:
💰 breach of fiduciary duty
💰 unjust enrichment
💰 professional malpractice
Meaning:
This isn’t just curiosity—it could directly affect the estate.
That makes Rule 2004 discovery appropriate.
⸻
🧠 Pre-litigation concern (Nasdaq had one valid point)
The judge acknowledged Nasdaq’s concern:
Rule 2004 cannot be abused just to get a free head start in litigation.
BUT…
He ultimately deferred to the trustee’s business judgment.
That’s important.
Translation:
“Yes, I see the concern—but I’m not stepping in here.”
⸻
👀 Prior production hurt Nasdaq’s credibility
This is a sneaky but important line.
Judge notes Nasdaq already produced 6 months of data previously.
Translation:
“If you already produced similar data, it’s harder to argue further production is impossible.” 💥
That undercuts Nasdaq’s burden argument significantly.
⸻
THE ACTUAL ORDER 📜
NASDAQ MUST PRODUCE BY JUNE 9, 2026 ⏰
Nasdaq must produce transaction data for:
✅ MMAT
✅ TRCH
Date range:
📅 September 21, 2020 → August 21, 2024
Including:
📊 RASH data /CORE data
📊 data dictionaries / all orders
📊 executions / cancellations
📊 replacements / order type modifiers
📊 order attributes
BUT:
❌ Nasdaq does NOT have to create a custom new “order type” field
⸻
Denied? “All other requests” in the subpoena package were denied w/out prejudice.
That means:
🚪 not necessarily dead forever
🚪 trustee may potentially narrow/repackage later
⸻
Practical takeaway 🦋
This is a meaningful trustee win.
Nasdaq fought production. Nasdaq lost the core fight.
The trustee gets a multi-year transactional dataset—exactly the kind of raw market data that can be used for forensic analysis.
The judge imposed guardrails, but the headline is clear:
Nasdaq must produce. 📈⚖️🦋
English
BAGGY Ben retweetledi
@nasdaq fought AGAINST transparency as hard as it could.
And LOST.
Just like @finra fought and lost.
Waiting for rulings on Citadel, Virtu and Anson Funds’ motions to quash.
What does all that trading data show that they are all fighting so hard not to show it???
“…The judge was blunt.
Big takeaway quote:
“The court is not persuaded that in modern times, producing roughly fifteen gigabytes of data in spreadsheet form is unduly burdensome for any entity, let alone one as sophisticated as Nasdaq.”…
NASDAQ MUST PRODUCE BY JUNE 9, 2026 ⏰
Nasdaq must produce transaction data for:
✅ MMAT
✅ TRCH
Date range:
📅 September 21, 2020 → August 21, 2024
Including:
📊 RASH data /CORE data
📊 data dictionaries / all orders
📊 executions / cancellations
📊 replacements / order type modifiers
📊 order attributes…”
- @kimkep4796
- @palikaras
KKep@kimkep4796
$MMAT / $TRCH / $MMTLP 🦋 Case: In re Meta Materials Inc., Bankruptcy Court, District of Nevada DOC: 2806 Date Entered: May 19, 2026 ⚠️ Not Legal Advice What happened in plain English: 🎣 Rule 2004 = Bankruptcy’s “fishing expedition” (yes, the judge basically says that) The judge reiterated what he’s hinted at before: Rule 2004 discovery is VERY broad. Translation: A bankruptcy trustee gets wide latitude to investigate: ✅ what happened to the debtor ✅ possible wrongdoing ✅ transactions involving third parties ✅ whether there are claims worth bringing for the estate This is not normal narrow civil discovery. It’s intentionally broad. ⸻ 📉 Nasdaq’s argument: “This is too burdensome” Nasdaq argued: 🛑 The trustee wants too much data 🛑 It would require custom/expert work 🛑 About 4 years of data is too much 🛑 Producing “order type” information would require creating special work product 🛑 Rule 2004 is being used as a pre-lawsuit litigation weapon ⸻ 👨⚖️ Judge’s response: Not buying most of it The judge was blunt. Big takeaway quote: “The court is not persuaded that in modern times, producing roughly fifteen gigabytes of data in spreadsheet form is unduly burdensome for any entity, let alone one as sophisticated as Nasdaq.” That’s a pretty direct rejection. 💥 Translation: “Nasdaq, you’re a major market operator. Don’t tell me 15GB is impossible.” ⸻ 📂 Trustee’s clarification mattered Judge noted trustee said: ❌ She is NOT asking Nasdaq to create a brand new custom “order type” field ✅ She IS asking Nasdaq to produce existing trade data and identify how order type can be determined from existing fields That distinction appears to have helped. ⸻ 🧱 Nasdaq’s Rule 45 procedural argument failed Nasdaq argued the subpoena process was improper. Judge said essentially: ❌ Nope. Nevada bankruptcy local rules explicitly allow Rule 45 subpoenas in this context. So that argument went nowhere. ⸻ 🎯 Standing / scope argument also failed Nasdaq argued: “Third-party stock trades aren’t Meta’s property.” Judge’s answer: The trustee presented evidence Meta was issuing stock during the relevant time. AND… The trustee identified possible estate claims like: 💰 breach of fiduciary duty 💰 unjust enrichment 💰 professional malpractice Meaning: This isn’t just curiosity—it could directly affect the estate. That makes Rule 2004 discovery appropriate. ⸻ 🧠 Pre-litigation concern (Nasdaq had one valid point) The judge acknowledged Nasdaq’s concern: Rule 2004 cannot be abused just to get a free head start in litigation. BUT… He ultimately deferred to the trustee’s business judgment. That’s important. Translation: “Yes, I see the concern—but I’m not stepping in here.” ⸻ 👀 Prior production hurt Nasdaq’s credibility This is a sneaky but important line. Judge notes Nasdaq already produced 6 months of data previously. Translation: “If you already produced similar data, it’s harder to argue further production is impossible.” 💥 That undercuts Nasdaq’s burden argument significantly. ⸻ THE ACTUAL ORDER 📜 NASDAQ MUST PRODUCE BY JUNE 9, 2026 ⏰ Nasdaq must produce transaction data for: ✅ MMAT ✅ TRCH Date range: 📅 September 21, 2020 → August 21, 2024 Including: 📊 RASH data /CORE data 📊 data dictionaries / all orders 📊 executions / cancellations 📊 replacements / order type modifiers 📊 order attributes BUT: ❌ Nasdaq does NOT have to create a custom new “order type” field ⸻ Denied? “All other requests” in the subpoena package were denied w/out prejudice. That means: 🚪 not necessarily dead forever 🚪 trustee may potentially narrow/repackage later ⸻ Practical takeaway 🦋 This is a meaningful trustee win. Nasdaq fought production. Nasdaq lost the core fight. The trustee gets a multi-year transactional dataset—exactly the kind of raw market data that can be used for forensic analysis. The judge imposed guardrails, but the headline is clear: Nasdaq must produce. 📈⚖️🦋
English
BAGGY Ben retweetledi
Have the MMs and spoofing algos finally met their worst frickin' nightmare?
Meet Professor Joshua Mitts, the Columbia Law data science weapon #NWBO just shielded from Citadel’s desperate subpoena.
This ain't some academic in an ivory tower. He’s the short sellers’ personal hell. Thread 👇
English
BAGGY Ben retweetledi
Mmtlp
MmtlpArmy has Dug for almost 4 years….damn near to China.
Handed So much Evidence to Congressional Representatives on a Silver Platter!Ohhh But 96% of them are Exactly like Hanky “We’ll See” Panky @SECPaulSAtkins ,
Turn a Blind Eye to Help
Wall St. and Fill Bank Accts
NWBOstacks@EatYerShorts
Have the MMs and spoofing algos finally met their worst frickin' nightmare? Meet Professor Joshua Mitts, the Columbia Law data science weapon #NWBO just shielded from Citadel’s desperate subpoena. This ain't some academic in an ivory tower. He’s the short sellers’ personal hell. Thread 👇
English
BAGGY Ben retweetledi
📣📣JUDGE IN MMAT MMTLP SAYS TRUSTEE IS WELL WITHIN HER RIGHTS TO DEMAND RECORDS AND INVESTIGATE 🌶🌶🔥🔥
The MMAT MMTLP Trustee is well with in her right to investigate potential Naked Short Selling and Market Manipulation Schemes.
Citadel, Virtu, Anson Fund, FINRA, DTCC and NASDAQ all tried to block discovery.
IF YOU DON'T HAVE ANYTHING TO HIDE DISCOVERY SHOULDN'T BE A PROBLEM 🤔🤔
English
BAGGY Ben retweetledi
The financial reset is happening.
There are many aspects to this reset:
1. Accountability in actual share counts.
2. Legal and financial title reconcilable in a court of law.
3. Real World Assets (RWA) are replacing financial instruments as people want to take delivery of “the real thing” versus trade the paper facsimile of said asset.
4. Commodities are rising while naked short selling of stocks are being exposed.
#MMTLP has stood in the gap exposed by the greed of the Wolves of Wall Street.
The below referenced lawsuit is the canary in the coal mine that will result in a seismic shift in accountability.
Investors will find faith renewed as Wall Street will no longer be able to trade and sell financial instruments/stocks they don’t own.
It’s all about tangible assets. Whether it be a stock like MMAT or an exchange like @abaxx_exchange , the world is waking up to the financial fraud perpetrated by the banking overlords whose system is collapsing while the business of RWA is rising.
The sun is rising and a new dawn is illuminating what’s real and what’s fake.
And the people who stood beside real will reap the rewards of their sacrifice and perseverance.
George Palikaras@palikaras
I know that @Maximus711474 actually reads documents. For those who do not, their dangerous and misleading commentary about the order is another signal of their ignorance and/or desperation to protect their patrons, while running their influencer/faked-shareholders-for-hire little business they are running for professional ambulance chasers. For the record: 1. The Court did NOT say MMTLP is “irrelevant”. In fact, the order references MMTLP multiple times. 2. The Court DID authorize BROAD production of #MMAT/TRCH trading data, including: -all orders -executions -cancellations -replaces -order attributes -RASH/CORE data across nearly FOUR YEARS which is extraordinary… Did you know? NASDAQ did NOT trade #MMTLP (which traded on the OTC), hence they do NOT have ANY MMTLP data to produce… you weird geniuses you! 🤣 3. The Court explicitly REJECTED Nasdaq’s “undue burden” argument and reaffirmed the Trustee’s broad Rule 2004 investigatory powers regarding potential wrongdoing.😎 4. Saying “everything else was quashed” is simply false. Nasdaq LOST the motion to quash in all MATERIAL respects related to the CORE trading data they control! 🦋 And finally, the Trustee is an independent fiduciary appointed by the Court. If the investigation had no merit, the subpoenas would NOT keep surviving judicial scrutiny. 🧐 speculation and opinions have exactly ZERO evidentiary value in court. Actual court orders do.
English
BAGGY Ben retweetledi
BIG courtroom win for $NWBO
The judge “quashed Citadel’s aggressive subpoena on Professor Joshua Mitts.”
Who is Joshua Mitts?
“The short sellers’ personal hell…
…Mitts is the godfather of exposing “Short and Distort” schemes.
He’s published brutal empirical takedowns on spoofing, layering, pseudonymous attacks, and manipulative options trading that create fake sell pressure.
He turns trading data into smoking guns. 👇 ..”
-@EatYerShorts
NWBOstacks@EatYerShorts
Have the MMs and spoofing algos finally met their worst frickin' nightmare? Meet Professor Joshua Mitts, the Columbia Law data science weapon #NWBO just shielded from Citadel’s desperate subpoena. This ain't some academic in an ivory tower. He’s the short sellers’ personal hell. Thread 👇
English