Bibigo

@wonnderfl_truth @kpajemu1 @Cool_Ustaz That’s still selective. The existence of a belief in a pagan culture does not prove the belief is false. Pre-Islamic pagans believed in jinn, yet you accept jinn as real. So why does the existence of a similar pagan belief in Greek texts automatically make fallen angels false?

@Bibigo61 @kpajemu1 @Cool_Ustaz Why are you trying so hard? Mythology = fake. If a religion contains mythology, that religion = fake.

The Quran states, “The sun and the moon move by precise calculation” (55:5), highlighting the order and accuracy present in the universe. More than 1400 years ago, this verse pointed to the precise system governing celestial bodies long before modern astronomy developed advanced methods for measuring planetary motion and orbital mechanics. Today, science confirms that the movements of the sun and moon follow exact mathematical patterns. Their positions, cycles, eclipses, and gravitational effects can be calculated with remarkable precision years in advance. The moon follows a regular orbit around the Earth, while the Earth revolves around the sun in a highly ordered system governed by physical laws. These precise calculations are used in calendars, navigation, space science, and predicting astronomical events. For many believers, the verse reflects the harmony and balance established in creation and encourages reflection on the perfection of the universe.

@wonnderfl_truth @kpajemu1 @Cool_Ustaz I never said Greek mythology was true. That’s not the point. U used hist. origin as a standard, then changed the criterion when it was applied consistently. That’s the double standard I pointed out. Do u apply the same historical-origin standard to all religions, or only to some?

@Bibigo61 @kpajemu1 @Cool_Ustaz Do I even need to say that Greek mythology is false? If you don't already know this, there's nothing more to say.

@wonnderfl_truth @kpajemu1 @Cool_Ustaz That hierarchy wasn’t stated when you used “Greek origin = false.” It appeared only after that argument failed. My point is about the shifting standard in the actual discussion, not a system you’re now redefining after the fact…

@Bibigo61 @kpajemu1 @Cool_Ustaz origin top category. revelation and mitogy subcriteria. It's that simple.

@realMaalouf Who would even value material things while in Gods immediate presence? 😵‍💫

A Muslim woman explains what Muslims will get in heaven: “Allah will reward men with 72 virgins. But women will be forever young and beautiful. We will live in gold palaces. Allah will give us silk clothes, diamonds, and slaves to serve us for eternity.” I have never seen a more materialistic and carnal religion.

@CuttingVoices @H1dd3nH4nd @unrealdawah @MasterMaliq You know, that the Mt fragment you bring up, is plagiarized in Sahih al-Bukhari 7281: The angels said: "Muhammad is a divider between the people."❓ Also, sure - God exactly knew, that Jesus sacrifice will force Satan to create an army aka ‘bring the sword’. Islam is that sword.

@H1dd3nH4nd @unrealdawah @MasterMaliq In the bible the word 'sword' is found 400-455 depending on translation. In the Quran, 0-1 depending on translation. The subject is the 'vicious advancement of Islam by sword' you say? Nice try, the bible is full sword killings and massacres. See Mathew 10:34.

"Islam spread by the sword" is one of the easiest lies to repeat. If it was forced, why did Christians and Jews survive, and even thrive, for centuries under Muslim rule? And explain Indonesia and Malaysia to me. No Arab armies. No conquest. Just traders. You don’t spread belief across oceans with a sword. You spread it through people, character, and trust.

@wonnderfl_truth @kpajemu1 @Cool_Ustaz You changed the criterion again. First origin mattered, now only revelation vs myth matters. That’s a shifting standard, not a response to the inconsistency I pointed out.

@Bibigo61 @kpajemu1 @Cool_Ustaz Hercules, Odin, Zeus mythology is not included in any prophet’s religious text. Claiming that it was obtained through revelation shows that the religion containing it is false.

@wonnderfl_truth @kpajemu1 @Cool_Ustaz You initially used historical origins as a reason to reject a belief, then abandoned that standard when it was applied to your own beliefs. Pivoting from a historical argument to a theological one just because you were caught in a contradiction is still, a double standard.

@Bibigo61 @kpajemu1 @Cool_Ustaz We do not reject supernatural beings because of their historical origins. We reject them because they are false and fabricated. For example, stories similar to Adam and Eve, or the creation of humans from clay, existed in ancient Chinese civilizations as well as in

@istheebirdreal2 @Xtopher_Uzo The Mass is a direct reenactment of the Last Supper. Every prayer we say comes from the Bible, and it is how the first Christians worshiped (ad. Letters of Justin Martyr 155 AD) "He is not the God of the dead, but of the living, for to God ALL OF THEM ARE ALIVE." Lk 20:38

@Bibigo61 @Xtopher_Uzo God is 100% not present in your pagan altars. That's why you continue praying to dead people😎

"The Catholic Church is occultic." "The Catholic Church is not biblical." "The Catholic Church worships idols." "The Catholic Church doesn't follow the Bible." "The Catholic Church This" "The Catholic Church That" Meanwhile Catholics every blessed day 😂:

@whpub @Xtopher_Uzo @fr_james1 Ch. 13 just means we don't burn animal sacrifices like pagans. Look at Ch. 66: Justin says the Eucharist is NOT common bread but the literal "flesh and blood of Jesus." In Dialogue with Trypho 41, he explicitly calls the Eucharist the "pure sacrifice" prophesied in Malachi.

No, not perfectly. He said the only acceptable sacrifice to God is to use His the fruits of His creation for ourselves and the poor: “we have been taught that the only honour that is worthy of Him is not to consume by fire what He has brought into being for our sustenance, but to use it for ourselves and those who need, and with gratitude to Him to offer thanks.” (First Apology 13) He didn’t think they were offering the body and blood of Christ as their one acceptable sacrifice. It was the tithe offering for the poor.

@istheebirdreal2 @Xtopher_Uzo Catholics bow toward the altar because the Bible says to bow before God's holy presence - just like the Israelites bowed toward the Temple altar. It’s a biblical sign of respect for God, not worship of an object.

@Xtopher_Uzo So Catholics bow before graven images and pray to dead people every single day? Thanks for reminding us 😎

@whpub @Xtopher_Uzo @fr_james1 The Mass is a direct reenactment of the Last Supper. Every prayer we say comes from the Bible, and it is how the first Christians worshiped. Letters from St. Justin Martyr (155 AD) prove their Sunday worship matches the structure of the Catholic Mass perfectly.

@Xtopher_Uzo @fr_james1 If I were to claim that Roman Catholicism is occultic, idolatrous and unbiblical (I do), then yes, that’s the video I would include as evidence.

Without lies, Islam dies.

@MasterMaliq @EvanEvans167 Then instead of questioning all the others, maybe use your reach by constantly condemning what’s wrong in Islam? It’s on you, Maliq.

@EvanEvans167 You’re turning extremists into the face of 2 billion people...Condemnation happens all the time, you’re just ignoring it because it doesn’t fit your point. That’s not truth, that’s selection bias.

Why am I the one who has to prove I’m peaceful? Why do I have to say "not all Muslims" every single time? I didn’t commit those crimes. I condemn them with my whole heart. So why am I still seen as the threat? I just want to live without explaining my existence to strangers who already decided I’m dangerous. Is that really too much? 😔💔

@elonmusk We must protect our Christian heritage at all cost!

Murderous migrants beheading innocent people in their home town is what’s making people angry, not “social media”!

@wonnderfl_truth @kpajemu1 @Cool_Ustaz Whether jinn exist or not isn’t the issue. My point is that you dismissed one supernatural belief because of its historical origins while accepting another with pre-Islamic origins. That’s a double standard.

@Bibigo61 @kpajemu1 @Cool_Ustaz Would you like to test whether they are myths or not? You'll have to bear the consequences of the results yourself. Yes or no?

THE CATHOLIC RULE OF LIFE I WISH SOMEONE HAD TAUGHT ME SOONER A few years ago, I thought becoming a better Catholic meant learning more. More theology. More apologetics. More books. More Catholic content. Those things are good. But I eventually discovered something surprising. Most saints did not become saints because they knew more. They became saints because they consistently did a few simple things every day. That realization changed how I view the spiritual life. So after studying Sacred Scripture, the Catechism, and the lives of the saints, I began noticing a pattern. Different saints. Different centuries. Different personalities. Yet they all built their lives around the same foundations. If someone asked me today: “How do I actually live like Jesus Christ every day?” This is the framework I would share. And honestly, it is the framework I am still trying to live myself. 1. GIVE GOD THE FIRST MOMENT OF YOUR DAY Before the notifications. Before the messages. Before the news. Before social media. Give God the first moment. Make the Sign of the Cross. Thank Him for another day. Offer everything to Him. The first voice you hear should not be the world. It should be God. 2. READ THE GOSPEL BEFORE YOU READ OPINIONS One verse. One paragraph. One chapter. Whatever you can manage. The point is simple: Let Christ shape your mind before the world shapes it for you. Many of us spend hours consuming information and only minutes receiving formation. That imbalance affects everything. 3. PROTECT THE STATE OF GRACE LIKE YOUR GREATEST TREASURE Because it is. The Church teaches that sanctifying grace is God's own life within the soul. Nothing on earth is worth losing that. Not success. Not money. Not pleasure. Not popularity. Go to Confession regularly. Take sin seriously. Take God's mercy even more seriously. 4. BUILD YOUR LIFE AROUND THE EUCHARIST The saints never got tired of speaking about the Eucharist. Neither should we. The closer they drew to Jesus in the Blessed Sacrament, the more they began to resemble Him. Sunday Mass is the minimum. Not the goal. If possible, attend daily Mass. Visit Jesus in Adoration. Stay after Communion. Speak to Him. Listen to Him. Remain with Him. 5. STOP LOOKING FOR HOLINESS IN EXTRAORDINARY THINGS Most holiness happens in ordinary moments. Being patient when you are tired. Forgiving when you would rather hold a grudge. Remaining kind when someone is difficult. Serving when nobody notices. The saints did not become saints because they did spectacular things every day. They became saints because they loved God in ordinary circumstances. 6. CARRY YOUR CROSS INSTEAD OF RUNNING FROM IT Every day brings a cross. A disappointment. A struggle. A wound. A sacrifice. A burden nobody else sees. Modern culture says: “Avoid suffering.” Jesus says: “Follow Me.” The difference is enormous. One path seeks comfort. The other seeks transformation.

@wonnderfl_truth @kpajemu1 @Cool_Ustaz Weren’t Jinns a concept from part of pre-Islamic pagan belief? Dismissing fallen angels as ‘myth’ while affirming Jinn as literal entities is completely selective and hypocritical.

@Bibigo61 @kpajemu1 @Cool_Ustaz Satan is a title, not a distinct species of being. There are two kinds of creatures with free will: humans and jinn. Those among them who advance in evil are called devils (shayatīn). In other words, there are human devils and jinn devils.

@RealShahriqKhan Quran is like that exam during which, one copied form a another; some truth is there, but it does not hold together.

When I was Muslim, I used to say the Bible was corrupted. It was my go-to. Anytime a Christian showed me something, I’d wave it off. “Your book’s been changed. The Quran came to correct it.” Then one day I decided to actually test that. Not with the Bible. With my own book. So let’s walk through Jonah. In order. The way the Quran tells it. Surah 37. Jonah runs from God. He boards the ship. They cast lots. He loses. The fish swallows him. He cries out and glorifies Allah. The fish spits him onto the shore, sick. A plant grows over him for shade. And THEN, verse 147: “We sent him to a hundred thousand people or more. And they believed.” You catch that? In the Quran, Jonah doesn’t get sent to Nineveh until AFTER the fish. The preaching, the people believing, it all comes last. End of story. But here’s where it fell apart for me. Go back to Surah 10, verse 98. There the Quran says the people of Jonah ALREADY believed. The punishment was ALREADY lifted off them. Done deal. So which is it? Did Nineveh believe before the fish, or after? And bro, you know what shook me? The Muslim scholars saw this problem too. Ibn Kathir. Maududi. They couldn’t reconcile the order. So they invented a fix. They said Jonah must have been sent twice. Once before the fish, where the people repented while he was gone. Then again after, to make it official. But the Quran never says that. It’s not in the text. They had to add it. They had to patch the timeline to make the story hold together. Now compare that to the book I called corrupted. In the Bible the order is clean and it never moves. Jonah runs. The fish swallows him. He’s spit out. He goes to Nineveh. He preaches. THEN they repent. And then Jonah sits on a hill, furious that God forgave them, and God grows a plant to teach him about mercy. Every piece in order. Cause, then effect. Nothing to patch. One book preserved the prophet at his worst and kept the sequence intact. The other sanded off the order, contradicted itself two chapters apart, and needed scholars 800 years later to rebuild the timeline by hand. That was the day it flipped for me. I spent years saying the Bible was the corrupted one. But the “corrupted book” is the one that keeps its story straight. And the “final correction” is the one that couldn’t. And when you see that, you’ll never be the same.

@RealShahriqKhan I live in Indonesia. People are taught to memorize Quran, using language they don't fully understand, and their religious knowledge comes primarily from teachers' interpretations rather than direct engagement with the text itself. It's about memorizing rather than understanding.

@SJKitFx @grahamroper33 @David_Y3 U just contradicted yourself. 1st you said Uthman acted 'to prevent corruption,' now you claim Allah preserves it 'no matter what.' If A.preserves it regardless, Uthman’s intervention was pointless. If humans had to burn texts to stop corruption, isn’t it a humanly managed book?

@Bibigo61 @grahamroper33 @David_Y3 This was a human decision as the Ummah grew but it did not violate 15:9. Allah would have preserved it no matter what, but the divisions between different dialects of the Ummah would have been real and potentially competitive.

The Qur'an is the only book in the world that challenges humanity by declaring that it is 100% from God and free from any error. Only Islam claims to be the one true religion. No other religious scripture in the world makes such a claim.