BillyRebel.ada

16.2K posts

BillyRebel.ada banner
BillyRebel.ada

BillyRebel.ada

@BillyCardano

Citizen of Cardano, America First Patriot, Information Warrior, Carnivore, Abolish Fiat, Anti-Deep State, Multipolar Peace 🇺🇲🤝🇨🇳🤝🇷🇺

Katılım Ekim 2022
1.7K Takip Edilen1.6K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
BillyRebel.ada
BillyRebel.ada@BillyCardano·
The world is dark enough, so don’t add to the shadows...
English
2
0
5
186
Science Magazine
Science Magazine@ScienceExpand·
The elasticity of a golf ball hitting a hard surface at 260km/h
English
93
214
5.5K
1.9M
Λrktos Journal
Λrktos Journal@ArktosJournal·
Pointing to, yes. But it is never an argument against heritability, especially on an aggregated group level. To deny the extreme relevance of heritability (which when analyzing groups under similar socioeconomic conditions grows to an incredibly relevant factor) is intellectual malfeasance. This is obviously a racist argument (hey, it's us), but it's also, and probably more importantly to you, a general fact about whatever group or societal situation you're analyzing.
English
1
0
0
25
Jean-François Gariépy 🧬
It doesn't matter. It doesn't matter that you don't know which genes are involved in squirrels eating nuts. You know they're eating nuts and you know it's because of their genes. You know that if you were to replace all of the squirrel's genes by spider genes, then they'd be weaving webs and eating insects. You know all of this despite not having a single clue what are the nut genes of the squirrel or the insect-eating genes of the spider.
English
1
6
64
904
BillyRebel.ada
BillyRebel.ada@BillyCardano·
@ArktosJournal @GassenMark30730 @JFGariepy @SadFuneralClown Since millions of people carry those same heritable traits and never commit a crime, biology alone cannot fully account for the action. It is the intersection of the two that matters, which is exactly why pointing to environmental factors is necessary, not babbling...
English
1
0
0
13
BillyRebel.ada
BillyRebel.ada@BillyCardano·
@ArktosJournal @GassenMark30730 @JFGariepy @SadFuneralClown The core issue is that a predisposition is a latent vulnerability, not a guaranteed outcome. If an environmental catalyst is required to turn a heritable trait into a specific action, then the environment isn't just background noise, it's potentially a critical causal factor.
English
2
0
0
19
BillyRebel.ada
BillyRebel.ada@BillyCardano·
@ArktosJournal @GassenMark30730 @JFGariepy @SadFuneralClown You're overindexing on genetics to explain a complex social and criminal outcome. Regardless if we accept that traits like low empathy, low-IQ or limited impulse control have heritable components, high heritability does not equal absolute behavioral determinism...
English
0
0
1
20
Λrktos Journal
Λrktos Journal@ArktosJournal·
@BillyCardano @GassenMark30730 @JFGariepy @SadFuneralClown That's not how it works when it comes to the genetic basis for complex behaviors. For a rapist in a modern society factors could include low intelligence, limited impulse control and low empathy. All of which are HIGHLY heritable (though not based on one gene each either).
English
2
0
2
46
BillyRebel.ada
BillyRebel.ada@BillyCardano·
@ArktosJournal @GassenMark30730 @JFGariepy @SadFuneralClown There are more potential factors at play than just those on a genealogical basis. If a rape gene indeed existed, wouldn't nearly all humans possess them, as we come from earlier humans who, at one generation or another, sexually reproduced using a forceful method like rape?
English
1
0
1
29
Λrktos Journal
Λrktos Journal@ArktosJournal·
And that would somehow be a more acceptable explanation than "more than a single gene"? Despite the fact that there are virtually always massive correlation between specific genes and various behaviours and conditionsn(correlations which automatically indicate causality, unlike environmental and socioeconomic "causes")?
English
1
0
0
39
Miguel Proulx
Miguel Proulx@miguelproulx·
@BillyCardano @GassenMark30730 @JFGariepy @SadFuneralClown Why do all libtards only believe in gene and darwinism for everything but humans. 10 species of canine, of cats, yet only one of humans Also "There isn't any bad Doberman only bad owners" right? "Statistic are racist' Get lost retard.
English
1
0
2
44
Elijah
Elijah@gpueater·
@BillyCardano @JFGariepy @SadFuneralClown I wouldn't say that there is a rejection of genetic determinism per se (only hard determinism), but instead that there are genetic factors/polygenic influences that result in a predisposition for criminal behavior or at least a rise in the risk for antisocial/criminal behavior.
English
2
0
0
25
BillyRebel.ada
BillyRebel.ada@BillyCardano·
@JFGariepy @SadFuneralClown And wouldn't we all have this supposed gene, considering our shared genealogical background of long-term evolution, having evolved from earlier humans who likely all engaged in forceful sexual reproduction at some point or another?
English
1
0
1
254
Jean-François Gariépy 🧬
@BillyCardano @SadFuneralClown Yes, there are genes for all of those things, because we all know if I was to change your genes for that of a squirrel, you wouldn't be raping human beings, using smartphones, or repairing a car. You'd be eating nuts. Therefore human genes cause human behaviors.
English
2
1
39
477