Billy Molasso, Ph.D.

1K posts

Billy Molasso, Ph.D. banner
Billy Molasso, Ph.D.

Billy Molasso, Ph.D.

@BillyMolasso

Senior Leader in Association Management ★ Exploring and Advocating for Early Childhood Literacy ★ Helping Struggling Readers Catch -Up ★ Let's Connect

Columbus, OH Katılım Ekim 2013
675 Takip Edilen767 Takipçiler
Karen Vaites
Karen Vaites@karenvaites·
This post is like a throwback to EduTwitter 2016. Half of my feed looked like this. Partly due to the many responses.
Doug Lemov@Doug_Lemov

Mini-white boards are great. I genuinely love them. But as with any means of participation, they have benefits and limitations and teachers should be aware of both and use accordingly. On the upside, they offer maximum observational efficiency. When everyone writes i can see the full data set—everyone’s answer—and when they hold them up I can scan and review with maximum speed. That’s a big win. Plus they feel low stakes to students and therefore low-risk… if it’s wrong I just erase it. Ideal for settings like retrieval practice. And when the routine is installed well they are fast and engaging. Some limitations to consider though. There’s a downslide to disposable writing that disappears. It’s harder to go back to it: to study and revise it later or to improve it. The answers are not in your notes! By the way we have a video of a chemistry teacher, Abi Mincer of Totteridge Academy in London who writes the answer on her smart board after students erase so there’s a list of the answers permanently visible. Love that. MWBs can also socialize hasty or even sloppy writing- with the sloppy referring to the production or to the thinking. The goal can easily become speed of response. The marker slips easily across the board and this just maybe makes it so that students don’t write as slowly and thoughtfully as they might on paper. Slow, deliberate thinking leads to careful word choice, the inclusion of new ideas and assists with encoding. MWBs can be a crutch. It’s an easy way to engage students. A bit easier than other also important ways to engage them such as cold call and stop and jot. That means there’s a risk of over relying on it. It’s a great tool for some situations. But a craftsperson needs lots of tools. I’m sure you can think of other benefits and limitations. Just wanted to share a few so that teachers are more likely to use a great tool for maximum gain.

English
3
0
15
4K
Billy Molasso, Ph.D. retweetledi
Literacy Council of North America
"The 'evidence-based literacy instruction aligned to the Science of Reading' that is described in the new federal Science of Reading Act – 2026 (H. R. 7890) is a political construct, not a scientific one." ow.ly/TKVw50YzbSv
English
0
4
3
182
Billy Molasso, Ph.D. retweetledi
Literacy Council of North America
In a decision issued by the Tenth District Court of Appeals of Ohio, the court affirmed LCNA’s standing in its lawsuit against Ohio’s unconstitutional literacy mandate, reversing the earlier dismissal and allowing the case to move forward. myliteracycouncil.org/lcna_wins_appe…
Literacy Council of North America tweet media
English
0
2
6
145
Billy Molasso, Ph.D. retweetledi
Literacy Council of North America
"The message to teachers was clear: adhere to the lesson scripts and structures as closely as possible... In our linguistically diverse context, this approach felt overwhelming, constraining, and, most troubling, disrespectful to struggling learners." ow.ly/ZepL50YxwJb
English
0
3
3
239
Judy Boksner
Judy Boksner@BoksnerJudy·
Kicking off March Madness with the LION OF READING! 🦁 The ONE THE ONLY Dr. Reid Lyon 🎉🎉🎉🎉 This episode is probably the most important one we recorded on The Literacy View! 🥳🥳🥳 Please share far and wide! 📢 #icon #literacy #education @FaithBorkowsky
Judy Boksner tweet media
English
1
1
2
214
Billy Molasso, Ph.D. retweetledi
Literacy Council of North America
Literacy Council of North America@mylitcouncil·
New National Reading Panel? Cool. Maybe this time we can include ALL the research, include veteran teachers, skip the “science of reading” hype machine, and ask who it’s actually helping. (Hint: not always kids.) 📚👀 Read more: nancyebailey.com/2026/02/19/a-n…
English
1
3
3
142
Billy Molasso, Ph.D.
Billy Molasso, Ph.D.@BillyMolasso·
@DanaPalubiak It’s because the change didn’t have the Impact they promised, so they need to save face. Still demonize the big three because that’s were the money competition comes from.
English
0
0
0
16
Dana Palubiak
Dana Palubiak@DanaPalubiak·
Something shifted in the reading wars this year. Same voices. Different tone. Suddenly… nuance. I’ve been trying to figure out why. Working on a piece about what changed.
English
3
1
2
93
Karen Vaites
Karen Vaites@karenvaites·
Hoo boy this comment on @ReadingShanahan's latest: "State mandates of specific techniques (e.g., OG, oral only phonemic awareness) mean that more kids are pushed through ineffective curricula and interventions. My own state legislature is eyeing mandated retention and advocacy groups are pushing hard on OG for all, including all kids in special education who have little hope of accessing the lessons. There’s no FDA of education and no accountability for the companies that push through ineffective programming. The situation is beyond frustrating and untenable and I don’t know how we fix it."
Karen Vaites tweet media
English
6
6
34
3.1K
Billy Molasso, Ph.D. retweetledi
Suzie rizzio
Suzie rizzio@Suzierizzo1·
ICE has been hanging around Logan Memorial Elementary School and when Community members started blowing their whistles to warn everyone this agent got upset,but obviously wasn’t in good enough shape to run and chase anyone!
English
171
1.3K
7.5K
203.5K
Laura Ingraham
Laura Ingraham@IngrahamAngle·
An avoidable BLUNDER — and DOJ knew it. “This was avoidable. DOJ should’ve had someone in the room with Lindsey Halligan — it would’ve taken away every argument for dismissal. She showed great courage and got an indictment despite being left without support.” — David Schoen
English
700
1.5K
6.3K
480.9K
Billy Molasso, Ph.D.
Billy Molasso, Ph.D.@BillyMolasso·
@rickwormeli2 How is that much different than using a scripted boxed curriculum? The struggle with content is important. AI and boxed programs both take that away. Looking forward to reading the substak.
English
1
0
2
43
Rick Wormeli
Rick Wormeli@rickwormeli2·
'A particularly important piece here by Carl Hendrick. In my experience working with teachers in this era of generative AI, a surprising number of them are out-sourcing the creation of lesson plans, assessments, feedback, grading, whole instructional design, and even what they know and can apply within their own disciplines to AI for the heavy lifting and sorting. This has created a noticeable and concerning decrease in their understanding of their own content as well as their intellectual and instructional agility, not only in their planning, but in the very moments of instruction with students: They are stumped or they deflect in the moments when an LLM's lesson plan meets the reality of messy, creative student thinking and inconsistent progress; teachable moments pass unaware. Educators here are avoiding the intense and professional engagement with subject content and effective instruction that leads to new clarity, insights, and teaching capacity, choosing instead to deliver generic recipes from indifferent probability models, which incidentally, often provide their responses based on the unattributed creative efforts of other educators. I completely understand the need to become expedient in our stressed-out educator world, but important elements so vital to successful teaching and learning are not only being lost, they are disparaged by those who never experienced them or who have succumbed to roads of least resistance. That resistance, that wrestling, is pedagogical oxygen, everyone, and we suffocate without it. 'Worth the read: Why ChatGPT for Teachers Might Make Things Worse open.substack.com/pub/carlhendri…
English
2
2
16
2.6K
Billy Molasso, Ph.D. retweetledi
Olivia Mullins
Olivia Mullins@oliviajune82·
I've been wanting to write a rebuttal to some of the knowledge-hesitancy arguments for a while. I disagree with much in this episode but it's a true treatment of the topic. My response is at this link. A link to the episode is in the next tweet. omullins.substack.com/p/on-knowledge…
Olivia Mullins tweet media
English
10
11
32
9.7K
Billy Molasso, Ph.D. retweetledi
Karen Vaites
Karen Vaites@karenvaites·
Yes, and… LETSs is 150 hours and expensive. Putting every teacher in a state through it is silly if more streamlined alternatives exist *for the theory part*. Smart states do the curriculum-specific training and the bigger-picture training on how kids learn to read. karenvaites.org/p/the-southern…
Karen Vaites tweet media
English
2
3
14
438
Jordan Adams
Jordan Adams@Jordan_C_Adams·
Most PD is worse than useless and teachers hate it. LETRS is actually very good on the science of reading research. But if it doesn't translate to practical steps teachers can use in the classroom, it won't make any difference. True of ALL PD.
Karen Vaites@karenvaites

“Dead LETRS”… @KataSolow’s WonkaThon entry had me at the title. We don’t have evidence that theory-only Professional Development improves outcomes. How do we get states to pivot? “The mandated PD (usually LETRS) is focused on theory and research. It is NOT connected to the curriculum that teachers are being required to adopt. It does NOT even directly relate to day-to-day instruction. In other words, what states are offering is NOT what most teachers are asking for.” @educationgadfly @MichaelPetrilli

English
1
1
8
1.1K