Jorge Pelaez | BSV COL

5.8K posts

Jorge Pelaez | BSV COL banner
Jorge Pelaez | BSV COL

Jorge Pelaez | BSV COL

@BitcoinSVCOL

Automation Eng. I promote the use and education of Bitcoin SV, on the way to humanity's 2.0 renaissance!. BSVA ambassador for Colombia.!

TX Katılım Kasım 2017
466 Takip Edilen1.6K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Jorge Pelaez | BSV COL
Jorge Pelaez | BSV COL@BitcoinSVCOL·
Take a look to this #Bitcoin OP_Codes Table and you will realize that no only #OP_CAT is disabled in #BTC. At the end of this year #BSV will fully restore the OpCodes with Chronicle update (including OP_VER, OP_VERIF, OP_VERNOTIF, OP_SUBSTR, OP_LEFT, OP_RIGHT, OP_2MUL and OP_2DIV), this will enable several new use cases and scripting functionalities. Imagine each Opcode as an element of the chemical periodic table, they are building blocks that allows nature to create molecules, RNA and DNA chains. Likewise, opcodes represent the building blocks for a scripting universe and future decentralized autonomous organizations with their own DNA codes.
Jorge Pelaez | BSV COL tweet media
BSV Blockchain@BSVBlockchain

The Chronicle Update will further align the BSV blockchain with the original Bitcoin protocol and removes the last remaining restrictions for developers building on the BSV blockchain. Learn about the details here. #BSVBlockchain #BSVChronicle

English
13
48
201
26.8K
Jorge Pelaez | BSV COL
Jorge Pelaez | BSV COL@BitcoinSVCOL·
Unpopular opinion: BRC100 wallets are ahead of their time—which is precisely why they aren't commercially viable yet. Perhaps by the next halving in 2028, the timing will be better; for now, they remain a misunderstood oddity. Keep building and try to not reuse Bitcoin address.
GIF
English
0
1
4
83
Jorge Pelaez | BSV COL retweetledi
S Tominaga (Aka Dr Craig Wright)
I have done many things wrong in my life; I have no need to pretend otherwise. But one charge even my most imaginative detractors cannot make stick is that I lacked balls. I stood up to a combined force involving Mark Zuckerberg, Jack Dorsey, and many of the largest players in the corrupt crypto industry. Not from the safety of a committee, not behind a chorus of anonymous cowards, and not with the soft little evasions of men who mistake popularity for principle. I took the blows openly. I was bloodied. I was dragged through the mud by people who confuse consensus with truth and wealth with virtue. And yet, here is the awkward fact they cannot quite digest: I am still standing. That, I suspect, is what irritates them most.
English
41
77
342
6.2K
Jorge Pelaez | BSV COL retweetledi
U.S. Senate Banking Committee GOP
Today, Chairman @SenatorTimScott led Banking Committee Republicans and Democrats in a historic bipartisan markup to advance to Clarity Act, legislation that will establish clear rules of the road for digital assets.
U.S. Senate Banking Committee GOP tweet media
English
74
355
1.4K
184.3K
Jorge Pelaez | BSV COL retweetledi
S Tominaga (Aka Dr Craig Wright)
Without nationality, democracy becomes a theatre in which the audience may clap, boo, or sulk, but never dismiss the actors. A nation is not merely a line on a map. It is a moral inheritance: language, law, memory, custom, obligation, humour, grievance, restraint, and the quiet knowledge that those who govern must eventually face those who are governed. That is why nationality matters. Not because every nation is perfect. Nations are not perfect. They are human things, and therefore full of dust, contradiction, bad poetry, and taxation. But they contain one indispensable political fact: accountability can be made personal. A French government may be removed by the French. A German government may be removed by the Germans. A British government may be thrown out by the British. But what does one do with a distant supranational authority that floats above the peoples it regulates? What ballot removes the whole structure? What election dismisses the machine? What vote says not merely “change the managers,” but “abolish the rule of this unaccountable arrangement over us”? There is the trick. Centralised power without national accountability does not become enlightened. It becomes insulated. It learns to call its preferences “values,” its commands “standards,” its failures “integration,” and its contempt for ordinary loyalties “progress.” It governs people whose affections it does not share, whose inherited customs it treats as embarrassments, whose borders it regards as administrative inconvenience, whose laws it subordinates to managerial abstraction, and whose dissent it explains away as ignorance, extremism, nostalgia, or insufficient education. This is not democracy enlarged. It is democracy diluted until only the label remains. A real political order must answer to a people. Not to humanity in the abstract. Not to a committee’s idea of civilisation. Not to a map coloured by bureaucrats. A people: particular, historical, recognisable, capable of loyalty, capable of shame, capable of throwing the scoundrels out. When rulers do not hold the values of the governed as sacred, they do not govern. They administer. And administration without affection becomes domination with better stationery. The danger is not merely tyranny. Tyranny at least has the vulgar honesty of a boot. The danger is a smiling despotism: polite, procedural, multilingual, endlessly consulted, never truly accountable. It does not smash the door in. It regulates the hinges, licenses the frame, harmonises the lock, and informs the owner that sovereignty was always a misunderstanding. Such systems cannot last. They erode loyalty because they offer no object worthy of it. They weaken law because law no longer feels like ours. They invite resentment because obedience without belonging is servitude. They create an empire of process over peoples who still remember they were once citizens. And when people can no longer correct power through legitimate political means, they will eventually seek correction through illegitimate ones. That is how centralised abstraction breeds collapse. Not because people hate order, but because they will not indefinitely endure an order that despises them. A nation gives democracy a home. Remove the home, and politics becomes either empire or riot. Usually, given enough time, both.
English
5
19
59
1.8K
Pac 🥒
Pac 🥒@PacArtCollect·
@BitcoinSVCOL @3dordi Yes the owner of the platform. I’m talking about all users publicly, this is a privacy issue.
English
1
0
0
35
Dordy
Dordy@3dordi·
Introducing a powerful new feature! Instantly export the address list of holders for any Ordinals (NFTs) Collection or BSV20/21 Token. Fast, simple, and built to elevate your workflow. Enjoy!
English
2
2
7
1.2K
Jorge Pelaez | BSV COL
Jorge Pelaez | BSV COL@BitcoinSVCOL·
@PacArtCollect @3dordi Zoide es una gran plataforma y respeto su mercado. Pero eso resulta inútil; puedo determinar la dirección completa de cualquier propietario de un Ordinal con muy poco esfuerzo. Con tan solo el ID del Ordinal, es posible descubrir todo su historial.
Español
1
0
0
49
Jorge Pelaez | BSV COL retweetledi
root
root@1rootSV·
Every block mined by GorillaPool mints a unique generative art piece as a 1Sat Ordinal in the payout tx - a deterministic SVG seeded from the block's data and rendered via an on-chain script. Rarity tiers range from common to legendary. gorillapool.io/bsv/gallery Learn more ... 🧵
root tweet media
English
6
4
24
1.4K
Jorge Pelaez | BSV COL retweetledi
Jorge Pelaez | BSV COL
Jorge Pelaez | BSV COL@BitcoinSVCOL·
Most of those who study Bitcoin and blockchain technology believe that they are the result of advancements in the exact, deterministic, and rigorous sciences—such as mathematics, game theory, cryptography, and computer science. However, they overlook the humanities, failing to realize that they have explored only half the story. Bitcoin is, in reality It is the pinnacle of all branches of human knowledge. a suspension bridge: anchored on one side by the exact sciences, it is supported on the other by the humanities—like philosophical currents, British law, england literature, economics, history, and the fundamental fact that we act in our own self-interest. If one studies only one side of the bridge, one might conclude that Satoshi Nakamoto was a team of three people. But if one examines human motivations and follows the threads that support this bridge, one will discover that the answer points to a single individual as the system's chief architect. A misplaced reference in the white paper [7][2][5] has nothing to do with science; it was a human preference regarding the establishment of the creator's identity— just as the selection of the number 21 million is in no way deterministic, but rather a fixation of preferences for certain numbers that also point to the identity fixation. 21M = [7]*[2]*[5]*3*10E13. Follow the clues, and you will find the initials of the person behind the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto.
English
2
3
17
607