Deflationary Degen

@SenAdamSchiff You're the biggest piece of shit to ever grace my knowledge

My thoughts go out to Tulsi Gabbard and her family, as her husband battles this serious health problem. I hope and pray that he makes a speedy and full recovery. While the circumstances around her departure are deserving of our sympathy, let’s be clear: Tulsi Gabbard’s only positive contribution to our nation's national security is her resignation. She politicized intelligence. She dismantled critical agencies keeping Americans safe. She weaponized the IC to pursue baseless election fraud claims. And more. We must ensure that her tenure — marked by a devotion to the person of the president and not to the security of the country — represents a terrible exception at DNI and not the new normal.

@XtraErudite @GBNEWS Not to mention the revenue we send to the federal government we'd get to keep, and also they literally try to sabotage our economy every chance they get. We've lost like 100billion plus is cancelled projects by the federal government. That's just new construction, not the revenue

@GBNEWS There's really no reason to become a state. They quite literally have all they'd require to be entirely independent & better off than over 150 countries currently are:

Canadian province to hold independence referendum - and could become a US state gbnews.com/news/world/alb…

@MarcNixon24 Keep blaming the fucking Americans and see how much more you drive that percentage up you bought n paid for clowns

WE HAVE A CRISIS Alberta separation is not just a fringe minority. This is why they’re freaking out right now. It’s a real thing.

@stickNblades @Leafsforeverrr @NHL_Muse She was definitely a whore trying to cash in, anyways here's a wall

@Leafsforeverrr @NHL_Muse So was OJ lol

Carter Hart has been an ABSOLUTE WALL in May 🤯🔥 Save percentage by game: .947 .969 .944 .826 .939 .926 .971 .957

@nationalpost Cause we're not fuckin retarded I guess

Poll reveals Gen Z Canadians are not boycotting U.S. travel. 61 per cent of Gen Z have the U.S. on their vacation itinerary this year, compared to just 14 per cent of Boomers nationalpost.com/news/canada/ge…

@Keir_Starmer You're fucked buddy, just get out of the way so someone can fix your mess you commie fuck

Net migration has fallen 82%. I promised to restore control to our borders. My government is delivering. I know there’s more to do, we’re introducing a skills-based migration system that rewards contribution and ends our reliance on cheap overseas workers.

@Sofia50020Sofia None of these twats could cut down a tree

Men, what’s preventing you from dressing like this?

@nationalpost Yeah really you fuckin retards?

NP Comment ✍️ Non-citizens in Canadian Forces struggling to 'treat women as their peers', report says nationalpost.com/opinion/jamie-…

@liberal_party You guys have ruined this country beyond repair, I hope you all get arrested once it collapses

Rent prices are down, salaries are up. We’re delivering on our plan to make life more affordable for Canadians.

@Keir_Starmer Lol

I’ll always champion peaceful protest. But the Unite the Kingdom march organisers are peddling hatred and division. We’ve already blocked visas for far-right agitators who want to come here to spew their extremist views. They don't speak for the decent, fair, respectful Britain I know.

Today’s ruling by Justice Leonard essentially found that the citizen-led independence petition process cannot proceed because the government did not fulfill certain constitutional responsibilities owed to First Nations. But here is the important point: the Alberta government did not initiate this petition process. Citizens did, through a lawful statutory mechanism created by the Legislature itself. So how does a court conclude that the government failed to fulfill duties that had not yet even arisen or been carried out, particularly when the government itself had not initiated the referendum process? It is also important to understand that the Alberta government has always had the ability to call a referendum on independence at any time if it chose to do so. That is not in dispute, and it was not the legal question before the Court in this case. Nothing in today’s ruling prevents the Alberta government from calling the very same referendum itself tomorrow. So think about that carefully. A citizen-led democratic process established by law is effectively halted, not because citizens failed to follow the legislated process, but because of obligations assigned to government itself. Yet the government retains the full ability to ask the same question directly. Courts and those in government must always have regard to the overall interests of justice, including democratic participation, the integrity of legislated statutory processes, and public confidence in lawful democratic frameworks established by the Legislature. I figured it would be appropriate to reflect on a few words from the Supreme Court of Canada: “…liberal democracy demands the free expression of political opinion” and political speech lies at the core of the Charter’s guarantee of freedom of expression. The Court further affirmed that freedom of expression includes “the right to attempt to persuade through peaceful interchange.” — Harper v. Canada The Supreme Court of Canada has also held that: “…the right of each citizen to participate in the political life of the country is one that is of fundamental importance in a free and democratic society.” — Figueroa v. Canada And in the Reference re Secession of Quebec, the Supreme Court of Canada recognized that democracy is grounded in the participation and democratic will of the people, and that a clear expression of the will of citizens carries constitutional and political significance that cannot simply be ignored. Specifically, the Court confirmed: “The democratic principle identified above would demand that considerable weight be given to a clear expression by the people of Quebec of their will to secede from Canada…” — Reference re Secession of Quebec So how does any of this truly reconcile with a situation where government itself can ask citizens a question through a referendum process, but a group of citizens following a lawful statutory process established by the Legislature is not permitted to ask the question? What message does that send when citizens engage in lawful democratic participation, comply with the very process created by government, and yet their voices are disregarded or treated as something to be feared? Democracy is not strengthened when lawful citizen participation is restrained or silenced. In this case, it was not government stopping the process, but the Court. That reality raises profound questions about the role institutions play in democratic participation and how citizen engagement is treated when it touches controversial political issues. After all, citizens do not hold institutional power. Their power is their voice. And if even that voice can be restrained after citizens lawfully engage in the exact democratic process created for them, what meaningful role are citizens truly left with in shaping the political future of their province and country? What do you think? Should lawful citizen participation be encouraged, even when institutions disagree with the message?

@Crisineh @4gottnHistory There was no steel then retard, they were using the copper Penny

@4gottnHistory Indeed, difficult but not impossible to process, even with tools belonging to the "technology" of those times. #TruthMatters x.com/i/status/20544…

Look closely at the features. The symmetry. The smooth contours around the eyes, mouth, and jawline. The subtle expression still preserved after thousands of years. This statue is made from Dolerite its harder than granite and incredibly difficult to shape, even with many modern tools. Yet somehow, ancient craftsmen were able to transform it into something that appears almost lifelike with bronze age tools.

@edmontonjournal Why tolerate it to begin with, clean it up. One of the most embarassing cities in the western world, shows how bad it is when you walk the streets of Europe at night. As bad as that is

'We will no longer be tolerant of what is happening on our streets': Edmonton Police's new approach to crime targets hotspots edmontonjournal.com/news/local-new…

@CTVNationalNews Hey buddy the police force in India will still let you do that

Winnipeg man denied opportunity to write police exam over ceremonial Sikh dagger ctvnews.ca/winnipeg/artic…

@katieporterca Fuckin retard

I’m Katie Porter and I approve this message.

@CTVNationalNews CTV propaganda network

Russia amplifying Alberta separatism debate to stoke division: study ctvnews.ca/canada/article…

@nenshi What in the sweet fuck are you even talking about

The UCP is raking in oil revenues while you're stuck choosing between a full tank and a full cart of groceries. That's a choice no family should face. Albertans deserve a break. Removing the provincial gas tax would help.

@thereallorilove You'd have to know she's hot, shes beautiful no matter if you're male or female

Guys, do you consider Megyn Kelly to be hot? I’m not hating, I think she’s pretty. I’m just curious about the male opinion on this matter.

@JCCFCanada Good, men shouldn't lead women's rights and men's rights

Woke academics are trying to recast renowned author J.K. Rowling as the villain of her own story, claiming her defence of women’s rights has “dethroned” her celebrity status. But while critics publish jargon-filled attacks, Rowling remains one of the world’s most influential authors, with a new Harry Potter series on the way and millions backing her stand for free speech and biological reality. nationalpost.com/opinion/amy-ha…

@JCCFCanada What're we doing in this fucking country

Columnist and author Barbara Kay has been targeted by notorious transgender activist Jessica Simpson over allegations of “misgendering.” Lawyers funded by the Justice Centre are assisting Ms. Kay, along with other high-profile Canadians who are now facing complaints before the BC Human Rights Tribunal. Read Ms. Kay’s account in her recent column: nationalpost.com/opinion/trans-…