Jay Jay

31.8K posts

Jay Jay banner
Jay Jay

Jay Jay

@BitsComplicated

Proud Dad. Agnostic atheist. Left leaning Independent. Science/Technology/Psychology/Philosophy. *We’re all story telling apes. **Satoshi is/was @CSTominaga

Katılım Ocak 2019
1.2K Takip Edilen1.6K Takipçiler
Jay Jay retweetledi
Siggi
Siggi@___siggi___·
We have made the full Grafana dashboard available with all the metrics captured during this test. You can access the metrics at: 1mtps.teranode.network username: viewer password: viewer More to come in the coming weeks...
English
3
11
88
2.6K
Jay Jay retweetledi
Siggi
Siggi@___siggi___·
We just concluded a scaling test with the latest version of Teranode, and averaged over 1.1 million transactions per second over a period of three days. #teranode #bsv
Siggi tweet media
English
34
136
417
44.5K
Jay Jay retweetledi
John Pitts
John Pitts@EquityDiamonds·
☢️ btc WARNING ☢️ btc (xbt) has been a complete disaster since an entity, whom only Novogratz and FinCEN know his name, moved $8 billion in ancient btc coins and sent them to Galaxy Digital who apparently sent them to Binance to be traded for US Treasuries “in kind”. Oh so you are trading and hopium-HODLing Jeffrey Epstein’s hijacked fork of Bitcoin called btc and thought you might have an advantage? The REAL players have much more info than you, and have the ability to trade on it (Binance) bc they’ve moved to locations with little to zero financial rules. don tRump (POTUS), FinCEN, and CZ at Binance (pardoned by tRump) all know exactly who the mover and shaker is, and you do not. $8bn is a huge sum of money to have in cash— only a handful of individual people have ever had that much cash at one time (billionaires typically have their wealth in assets like company ownership, various real estate, etc…). It’s probably the biggest FinCEN cash-movement KYC/AML job of all time. Who are the suspects? CZ himself (But how did he obtain such early and unmoved bitcoin since he came into bitcoin later?) Ross Ulbricht (supposedly 400k old bitcoin unaccounted for) Satoshi Nakamoto (definitely could’ve assembled that amount of bitcoin) The point here, tho, is you don’t know but tRump family can find out in a quick 80 second phone call to Andrea Gacki or @mikenovogratz. They not only know who done it but probably have the best idea on if more is coming. You don’t have what it takes to own btc— you don’t. But CZ, Novo, and tRump Mafia do. “Give unto Caesar what is Caesar’s” If I owned btc I would sell all of it today and never look at it again. The reason is because owning btc is like playing in a casino table with the worst odds— all the advantage is with the house. And I won’t even get into the illegal parts— where the “house” can cheat and create a “The Sting”-like facade around you (wash trading— see Jeffrey Epstein emails). You aren’t going to win. Excuse me for being the one to inform you but at least btc is still $60k while I’m highlighting what you don’t know Mr Financial Advisor and Mr Financial Investment Fund. btc is not a financial asset— it’s a rigged casino and you aren’t on the house’s team— you’re just an uninformed gambler.
Michael Green@profplum99

I confess I am intrigued by the growth in Lightning usage, albeit it’s being subsidized by Block. Would also note a positive divergence is building short-term. Bitcoin is dying, but not dead yet.

English
10
12
68
3.1K
Jay Jay retweetledi
BSV Association
BSV Association@BSVAssociation·
"We’re going to see governments take blockchain seriously." Compliance clarity is here - unlocking blockchain’s mainstream adoption. The organisations that build pilots now - with compliance, auditability and regulation in mind - will be best positioned when these frameworks land.
English
3
34
104
2.7K
Jay Jay
Jay Jay@BitsComplicated·
Far more accurate than not. Wasn’t just Epstein however. There are thousands of articles/videos with regards to Epstein/MIT/Digital Garage and Blockstream — and ultimately the ways in which Bitcoin’s original protocol was hijacked and altered.
Aaron Day@AaronRDay

JEFFREY EPSTEIN HIJACKED BITCOIN AND NO ONE IS TALKING ABOUT IT Jeffrey Epstein didn't just traffic people. He hijacked Bitcoin. We found it in the files. Exposed it on The Corbett Report today. Epstein funded the MIT developers who killed Bitcoin as peer-to-peer cash. His crypto advisor Brock Pierce ran the Bitcoin Foundation into the ground, then handed development funding to MIT where Epstein's money was explicitly earmarked for the core devs. We have the emails. Epstein invested in Blockstream, the company that only exists if Bitcoin stays throttled at 7 transactions per second. Then his money funded the developers who made that permanent. Pierce co-founded Tether. A University of Texas study found over 50% of Bitcoin's 2017 price pump came from unbacked Tether printing. The CFTC found only 27 cents backing every dollar of Tether. They manufactured the "digital gold" narrative with fake money. Tether has never passed an audit. Not once. No firm will even work with them. Then Howard Lutnick, Epstein's literal next door neighbor who lied under oath about their relationship, invested $600M in Tether through Cantor Fitzgerald. His firm now manages all of Tether's treasury reserves. Lutnick went from fundraising for Hillary Clinton to chairing Trump's transition team. He installed Bo Hines as White House crypto advisor. Together they pushed the Genius Act, which requires all stablecoins to be backed by US Treasuries, managed by Lutnick's firm. 10 days after the Genius Act passed, Hines quit the White House and became CEO of Tether's US subsidiary. The Genius Act is not crypto innovation. It is a backdoor CBDC that funds $3 trillion in additional government debt while making Lutnick's firm the biggest beneficiary. And there is something worse coming. The Clarity Act will tokenize everything you own. Your stocks, 401k, commodities, real estate. All programmable, trackable, seizeable. Combined with legal changes already made in all 50 states since 1994, when the next financial collapse hits, your assets transfer to the four largest banks with a click of a button. Every player is connected. Every move was coordinated. This is not Big Short 2.0. This is Big Short 2.0 on steroids, pre-planned and run by the same network that already owns the outcome.

English
0
0
2
77
Jay Jay
Jay Jay@BitsComplicated·
@BitcoinSensei4U @kurtwuckertjr Replies like these are why I just ignore Twitter these days. Read the whitepaper. Again. And then again. And then again. And again.
English
0
0
1
4
Bitcoin_Sensei
Bitcoin_Sensei@BitcoinSensei4U·
@kurtwuckertjr Wow, impressive. Your research is so deep that you don't understand the problem Bitcoin is solving. If you don't understand the problem, you can't value the solution either. Study Bitcoin
English
1
0
0
42
Jay Jay retweetledi
Kurt Wuckert Jr
Kurt Wuckert Jr@kurtwuckertjr·
The market cap of Bitcoin should be based on everything it disrupts. But let's ask the hard question: Over the last 17 years, how many people in finance, big tech, or anywhere in the real economy have lost their job because Bitcoin made them obsolete? That number approaches zero very closely. A multi-trillion dollar market cap has accrued, but it’s almost entirely based on the speculation that it might someday disrupt something or somebody. And it hasn't happened yet. We are looking at the ultimate speculation cycle. Watch the full episode here: youtube.com/live/k5vDoFA-P… 🎙️ JOIN THE AMA: I’m taking your toughest questions on Bitcoin, markets, and the future of tech every Tuesday at 2 PM EST on Kurt’s Podcast. 🔔 SUBSCRIBE: Join the community as we dig where others won't. 🌐 FULL RESEARCH: kurtwuckertjr.com.
YouTube video
YouTube
English
11
29
99
4.3K
Jay Jay
Jay Jay@BitsComplicated·
Still heartbreaking to see in 2026. 🤦‍♂️
Kristian Csepcsar@KristianCsep

🚨 JUST IN: this image was mined into block 938576 without OP_RETURN, showing Knots filtering does not prevent it. The transaction was included via MARA Slipstream. It was created by bitcoin developer Martin Habovstiak, who published a detailed research paper explaining exactly what he did and how anyone can verify it. RESEARCH TLDR 👇 His goal was to test if stricter filtering rules can actually stop arbitrary data from being embedded on-chain. Full research: KnotsLies(dot)com 🔗below WHAT THIS TRANSACTION SHOWS: • The image is stored contiguously inside a single transaction • No OP_RETURN was used • No Taproot was used • Consensus rules were followed • The transaction can be independently verified by anyone running a node His core argument: • Limiting OP_RETURN does not stop arbitrary data storage • Policy filters shift the data rather than remove the capability • If one encoding path is restricted, another can be engineered • Workarounds are practical, not theoretical SPAM OR WHACK-A-MOLE? I’m not a technical expert. But the more I read about all this, the more it feels like a whack-a-mole game. You close one door, someone finds another. I don’t like spam. I don’t like images embedded on-chain. But it doesn’t seem like there’s an effective way to fully stop it. What are your thoughts? - Full research: KnotsLies(dot)com 🔗below

English
0
0
1
66
Jay Jay
Jay Jay@BitsComplicated·
@kurtwuckertjr Happy 40th Big Kurt! Congratulations on surviving another revolution around the Sun! Stay healthy, stay happy and enjoy!
English
0
0
1
10
Jay Jay retweetledi
Kurt Wuckert Jr
Kurt Wuckert Jr@kurtwuckertjr·
The first picture, I was 21. I was a work-a-holic, and living in an abusive household, stressed to the max and trying to solve problems for people who couldn’t save themselves. Jiu-Jitsu started saving my life starting when I was 24, and my dearest friends in the church helped me get away from the toxicity. When I was 27, I met the love of my life, and we started a crazy journey together. Today is the last day of my 30’s. I will enter my 40’s tomorrow as a co-founder in 3 companies, a father of 3 children, husband of over ten years a Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu black belt and in the best shape of my life! I spent the day working on GorillaCloud™ and coding up a secret project and lifting weights at the gym. Tomorrow, I’ll mostly take a day off. God is good.
Kurt Wuckert Jr tweet mediaKurt Wuckert Jr tweet mediaKurt Wuckert Jr tweet media
English
60
9
226
4.3K
Jay Jay retweetledi
Jay Jay
Jay Jay@BitsComplicated·
Blockstream, Digital Garage Team Up to Foster Blockchain in Japan *Joi Eto / Jeffrey Epstein’s Digital Garage coindesk.com/blockstream-di…
Jay Jay tweet media
Deutsch
0
3
5
0
Jay Jay
Jay Jay@BitsComplicated·
@CsTominaga @extrax2030 Epstein was, in part, funded by Russia (indirectly by Putin himself). A honeypot, from gathering intel and “kompromat” on the most powerful, connected ppl in the West, to altering Bitcoin OG design into anonymity. Not Mossad. Also Ethereum, Vitalik, Russian Business Network.
English
5
0
2
263
S Tominaga (Aka Dr Craig Wright)
What I think is that the conclusion people are shocked by is the one I’ve been stating for years: the control mechanism was captured, and the crowd kept chanting “decentralised” as if repeating a word turns it into a fact. You don’t need melodrama to see the structure. When a small, identifiable group can decide what code is accepted, what “policy” is enforced, and what changes get merged, you have a chokepoint. Call it “open source” if it helps you sleep; the reality is governance by gatekeeping. As for the “Epstein files = Israel hijacked BTC” leap: that’s a claim, and claims require proof—full chain, provenance, context, verification, not a screenshot and a fever dream. But the underlying vulnerability—money and influence flowing into a tiny set of decision-makers—was visible a decade ago. Back in 2015, everyone with a microphone was bragging about how “easy” it was to raise money in BTC—Bitcoin and Dice culture, quick funding, no standards, no accountability. That’s exactly how you attract the wrong money and the wrong incentives: you make the system hospitable to anyone who can pay, and then you act surprised when they do. So yes: stop worshipping a myth. The lesson isn’t “boo, spooky cabal.” The lesson is: if you build a chokepoint, somebody will buy it—or capture it—and the rest will clap while insisting it’s “decentralised.”
English
18
61
245
5.1K
Jay Jay
Jay Jay@BitsComplicated·
Epstein Op was funded in part by Putin team. Honey pot. Included understanding how to change (anonymize) OG design of Bitcoin to obfuscate tx’s and move money. Before Bitcoin had a price it was used by UK/US #SigInt to trace the "Russian Business Network". 👉 @coffeebreak_YT
GIF
English
0
0
0
141
Jay Jay retweetledi
BSV Association
BSV Association@BSVAssociation·
Did you know that BSV can hold the daily transactions of the New York Stock exchange? Teranode’s 1M TPS transaction power is unlocking a world of innovative use-cases on BSV blockchain. Watch & find out how.
English
16
58
181
9.4K
Jay Jay retweetledi
Science girl
Science girl@sciencegirl·
Mesmerizing visuals reveal glutamate release at synapses The protein iGluSnFR3 lights up when it binds glutamate, making these signals visible
English
35
139
678
36K
Jay Jay retweetledi
S Tominaga (Aka Dr Craig Wright)
Peer as in Peer to Peer, properly understood, is not a compliment one pays to oneself; it is a condition one endures with others. A peer network presumes approximate equality: not in talent, not in virtue, but in function. When the function is shared, the participants can meet one another without metaphysical gymnastics, because each stands in the same relation to the system: same duty, same authority, same exposure to consequences. In the original design of Bitcoin, “peer” had that plain meaning. The participants were nodes that created: they validated what they received, assembled what they found legitimate, and—when able—produced blocks. Equality did not require identical hardware or identical luck; it required identical role. One did not exist as a decorative witness to other people’s work. One either carried the burden of producing the record or remained an observer outside the category that mattered. Section 5 (“Network”) is the austere heart of that conception. It describes a single pipeline, not a hierarchy of social castes: transactions are broadcast; nodes collect them; nodes work on a proof-of-work block; the first to find proof broadcasts; others accept it if valid; and they express acceptance by building on it. The prose is notably indifferent to theatre. It does not ask for “important” nodes, “special” nodes, or “pure” nodes; it asks for nodes that do the job. The point is not status. The point is that the record is made by those who assume the cost of making it. Two brief fragments capture the tone without the sermon. “New transactions are broadcast to all nodes.” “Nodes collect new transactions into a block.” “They express their acceptance… by working on creating the next block.” Those lines matter because they are not marketing; they are mechanics, and mechanics do not flatter anyone’s self-image. BTC, by contrast, has tried to preserve the prestige of the word “peer” while abandoning the equality that gave it meaning. A “peer,” one is told, can now be a range of things: one that creates blocks, one that merely relays, one that merely watches, one that performs ceremonial validation with no capacity to finalise anything. That is not a peer network; it is a network of unequal roles trying to share a single moral title. When roles diverge, authority diverges. When authority diverges, the claim of peerhood becomes a costume. Ayn Rand would recognise the manoeuvre at once: the appropriation of a noble term to cover an ignoble retreat from responsibility. The producer is burdened, the bystander is sanctified, and the word that once named a functional equal is stretched until it means “anyone who connects.” But equality is not achieved by redefining the word; it is achieved by sharing the task. If one party bears the cost of creating the record and another merely narrates, the relationship is not peer-to-peer; it is labour-to-commentary. And so the modern confusion is not technical; it is conceptual. “Peer” cannot be a sliding scale of convenience. Either the network is composed of participants who, in principle, can all perform the same essential act—creating the authoritative record—or it is a network of differentiated roles in which some produce and others merely posture. The first is intelligible. The second is a polite fiction, and polite fictions are the favourite refuge of people who want the credit without the burden.
English
22
31
117
5.7K