Biz

@brim006 Awful.

What’s it like living in this part of Minnesota?

@Rickisback_ON_X Perhaps their constituency supports them in this.

As a sitting member of Congress, refusing to appear for the SOTU Address should be cause for censure and a removal from office by the voters. No matter who the President is.

@Maerox @Daractenus Oh dear. It appears you failed to comprehend the video. Watch it again...... And this time try to use YOUR brain.

#1 It’s a crime scene, #2 he said “we have medics on scene”, #3 this woman is irate and hasn’t been verified or cleared to be a physician. To allow this irate unverified woman to touch the subject and the evidence would be tainting the scene. Furthermore, then woman clearly says “you just killed my neighbor.” So how is it she is already under the impression the woman is not alive so why should she be allowed to check the pulse? Use your brains people.

Doctor: "Can I go check her pulse?" ICE: "No! Back off! Now!" Doctor: "I'm a physician." ICE: "I don't care."

@PoolFeline @Shilohmarx @AAGDhillon So...... Just like the Epstein file shit show.

@Shilohmarx @AAGDhillon Buckle up. The fraud is at an epic scale, and they are backed into a corner. I expect nothing but massive shredding, burning, distracting, concealing, and bleach bit type behaviors

The U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division under @AAGDhillon has filed a motion to compel the State of Minnesota to produce federal election records. These records include: - the Minnesota statewide voter registration list; - each voter's name, date of birth, and address; and - as required by HAVA - the last four digits of the voter’s Social Security number or driver’s license/state identification number.

@DailyNorseman Define " Long-Term".

People want a long-term answer at quarterback without going through the development process it takes to get one. There are some things you can't speedrun. Sorry.

@KOC4COTY There's a reason why Bud Grant didn't play rookies.

Vikings fans are so insufferable. JJ has played four NFL games and half the fan base has already given up on him

@Nurse53093502 @redpillb0t Interesting topic for making your point. If there's one subject where the integrity of medical science has been put into question... it would be covid. It also pays to remember that not everybody advertises their credentials online. It does not mean they don't have them.

@BizMac88 @redpillb0t Ncbi,Pubmed are put out by NIH. The peer reviewers on the autopsy study were all antivax bullshitters. The organization received multiple complaints about the study, which only involved 75 handpicked autopsy reports.

There is no science that shows vaccines cause Autism Except in these published studies which show vaccines cause Autism: ▪️ ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P… ▪️ ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21623535 ▪️ ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25377033 ▪️ ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24995277 ▪️ ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12145534 ▪️ ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21058170 ▪️ ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22099159 ▪️ ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P… ▪️ ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17454560 ▪️ ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19106436 ▪️ ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P… ▪️ ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P… ▪️ ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21299355 ▪️ ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21907498 ▪️ ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11339848 ▪️ ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17674242 ▪️ ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21993250 ▪️ ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15780490 ▪️ ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12933322 ▪️ ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16870260 ▪️ ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19043938 ▪️ ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12142947 ▪️ ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24675092

@Nurse53093502 @redpillb0t Were any of the links in the original post that you responded to, removed as illegitimate? Because if not, what is your point?

@BizMac88 @redpillb0t I don’t cite studies that have been removed as illegitimate. I don’t cite illegitimate studies. Why would you? All of the rebuttals by the science community to this study are available. Google 🤷‍♀️

@Nurse53093502 @redpillb0t What I'm getting from this And the other article you posted, is that the lancet needs to look at their peer review process. What point were you trying to make?

@BizMac88 @redpillb0t It was, they removed and scrubbed, as did many others. thelibertybeacon.com/breaking-news-…

@Nurse53093502 @redpillb0t But you do cite studies from there yourself, yes? So are you a hypocrite or just an opportunistic cherry picker? Because it appears that you are trying to downplay the legitimacy of this scientific practice or perhaps..... you're just critical of the scientists.

@BizMac88 @redpillb0t The quality has been questioned, and studies have been removed. Here’s one from the site itself retracting a fraudulent study. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC81…

@Nurse53093502 @redpillb0t That looks like a preprint. Not peer-reviewed . Unlikely that it was ever on ncbi but feel free to prove me wrong.

@BizMac88 @redpillb0t Here’s another that turned up on ncbi & was removed. factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.34…

@Nurse53093502 @redpillb0t It's a library of peer-reviewed and published studies. Do you seriously mean to question the quality?

@redpillb0t Ncbi is a library of both truth and fiction.

@lsferguson @MissBeck12 @JagicMan Clearly you are profiling your fellow shoppers. Using what criteria? ........ Or do you just look over their shoulder when they're paying? That's a two-way street, Junior.

@MissBeck12 @JagicMan Correct. Look in the carts. All brand names and choice cuts of meats. That's in no way right

If SNAP disappeared, grocery store prices would plummet

@shelbytweten @lonzosburner How many years did cousins get to prove he "couldn't win a playoff game"?

@lonzosburner The reason we got rid of Cousins is because he “couldn’t win a play off game” so the same logic should apply for Darnold. I’m talking about the CONSISTENCY we lost.

Everyone wanted to talk soooo much shit about Cousins & my thing was ALWAYS at least he was consistent & if he leaves, we go back to QB roulette. Look at us now, the worst we’ve been since before him. Embarrassing.

@thevivafrei @fordnation Misrepresented? Not even a little. But for sure point your finger at the cost as a distraction from the truth. They buy it every time. reaganlibrary.gov/archives/speec… And just in case you find reading the transcript challenging 👇 youtu.be/5t5QK03KXPc?si…

Is anyone going to ask @fordnation how that stupid ad misrepresenting what Ronald Reagan said cost… $75 million? I had to double check, because I thought it was a mistake. $75,000,000. Hey Doug, how the hell did that ad cost $75 million? Launder money much?

@thorku I blame free agency.

I’ve been a Vikings fan for 41 years. 4 decades of disappointment and mule-kicks to the groin. This is up there with the most pathetic no-shows of my lifetime.

@rthrash3 @SecKennedy For anyone who read this far.... " The gold standard" that was mentioned by the other guy are randomized controlled trials or RCTs. There were no RCTs done on pregnant women or infants using acetaminophen prior to FDA approval...... Likely for ethical reasons.

@rthrash3 @SecKennedy You didn't answer my question about the scientific relevance of the peer review process while bashing scientists who have successfully published using that exact process. Your reactive "context" is mixed messaging. And yet..... You accuse me of being the biased one. Okay.

As usual, the mainstream media attacks me for something I didn’t say in order to distract from the truth of what I did say. At yesterday’s Cabinet meeting, I said: “There are two studies that show children who are circumcised early have double the rate of autism, and it’s highly likely because they’re given Tylenol.” An August 2025 Preprints.org review by Patel et al. directly validates my point that the observed autism correlation in circumcised boys is best explained by acetaminophen exposure, not circumcision itself. Newsweek reflected my comments most accurately. USA Today partially reported what I said but used misleading framing. New York Post distorted it completely with its headline, implying I said circumcision causes autism. So once again, MSM chooses to character assassinate me instead of educating Americans by digging into the science. The paper I was referring to identifies the 2015 Danish circumcision study as “the most compelling ‘standalone’ evidence that acetaminophen triggers autism in susceptible babies and children.” It presents a mechanistic model showing that acetaminophen acts in combination with oxidative stress to cause neurodevelopmental injury. The study’s authors call the evidence “overwhelming” and argue the precautionary principle demands avoiding acetaminophen during pregnancy and early infancy, precisely echoing my public warning. In short, the preprint provides a rigorous scientific framework that substantiates my interpretation: the risk stems from acetaminophen use in infants, not from circumcision itself. SOURCE: preprints.org/manuscript/202…

The Bobby Kennedy video Meta doesn’t want you to see, narrated by Woody Harrelson.

@rthrash3 @SecKennedy So researchers with poor histories successfully get through peer-review and published....Or is it just THESE researchers? And.. What exactly are you saying about the scientific significance of the peer-review process? The difference between us is I've read the paper, you didn't.

Researchers are biased with poor history of prior publication quality. Preprint is the equivalent of saying “I have dirt I will reveal later” which doesn’t amount to jack squat until it does. Preprint is great if presented at a scientific meeting for open questioning and scrutiny which this didn’t do either. Are you saying you read this low N preprint toilet paper and found something worthy in it? Let’s hear it.