BlessedOne.eth

$eth is grinding up LFG BABBYYY

The current state of smite game mean I get vulcan adcs and sylvanus solos, and people think its ok

@SMITEGame 530pm on a saturday and this is the game im getting. This is awful man

He who buys every dip will eventually discover there are many dips. ~ Sun Tzu

$Eth is slowly grinding up. Slowly then all at once

UNDEFEATED.

Just be a perma bull and you’ll sleep so much better at night

Holy shit eth is up 8% LFGGG

Why are you, as a man, checking your long term portfolio every day?

We are going to 10-20x from these prices. I bet my entire life, 10yrs worth of research & entire net worth on this moment. I’m warning you that life changing wealth is about to come. The market isn’t dead, people are just impatient. Wealth flows from the impatient to the patient. Understand that, and you beat 95% of investors. You all deserve what’s about to happen. I’ve done this for 10 years. I don’t watch charts, I watch people. I wait for the moment everyone gives up. That’s when I go heavy. And when I do, I’ll post it here because I want us to win together. The opportunity of a lifetime is coming. Many people will regret not following me sooner.

You can literally 6-7x your money by buying eth here and doing nothing Some might think I’m retarded for saying this and I am but it’s true

alright nvm we're poor again

Now, the quantum resistance roadmap. Today, four things in Ethereum are quantum-vulnerable: * consensus-layer BLS signatures * data availability (KZG commitments+proofs) * EOA signatures (ECDSA) * Application-layer ZK proofs (KZG or groth16) We can tackle these step by step: ## Consensus-layer signatures Lean consensus includes fully replacing BLS signatures with hash-based signatures (some variant of Winternitz), and using STARKs to do aggregation. Before lean finality, we stand a good chance of getting the Lean available chain. This also involves hash-based signatures, but there are much fewer signatures (eg. 256-1024 per slot), so we do not need STARKs for aggregation. One important thing upstream of this is choosing the hash function. This may be "Ethereum's last hash function", so it's important to choose wisely. Conventional hashes are too slow, and the most aggressive forms of Poseidon have taken hits on their security analysis recently. Likely options are: * Poseidon2 plus extra rounds, potentially non-arithmetic layers (eg. Monolith) mixed in * Poseidon1 (the older version of Poseidon, not vulnerable to any of the recent attacks on Poseidon2, but 2x slower) * BLAKE3 or similar (take the most efficient conventional hash we know) ## Data availability Today, we rely pretty heavily on KZG for erasure coding. We could move to STARKs, but this has two problems: 1. If we want to do 2D DAS, then our current setup for this relies on the "linearity" property of KZG commitments; with STARKs we don't have that. However, our current thinking is that it should be sufficient given our scale targets to just max out 1D DAS (ie. PeerDAS). Ethereum is taking a more conservative posture, it's not trying to be a high-scale data layer for the world. 2. We need proofs that erasure coded blobs are correctly constructed. KZG does this "for free". STARKs can substitute, but a STARK is ... bigger than a blob. So you need recursive starks (though there's also alternative techniques, that have their own tradeoffs). This is okay, but the logistics of this get harder if you want to support distributed blob selection. Summary: it's manageable, but there's a lot of engineering work to do. ## EOA signatures Here, the answer is clear: we add native AA (see eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8141 ), so that we get first-class accounts that can use any signature algorithm. However, to make this work, we also need quantum-resistant signature algorithms to actually be viable. ECDSA signature verification costs 3000 gas. Quantum-resistant signatures are ... much much larger and heavier to verify. We know of quantum-resistant hash-based signatures that are in the ~200k gas range to verify. We also know of lattice-based quantum-resistant signatures. Today, these are extremely inefficient to verify. However, there is work on vectorized math precompiles, that let you perform operations (+, *, %, dot product, also NTT / butterfly permutations) that are at the core of lattice math, and also STARKs. This could greatly reduce the gas cost of lattice-based signatures to a similar range, and potentially go even lower. The long-term fix is protocol-layer recursive signature and proof aggregation, which could reduce these gas overheads to near-zero. ## Proofs Today, a ZK-SNARK costs ~300-500k gas. A quantum-resistant STARK is more like 10m gas. The latter is unacceptable for privacy protocols, L2s, and other users of proofs. The solution again is protocol-layer recursive signature and proof aggregation. So let's talk about what this is. In EIP-8141, transactions have the ability to include a "validation frame", during which signature verifications and similar operations are supposed to happen. Validation frames cannot access the outside world, they can only look at their calldata and return a value, and nothing else can look at their calldata. This is designed so that it's possible to replace any validation frame (and its calldata) with a STARK that verifies it (potentially a single STARK for all the validation frames in a block). This way, a block could "contain" a thousand validation frames, each of which contains either a 3 kB signature or even a 256 kB proof, but that 3-256 MB (and the computation needed to verify it) would never come onchain. Instead, it would all get replaced by a proof verifying that the computation is correct. Potentially, this proving does not even need to be done by the block builder. Instead, I envision that it happens at mempool layer: every 500ms, each node could pass along the new valid transactions that it has seen, along with a proof verifying that they are all valid (including having validation frames that match their stated effects). The overhead is static: only one proof per 500ms. Here's a post where I talk about this: ethresear.ch/t/recursive-st… firefly.social/post/farcaster…

if you fell for the “ViTaliK iS SeLLInG FuD” then you are retarded he proactively announced weeks ago that he would be selling some tokens to fund critical future network development. i.e., he’s giving all of it away to invest in future capability development FOR ETHEREUM and transparently has like 95% of his personal wealth stored onchain, on Ethereum, in ETH while almost every other Foundation and founder in the space LARPs, dumps on your head every day, and you have no fucking idea because you don’t know what their wallet address is gg wp

the last 50 people left on ct are about to get insanely wealthy together

Chat $eth is up 13% on the day

@btc_charlie No manipulation

Genuine q. What fuels the next crypto bull run?

I always see posts of @VitalikButerin selling $eth but why are we not also mentioning that these are scheduled and publicly announced sales. He literally states the purpose of every single sell

And there it is: Jane Street was behind the 2022 crypto winter, destroying Terraform by first depegging the token and destroying the ecosystem, then pretending it would rescue Terra, while effectively it was soaking up what little value remained.

Calm reminder that $eth touched $5k with Jane street manipulation. I wonder what’s going to happen now