BlueMoose56

3.7K posts

BlueMoose56 banner
BlueMoose56

BlueMoose56

@BlueMoose576595

Individual liberty, limited government, America first, private property, and personal autonomy. Never forget what the communists did to us during Covid.

Utah, USA Katılım Şubat 2025
191 Takip Edilen90 Takipçiler
BlueMoose56
BlueMoose56@BlueMoose576595·
@JarretW @charise_lee Next you'll be very surprised to learn that elected representatives are somehow better investors than Warren Buffet.
English
0
0
0
1
Jarret Willey
Jarret Willey@JarretW·
@charise_lee A real estate developer bought land? Wow!! Imagine that. Next they will notice that everyplace they build a Walmart or mall that someone either bought the land before or after.
English
42
0
6
2.9K
Meidas_Charise Lee
Meidas_Charise Lee@charise_lee·
🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨 Big time shenanigans going on in UTAH‼️ Utah speaker of the house Mike Schultz owns hundreds of acres of land right near the Stratos data Center site‼️ THIS IS JOURNALISM‼️
English
234
2.8K
9.3K
96K
BlueMoose56
BlueMoose56@BlueMoose576595·
Republicans which should oppose the surveillance state seem to be defending the data centers, while the democrat communists fight them because they can't abandon the religion of climate change. Strange times indeed.
English
0
0
0
3
BlueMoose56 retweetledi
Just Phil Lyman
Just Phil Lyman@phil_lyman·
Utahns deserve transparency first, not sweetheart PPPs that privatize gains and socialize the risks. Put Utah families ahead of billionaire projects. Stratos in Box Elder is a textbook example of a Public-Private Partnership, except the ‘public’ side is on the hook while the private developers and out-of-state investors walk away with the profits. MIDA, tax breaks, fast-tracked approvals, and government muscle to hand over 40,000 acres for a 9 GW natural gas-powered data center were sold as ‘national security’ and ‘economic growth.’ But Utah taxpayers and ratepayers get the bill; higher electricity costs, strained water resources, environmental risks and long-term liabilities if this massive project under-delivers on jobs or becomes a stranded asset. No full independent studies, minimal public input, and rushed deals that shift real accountability away from the people footing the bill.
Just Phil Lyman@phil_lyman

Utah deserves FULL TRANSPARENCY on the Box Elder Stratos Project BEFORE we move forward. Official fact sheets and the Governor's FAQ make strong claims, but claims aren't data. We need published, independent studies and real public review periods now, not later. Utahns aren't against jobs, investment, or Al. We're against rushed decisions in the dark. We demand and deserve transparency, independent verification, and accountabilitv. Protests, water rights protests (nearly 4,000 filed), and referendums show the public wants answers, not promises. Here are some of the critical issues and questions that MUST be answered publicly, with independent studies, data, and verifiable details, for real transparency: 1. WATER: Exact projected consumption at full buildout? Closed-loop or dry cooling claims sound good, but where is the published hydrologic analysis, independent review, or proof of net-zero or zero water turbine tech? Water rights app withdrawn after massive protests. When will the refiled application and full impact data (on aquifers, Great Salt Lake watershed, and existing ag rights) be released for public comment? 2. ENERGY and POWER: Detailed specs on the on-site natural gas plants (sourced from Ruby Pipeline)? Long-term fuel supply, reliability, and any grid interaction? Proof it truly won’t raise resident power prices or strain infrastructure? 3. ENVIRONMENTAL and WILDLIFE IMPACTS: Why no independent Environmental Impact Statement or equivalent before county approval? Full studies on wildlife corridors, grazing land, noise, light pollution, and cumulative effects on the fragile desert and Great Salt Lake ecosystem? When will Division of Wildlife Resources, Air Quality, and Water Quality reviews be public? 4. ECONOMIC REALITY and ACCOUNTABILITY: Verifiable breakdown of jobs (how many permanent, local, high-wage versus construction?), tax revenue projections versus actual infrastructure costs, and binding clawback clauses if promises aren’t met? No county funds needed is great, but what are the enforceable safeguards for residents? 5. PUBLIC PROCESS and TIMELINE: Why was the project approved with scant time for studies and limited hearings? Exact timeline, dates, and opportunities for meaningful public comment on all future permits (water rights, air permits, etc.)? Design Review Committee details and how local voices will be included? 6. LONG-TERM VIABILITY and OVERSIGHT: What happens if AI or data center tech shifts and this becomes a stranded asset? Who are the actual tenants or operators? How does MIDA’s national security or defense angle affect transparency? Full disclosure on military ties without compromising security. 7. HEALTH and COMMUNITY: Independent assessments of noise, air, traffic, and quality-of-life impacts on nearby rural residents and Box Elder County as a whole.

English
4
23
48
778
BlueMoose56
BlueMoose56@BlueMoose576595·
@CherylB2121 @phil_lyman If loyalty for Trump blinds you to the obvious betrayals of America first policies in this administration, and the surveillance state reality of data centers, the uniparty will destroy our nation and you'll be waving pom poms.
English
0
0
0
4
Red Saints🇺🇸
Red Saints🇺🇸@CherylB2121·
So disappointing. I’m worried you can no longer see the good in anything. You find fault and talk down, every situation and position. I have not seen a positive post in months about policy. You called the war a “quagmire” to the Deseret News, and you also made it clear you are no longer on Trumps side in that article. I sincerely, from the bottom of my heart, hope this changes soon. The primaries are close.
English
1
0
0
38
BlueMoose56 retweetledi
illuminatibot
illuminatibot@iluminatibot·
Nobody voted for data centers. Nobody voted for AI. Nobody voted for mass surveillance. The entire fabric of western society is being changed without the will of the people.
English
175
1.5K
4.7K
35.3K
BlueMoose56 retweetledi
Disagree Butter
Disagree Butter@disagreebutter·
Warrantless searches, FISA courts, kill switches in cars, what's next @RepMaloyUtah?
Disagree Butter tweet media
English
9
52
218
2.1K
BlueMoose56
BlueMoose56@BlueMoose576595·
The dystopian surveillance state the uniparty wants can't happen without data centers and A.I. tracking your every move.
English
0
0
1
10
BlueMoose56
BlueMoose56@BlueMoose576595·
The people who told us the Covid "vax" was safe and effective also said we had to reduce our energy consumption or the world ends. Suddenly, they want data centers that double the energy output used in a whole state.
English
0
0
1
10
BlueMoose56 retweetledi
Jeff Raissle
Jeff Raissle@BadMoonRaissle·
@redpillb0t Reminds me of when we had to stay locked up and 6 feet apart - until it was ok to riot and march shoulder to shoulder with thousands of others for BLM.
English
3
2
262
3.1K
BlueMoose56 retweetledi
Evan
Evan@EvaniswilsoN·
@redpillb0t They banned incandescent light bulbs because they “use too much energy”
English
1
8
164
2.2K
BlueMoose56
BlueMoose56@BlueMoose576595·
@IamPranavJ @redpillb0t The point is that the same people who lied to you and tried to control your life through climate change hysteria are now pushing data centers. You're a fool if you think it's for your benefit.
English
1
0
2
138
Pranav
Pranav@IamPranavJ·
@redpillb0t data centers and almond farms aren't the same thing. one runs the AI that's accelerating drug discovery, materials science, energy modeling. the other one waters nuts. compare like for like or don't compare.
English
26
1
6
3.5K
BlueMoose56 retweetledi
redpillbot
redpillbot@redpillb0t·
Remember just a couple years ago when using electricity and diesel caused climate change, now data centers use as much power as cities and its no problem
English
295
8.7K
35.7K
331.6K
BlueMoose56
BlueMoose56@BlueMoose576595·
@goud4utah I listened to it this morning. It was very interesting.
English
0
0
0
6