Blue Owl

@2vexy @MentisWave @SenWarren I don't believe in the X won the conflict therefore X is right a rapist who got away with his action is a winner of the conflict but he is not the just winner of the conflict in a world of sunshines and rainbows should be losing the conflict and give reparations to victims

@Blue_Owl_X @MentisWave @SenWarren The first-comers are not always the objective winners, that is an unjustified assumption.

Today, I'm introducing my wealth tax — and more than 50 members of Congress are joining me. It’s time for the government to start working for American families, not just the ultra-rich.

@2vexy @MentisWave @SenWarren recourses are scarce thus we have conflicts (contradictory ends) ownership is a way to solve conflicts by having the first comers who mix labour with nature be the people who objectively should win sometimes it's hard to tell how should win therefore arbitration and the judiciary

@Blue_Owl_X @MentisWave @SenWarren There's no contradiction in my beliefs, go ahead and demonstrate the contradiction. You haven't even justified your theory of property rights.

@JoJoQueer_V1 @MarcherReborn should the printing of money and banks be owned by evil private corporations without any government regulations or owned by the government to stop greedy corporations from hurting poor residents and for public safety

@MarcherReborn Socialists don't believe this by the way it's really easy to argue against socialism when you have no idea what the fuck it even is

@fiat_money @MarcherReborn four public socialist programs tow would get you donations for your campaign and the other tow would give dependent voters all four are evil we are anarchists not cuckservatives we want to abolish the state and end it benefits and it's benfaries

@yourstruly_98 @Bx39a9eXJ3KZKKV @AnniesFirstMate @liquid2ulu half?I think you meant 90%

@Bx39a9eXJ3KZKKV @AnniesFirstMate @liquid2ulu And yet private charities are infinitely more effective and efficient than tax-funded welfare programs. I would much rather be able to choose exactly how and by whom my money is spent, than hope it’s spent well, but inevitably have half that money go to corporations and Israel.

The leftist sincerely believes that if a man gives him free food, it is torture if the food is not a filet mignon.

@2vexy @MentisWave @SenWarren that's why we no political party makes sense non of theses politicans have any values only whims that they want ,like you with government spending it's gymnastics

@Blue_Owl_X @MentisWave @SenWarren And ive already explained that you are incorrect because your theory of property rights is incorrect. The correct theory of property rights is one in which the state owns the tax income.

@2vexy @MentisWave @TrackOilPACs less government is less administrators and enforcers less of those are less taxpayer dollars and less laws and programs less of those are less money that can be embezzled or turned into dependent voters which are both the main ways people use the word corruption in politics

@MentisWave @TrackOilPACs Why would we assume less government would solve corruption?

you mean a world with a Green New Deal?

@2vexy @MentisWave @SenWarren we are running around in circles my second and third response already explained that the state isn't owning they are merely claiming ownership by forcibly taking someone's property to fit thier claims they don't own your paycheck they don't own your labor when you are abroad

@Blue_Owl_X @MentisWave @SenWarren Then the state is not being violent by defending its property rights (taxation). So you've just given me the justification for why taxes aren't theft.

Luego tienen la cara dura estos zurdos de llamar "nazi" a cualquiera que no piense como ellos.

@2vexy @MentisWave @SenWarren protecting myself from someone who want to violate my property is not me being violent but it's self defense Ethier way violaters of property rights should and will get thier property right's Ethier way monopolized institutions are not needed to do that wich was your first claim

@Blue_Owl_X @MentisWave @SenWarren Property rights are always enforced by violence, even if you believe it is done by mixing labor with nature. I reject that corrupted version of property rights though.

y donde esta nuestra utopia entonces

@CidKunai @dbenner83 it's the government and it's monopoly that let justice be evaded all of the people in the island where politicans/people who funded them I doubt centralizing speech ownership news and so on would make people in such high places of government less corrupt

@dbenner83 Why would anybody believe this though? Capitalism produces cronyism, it produced the Epstein Class. What is the safeguard mechanism to preventing next time what it has produced over the past 500 years?

Correct.

@cosmicvoyager17 @KnowledgeArchiv you can't bitch about government wars when the subject we are talking about is someone who wanted a night watch man state I wish every authoritarian nation the best of luck in thier noble mission of killing communists the usual useful idiots who fell for it again

@KnowledgeArchiv If capitalists understood geography, they wouldn’t be as moronic as the crony capitalists and warmongering neocons who can’t do jack to reopen Strait of Hormuz. Apart from the fact that billions of people suffer from the current capitalistic blunder, everything is great. Cheers.

“If socialists understood economics, they wouldn’t be socialists.” — Friedrich Hayek

@EgmontHandtke @KnowledgeArchiv profit is when government deficit therefore you are wrong is not an argument if anything the last part is true ethics and philosophy are far more important to libertarians then economics

'If Hayekians understood economics, they wouldn't be Hayekians.' (AXEC's paraphrase) Friedrich Hayek never understood profit, and by logical consequence, how the economic system works. This is self-disqualifying. The free-market economy runs on profit. Macroeconomic profit Qm is given by the axiomatically correct Profit Law/Balances Equation (I−Sm)+(G−T)+(X−M)−(Qm−Yd)≐0. The Law implies Qm≡G−T>0, i.e., macroeconomic profit is (co-)produced by deficit-spending/money-creation, i.e., the growth of public debt. In the free-market economies, public debt has increased with minor interruptions for 200+ years. So, Qm≡G−T>0 is crucial for Capitalism's survival. The contemporary monetary economy has to be continuously saved from breakdown by the deficit-spending/money-creating duo Treasury / Central Bank, i.e., the State. Only anti-capitalists denounce the State for public debt. The premise of Hayekianism, i.e., that the unfettered free-market economy is a self-adjusting, self-stabilizing, and self-optimizing system, is axiomatically false. This means that Hayekianism is failed/fake science. This, in turn, means that all Hayekians are scientifically incompetent. Ultimately, this means that Hayek's Liberty flag-waving is not economics at all but plain political agenda pushing.

@BlackDogThree @itssanman collectivism is a drug at this point

@itssanman They deserve it.

Leftists are all genocidal psychopaths

@whiskero347 @V3RSTAPP3NISM communists always say this and never elaborate further on the correct definition of socialism under the dictionary people's police

@V3RSTAPP3NISM Almost everything you've been told about socialism in the west was a lie made by capitalist pedophiles.

@2vexy @MentisWave @SenWarren if property rights were claims enforced by violence without mixing labor with nature and maintainf this man made property then yes I am against this corrupted version of property rights

@Blue_Owl_X @MentisWave @SenWarren So you don't believe in property rights?

@ShpadaIMithras @BolshevikCake @ShitpostRock2 somehow actually happened

@BolshevikCake @ShitpostRock2 Polish communist is like gay hamas supporter

@ShitpostRock2 x.com/i/status/20379…