Bluebelle

@Devin_Heroux Is the next step leaving Canada altogether?

John Herdman has stepped down as head coach of Canada's national men's team and is now head coach of TFC. He will take over from interim skipper Terry Dunfield on Oct. 1. Thoughts? cbc.ca/sports/soccer/…

@rae_lila @HabsFanInTO @TKRiders Kieron Pollard was incredible. Nice job by DJ Bravo & Narine bowling too.

@HabsFanInTO @TKRiders It was great!!

Well, I guess this one is over. #NextLevel

@jfinch Plus he was printing everything in HIS condo.

Wow, the entitlement of these parents is over the moon. And their child put up 50K as part of the bond? Where does a 21 year old get enough cash to put up 50K? Unless...🙄 cbc.ca/news/canada/ma…

@StormnRemp @EdKrassen @GCapital_LLC Didn’t he say something along the lines of just say it was corrupt and let us deal with it? How is that just questioning the results?

@EdKrassen @GCapital_LLC I think Ed is setting a dangerous precedent by saying Trump was trying to remain in power. He was simply questioning the results of an election that he knew was filled with irregularities that were worth investigating. Also Ed, we are a republic, stop using the word democracy.

BREAKING: Judge Chutkan is currently listening to arguments from Trump’s defense attorney John Lauro and the US government over when the trial date should be set. A few noteworthy comments from the hearing: Judge Chutkan let the defense know that they will absolutely not get the 2026 trial date they have asked for. She also said the January 2, 2024 date will also not be approved. She then stated, “This case involves one defendant and four counts," before asking "Why is this case complex, other than the historic aspect of it?" Lauro then said, “We’re going to have a very, very unique and extensive motion that deals with executive immunity.” Lauro said that they will file motions on “selective prosecution” and on “presidential immunity.” The prosecution, is pushing for Chutkan to announce a trial date today. Chutkan has not yet set a date. Do you think that Presidential immunity and selective prosecution could hold up here?

@rae_lila @quickbeam71 @DebraLane_ @Fourseen1 @6junej @jerfusha @JenCarsonTaylor Oh, very true. I guess she wouldn’t be called Queen either, then. Just Consort Diana, the King’s wife.

@quickbeam71 @Bluebelle051 @DebraLane_ @Fourseen1 @6junej @jerfusha @JenCarsonTaylor Fun fact - if Diana & Charles had remained married and she was still alive, she also would have been a Queen Consort. I wonder how this conversation would be going then.

@6junej @DebraLane_ @quickbeam71 @Fourseen1 @jerfusha @JenCarsonTaylor Again, nobody said anything differently. She did not inherit the title, so she’s not a Queen Regnant. She’s married to a King, which makes her a Queen Consort. So, for what seems like the millionth time, she is not a Monarch, but she is a Queen. Just like all throughout history.

@DebraLane_ @Bluebelle051 @quickbeam71 @Fourseen1 @jerfusha @JenCarsonTaylor Exactly right!

@quickbeam71 @DebraLane_ @Fourseen1 @6junej @jerfusha @JenCarsonTaylor It makes one wonder what happened when Queen Victoria died, and Edward VII took the throne. Did people say Queen Alexandra wasn’t a real Queen? I can’t imagine it happening.

@Bluebelle051 @DebraLane_ @Fourseen1 @6junej @jerfusha @JenCarsonTaylor I know. I stopped responding bc, while beauty is only skin deep, stupid goes clear to the marrow.

@DebraLane_ @Fourseen1 @6junej @jerfusha @quickbeam71 @JenCarsonTaylor Yes, I know. I don’t want to start this up again. The spouse of a Monarch is a consort. Prince Philip was a consort. Camilla is a consort, but as the wife of the King, she is also Queen. This is only an issue because QEII was also Monarch.

@6junej @Fourseen1 @jerfusha @quickbeam71 @DebraLane_ @JenCarsonTaylor Even though I am repeating myself here, consort describes what type of Queen they were.

@Fourseen1 @Bluebelle051 @jerfusha @quickbeam71 @DebraLane_ @JenCarsonTaylor Does not chamge the FACT that they are consort only.

@6junej @jerfusha @quickbeam71 @DebraLane_ @JenCarsonTaylor Nobody here, at all, said she would rule. Just stating she is a Queen. You seem unable to understand there is a difference between Queen and Monarch.

@Bluebelle051 @jerfusha @quickbeam71 @DebraLane_ @JenCarsonTaylor Queen consort which actually means Consort only officially. Not actually Queen and will never rule as a Queen. Its simple

@6junej @jerfusha @quickbeam71 @DebraLane_ @JenCarsonTaylor She was an actual Queen because she was married to a King. Nobody said she was going to ascend the throne. Queen is the title - there are two types of Queen. Queen Regnant, who rules in their own right, and Queen Consort, wife of a King. Once again - it’s history.

@jerfusha @Bluebelle051 @quickbeam71 @DebraLane_ @JenCarsonTaylor Consort to the King. Not in line for throne and therefore Consort and Queen Mother to the King and grandmother to Elizabeth. Its not that difficult to understand! She would never ascend to actual Queen and figurehead of the state because it is lineage only! 🙄

@6junej @jerfusha @quickbeam71 @DebraLane_ @JenCarsonTaylor *deceased husband

@6junej @jerfusha @quickbeam71 @DebraLane_ @JenCarsonTaylor No, it isn’t. A dowager is a woman who still holds a title or retains property from her husband. She would be Queen dowager, and as such retain the title of Queen Camilla.

Should have kept Schneider in.

I can’t watch this upcoming at bat. 🫣#NextLevel

Just a bit to the left or right, and that’s a Springer dinger. #NextLevel

@rae_lila @Fourseen1 @6junej @quickbeam71 @DebraLane_ @JenCarsonTaylor Again - history

@Bluebelle051 @Fourseen1 @6junej @quickbeam71 @DebraLane_ @JenCarsonTaylor People just make stuff up. Saw a post yesterday that said Diana was the first woman who was wife of a king, mother to the next and grandmother to the future king. Just so incredibly wrong. Never mind that Diana was never wife of a king.

I don’t believe I’ve ever seen a double wicket maiden over before. #CPL23