
BluntForceOptions
4.1K posts

BluntForceOptions
@BluntForceOpt
40-Yr Markets Veteran | Behavioral Econ | Seasoned Biotech Investor | Special Situations | Value/Trend Inflections | Founder/CEO (Ret.) | PM | Opinions only-NFA



















JUST IN: AI CHIPMAKER CEREBRAS JUST PRICED ITS IPO AT $185 PER SHARE, ABOVE THE $150-$160 MARKETED RANGE The order book was oversubscribed 20+ times. The full picture, per Bloomberg: The deal: - IPO price: $185 (above the $150-$160 range, which had already been raised Monday) - 30 million shares offered (also revised higher Monday) - Total raised: ~$5.55 billion - Order book: 20x+ oversubscribed - Cerebras asked institutional investors to specify the max price they'd pay, to gauge true demand The company: - AI chipmaker positioning to challenge NVIDIA $NVDA - Amazon $AMZN said this year it plans to use Cerebras chips alongside its Trainium processors - OpenAI released its first model running on Cerebras chips in February - OpenAI holds 33.4 million warrants for Cerebras shares, with some vesting tied to compute delivery dates and Cerebras' market cap exceeding $40 billion The M&A backdrop: - Arm Holdings $ARM and majority owner SoftBank made an approach to acquire Cerebras weeks before the expected IPO




One of the biggest myths concerning differences between today's tech rally and the '90s version is the belief that today's companies are "real" whereas similar companies in the 90s were all fugazi. That is simply not true: - $CSCO revs ($19,928) +55% and net income + 32% in fiscal 2000 - $MSFT revs ($22,956) +16% net income +21% - Lucent revs +12% - SunMicro revs ($15,721) +33% and oper inc +57% - $ORCL revs +15% net income +380% - $QCOM revs +12% EPS + 31% - $EBAY revs +92% net income +400% - $YHOO revs +88% net income +48% - $DELL revs +38% net income +14% - $IBM revs +1% net income +5% - $INTC revs +15% net income +44% - $AAPL revs +30% net income +31% *-This is from annual reports. I'm not accounting for any mergers or other adjustments that may or may not have occurred during the year. Its sunday. Of course, we know about the many companies that were not making money. Pets.com, theglobe.com and Webvan lost money (even though revs were up 1,200%); even $AMZN lost money. This is not to say today's companies (i.e. $META, $GOOGL, $AAPL, $SNDK, $VRT, etc) are not comparatively "better" companies because they probably are. I would simply argue companies at the top of the index in 1999/2000 were very much "real" and should not be dismissed simply because of what ensued. @DivesTech @michaelsantoli @carlquintanilla @RiskReversal @GuyAdami @lisaabramowicz1 @Chartfest1 @dmoses34











