BluntForceOptions

4.1K posts

BluntForceOptions banner
BluntForceOptions

BluntForceOptions

@BluntForceOpt

40-Yr Markets Veteran | Behavioral Econ | Seasoned Biotech Investor | Special Situations | Value/Trend Inflections | Founder/CEO (Ret.) | PM | Opinions only-NFA

Inland Northwest Katılım Nisan 2023
91 Takip Edilen978 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
BluntForceOptions
BluntForceOptions@BluntForceOpt·
"The stock market is never obvious. It is designed to fool most of the people, most of the time."—Jesse Livermore. After almost four decades in this game, it’s a reminder I come back to often, and one every serious market professional eventually learns. This business rewards process, discipline, and execution—not hype or guesswork. The market’s job is to challenge your conviction; your job is to stay grounded in the work. With that said, I invest heavily in institutional-grade research platforms and technical tools to ensure every thesis is backed by high-signal data. My approach is a synthesis of advanced technical analysis and deep forensic due diligence. I leverage this framework to challenge consensus and discover the disconnect between market sentiment and data-driven reality. Hope is not a strategy. I trade on a repeatable process designed to put the mathematical odds in my favor. Tune out the noise. Stick to the plan. Focus on execution. Wishing everyone continued success and good trading ahead.
English
1
1
7
749
BluntForceOptions
BluntForceOptions@BluntForceOpt·
$ELF value is getting interesting down here, but the macro demands respect. Bypassing the underlying equity and selling the $30 puts instead. Extended the expiration slightly to capture a premium-rich, sub-0.10 Delta. Wide margin of safety locked in ahead of the print. Will adjust/add to the position post-numbers. Stay tuned.
English
1
1
4
722
BluntForceOptions retweetledi
Barchart
Barchart@Barchart·
Berkshire Hathaway is now sitting on an all-time high $397 Billion in Cash, enough to buy 478 companies in the S&P 500 🚨🤑
Barchart tweet media
English
122
352
1.9K
180.6K
BluntForceOptions
BluntForceOptions@BluntForceOpt·
$QXO Took advantage of the flush earlier today. Loaded up on LEAPs right at the $16 LOD. Already holding short puts at the $16 strike after rolling out of the $18's recently. The core thesis and upside potential hasn't changed... the stock just went on sale. Giddy up.
English
0
1
7
633
BluntForceOptions
BluntForceOptions@BluntForceOpt·
$SPY $QQQ - Buffett's $397B Cash Pile Is Telling You Something. Are You Listening? The AI buildout is officially starving the cash machine. BofA recently put out the chart nobody on @CNBC wants to talk about. Aggregate hyperscaler Free Cash Flow margins are projected to collapse from a ~20% historical peak straight down to ~0% in 2026–2027... before clawing back to a measly ~2% in 2028. $GOOGL. $MSFT. $AMZN. $ORCL. The China Big 3. All of them. Simultaneously. Hitting a multi-year cash generation trough at the exact same moment. That's not a coincidence. That's the AI buildout eating the cash machine alive. The capex numbers tell you why. Goldman Sachs now models cumulative hyperscaler capex of nearly $1.4 trillion (between 2025 and 2027)... roughly triple the $485B these companies spent across 2022–2024. → Microsoft: $76B (2024) → $376B projected over the next three years → AWS: $49B → $321B → Oracle: $11B → $115B These aren't growth investments. These are bet-the-company numbers. And here's the part the tape isn't pricing... The exact same names funding this buildout are the names that have driven S&P 500 concentration to historic extremes. The top 10 stocks now account for over 40% of the entire index. $NVDA alone is pushing 8%... the largest single-stock weight in the S&P 500 since 1981. Cash generation collapsing. Index concentration peaking. Capex obligations locked in for three years. That's not balance. That's a setup. The perma bull response is that the capex is the moat and the returns will come. Maybe they will. But the cycle is increasingly being held together by circular financing... Nvidia investing in OpenAI, OpenAI committing to Oracle, Oracle buying Nvidia, vendor-financed GPU leases stretching across years of unproven end-demand... and that just a few. The circle jerk is alive and well. When the same dollars round-trip through three balance sheets and get booked as "revenue" each lap, the cash conversion gets much harder to verify... not easier. And speaking of people who know how to read a cycle... $BRK.B is sitting on a record $397.4 billion in cash. That's 59% of the entire investable portfolio. Cash doubled in a single year... the largest 12-month build in Berkshire's history. And he's saying the quiet part out loud. At the Berkshire annual meeting two weeks ago, Buffett told the room directly: "It isn't our ideal environment in terms of deploying cash for Berkshire." He also flagged what he sees as "gambling" in the markets. New CEO Greg Abel echoed the same discipline: "Capital discipline is the rule, which we will be acting decisively upon when there is a dislocation." And on AI specifically -- the one trade everyone on the street is crowded into? Abel was unambiguous: "We're going to be a builder of technology, rather than just a buyer of technology... not going to do AI for the sake of AI." Buffett didn't become who he is because he's stupid, and he's not scared to invest. He's methodical, he's typically deployed, and he's not afraid to swing. The fact that the greatest capital allocator of our lifetime is parked in T-Bills -- and his successor is publicly telegraphing they're waiting for a dislocation -- at the exact moment retail is piling into AI infrastructure plays at nosebleed multiples should tell you something. He's not scared. He's patient. There's a difference. And the difference is what separates surviving the cycle from getting buried by it. History doesn't repeat, but it sure as hell rhymes... For those who don't know (and fwiw), at their peak in 1881, US railroads were 63% of the entire US stock market. The most dominant innovation sector ever measured. Companies laid thousands of miles of track on the faith that freight revenue would follow. When the downstream economics didn't materialize on schedule, leverage did the rest. Yep, we've seen this movie before. The first reckoning came in the Panic of 1873; Jay Cooke & Co., the biggest investment bank in America and the primary financier of the Northern Pacific Railroad, failed on Sep 18, 1873. The NYSE closed for ten days. 89 railroad companies went bankrupt. The depression ran four years. Twenty years later, the Panic of 1893 took out another quarter of US railroads... same industry, same playbook, same outcome. The technology was real. The transformation was real. The capital cycle still broke. Twice. AI may very well rewire the global economy. That's not the debate. The debate is whether this market is pricing in the inevitable "Trough of Disillusionment" between spend now and earn later. Right now? It's pricing perfection in a straight line. But history tells another story. The capex is guaranteed. The return on that capex is still a massive leap of faith. The concentration risk if that leap takes too long is what nobody on the bid is modeling. And one last thing... the financial media machine has one job, and it isn't informing you. It's keeping the order flow moving while the smart money fades the very narrative they're paid to amplify. It's not a conspiracy theory... it's just how the sausage gets made. Story peaks. Breadth cracks. The little guy gets left holding the receipt. Don't be the receipt. Plan accordingly.
BluntForceOptions tweet mediaBluntForceOptions tweet mediaBluntForceOptions tweet media
English
0
2
5
365
BluntForceOptions
BluntForceOptions@BluntForceOpt·
$SLDB Technical Breakdown & Structural Topping Pattern in Focus The macro backdrop across the small-cap biotech space ( $XBI ) took a definitive hit in today's session. Re-emerging inflation anxieties and rising bond yields triggered a broad-based sector flush, forcing extended names to face technical realities. Looking at the daily chart for SLDB, the price action has carved out a textbook Head & Shoulders topping pattern that's actively threatening a major structural shift. Pattern Topology - Left Shoulder: Peak formed in March, putting in local resistance in the $8.50–$8.75 zone. - Head: The absolute peak printed at $8.87 (the 1.0 Fib retracement level) in mid-April. - Right Shoulder: A clear lower-high distribution phase throughout early May, failing below the $8.50 level and confirming exhausting buy-side pressure. The Neckline & Downside Targets Today's -9.31% flush brought SLDB down to a close of $6.92, placing it directly on top of--and arguably breaking--the ascending neckline support. If this neckline fails to hold on a daily closing basis, momentum shifts decisively to the bears, exposing a clear downside runway to the following keyed support clusters: - S-1 & Moving Average Cluster ($6.41 – $6.18): A clean break below the neckline opens the door straight to the 61.8% Fibonacci retracement level at $6.41. Just below that sits the 200-day SMA at $6.18. Expect price action to gravitate heavily toward this cluster; the 200-day SMA serves as the ultimate line in the sand for the long-term trend. - S-2 (50% Retracement): If the 200-day SMA fails to stem the bleeding, the next structural shelf rests at the 50% Fib level at $5.65. - S-3 & S-4 (Deeper Value Shelves): If a macro-driven liquidation scenario intensifies, deeper structural support lines up at the 38.2% Fib at $4.89 (S-3) and the 23.6% Fib at $3.95 (S-4). The Bottom Line: The pattern structure dictates the bias. Until SLDB can reclaim the breakdown level and stabilize, the path of least resistance remains a gravitational pull into the 200-day SMA liquidity pocket. Respect the breakdown and manage risk accordingly. NFA. Please do your own DD.
BluntForceOptions tweet media
English
0
1
3
373
BluntForceOptions
BluntForceOptions@BluntForceOpt·
$REGN top-line Phase 3 data for the fianlimab/cemiplimab combo in first-line metastatic melanoma is out. The trial failed to hit its primary endpoint of improving progression-free survival (PFS) with statistical significance. The high-dose cohort posted a median PFS of 11.5 months vs. 6.4 months for pembrolizumab alone. While that is a +5.1 month absolute gain, the statistics missed the mark: the Hazard Ratio hit 0.845 (crossing 1.0 with a 95% CI of 0.709 to 1.008) and the p-value landed at 0.0627. The low-dose cohort underperformed at 9.6 months (p=0.4661). Safety remains intact with no new signals. The pipeline focus now shifts entirely to the ongoing Phase 3 head-to-head trial against Opdualag.
BluntForceOptions tweet mediaBluntForceOptions tweet media
English
0
1
6
1.1K
BluntForceOptions
BluntForceOptions@BluntForceOpt·
Watching FinTV regulars try to normalize high interest rates and surging energy costs is laughable... and an absolute masterclass in behavioral bias. The refusal to adjust index price targets in the face of clear and serious macro headwinds isn’t analysis... it’s career preservation. Whistling by the graveyard works perfectly right up until the liquidity shifts. Don't mistake broadcast confidence for institutional reality.
English
0
0
5
809
Adam Weingartner
Adam Weingartner@pittore187·
SPX up 9 points this week RUT down 2.3%, but just an inside week
English
2
0
15
2.4K
BluntForceOptions
BluntForceOptions@BluntForceOpt·
$RGNX Grabbed a few more on this weakness, bringing my allocation to approximately 50%. While the tape is a bit messy today, the data clearly supports the long-term thesis. I’m keeping the focus strictly on the strength of the clinical results and the functional data while the market works through the short-term noise. Have a good weekend.
English
1
0
7
492
BluntForceOptions
BluntForceOptions@BluntForceOpt·
@CNBC Yesterday: "Buy the memory stocks, they’re galloping!" Today: "Be more selective in the frenzy." The only frenzy is Jim Cramer trying to rewrite his own history. Please.
English
0
0
3
88
BluntForceOptions
BluntForceOptions@BluntForceOpt·
$RR Technical inflection & the $2.80 pivot Watching RR closely as it tests the critical $2.80 ish pivot. The daily chart reveals a textbook bottoming structure, effectively a cup & handle... or an ascending consolidation, now pressing against the neckline. My technical thesis: The pattern: We're seeing a textbook C & H structure on the daily, w/the handle currently absorbing supply just below the breakout trigger. This, IMO, reflects a shift from distribution to aggressive accumulation. Neckline scrutiny: We're watching for continued supply absorption at the $2.79 - $2.82 zone. A clean breakout here shifts the regime from sideways accumulation to active trend expansion. Price targets: The immediate magnet is a logical move toward the 200-day MA (SMA confluence at $3.37 - $3.41). Beyond that, we have clear levels at $4.69 (R-2) and $5.58 (R-3). Volume profile: The TrendSpider Raindrop chart I watch (not shown) confirms volume is weighting heavily in the upper range of the daily candle, suggesting buyers are defending the breakout zone. Risk management: The thesis remains valid as long as we hold the ascending support line (approx. $2.60). The bottom line: We're looking for a high-volume close above the neckline to confirm the move. If the momo triggers, the risk/reward toward the 200-day MA is highly asymmetric. Stay tuned! As always, NFA, so please do your own work... and GLTA!
BluntForceOptions tweet media
English
1
2
14
1.2K
BluntForceOptions
BluntForceOptions@BluntForceOpt·
$RGNX -40% (at low) is a total disconnect. Data is a definitive win, IMO. Grabbed some down at $6.06 earlier on the flush. I’ll take the science over the runway or regulatory musical chairs headlines every time. Giddy up.
English
0
1
7
483
BluntForceOptions
BluntForceOptions@BluntForceOpt·
$ENGN Added to the enGene long in the 1.46–1.48 range. Now around 40% allocated as this bottoming process materializes. Post-print price action is pretty typical and doing exactly what I expected... flushing out emotional hands while the valuation sits at a massive discount to the ~$3.75 adjusted net cash floor. Bottoms are a process, not an event. Sticking to the plan and building methodically into the recent flush.
BluntForceOptions@BluntForceOpt

$ENGN Stepped in at the lows today. Here's why. The stock got cut by 80% on a durability print that came in softer than the Street wanted. The tape did what the tape does on a biotech disappointment day... sold first, asked questions... never. But when the dust settles and you actually run the math on what you're buying at $1.70, this is one of the cleanest setups I've seen in this space all year. Let me walk you through it. First, the Balance Sheet → Cash & marketable securities: $312.5M (Q1 FY26 10-Q, as of Jan 31, 2026) → Market cap fully diluted at $1.78: ~$124M → Enterprise value: more than $130M negative, after adjusting for burn and debt drawn → Runway into 2H 2028 → Plus access to up to $100M in additional Hercules tranches (milestone-gated) Let that sink in. The market is paying you ~$130M+ to own this company. Cash alone is worth more than 2x the entire equity. Every dollar of platform value, every dollar of BLA optionality, every dollar of partnership potential... the market's handing you for free, and writing you a check on top of it. Net cash per share alone is roughly $3.75 ish after adjusting for burn and the Hercules drawdown. That's not a price target. That's the floor underneath this stock right now, today, on the bal sheet that exists. Which means a move from $1.78 to $3.50 is +97%... and the stock would still be trading below cash. A move to $3.75 is +110% and just gets you back to net cash per share w/the platform thrown in for free. That's not a moonshot. That's mean reversion to a number that's already on the 10-Q. The Data: Less Bad Than the Tape Wants You to Believe The 25% 12-month KM duration of response is what spooked the room. Fair. But context matters, and the context is being completely ignored. Adstiladrin (Ferring) is the only approved adenoviral gene therapy in BCG-unresponsive CIS. It cleared FDA with a median duration of response of 9.7 months and ~24% of all enrolled CIS patients high-grade recurrence-free at 12 months. Long-term, only ~10% of original responders were still recurrence-free at 5 yrs. That's the existing regulatory bar... and it's not a high one. Detalimogene's print today lands in the same neighborhood, not below it. The headline durability number isn't where this drug differentiates anyway. The other numbers from today's print are where it gets interesting: → 54% complete response at any time → 43% complete response at 6 months → 3.2% progression rate to muscle-invasive disease → 55% TRAE rate, 91% of those Grade 1-2 → 2.4% discontinuation, 2.4% interruption That 3.2% progression rate, in my view, is the line nobody's really talking about. It means patients stay bladder-sparing eligible. That's not a footnote -- that's a genuine clinical win in a disease where the alternative is cystectomy (full bladder removal). Doctors and patients both care deeply about this. And the platform itself -- DDX, non-viral, shelf-stable, no cold chain -- is the real long-term asset. In community urology, where the actual prescription volume lives, that logistical profile is a genuine commercial moat. You don't need to win on raw efficacy if you win on access. The Catalysts... Eight Days, Then 6+ Months AUA Plenary on May 15 is the next narrative reset window. Management gets the medical community in a room and gets to reframe today's print on their terms, not the tape's terms. BLA submission is still on the 2H 2026 path. RMAT designation. CDRP program participation. Manufacturing validation batches already complete. SAP submitted. The regulatory machinery is moving regardless of how the stock traded today. What I'm Watching Honestly The most recent 32-patient subgroup ran softer than the prior cohort (39% CR any time, 32% at 6mo). Mgmt says no demographic differences identified, comprehensive analysis ongoing. Real risk, eyes open. And cretostimogene (CGON) is the durability benchmark looming over the entire space -- different commercial profile (viral, cold chain, complex logistics), but it's the comp the bears will throw at this name. I'm not pretending it doesn't exist. Net/Net $130M+ of negative EV. Cash floor at ~$3.75 per share. 3.2% progression rate. Real catalyst window in eight days. BLA optioned in 2H 2026. A non-viral platform with real commercial logistics advantages once you're past the initial regulatory hurdle. IMHO, the story isn't dead. The price just got panicked. That's the trade. Starter sized accordingly... about 1/3 position. Will reassess after May 15. As always, just my two cents. NFA. Please do your own work. Good luck to everyone.

English
0
2
8
882
BluntForceOptions retweetledi
Barchart
Barchart@Barchart·
Semiconductor Stocks are now trading 63% above their 200-day moving average, the largest margin since the Dot Com Bubble Burst 🚨🚨🚨
Barchart tweet media
English
69
276
1.6K
116.6K
BluntForceOptions
BluntForceOptions@BluntForceOpt·
@DanGreenhaus Good stuff, Dan. I appreciate you sharing this. I recall the sequence of events distinctly.
English
0
0
4
97
Dan Greenhaus
Dan Greenhaus@DanGreenhaus·
I would add, and I think many know this, the stocks themselves/the index gave you almost no time to process what was happening. PC shipments were slowing, profit warnings were slowly mounting, the MCI/Sprint merger was abandoned....as they say, "nobody rings a bell at the top." One month after the NASDAQ hit its March peak, it was down by a third and nearly 40% by mid-May. As if this wasn't difficult enough, the NASDAQ then rallied by 30%+ to early September. CSFB was bidding for DLJ and Fed rate hikes appeared to be over with. Alas, 'twas not to be and by year end, just nine months after the peak, the NASDAQ was cut in half.
Dan Greenhaus tweet media
Dan Greenhaus@DanGreenhaus

One of the biggest myths concerning differences between today's tech rally and the '90s version is the belief that today's companies are "real" whereas similar companies in the 90s were all fugazi. That is simply not true: - $CSCO revs ($19,928) +55% and net income + 32% in fiscal 2000 - $MSFT revs ($22,956) +16% net income +21% - Lucent revs +12% - SunMicro revs ($15,721) +33% and oper inc +57% - $ORCL revs +15% net income +380% - $QCOM revs +12% EPS + 31% - $EBAY revs +92% net income +400% - $YHOO revs +88% net income +48% - $DELL revs +38% net income +14% - $IBM revs +1% net income +5% - $INTC revs +15% net income +44% - $AAPL revs +30% net income +31% *-This is from annual reports. I'm not accounting for any mergers or other adjustments that may or may not have occurred during the year. Its sunday. Of course, we know about the many companies that were not making money. Pets.com, theglobe.com and Webvan lost money (even though revs were up 1,200%); even $AMZN lost money. This is not to say today's companies (i.e. $META, $GOOGL, $AAPL, $SNDK, $VRT, etc) are not comparatively "better" companies because they probably are. I would simply argue companies at the top of the index in 1999/2000 were very much "real" and should not be dismissed simply because of what ensued. @DivesTech @michaelsantoli @carlquintanilla @RiskReversal @GuyAdami @lisaabramowicz1 @Chartfest1 @dmoses34

English
6
6
30
8.2K
BluntForceOptions retweetledi
BluntForceOptions
BluntForceOptions@BluntForceOpt·
$ENGN Stepped in at the lows today. Here's why. The stock got cut by 80% on a durability print that came in softer than the Street wanted. The tape did what the tape does on a biotech disappointment day... sold first, asked questions... never. But when the dust settles and you actually run the math on what you're buying at $1.70, this is one of the cleanest setups I've seen in this space all year. Let me walk you through it. First, the Balance Sheet → Cash & marketable securities: $312.5M (Q1 FY26 10-Q, as of Jan 31, 2026) → Market cap fully diluted at $1.78: ~$124M → Enterprise value: more than $130M negative, after adjusting for burn and debt drawn → Runway into 2H 2028 → Plus access to up to $100M in additional Hercules tranches (milestone-gated) Let that sink in. The market is paying you ~$130M+ to own this company. Cash alone is worth more than 2x the entire equity. Every dollar of platform value, every dollar of BLA optionality, every dollar of partnership potential... the market's handing you for free, and writing you a check on top of it. Net cash per share alone is roughly $3.75 ish after adjusting for burn and the Hercules drawdown. That's not a price target. That's the floor underneath this stock right now, today, on the bal sheet that exists. Which means a move from $1.78 to $3.50 is +97%... and the stock would still be trading below cash. A move to $3.75 is +110% and just gets you back to net cash per share w/the platform thrown in for free. That's not a moonshot. That's mean reversion to a number that's already on the 10-Q. The Data: Less Bad Than the Tape Wants You to Believe The 25% 12-month KM duration of response is what spooked the room. Fair. But context matters, and the context is being completely ignored. Adstiladrin (Ferring) is the only approved adenoviral gene therapy in BCG-unresponsive CIS. It cleared FDA with a median duration of response of 9.7 months and ~24% of all enrolled CIS patients high-grade recurrence-free at 12 months. Long-term, only ~10% of original responders were still recurrence-free at 5 yrs. That's the existing regulatory bar... and it's not a high one. Detalimogene's print today lands in the same neighborhood, not below it. The headline durability number isn't where this drug differentiates anyway. The other numbers from today's print are where it gets interesting: → 54% complete response at any time → 43% complete response at 6 months → 3.2% progression rate to muscle-invasive disease → 55% TRAE rate, 91% of those Grade 1-2 → 2.4% discontinuation, 2.4% interruption That 3.2% progression rate, in my view, is the line nobody's really talking about. It means patients stay bladder-sparing eligible. That's not a footnote -- that's a genuine clinical win in a disease where the alternative is cystectomy (full bladder removal). Doctors and patients both care deeply about this. And the platform itself -- DDX, non-viral, shelf-stable, no cold chain -- is the real long-term asset. In community urology, where the actual prescription volume lives, that logistical profile is a genuine commercial moat. You don't need to win on raw efficacy if you win on access. The Catalysts... Eight Days, Then 6+ Months AUA Plenary on May 15 is the next narrative reset window. Management gets the medical community in a room and gets to reframe today's print on their terms, not the tape's terms. BLA submission is still on the 2H 2026 path. RMAT designation. CDRP program participation. Manufacturing validation batches already complete. SAP submitted. The regulatory machinery is moving regardless of how the stock traded today. What I'm Watching Honestly The most recent 32-patient subgroup ran softer than the prior cohort (39% CR any time, 32% at 6mo). Mgmt says no demographic differences identified, comprehensive analysis ongoing. Real risk, eyes open. And cretostimogene (CGON) is the durability benchmark looming over the entire space -- different commercial profile (viral, cold chain, complex logistics), but it's the comp the bears will throw at this name. I'm not pretending it doesn't exist. Net/Net $130M+ of negative EV. Cash floor at ~$3.75 per share. 3.2% progression rate. Real catalyst window in eight days. BLA optioned in 2H 2026. A non-viral platform with real commercial logistics advantages once you're past the initial regulatory hurdle. IMHO, the story isn't dead. The price just got panicked. That's the trade. Starter sized accordingly... about 1/3 position. Will reassess after May 15. As always, just my two cents. NFA. Please do your own work. Good luck to everyone.
English
7
4
15
3.5K
BluntForceOptions
BluntForceOptions@BluntForceOpt·
One of the Best Features on Finviz Nobody Talks About: Elite Alerts We all have access to alerts, but there is a massive difference between "notification noise" and actionable signal. I run alerts across multiple institutional-grade platforms, but I find the @finviz_com alert desk to be the most cohesive setup for speed and raw data access... especially when I’m away from my primary monitors. It’s not just a price trigger... it’s a mobile research desk: ▻ SEC Forensic Feed: Most apps just give you news. Here, you can actually filter for the specific filings that move the needle--Form 4s, 13Fs, or 8-Ks--and get them the second they hit the wire. Nothing beats being one of the first to see an insider buy, etc. ▻ Unified Logic: It bundles price action, insider activity, and analyst shifts into one stream. You aren't jumping between three apps to find out why a ticker is moving. ▻ Operational Speed: In this market, if you’re waiting for the talking heads to report a filing, you’re already late. This setup cuts out the middleman. If you’re already an Elite subscriber and aren't utilizing the alert desk, you’re leaving a significant operational edge on the table, IMO. Check it out! H/T @finviz_com for the clean execution on these.
BluntForceOptions tweet media
English
1
2
15
1.1K
BluntForceOptions
BluntForceOptions@BluntForceOpt·
The $400 Billion Question: Discipline vs. Exuberance Berkshire Hathaway isn't just sitting on $397.4 billion because they lack ideas. They're sitting on it because they refuse to pay hype prices for growth that hasn't been proven out yet. While the market is currently intoxicated by the same kind of irrational exuberance we’ve seen in previous cycles, Greg Abel’s message is clear: Capital discipline beats FOMO every single time. They are building in-house and waiting for the inevitable valuation reset to steal quality assets at a fair price when the downside reaction finally hits. In a world of noise, patience is the ultimate high-signal move. $BRK.A $BRK.B $QQQ thestreet.com/investing/berk…
English
2
1
3
149
BluntForceOptions
BluntForceOptions@BluntForceOpt·
Q2 2026 Biotech Catalyst Outlook: 88 Major Data Readouts & Regulatory Milestones The biotech sector is entering a heavy window for Phase 2/3 results through the remainder of H1 2026. For those of us deep in the clinical trenches, the team at @BiopharmIQ consistently delivers institutional-grade tracking essential for navigating these binary events. Their latest watchlist highlights a massive cluster of data readouts... 26 catalysts scheduled for May and another 20 in June. If you aren’t already following them, they are a premier resource for keeping your watchlist updated with high-signal data. $XBI $IBB $CYTK $PFE $LLY
BluntForceOptions tweet mediaBluntForceOptions tweet media
English
1
1
5
186