Larry Alex Taunton@LarryTaunton
ROTHERHAM & HOW MUSLIM SEX GANGS OPERATE: MY REPORT FROM THE UK🧵
In South Yorkshire is the city of Rotherham. Prior to 2012, Rotherham was a city unknown to most of the world. Today, the name is associated with scandal, some of the worst (known) mass child abuse in modern history, and a nation’s deep shame.
In that year, The Times (of London) unearthed one of the dirty secrets of multiculturalism and an indiscriminate immigration policy. Under the explosive headline “Police Files Reveal Vast Child Protection Scandal,” Times journalist Andrew Norfolk reported:
“Confidential police reports and intelligence files that reveal a hidden truth about the sale and extensive use of English children for sex are exposed today. They show that for more than a decade organised groups of men were able to groom, pimp and traffic girls across the country with virtual impunity. Offenders were identified to police but not prosecuted. A child welfare expert, speaking under condition of anonymity, said that agencies’ reluctance to tackle such street grooming networks was ‘the biggest child protection scandal of our time.’ The Times has published several articles about a pattern of crimes across northern England and the Midlands involving groups of men, largely of Pakistani heritage, and the sexual abuse of white girls aged from 12 to 16.”
The “child welfare expert speaking under conditions of anonymity” was Jane Senior, a Rotherham social worker, who detected a pattern in the at-risk adolescent girls with whom her agency dealt. Mostly from broken homes and in state foster care, the files she surreptitiously delivered to Norfolk revealed that since 1997, local authorities knew about, but ignored, the “industrial-scale” rape and trafficking of no less than fourteen hundred white British girls. Traffickers maintained control of these girls with the injection of drugs, physical abuse, and threats, with at least one girl being taken into the countryside where gasoline was dumped on her while her assailant held a match and warned her of the consequences should she tell anyone about her rape. Girls who reported their abuse to local police were ignored, told to stop wasting police time, or, as one was told: “Don’t worry — you aren’t the first girl to be raped by XX and you won’t be the last.” As sophisticated as any mafia, Muslim-run restaurants and taxi services facilitated the trafficking of girls, and it soon became clear some Muslim police officers were complicit in these operations.
As Rotherham’s police and the city council (who knew very well of these abuses) fell under media scrutiny, excuses for their inaction ranged from fear of charges of Islamophobia to an unwillingness to force British cultural norms on people who do not share those values. Said one police officer: “There was an educational issue. Asian males didn’t understand that it was wrong and the girls were not quite there [past puberty]. They were difficult groups to deal with. We can’t enforce our way out of the problem.”
In other words, reigning political sensitivities led some officers and council members to the conclusion that they must respect the fact the raping of pubescent girls is part of the cultural heritage of the men in question.
The scandal sparked a nationwide debate with many accusing Andrew Norfolk — and, when her identity was revealed, Jane Senior — of racism. Any thought of the girls was overshadowed by progressives who rushed to defend multiculturalism, Islam, and an idiotic immigration policy. This was the failure of political correctness writ large. Perhaps they learned from the experience….