Bo Jangles

38.8K posts

Bo Jangles banner
Bo Jangles

Bo Jangles

@BoJangular

Life adventurer, Lubertarian, Traveller, Sailor & AC tragic, Sportlovin' Grandfather & Political dog chaser

AOTEAROA Katılım Mayıs 2010
828 Takip Edilen351 Takipçiler
Bo Jangles retweetledi
Robin Monotti
Robin Monotti@robinmonotti·
JOHN CLAUSER, 2022 PHYSICS NOBEL PRIZE WINNER: "I can very confidently assert, there is no climate emergency. As much as it may upset many people, my message is the planet is NOT in peril. Atmospheric CO2 and methane have negligible effect on the climate. The policies government have been implementing are totally unnecessary and should be eliminated. So far, [we] have totally misidentified what is the dominant process in controlling the climate, and all of the various models are based on incomplete and incorrect physics. The dominant process, is “the cloud-sunlight-reflexivity thermostat mechanism. Clouds are all bright white, and they reflected 90% of the sunlight back into space making them the most crucial yet most overlooked aspect of the climate system. Two-thirds of the Earth are ocean. The Pacific Ocean alone is half the Earth. The average cloud cover for the Earth is 67%; about 50% over land and 75% over oceans. I claim that the above conspicuous properties of clouds are the missing part of the puzzle."
Robin Monotti tweet media
English
89
1.5K
2.9K
32.3K
Bo Jangles
Bo Jangles@BoJangular·
Tell Rowan Dean that ‼️
Led By Donkeys@ByDonkeys

“My name is Amos Goldberg. I am an Israeli Professor of Holocaust Studies. For nearly 30 years I have researched and taught the Holocaust, genocide and state violence. And I want to tell whoever is willing to listen that what’s happening now in Gaza is a genocide. A year ago when October 7th happened, like all Israelis I was in shock. It was a war crime and a crime against humanity. 1200 people - more than 800 of them civilians - were killed in one day. Children and the elderly were among those taken hostage. Communities were destroyed. It was outrageous, traumatizing, personal. Like most Israelis, I know people who were killed, who lost loved ones or whose loved ones were taken hostage. But immediately afterwards came Israel’s response and within weeks thousands of civilians were killed in Gaza. It took me some time to digest what was unfolding before my eyes. It was agonizing to confront that reality. I was reluctant to call it a genocide. But if you read Raphael Lemkin – the Jewish-Polish legal scholar who coined the term ‘genocide’ and was the major driving force behind the 1948 United Nations Genocide Convention – what is happening in Gaza now is exactly what he had in mind when he spoke about genocide. It does not need to look like the Holocaust to be a genocide. Each genocide looks different and not all involve killing of millions or the entire group. The United Nations Genocide Convention explicitly asserts that genocide is the act of deliberately destroying a group in whole or in part. Those are the words. But there does need to be a clear intent. And indeed, there are clear indications of intent to destroy Gaza: Israel’s leaders - including the prime minister and the minister of defence - and many high-ranking military officers, media personalities, rabbis, as well as ordinary soldiers were very open about what they wanted to achieve. There were countless documented incitements to turn the whole of Gaza into rubble and claims that there are no innocent people living there. A radical atmosphere of dehumanization of the Palestinians prevails in Israeli society to an extent that I can’t remember in my 58 years of living here. Now that vision has been enacted. Tens of thousands of innocent children, women and men have been killed. Over a hundred thousand were wounded. There is a near total destruction of infrastructure, intentional starvation and blocking of humanitarian aid. There are mass graves and reliable testimony of summary executions. Children that were shot by snipers. All the universities and almost all hospitals are gone. Almost all the population is displaced. There have been numerous bombings of civilians in so-called ‘safe zones’. Gaza does not exist anymore. It is completely destroyed. Thus, the outcome fits perfectly with the stated intentions of Israel’s leadership. Lemkin - that scholar who coined the term ‘genocide’ - described two phases of a genocide. The first is the destruction of the annihilated group and the second is what he called ‘imposition of the national pattern’ of the perpetrator. We are now witnessing the second phase as Israel prepares ethnically cleansed areas for Israeli settlements. And therefore, I have come to the conclusion that this is exactly what a genocide looks like. We don’t teach about genocides in order to realize it retrospectively. We teach about it in order to prevent it and to stop it. But like in every other case of genocide in history right now we have mass denial. Both here in Israel and around the world. But reality cannot be denied. So yes, it is a genocide. And once you come to this conclusion you cannot remain silent.” - Statement to Led By Donkeys, December 2024 - Photo: Parliament Square, London, 8.40am, 4th December 2024

English
0
0
0
6
Bo Jangles retweetledi
The Cradle
The Cradle@TheCradleMedia·
Ali Akbar Velayati, former Iranian foreign minister and senior adviser to Iran's supreme leader: • "History bears witness that everyone who came seeking domination, from Alexander to Genghis Khan and Trump, ultimately ended up dissolving into the heart of ancient Iranian civilization." • "For this nation is an authentic, deeply rooted civilizational identity, not a commodity to be bought or rented with oil dollars." • "This time, Iran’s red line is clear: papers and signatures alone are not a guarantee." • "The tangible guarantor of the agreement’s survival is the Strait of Hormuz." • "For geography does not lie, and it is the final judge over every covenant written on paper."
The Cradle tweet media
English
21
266
686
16.4K
Bo Jangles
Bo Jangles@BoJangular·
Tell Rowan Dean that
Led By Donkeys@ByDonkeys

“My name is Amos Goldberg. I am an Israeli Professor of Holocaust Studies. For nearly 30 years I have researched and taught the Holocaust, genocide and state violence. And I want to tell whoever is willing to listen that what’s happening now in Gaza is a genocide. A year ago when October 7th happened, like all Israelis I was in shock. It was a war crime and a crime against humanity. 1200 people - more than 800 of them civilians - were killed in one day. Children and the elderly were among those taken hostage. Communities were destroyed. It was outrageous, traumatizing, personal. Like most Israelis, I know people who were killed, who lost loved ones or whose loved ones were taken hostage. But immediately afterwards came Israel’s response and within weeks thousands of civilians were killed in Gaza. It took me some time to digest what was unfolding before my eyes. It was agonizing to confront that reality. I was reluctant to call it a genocide. But if you read Raphael Lemkin – the Jewish-Polish legal scholar who coined the term ‘genocide’ and was the major driving force behind the 1948 United Nations Genocide Convention – what is happening in Gaza now is exactly what he had in mind when he spoke about genocide. It does not need to look like the Holocaust to be a genocide. Each genocide looks different and not all involve killing of millions or the entire group. The United Nations Genocide Convention explicitly asserts that genocide is the act of deliberately destroying a group in whole or in part. Those are the words. But there does need to be a clear intent. And indeed, there are clear indications of intent to destroy Gaza: Israel’s leaders - including the prime minister and the minister of defence - and many high-ranking military officers, media personalities, rabbis, as well as ordinary soldiers were very open about what they wanted to achieve. There were countless documented incitements to turn the whole of Gaza into rubble and claims that there are no innocent people living there. A radical atmosphere of dehumanization of the Palestinians prevails in Israeli society to an extent that I can’t remember in my 58 years of living here. Now that vision has been enacted. Tens of thousands of innocent children, women and men have been killed. Over a hundred thousand were wounded. There is a near total destruction of infrastructure, intentional starvation and blocking of humanitarian aid. There are mass graves and reliable testimony of summary executions. Children that were shot by snipers. All the universities and almost all hospitals are gone. Almost all the population is displaced. There have been numerous bombings of civilians in so-called ‘safe zones’. Gaza does not exist anymore. It is completely destroyed. Thus, the outcome fits perfectly with the stated intentions of Israel’s leadership. Lemkin - that scholar who coined the term ‘genocide’ - described two phases of a genocide. The first is the destruction of the annihilated group and the second is what he called ‘imposition of the national pattern’ of the perpetrator. We are now witnessing the second phase as Israel prepares ethnically cleansed areas for Israeli settlements. And therefore, I have come to the conclusion that this is exactly what a genocide looks like. We don’t teach about genocides in order to realize it retrospectively. We teach about it in order to prevent it and to stop it. But like in every other case of genocide in history right now we have mass denial. Both here in Israel and around the world. But reality cannot be denied. So yes, it is a genocide. And once you come to this conclusion you cannot remain silent.” - Statement to Led By Donkeys, December 2024 - Photo: Parliament Square, London, 8.40am, 4th December 2024

English
0
0
0
8
Bo Jangles retweetledi
Krzysztof Szczawinski 🇵🇱
Krzysztof Szczawinski 🇵🇱@Kristof_Poland·
First they destroyed Jaguar. Now it’s the turn of Ferrari. Must be a coincidence – just like with the burning churches in France… But what if the myth of Ferrari has been destroyed on purpose? Ferrari was all that went against the dominant narratives of our age – it represented defiance, male virility, strength, individuality, desire, competition, independence, joy, pride and individual success. All those things that the current world would like to ban. It was loud in a world demanding silence. Excessive in an age obsessed with restraint. It was truly emotional. It stood for speed, danger, ambition, even conquest – it stood for the idea that a man could still dream of becoming greater than he was. Not safe. Not humble. Not apologetic – unlike everything in our current world… The myth of Ferrari just stood in the way. And myths are dangerous when they remind people that greatness still exists… It represented something ancient: masculine pride, individual triumph, the joy of standing out instead of blending in. It celebrated victory openly, without guilt. Power without excuses. Beauty without compromise. It became intolerable. And so it had to burn – like the cathedrals… Our civilization tears down its symbols of vitality, excellence, and pride. It couldn’t be standardized, softened, domesticated – so it had to be destroyed. Well, now it is no more. This is what happens to those who stand in the way of "progress" – those who refuse to kneel before "the spirit of our age"… I have had my Ferrari moment years ago – I don’t mind personally – but our children will not be allowed to taste that… R.I.P. Ferrari 🕯️🙏
Krzysztof Szczawinski 🇵🇱 tweet mediaKrzysztof Szczawinski 🇵🇱 tweet media
English
8
22
84
8.8K
Bo Jangles retweetledi
Brivael Le Pogam
Brivael Le Pogam@brivael·
Thiel avait raison sur la compétition. On l'applique mal. La rivalité USA-Europe est le cas d'école parfait du désir mimétique girardien : deux civilisations qui se ressemblent trop pour s'inventer, alors elles se copient en se détestant. L'Europe régule parce que l'Amérique innove. L'Amérique se politise parce que l'Europe moralise. Les deux s'épuisent dans un mirror match qui ne produit ni Tesla, ni TSMC, ni rien. Sortie du jeu mimétique : ne pas concurrencer. Monopoliser. Mais tous les monopoles ne se valent pas. Un monopole est un concentrateur de pouvoir. La seule question qui compte : quelle philosophie le pilote ? Il y en a trois sur la table en IA aujourd'hui : Safety-maximaliste → décélération déguisée en prudence. Le piège ici, c'est que la logique du "safety à tout prix" mène mécaniquement au contrôle de masse. Si l'IA est trop dangereuse pour être libre, alors elle doit être centralisée, alignée sur "les bonnes valeurs", filtrée, surveillée. Tu finis avec un Politburo algorithmique qui décide ce que 8 milliards de personnes ont le droit de penser, créer, demander. C'est la dystopie soft qui se termine en dystopie dure — et l'histoire montre que ces régimes finissent toujours très mal, pour leurs sujets comme pour leurs architectes. Commercial-neutre → optimise l'engagement, pas la civilisation. Pas méchant, juste vide. Construit le futur par accident, au gré des KPIs trimestriels. Pro-human + pro-liberty + pro-expansion → xAI. Le seul stack philosophique compatible avec un futur Kardashev I. Les autres optimisent pour ne pas perdre. xAI optimise pour gagner l'espèce. Maintenant le point que personne ne veut voir : L'IA est un play d'infrastructure. Les weights vont devenir des commodités — comme l'électricité, comme la bande passante, comme le cloud avant elle. Se battre pour avoir "le meilleur modèle" en 2027 sera aussi pertinent que se battre pour avoir le meilleur fournisseur d'électrons. La vraie bataille : qui construit la couche physique. Compute, énergie, fabs, datacenters. Terrafab. C'est là que la philosophie s'incarne en atomes — et les atomes, contrairement aux bits, ne se forkent pas. Donc la stratégie en deux temps : 1/ Aider xAI à scaler Terrafab au maximum. Pas par fidélité — par calcul. C'est la seule infrastructure dont la philosophie est alignée avec l'expansion humaine. 2/ Construire des monopoles verticaux par-dessus. Là où les weights sont commoditisés, la valeur remonte vers l'application, la distribution, la marque, le craft. Et c'est là que ça devient intéressant pour les builders. Le capitalisme devient une creator economy. Si tu n'es pas LA référence sur ta niche, tu n'existes pas. Le milieu disparaît. Le long tail des "concurrents corrects" est mangé par l'IA elle-même. Soit tu es le monopole de ta verticale, soit tu es un feature dans le prompt de quelqu'un d'autre. C'est binaire. C'est brutal. C'est la meilleure nouvelle pour les vrais builders depuis 20 ans.
Brivael Le Pogam tweet media
Français
3
5
33
4.6K
Bo Jangles retweetledi
Sputnik
Sputnik@SputnikInt·
🚨"Where is Macron? Where are the marches in Paris?" Russia's MFA spokeswoman slams complete silence over deaths of 21 children in Starobelsk and over 150 people in Iranian school 💬 "When something happens in Paris, they change avatars, light up the Eiffel Tower, and march in the streets. But when children die in Russia, Iran, the Middle East, Asia or Africa — silence. As if nothing happened."
English
25
154
409
7.2K
Bo Jangles retweetledi
Nuclear for Australia
Nuclear for Australia@nuclearforaus·
Nuclear power is a direct alternative for coal. 77% of the jobs at a coal plant are transferable to a nuclear plant. Both energy sources are different types of thermal power with turbines. ✍️Take Action 📚Learn More 🛍️ Shop Merch nuclearforaustralia.com
Nuclear for Australia tweet media
English
18
37
109
1.9K
Bo Jangles retweetledi
Dr. Matthew M. Wielicki
Dr. Matthew M. Wielicki@MatthewWielicki·
The UK just “smashed” its May temperature record… but here’s the part the Met Office conveniently leaves out: The PREVIOUS record was set in 1922. That’s 104 years ago. Long before SUVs, private jets, or modern CO₂ emissions. Heathrow Airport didn’t even exist yet. The area was literally farmland and small villages. So if a 1922 heatwave could produce nearly identical temperatures in a world with ~130 ppm less CO₂, maybe, just maybe, natural variability plays a much bigger role than the panic merchants admit.
Met Office@metoffice

Temperatures at Heathrow have recently reached 33.5°C, provisionally beating the all-time May record

English
849
5K
16.8K
737.2K
Bo Jangles retweetledi
J Stewart
J Stewart@triffic_stuff_·
🚨 BLAIR BOMBSHELL: SCRAP NET ZERO NOW! “THERE’S NO LOGIC TO IT!” 🔥 Tony Blair Demands Starmer Scrap Milibands Mad Expensive Green Agenda Immediately‼️ Blair has just shredded mad Miliband and the entire net zero agenda. There’s zero logic to it! Asked directly for total clarity: “For total clarity, are you advising Keir Starmer to rip up Ed Milibands green energy targets?” Blair bluntly replied: “Yes I am!” He explained that the 3 biggest emitters in the world today are China, America and India. Together they “account for just over 50% of global emissions.” All are pursuing cheap energy. They still do renewable energy. “China for example builds more renewable energy than the rest of the world put together.” “It just means that the lens from which they judge policy is cheap energy.” He rightly points out Britain’s emissions are “under 1% of global emissions” so we can’t solve climate change. And says he “doesnt understand the logic behind” imposing costs on businesses and consumers to pursue net zero when the rest of the world is not doing so. He says again he doesnt understand why we’re shutting down North Sea oil and gas industry in circumstances where no other country in the world is doing that if “they’ve still got a requirement to import energy from oil and gas”. It costs way too much and “is not the right priority!” Net zero is not saving the planet. It is economic self-harm. Blair has just blown the entire agenda apart.
English
1.1K
1.8K
5.3K
277K
Bo Jangles
Bo Jangles@BoJangular·
Ditto Australasia 👺💥
J Stewart@triffic_stuff_

🚨 BLAIR BOMBSHELL: SCRAP NET ZERO NOW! “THERE’S NO LOGIC TO IT!” 🔥 Tony Blair Demands Starmer Scrap Milibands Mad Expensive Green Agenda Immediately‼️ Blair has just shredded mad Miliband and the entire net zero agenda. There’s zero logic to it! Asked directly for total clarity: “For total clarity, are you advising Keir Starmer to rip up Ed Milibands green energy targets?” Blair bluntly replied: “Yes I am!” He explained that the 3 biggest emitters in the world today are China, America and India. Together they “account for just over 50% of global emissions.” All are pursuing cheap energy. They still do renewable energy. “China for example builds more renewable energy than the rest of the world put together.” “It just means that the lens from which they judge policy is cheap energy.” He rightly points out Britain’s emissions are “under 1% of global emissions” so we can’t solve climate change. And says he “doesnt understand the logic behind” imposing costs on businesses and consumers to pursue net zero when the rest of the world is not doing so. He says again he doesnt understand why we’re shutting down North Sea oil and gas industry in circumstances where no other country in the world is doing that if “they’ve still got a requirement to import energy from oil and gas”. It costs way too much and “is not the right priority!” Net zero is not saving the planet. It is economic self-harm. Blair has just blown the entire agenda apart.

Italiano
0
0
0
4
Peter Clack
Peter Clack@PeterDClack·
In a colossal looming bottleneck, up to two thirds of ageing wind turbines and solar panels will need replacing before the Net Zero deadline in 2050. There are currently 1.5 million operational turbines installed worldwide and 7 to 8 billion solar panels, scattered across myriad often remote landscapes. While described as 'farms', many cover extensive areas of productive rural farmland. Early generation turbines have an expected working life of 15 to 24 years, and solar panels 22 to 26. Because these have been installed progressively for decades, many are past their working lives already - a number expected to rise exponentially. The most troubling issue is how to deal with these assets as they drop out of the system. Who will pay? The effort is shifting from increasing capacity to merely trying not to fall behind. It is a treadmill reality. Renewables have not managed to come close to replacing fossil fuels, which currently provide 81% of the world's primary energy, while wind and solar alone offer only 6% (Energy Institute’s Statistical Review of World Energy). Modern wind turbine blades can reach lengths of over 100 metres, eclipsing the wingspans of wide-body aircraft like the Boeing 747 (Vestas or Siemens Gamesa). This scale turns the dream of recycling into a logistical nightmare. While global solar capacity has surpassed the 2.5 terawatt milestone - spurred by an installation rate that surged by 40% in 2025 alone - the geographic and material footprint is emerging as a major spatial crisis (International Energy Agency). Around 77% of this recent growth occurred in China, which now operates roughly 690,000 turbines. Big builds mean big future waste. As this capacity multiplies, so does the inevitable hangover. Between 2038 and 2053, almost all current installations will reach their expiration date. Many countries are already cracking down on blade graveyards, terrified of leaching toxins from decades-old solar panels or the indestructible properties of composite turbine blades. The full financial and environmental cost of this looming disposal crisis is currently impossible to calculate, precisely because the economics of recycling fail when recovery costs outstrip the value of the reclaimed material. This threatens to become a rolling, ongoing gridlock lasting for decades. At the same time, the demand on mining for vast quantities of raw materials, particularly metals like copper and rare earth components to build the next generation, is already outstripping capacity. The world is facing a permanent cycle of depletion and disposal that may never be truly resolved.
Peter Clack tweet media
Bega, New South Wales 🇦🇺 English
35
235
458
5.7K
Bo Jangles retweetledi
Kathleen Tyson
Kathleen Tyson@Kathleen_Tyson_·
@KingKong9888 Switzerland abdicated its role as a neutral fiduciary for global capital when it bowed to FATCA and joined sanctions on Russia. Safety and stability are better in Hong Kong.
English
22
84
487
10.4K
Electroverse
Electroverse@Electroversenet·
The UN promotes the idea that today's climate is uniquely hot and chaotic. But the historical record says otherwise. Across Europe, the late-1600s and early-1700s saw rapid natural warming. Temperatures in Moscow, for example, spiked sharply around 1700. The same signal appears in Berlin and also in Paris. This was not a local anomaly. It was a broad climate shift, one long before industrial emissions. Central England shows the same pattern. Between 1695 and 1735, average temperatures rose about 2C in just 40 years. By comparison, today's widely cited 1.5C unfolded over 150 years. Large, rapid temperature swings are not new. They have happened naturally, long before industrial fossil fuels. This is the historical context we are not shown.
English
19
119
261
6K
Bo Jangles retweetledi
Rothmus 🏴
Rothmus 🏴@Rothmus·
As a young socialist, Hayek read Ludwig von Mises’ 1920 paper “Economic Calculation in the Socialist Commonwealth.” Mises showed that socialist central planning isn’t merely inefficient, it’s impossible. Without private property and genuine market prices, planners lack any rational way to allocate scarce resources or determine real costs and needs. Even Oskar Lange, a leading socialist in the calculation debate, effectively conceded the point. While he promoted “market socialism” with trial-and-error pricing by a central board, real-world socialist planners in Eastern Europe quietly relied on world capitalist market prices as a guide. Without external free-market price signals, pure socialism would be economically blind and coordination would collapse. Mises went further, arguing that interventionism, the “middle way” of government meddling, is inherently unstable. Each intervention creates problems that invite more interventions, eventually leading to full socialization. Price controls cause shortages, subsidies distort production, and the cycle continues until the economy is fully planned. The lesson is clear. Rational economics requires genuine market prices emerging from voluntary exchange and private property. Half-measures don’t stabilize the system. They accelerate the drift into central planning. The Austrian School understood this decades before the collapse of the Soviet bloc proved it in practice.
English
364
1.8K
7.8K
14.6M
Bo Jangles retweetledi
New Direction AFRICA
New Direction AFRICA@Its_ereko·
🚨 AFRICA, WAKE UP: The global double standard is staring us right in the face. The West taught us to despise Idi Amin Dada as a ruthless, bloodthirsty dictator, tyrant, and that his brutality absolutely deserved condemnation. But look at the world today: Benjamin Netanyahu's government flattens entire cities, displaces millions, and oversees the killing of tens of thousands of innocent civilians. The response from Western powers? They do not sanction him. Instead, they fund him, send him weapons, shield him from international law, and give him standing ovations in Congress. Why is an African ruler automatically labeled a butcher, while a Western ally committing mass devastation is protected as a defender of democracy? International justice is a myth. The rules-based order is a weapon used to discipline the Global South while granting total immunity to the Global North. We must stop letting Eurocentric media dictate who we are allowed to call a villain. Same devastation. Different skin color. Different geopolitical alignment. Retweet to wake the continent up.
New Direction AFRICA tweet mediaNew Direction AFRICA tweet media
English
31
351
512
12.2K
Bo Jangles retweetledi
RT
RT@RT_com·
Megyn Kelly says US now at war with Iran because Trump 'FELL' for Netanyahu's SWEET TALK 'Every other president SAW THROUGH IT — EXCEPT TRUMP!'
English
21
81
371
17K
Bo Jangles retweetledi
TheRealThelmaJohnson
TheRealThelmaJohnson@TheRealThelmaJ1·
The Maduro regime is still in power in Venezuela. The IRGC regime is still in power in Iran. The Epstein regime is still in power in D.C.
English
86
2.6K
9.7K
78.1K
Bo Jangles retweetledi
Sabrina F.
Sabrina F.@itsmeback_·
LE PAROLE CHE STANNO FACENDO IL GIRO DEL MONDO.🇷🇺 "SONO SCHIFATO DAL VOSTRO CINISMO!" DURO SCONTRO AL CONSIGLIO DI SICUREZZA ONU: LA RUSSIA ATTACCA L'EUROPA IN DIRETTA! #Russia #Ucraina #Europa 🗣«A dire il vero, provo imbarazzo e vergogna per alcuni colleghi nel Consiglio di Sicurezza. Sapevamo che avremmo sentito qualcosa di simile dai membri europei del CS, ma oggi il livello del loro cinismo è fuori scala. Nessuno di loro si è degnato nemmeno di menzionare i bambini morti a Starobil'sk. Dite che non potete confermare in modo indipendente e non siete sicuri che non sia una messa in scena. Ma anche lo Stato Maggiore delle Forze Armate dell'Ucraina ha confermato di aver colpito Starobil'sk. 🗣Questo non è nemmeno ipocrisia o doppi standard, è un aperto scherno delle vittime infantili. Nel nostro intervento abbiamo detto che per voi ci sono vittime degne di compassione e altre che non la meritano. Ascoltarvi, intendo i membri presenti e assenti dell'Unione Europea, è un insulto ai sentimenti di tutte le vittime, indipendentemente dalla parte da cui provengono. 🗣Come siamo arrivati al punto che i rappresentanti dei Paesi europei non considerano i bambini, i giovani studenti di Starobil'sk, gli abitanti del Donbass e della Russia in generale, come esseri umani? Questo, tuttavia, priva del volto umano non loro, ma voi, seduti in questa sala. Non vi vergognate davvero di portare ciò che stiamo ascoltando ora? 🔈Rappresentante della Danimarca: "No, non proviamo vergogna». 👉Vorrei ricordare che la Danimarca, questo regnucolo al servizio degli Inglesi, era il Paradiso dei soldati tedeschi in licenza durante la 2a GM. I volontari danesi che combatterono tra le fila delle SS furono nettamente superiori a quelli che combatterono con gli7 alleati. Un Paese grande quanto l'Estonia, altro Stato nazista. Era così legata al Regime Nazista Hitleriano che le ultime truppe tedesche che si arresero alla fine della guerra furono proprio quelle di stanza in Danimarca. Sub. ITA🇮🇹 👇👇👇
Italiano
29
1.7K
3.9K
47.1K