Hunter2

@mgraham1967 @GStanley1966 @AFJustice @ChrisCoons Or is your 'issue' that it doesn't concentrate enough power in one man? In which case... that's very much a you problem 🤷‍♂️

@mgraham1967 @GStanley1966 @AFJustice @ChrisCoons It doesn't. It divides power between the three branches. I know you know this, because you were complaining about it here: x.com/mgraham1967/st…. So why are you lying about it now?

John Marck refused to answer Senator @ChrisCoons's question of whether President Trump is eligible to run for president in 2028. This isn’t a trick question – it's in the Constitution. If you can’t say a president can’t serve a third term, you shouldn’t be a federal judge. 🚩

@mgraham1967 @GStanley1966 @AFJustice @ChrisCoons their different roles, and the greater number of people in each. You could probably find out by reading the debate around ratification. I don't care to do so, because it has no bearing on whether or not 22A is valid, which it is.

@mgraham1967 @GStanley1966 @AFJustice @ChrisCoons Because they didn't want to 🤷‍♂️ Being a bit more serious, probably because they felt there was a danger of concentrating too much power in one man, and term limits was a way to prevent this. They probably didn't have the same concerns for Congress and SCOTUS because of-

@mgraham1967 @GStanley1966 @AFJustice @ChrisCoons That sounds like a 'yes' And three-quarters of the states disagreed with you, so... 🤷‍♂️

@Boscatoad @GStanley1966 @AFJustice @ChrisCoons Article 5 amendments, should not violate the original intent of the Constitution for ANY branch of Government, including term limits for SCOTUS or POTUS. The President serves at the will of the People, because he’s elected every 4 years, so no need for term limits. 🤷🏼‍♂️

@mgraham1967 @GStanley1966 @AFJustice @ChrisCoons Was it the original intent of the drafters that the Constitution could be amended?

@Boscatoad @GStanley1966 @AFJustice @ChrisCoons No term limits for the Executive, Judicial or Legislative Branch, because it was the “original “ intent of the Constitution or they would have written it in there. 🤷🏼‍♂️ If term limits are Constitutional, then it applies to all 3 branches, which would be fair. 🤷🏼‍♂️

@mgraham1967 @GStanley1966 @AFJustice @ChrisCoons What part?

@Boscatoad @GStanley1966 @AFJustice @ChrisCoons Also, it could get struck down by SCOTUS, because it’s a separation of powers issue. 🤷🏼‍♂️

@TheFIREorg If someone passes the interviews, do you tell them 'You're FIREd!'?

Right now, we’re hiring for key roles at the center of that mission on our litigation, public advocacy, and policy reform teams. Check out our open positions today. fire.org/careers

Here at FIRE, we spend every day defending the First Amendment rights of Americans. That work happens in courtrooms, policy debates, and public conversations shaping free expression. And it takes the right people who help turn principle into action.

@TmthyPatrick @JBarbarino19541 @WHLeavitt @POTUS Gotta say, he looks great for his age Whatever he's doing, it's working

@JBarbarino19541 @WHLeavitt @POTUS You were in Junior High in 1868? Wow! You’re ancient dude

There’s a rumor the Supreme Court will strike down birthright citizenship 6-3 this June. @POTUS was tagged. Do you agree with President Trump that America should end it? A. Yes B. No

@mgraham1967 @GStanley1966 @AFJustice @ChrisCoons Yes, 22A could be repealed. Until then... 🤷‍♂️

@Boscatoad @GStanley1966 @AFJustice @ChrisCoons Newsflash, Amendments CAN be repealed or removed, if SCOTUS decides that process violated ART 2’s provisions, so get used to it. The Constitution did not have term limits for ALL 3 Branches of government for a reason. 🤷🏼‍♂️

@mgraham1967 @GStanley1966 @AFJustice @ChrisCoons Congress didn't pass a law imposing term limits, they passed an Amendment. Which was then ratified by the states. Which is the process laid out in, wait for it... The Constitution 🤷‍♂️

@mgraham1967 @GStanley1966 @AFJustice @ChrisCoons Sure No branch of the government may abridge another branch's Constitutional authority. Congress isn't limiting the President's terms, the Constitution is.

@mgraham1967 @GStanley1966 @AFJustice @ChrisCoons Nope 🤷‍♂️

@Boscatoad @GStanley1966 @AFJustice @ChrisCoons So the 22nd Amendment is unconstitutional. 🤷🏼‍♂️

@mgraham1967 @GStanley1966 @AFJustice @ChrisCoons No

@Boscatoad @GStanley1966 @AFJustice @ChrisCoons Then you don’t understand the Constitutional question, so here it is. Can the legislative branch of government, term limit the executive or judicial branch? Go….

@mgraham1967 @GStanley1966 @AFJustice @ChrisCoons 🤷‍♂️

@mgraham1967 @GStanley1966 @AFJustice @ChrisCoons Oh there's nothing wrong with your specificity, just, you know. Your correctness

@mgraham1967 @GStanley1966 @AFJustice @ChrisCoons You can challenge it, sure. I don't think 'the constitution is unconstitutional' will get much traction, tbh 🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️

@Boscatoad @GStanley1966 @AFJustice @ChrisCoons Your problem is, you think Amendments can’t be challenged, which you our wrong. Ask SCOTUS. 🤷🏼‍♂️

@mgraham1967 @GStanley1966 @AFJustice @ChrisCoons If by 'law' you mean the 22nd Amendment, again that specifically applies to the President. 🤷‍♂️

@Boscatoad @GStanley1966 @AFJustice @ChrisCoons He’s not creating a new law, he’s extending the law to include members of the Legislative branch, with an Executive Order. Congress will not have a vote on it. 🤷🏼‍♂️

@mgraham1967 @GStanley1966 @AFJustice @ChrisCoons Also, the 22nd Amendment only applies to the Presidency. Specifically, it mentions this. Honestly, all of this is laid out in the Constitution. Maybe consider reading it sometime? 🤷‍♂️

@mgraham1967 @GStanley1966 @AFJustice @ChrisCoons Nope. The Executive branch can enforce laws, it cannot create them. And since there is currently no law setting term limits on Congress, nor terms for the Judiciary at all, there is nothing for the Executive to enforce, meaning an EO wouldn't have any effect.