Michael Brazil
17 posts
@chrisklomp @Reporters_nl Dar ben ik weer! Als Klomp het woord 'integer' gebruikt kun je er 100% zeker van zijn dat het om oplichters gaat zoals Klomp zelf die maar blijft beweren 'dat er een strafzaak tegen mij komt'. Talking about nepnieuws!
21/5/26 - FACTORY OF DEATH: ERASMUS MC ROTTERDAM, THE NETHERLANDS 🧵 1/…. Micha Kat – Brazil 🇧🇷 On one of the last days of 2012 a remarkable piece appeared in the Algemeen Dagblad, one of the biggest newspapers in The Netherlands. The headlines were the most strange and sinister the world has ever seen: In the USA I was compared with Adolf Hitler and How a big step forward in combating bird flu became a nightmare. What was going on here? In this piece we will disclose the biggest secret in the world’s history of scientific research: how a team of virologists at a university in The Netherlands under the veil of ‘scientific progress’ built viruses with the explicit aim to reduce the worlds population. The article is basically an interview with prominent Dutch virologist Ron Fouchier. It was the first interview ever published with this Erasmus MC virologist in The Netherlands and the occasion was exactly as sinister as the headlines suggested: Fouchier and his team succeeded in ‘upgrading’ the avian flu-virus H5N1 (the most deadly variant) to being ‘airborne’ and thus transmissible from human to human. They achieved this by transposing this feature (being airborne) from avian flu-virus N7H7 to H5N1, thus creating what in essence is a bioweapon. But this b-word was not in the article. Nor was explained to the Dutch public what was the real significance of this piece of why it was published in the first place. We will reveal this now, 14 years later for the first time: the interview was the deep state-celebration of the first successful gain of function-operation in the world that opened the gates to the construction of a series of weaponized viruses that since made world headlines: MERS, Covid 19, Monkeypox, Ebola, Hanta. SARS is not mentioned because Fouchier and his team worked on upgrading that virus the year before but could not achieve the crucial gain of function-breakthrough. ‘When the gain of function was realised at last, we celebrated by throwing a box of beer on the table’ says Ron Fouchier in the interview. But the reporter of the Algemeen Dagblad faced a peculiar, never-seen-before and unsolvable journalistic problem: how to ‘repack’ a scientific breakthrough to kill the world’s population as something ‘good’ or at least, if that would not be possible, as something that appeared legit of, if that would also be a bridge too far, as something that would not raise suspicions and maybe even lead to the arrest of mr Fouchier and his team? One of the main strategies that is applied is situations like this is: paint the perpetrator as a victim. And that is exactly what the journalist did. ‘I was compared to Hitler’ lamented Fouchier. ‘My daughter was harassed at school’, ‘We needed police protection round our premises’, ‘I received death threads’. Why would all these terrible things have happened if mr Fouchier did something for the benefit of the world? Amidst all the spins and framings the journalist still could not let go of this paramount question: why did you do it? What are the benefits? Fouchier was unable to answer. The journalist scribbled these words on her notepad: We acted out of honest motives only.
Dear @elonmusk, @X, @Support, @Safety, @GlobalAffairs, @grok and @xai, I am reposting this because the issue has not disappeared. Micha Kat, the Dutch Conspiracy Theorist Laureate, has now been suspended from X for nearly two weeks. No clear explanation. No visible review. No public reassurance. No meaningful response. For an ordinary account, that would already raise questions. For one of the most recognisable dissident voices in the Dutch conspiracy and anti-consensus sphere, it should set off every alarm bell. Micha is known for his “BOMBSHELLS”, often delivered in theatrical fashion. But beneath that style lies something far more serious: he follows the lines others prefer to avoid. COVID. Virus narratives. Laboratories. Geopolitical networks. International health structures. Alleged elite abuse networks. Media silence. Compromised alternative media. And that last point matters. Micha does not only challenge mainstream media. He also exposes the alternative media sphere when he believes it has become compromised, controlled or corrupt. That makes him inconvenient not only to the official narrative, but also to the managed opposition around it. This is why his suspension matters far beyond one Dutch account. X is no longer just an app. The old internet was a place you visited. The next digital order is becoming a layer you must pass through. Speech, reputation, identity, payments, health status, work, political legitimacy, social participation and access to the public conversation are increasingly being reorganised through digital systems. We are moving from voluntary online expression toward a world where digital presence becomes a condition of public existence. This is not only about one suspended account. Europe is entering a new digital governance phase: the Digital Services Act, the AI Act and the European Digital Identity Wallet are all shaping how speech, identity, access, moderation, reputation and algorithmic visibility will be organised in the years ahead. That makes the silent removal of a controversial journalist and researcher from a major public platform even more serious. If X uses AI, automated systems or opaque moderation layers to manage visibility, framing or access, then transparency and meaningful appeal are not optional details. They are the minimum requirement for a digital public square that still wants to call itself free. In such a world, silently removing a controversial journalist and researcher is not a minor moderation issue. It is a warning from the future. On X, highly controversial figures can remain extremely visible when they mainly produce spectacle, moral poison, political theatre or controlled provocation. Kanye West, Nick Fuentes, Andrew Tate, Tommy Robinson, Alex Jones and similar figures can move through the public conversation as loud distractions. But when someone like Micha Kat follows lines toward China, COVID, virus dossiers, laboratories, international health structures, alleged elite abuse networks and compromised alternative media, the machine suddenly appears far more cautious. That is the painful asymmetry. And it should be treated as a major red flag. Because if spectacle is allowed to move freely while the real nerve is quietly managed, then the issue is no longer simply moderation. It is the management of what kind of truth is allowed to become visible. The question is not whether Micha Kat is comfortable, polished or reputationally safe. Precisely not. If truth-seeking is the standard, reputational damage cannot become the gatekeeper of public speech. The more controversial a figure is, the more rigorously his claims should be challenged, examined and debated. Not silently removed. Freedom of Speech, not Reach? This is now more fundamental: no reach, no visibility, no explanation, and eventually no access to the digital public square at all. If X and Grok truly stand for truth-seeking, this case deserves serious review. What exactly is X afraid of? Please review this urgently.
@BrazilMich77527 Volgens mij heb jij een mail gehad van Twitter waarin staat dat je geen nieuwe account mag aanmaken.
Partijdigheid @Politie @ALVteamRdam @vrijheidalice @NJHoekman @JDTVproducties @KAFKA_Dev
