Jimmy Corsetti

@TimothyAlberino @joerogan 🔥🙌🏻

Had a fascinating conversation with the GOAT. @joerogan

Most people go their whole lives without ever seeing a Bald Eagle in the wild 🦅 Spotted at The Gates of The Mountains, Montana 🇺🇸

India is remnants of a lost ancient civilization that possessed technology that far exceeds what we were taught in school.

@LoganM78494 I never said it was cut by a laser. But it is indeed laser-like. And the rough stone (which includes quartz within the granite) absolutely does protrude over the line cut.

@BrightInsight6 Nothing would protrude over the cut, that's not how lasers work Particularly the darker colored cells would absorb more and you'd see none of them along the seem

Back when I first posted these spectacular photos, naysayers attempted to claim it was part of the SAME stone; a “natural crack” Nope. It’s evidence of a lost ancient tooling capable of ‘laser-like’ precision cuts on Granite 💯

@LoganM78494 The line is completely flat, you’re observing the 3d aspect of the rough stone protruding over/outside the cut.

@BrightInsight6 What kind of laser cuts like this? Have you ever laser cut anything before?

@omardoesstuff2 😂

@BrightInsight6 The naysayers are smoking natural crack.

These are the stones here:

@MadMatt9000 Lmao, this is awesome 👏🏻 😅

Jimmy it is important to me that you see this youtube.com/watch?v=obckNb… @BrightInsight6

Gratitude to the universe and to all friends everywhere for so many kind wishes. My cardiac surgery went well -- better than expected. I'll update properly next week. Meanwhile, I'm home, surrounded by love, am enjoying a great reawakening of energy and intend to dive into writing Chapter 21 of my new book tomorrow. Happy Summer Solstice!

How many of us pleaded with friends and family to understand these *obvious facts* years ago, but were laughed at or ignored? Where are all the Fauci defenders now?

@appears_mental lol, figured I’d get nuked my European friends for saying Soccer 😄

@BrightInsight6 >Football field in the post >Soccer field in the graphic Well played 😀

The Great Pyramid of Giza covers 13 acres For perspective, compare to a World Cup Football field ⚽️

@ArizonaGrows Love it, we think alike! Made a post comparing it to a 100m Soccer field!

@BrightInsight6 For perspective a football field is 120 yards. 360 feet. So it's longer than two of them.

The Great Pyramid of Giza is so massive, when you stand at its base (which is 755ft wide on all four sides), the distance to the center at its top is a staggering 377ft (115 meters) in front of you 🤯

@WhiteTrashDK This is true! But for the point of describing the distances at its base, I didn’t include that!

@BrightInsight6 8 sides 😉

@UnfinishedSynt I’m not so sure about that

@BrightInsight6 Poor take.

In July 2024, heavy rainfall led to the collapse of an ancient Pyramid in Mexico Amazing to think that the Great Pyramids of Egypt were constructed thousands of years earlier, but were built with far superior sophistication No ancient Civilization compares to the Egyptians

@DeDunkingPast @DrZamilov @UnchartedX1 Well said, Dan 💯

@DrZamilov @UnchartedX1 This is the worst breakdown of science vs pseudoscience I’ve ever read. You fail to account for a ‘known unknown’ in your work, and I’ve pointed this out to you and you laugh about it. If you think that’s science, I’ll get my definition of it from a fortune cookie

Dear Dan @DeDunkingPast - I agree with you that dreamers like you CAN and perhaps SHOULD inspire scientific research. After all, Ben van Kerkwyk @UnchartedX1 inspired me to go 'all in' on the ancient Egyptian vase study, which I published in Nature Heritage Sciences: nature.com/articles/s4049… The difference between science and pseudoscience is this: 1) Pseudoscientists (like Ben or Graham Hancock) basically say, 'trust me, bro!' They do not cite their sources, do not publish their raw data, and do not disclose nitty-gritty details of their study methods, thus depriving us of the ability to independently verify their claims. 2) Scientists, however, do meticulously cite their sources, publish their raw data, and provide the nitty-gritty details of study methods, and invite critical discussion of the results. This is done to enable independent verification, which is a big deal in science. Science does not require trust, no. Instead, it gives you a 'toolkit' to derive reliable conclusions. Pseudoscience, however, says 'Trust me! I made a discovery! Look how cool it is!' But it conveniently omits all the steps in between that would allow one to ascertain the veracity of the claims. It is a lot of work to supply the missing steps. But following them eliminates an issue of trust and transparency: all the data is there for everyone to see and judge. maximus.energy/index.php/2026…

@East10Outpost Truth 💯

@BrightInsight6 The Egyptians don't even compare to pre-dynamic egyptians😁

@ToddJobson Rain would do absolutely nothing to bring these down

@BrightInsight6 🤔Ummm.. maybe Egypt doesnt get regular CONSTANT rain & erosion being in a desert ??🤦‍♂️🤣