Nobody likes my posts. Thanks Elon

Keep in mind as you read the news today… most of the disasters and problems and all being reported have fairly simple solutions. The fact that none of those solutions are implemented is the actual news of each day. Good luck.

Marco Rubio after finding out Pam Bondi was fired

The perfect response…

This retard is going to get destroyed in the Macron lawsuit and she’ll get destroyed in an Erika lawsuit. If you think she’s like some kind of genius, you’re wrong. She’s a malicious halfwit. Everything she says is wrong, and if you believe her, you are a sucker.

@TheLastRefuge2 Sundance, a lot of smart people question Tulsi’s ties to Jackson Hinkle.

The Guardian is to GCHQ as the Washington Post is to the CIA. The British Intel outlet doesn't like Tulsi.

All the large accounts that present themselves as truth-seeking journalists or commentators, then quote posts like this and act utterly baffled—“What the hell!?” “WTF!?” “What’s going on here???”—are frauds. It took me less than a minute to see what the court documents actually said and understand what they meant. They do not show that the bullet was not fired from the gun. They show only that the bullet was too fragmented to confidently link it to ANY gun. This is not uncommon, and DOES NOT mean the bullet didn’t come from Robinson’s gun. Of course the defense attorneys are going to spin this as evidence that Robinson is innocent. That is what defense attorneys do. They scrape together every possible fragment of doubt and present it as if it were fully exculpatory. It’s not. Defense lawyers are paid to downplay or ignore evidence pointing to guilt, exploit people’s cognitive biases, and make fallacious arguments sound persuasive. This information about the bullet doesn’t erode the case for Robinson’s guilt in any way. It is totally neutral on that front. And it in no way invalidate the mountain of positive and mutually corroborating lines of evidence we do have for Robinson’s guilt. You should expect more from the commentators you follow, and hold them accountable by refusing to give them your attention in the future. If they could not be bothered to spend even one minute checking the facts before spreading confusion to you and millions of others on X, they do not deserve your attention. They are nothing more than grifting engagement farmers.

Tonight, a Black Lives Matter activist came up to me, put a camera in my face, & said, “What do you think of the Black Lives Matter movement?” I responded, “I don’t think black men should be unjustly locked up, while illegal aliens are rewarded with freedom.” He didn’t say anything & walked away.

She’s on the warpath.

@catturd2 @SafetyNotorious Just once, I would love to hear a loud “Show us your hooters!” from the crowd. Just once.

@yoyonofukuoka Fair warning And, yes, Leftists always lie: “Japan hates America” “The world hates America” “America hates Japan” “You should hate your own country” The truth is that Leftists have to lie because Leftism is the Revolution against Reality x.com/xtremelydad/st…

Do not let the online demoralization campaign work on you. This country is still the greatest in the world and it is still worth fighting for. Handing power to marxists will teach nobody "a lesson" it will be the end of this country as we know it. Never vote Democrat. NEVER stay home.

If the guy who lives in Brazil and dresses like a girl and sucks the toes of a black gay prostitute, with meth paraphernalia in the background, doesn’t understand politics, nobody does.

1) But what might be more stupider (I know) is calling brazenly Marxist political warfare activities liberal. In fact, it's a narrative trap enforced by the GOPe. It's their institutions that have accepted the controlled opposition mission of ensuring all discussions remain marooned in the archaic language of "liberal" or the non-descriptive language "far left." "Far Left" cannot generate indicators, hence no warning is possible. On this last point, "far left" is a narrative term that the GOPe enforces when suppressing the REAL language of political warfare, Marxism, the DSA, etc. Why? Because you cannot target what you will not define. "Far Left" allows you to keep the target audience you control in a narrative churn that says less than what's heard. Terms like Frankfurt School, CrimethInc, Unity of Fields (Hamas) are the Marxist or Islamist agents actively present that can be identified and targeted. The GOPe knows what they do. They know they do it to you. Just like they know America is a Republic, and yet agree to progress the Left's preferred term, "democracy." This means, among other things, that groups that trade on the Federalist brand actually end up using it to gut what it stands for. Knowingly. Comrad! There are no accidents. There are no "but if they only knew(s)." The fact that it happens confirms that reality that it was intended. All threat analysis starts here! As stated in the 2018 "ReRemembering the MisRemembered Left," the use of the term "liberal" is a deliberate tactical choice in the service of a sustained active measure to keep the public in a sustained state of strategic incomprehension. All the while using "far left" as the preferred 24-hour news cycle term to create the illusion that the issues are being addressed when, in fact, it's just the opposite. This is why America keeps losing ground, even when majorities are elected to stop it. From pages 9 to 12 or ReRemembering on the true cost of using the word "liberal."

It's for those who speak into the void, hear the void speak back, and then move against the void. It's a very lonely place. The Prisoner who’s seen the sun and now knows what he sees also knows that when he re-enters (Plato’s) cave, those chained to the wall will be so attached to the shadows that inform their judgment that they will prefer to kill you. It’s why Cypher chose the Matrix. To your question, it's not what he gets from it, it's about sustaining what has already been achieved through the next phase, in which the Nouvelle Théologie transitions from covert control of the Church in a classic counter-state operation capable of operating in the open, having successfully negotiated a sustained period of 'dialogue and praxis' just as folks like Gramsci laid out. It's the management of the Church after the Alta Vendita scenario has been successfully executed: "Let the clergy march under your banner in the belief always that they march under the banner of the Apostolic Keys. You wish to cause the last vestige of tyranny and of oppression to disappear? Lay your nets like Simon Barjona. Lay them in the depths of sacristies, seminaries, and convents . . . You will bring yourselves as friends around the Apostolic Chair. You will have fished up a Revolution in Tiara and Cope, marching with Cross and banner—a Revolution which needs only to be spurred on a little to put the four quarters of the world on fire." What's being negotiated now is the ability to march in the open, dare I say, 'Loud and Proud', in "tiara and cope," as it leads “the Revolution . . . to put the four corners of the world on fire." If the Nouvelle Theologie leading to Vatican II was the insurgency, then the post-Vatican II era has the Counter-state leading the insurgencies. And not just as bystanders, but rather as full participating allies. And not just Fr Martin on the red side of the "Red-Green Alliance" ledger, but also on the green side as well. How is that you say? Well, if you have to ask . . . When the Archdiocese of Chicago supports Hamas against Juliana Taimoorazy (below), it necessarily accepts ISIS’s liquidation of those same Assyrian Catholics in Syria and Iraq today. To be an ally of the IM (Islamic Movement) here is to be an ally there. It’s just that simple. Just look at how they came to the vocal defense of the “Palestinian Christians” - by which is meant those Christians living in Gaza. Why did the USCCB and Vatican protest the collateral damage the IDF (may have) caused in Gaza? Well, NOT because the Gaza Christians were attacked in some targeted campaign against Christians in Gaza, but rather to come to the support of their allies, HAMAS. The same HAMAS that the Archdiocese of Chicago prefers over Julian Taimoorazy and other severely persecuted Christians at the hands of their “shoulder to shoulder” brothers. It’s just that simple. Had the Church cared about the Palestinian Christians, they would have begun protesting when those Christians were being culled from ‘Palestine’ - over a 95% reduction no less, at the hands of the PLO, PFLP, and HAMAS et al. So, why doesn’t the Church full-throatedly protest Boko Haram’s mass killing of Christians at scale in Nigeria? After all, most of them are Catholic! Easy! (And it really is this easy.) Because they are part of the same Islamic Movement (the IM) that the Muslim Brotherhood leads in the United States, in which the USCCB proudly stands “shoulder to shoulder” as they “build (Sayyid Qutb style) bridges in “dialogues” oriented to the subordination and reduction of the Catholic Church and all Christianity. After all, to really protest Boco Haram or ISIS would be to upset the always “delicate” relationship with their bridge building partners. And besides, it’s not as if Assyrian Catholics are New Theology Catholics in need of preserving as the new church moves forward. The New Theology seeks the negation of the Old, almost as if the “New” is an intentional dialectical negation of the Old. Go figure. It’s so simple that only idiots who think they’re smart can’t understand it. Besides, who needs an ethnic church that traces its history back to the Apostles, in the language of the Apostles, as a reminder that Tradition looks back, as it already infallibly says in Pastor Aeternus? KNOW WHAT YOU SEE and remember, 2 + 2 always equals 4. And also remember that proper Catholic (and all Christian) ecclesial and theological language that’s put in the service of deception is casuistry. Just commit to knowing what you see and call it that. Pachamama, Fr Martin, de Chardin, von Balthasar? Same god? All casuistry. But be prepared to be overwhelmed with that high theology language, used for sustained misdirection, used to improperly assume a dominant posture from which to confuse the simple faithful, or rather, the sensus fidelium. “Tiara and Cope”! But also remember that “Tiara and Cope” Catholics pray to the Spirit that moves history forward. Hegel called it the Geist. Pierre (and the Greeks) called it the World Soul - or Omega Jesus - or World Spirit. So did Ratzinger! (Oops, did I just say that?) Just say No! If it wasn’t Catholic in 1900, it’s not Catholic today. If it’s Catholic today and wasn’t in 1900, then it’s not Catholic (at all). It’s that simple. On casuistry, when given a technically correct “One God” explanation argued along speculative theological lines, itself completely opaque to the normal faithful, when measured against the actual and intentional damage and confusion it creates, that “one god” syllogism crumbles to nothingness when measured against Elijah’s rebuke: “Elijah went before the people and said, ‘How long will you waver between two opinions? If the Lord is God, follow him; but if Baal is God, follow him.’ But the people said nothing.” (1 Kings 18:21) And New Theology types likewise will say nothing. But they know. While the Old Theology is repulsed by misdirection, the syncretic New Theology seeks it out as an end-of-history outcome that their spirit drives forward. But really, how does one not sense the esoteric syncretism in this equation? Returning to the Archdiocese of Chicago, if one positions Saul Alinsky as a Gramsci Marxist, and recognizes that Gramsci Marxists joined the Long March (Maoist Insurgency) in 1968, and then remembers that "Rules for Radicals" was written about how Alinsky set up mass line activities (rub the wounds raw) through “community organizations” (proletariat cells) in Chicago, alongside coopted elements of the Archdiocese of Chicago, then one should be on notice that the truth might be on the other side of what one sees. Just re-read “Rules.” It really is RIGHT THERE. Then recall that after the COMINTERN called for the standing up of an Interfaith organization for the purpose of penetrating into the churches in the mid-30s, Alinsky founded the Industrial Areas Foundation (IAF), which, to this day, remains the largest interfaith organization in the US, and remains the dominant interfaith organization in the Archdiocese of Washington, DC, and Northern Virginia. So, when hearing that an American became the pope, as a Catholic, the provenance that emerges reflects how he went to this seminary and served in that church etc. But as an intelligence officer with a bent towards counterintelligence, counterterrorism, and political warfare, a parallel provenance emerges that recognizes the early deep penetration of the Archdiocese of Chicago, Cardinal Bernardin’s (not so) covert Marxism, resulting in documents like the “Seamless Garment,” and Leo’s long-term missionary work in Peru while pondering Pachamama, and whether and what type of interactions Prevost might have had with groups like the Sendero Luminoso. There is the concern that the CI provenance tips the scales. And while pondering this, also recognizing what can easily be understood as a calibration and dosing effort that oscillates between Fr Martin, a militantly pro-immigration posture that makes a mockery of national borders and identity, when balanced out against truly well executed Tridentine masses in full Latin - and recognizing that this too can be understood in a dialectical frame as one that keeps the target audience off balance. And then recognizing that in holding out things like the Tridentine Mass, he knows exactly what the faithful seek when actually denied to the full faithful. As I realize I’m droning on, I’ll end this chat here with this observation. For those who understand political warfare, including its dialectical nature, a picture emerges in which the discerning know what they see, and what they see is not good. And, rounding out from yesterday, taking note of the seamless, harmonious interplay between the Alta Vendita and Gramsci, between Chardin and Alinsky, one should remember that the Communio needs the Concilium in just the way the Gerondins needed the Jacobins, in which the non-violent main actor drives its violent splinter.

You will know if John Thune is actually trying to get the votes when RINOs lose their coveted committee positions. They are grift currency in DC. Until then he’s lying about even trying to get the votes.

Stop trying to turn Catholicism into a BLM victimhood cult. We number 1.4 billion globally. It’s pathetic. You’re like Jesse Jackson taking every personal attack against you and making it about race/religion.

Almost nothing happening on X really matters. Ditto for podcasts. Battles between terminally online Jew haters and gatekeepers who see antisemitism around every corner, all a sideshow. What matters is the GOP still doesn't know how to unite and follow Trump's lead.

Babies are the answer.

No…America is a republic, and liberals and progressive populists would rather see it become a pure democracy. A republic protects individual rights, while a democracy devolves into majority rule—where 51% of the people can dictate terms to the other 49%. Terminology matters because we’re losing our individual rights, as intended by the progressives.