Bryan Poe, TX

@CliffordDMay What do more recent NSSs say about Russia? China? North Korea?

What's imminence got to do with it? First, because even under the most creative interpretations of international law and just-war theory, there’s no prohibition against addressing threats that are not “imminent.” Second, because there is no agreed-upon definition of imminence. If your enemy picks up a pistol, does that constitute an imminent threat? Or must you wait until you see his finger on the trigger – by which time it may too late for you to defend yourself? The 2002 U.S. National Security Strategy – the NSS that followed the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001 – explicitly endorsed preemptive action against gathering threats. In line with that criteria, CIA Director John Ratcliffe last week told the Senate Intelligence Committee that Iran posed a “constant threat to the United States…and posed an immediate threat” before the war began. More, if you're interested, here: washingtontimes.com/news/2026/mar/…

@krassenstein Nobody needed to be warned. It was obvious from the start.

BREAKING: The WSJ REPORTS THAT: “At least 3 congressional Republicans, including chairs of House and Senate Armed Services; are strongly hinting that a ground operation in Iran is planned and could potentially be underway soon.” I warned you all.

@McFaul Is this overstating the use of frequency hopping?

And this is why the US Department of Defense should be doing more collaborative work with Ukrainian defense companies.

@AriFleischer We should have shut the airports down before 911 with the information that administration was provided.

If we we go into this weekend with TSA unfunded, it won’t surprise me if all TSA agents stop working, shutting down US airports entirely, This is madness. It’s brutal to TSA and their families and it’s punishing to the travelling public. Congress must reach an agreement, before it’s too late.

@ThamesPotomac @RepNancyMace Potentially far worse

@RepNancyMace This is Iraq all over again 🤦‍♂️

Just walked out of a House Armed Services briefing on Iran. Let me repeat: I will not support troops on the ground in Iran, even more so after this briefing.

@McFaul If it’s like NCMI intel on pandemic in late fall 2019, someone will soon say no such product exists…

Is anyone aware of an NSC options paper presented to the president that outlined the pluses and minuses of launching a war against Iran? If such a paper was produced, did it include a point about the negative economic impact of the war on the economies of our allies and partners around the world?

@johncusack 1977 John, have a great morning!

Trump is such an insane blithering idiot What he’s thinking about is whether he could win a fight with Elvis - dead since - 19 78 ? While he may actually send US troops to be slaughtered in Iran And it will make the Gallipoli look like a birthday party

@Maga_Trigger 10 because the message from the cop was disregarded

On a scale of 1-10 how much do you think this was staged?

@HistorylandHQ Like Rance Stoddard?!

Ron Howard with his brother Clint and their father Rance in 1970.

@realDonaldTrump Your buddy’s Grok is a bit challenged geographically. Hope DOD has a better version!

@tedcruz Then, could you also please explain your 2020 election actions? You know, as a member of the bar?

Jack Smith went to court and said that I’d destroy evidence if I knew about his subpoena. Judge Boasberg signed off on the order. I’m a member of the bar, I take my obligation seriously — there’s no basis for that.

@realDonaldTrump I do like the multi-pronged strike force idea! God speed to all the assembled troops preparing to go in. The sooner we finish this project, the sooner we succeed! chatGPT graphics

@GeraldoRivera The probability of an invasion is 100%. Think of air strikes as the foundation and ground invasion and liberation as the Plaza Iran.

With 2500 troops from the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit bearing down on Iran, now we see the very real possibility that a combat brigade from the Army’s storied 82nd Airborne Division will likely also be heading to Iran. Despite talks of peace, the conflict is still escalating.

@JamesTate121 By assault do you mean neighbor’s expression of concern for children’s safety?

Alan Ritchson was assaulted by Ronnie Taylor twice in front of his kids. He is MAGA and the don’t tread on me crowd of course did not take Alan’s side because he doesn’t agree with them politically. They are deplorable lying cowards.

@marklevinshow I agree with all save 4. They DID say Israel forced the issue (Rubio). That’s at least one thing Kent is right about!

SOME OF THE KEY TAKEAWAYS FROM MY INTERVIEW WITH JOE KENT. I decided to provide this summary because the media have either ignored the interview or focused on more trivial bits of the interview without reporting on some of Kent's astonishing statements and misdirection. You can decide for yourself. 1. I pressed Joe Kent on widespread allegations from multiple sources and in multiple news outlets about his leaking of classified information and an investigation that started well before he resigned. He denied leaking classified or confidential information to anyone at any time and said he was unaware of an investigation. 2. Kent denied leaking Charlie Kirk's group texts to Candice Owens, which were given to him in confidence by Andrew Kolvet, despite Kolvet implying otherwise. Kolvet issued his own video stating Kent suggested Kovet release the texts to the public, which he refused to do. Soon thereafter, Owens released them and has obsessively used the texts to suggest Israel assassinated Charlie. 3. Kent accused Israel of starting the 12-day war against Iran and our subsequent bombing of the Iranian nuclear sites. I know for a fact that Israel did not launch that operation without the go-ahead by President Trump. Furthermore, Israel did not force the President to bomb the nuclear sites. President Trump knew exactly what he was doing and made the decision after consulting with his civilian and military advisers. 4. Kent insisted that Israel was going to attack Iran several weeks ago and, again, forced President Trump to launch our current military campaign (in coordination with Israel) against Iran. The President, Marco Rubio, John Radcliffe, and others, all deny it. 5. He insisted that Khamenei wanted a peace deal and had issued a fatwa years ago declaring that Iran would never develop a nuclear weapon. I knew this was as absurd argument and pressed Kent. The President's envoys also contradicted this by the facts, as have others, as there are obvious and plentiful facts of Iran's pursuit of a nuclear weapon, manufacture and accumulation of nuclear material, its violation of nuclear agreements, and its clandestine activities surrounding the entire decades' long project. 6. I mentioned Iran had lied about the reach of its ballistic missiles, to include most of Europe, to which Kent said nothing. 7. Kent's obsession with Israel as the aggressor against Iran was apparent throughout the interview. He repeatedly portrayed Iran as the victim, ignoring Iran's myriad acts of terrorism and its establishing, funding, training, and arming of Hezbollah and Hamas, among other things. 8. Kent repeatedly accused Israel of controlling President Trump's decisions respecting Iran, ignoring my repeated mentioned of the myriad examples of Iran's 47-years of acts of terrorism and war against our country, embassies, military installations, military personnel, and assassination attempts against the President and other top administration officials. 9. Kent ignored the repeated declarations by the President that he would not allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon, and repeatedly insisted that Iran was not close to making a nuclear weapon, in direct contradiction of Iran's own representations to Special Envoys Witkoff and Kushner in the final rounds of negotiations before the President ordered the current military actions, as well as CIA Director Radcliffe's sworn testimony and the statements of others in the know. 10. When I asked Kent to name the 18-intelligence agencies that he claims unanimously concluded Iran was not close to having a nuclear weapon, he did not. Of course, the President makes the final decision based on all the information provided to him, including not only intelligence information but information from other sources as well, and other circumstances. Nonetheless, Kent's assertion cannot be verified. 11. One of the most preposterous and pernicious of Kent's views was his insinuation that Israel may have been behind the assassination of Charlie Kirk, which he declared during his interview with Tucker Carlson. I pressed him hard on this. He tried to adjust his insinuation to suggest there could have been a foreign actor but that was clearly an equivocation. He also claimed he could not provide specifics as he could not reveal them, or the information was classified or whatever. But he insisted it needed to be pursued. Obviously, he has no information to support any of it. It was a blatant antisemitic trope, to go along with his other obsessions with Israel. 11. I asked Kent about the timing of his resignation and the provocative claims in his letter, as well as his allegations against Israel and supposed Israeli lobbyists and their claimed influence on the President (convincing him to go to war). He responded with generalities, talked about a media echo chamber, and repeated his charge that the President essentially was not making his own decisions. He also said he did not issue his letter at the outbreak of the war because he had hoped the President would quickly reverse course. Clearly, his resignation, letter, and the timing was intended for media consumption and to undermine the President and, he hoped, delegitimize the President's decisions, which Kent knew would be used by the media, the Democrats, the Woke Reich, and others against the President and his decisions. There was much more. You can listen for yourself here:

@WilliamShatner George Burns smoked cigars up towards 100!

At 95, I'm still smokin'! 😝 I’ve learned two things: Never waste a good cigar. Never trust anyone who says you should ‘act your age.’ 😉👍🏻