Wouter van der Lee

Geen papieren? Kom naar Amsterdam.

Vandaag ben ik in Brussel voor mijn eerste Europese Raad. De internationale ontwikkelingen volgen elkaar in rap tempo op; genoeg dossiers vragen onze aandacht. Nederland wil een aanjagende en constructieve rol spelen om de EU vooruit te helpen. Onderwerpen op de agenda: ➡️ De situatie in het Midden-Oosten en de gevolgen voor de energieprijzen. ➡️ Het belang van financiële steun aan Oekraïne. ➡️ Versterking van de EU-defensie om onze vrijheid en veiligheid in Europa te beschermen. ➡️ Hoe we als EU migratiestromen richting Europa in goede banen kunnen leiden. ➡️ Vergroten concurrentievermogen zodat Nederlandse bedrijven meer banen kunnen creëren en voor een sterke EU in een snel veranderende wereld.

🚨IS STARMER COMPROMISED? FROM FREE SPEECH DEFENDER TO JAILING PEOPLE FOR SOCIAL MEDIA POSTS 🤔🔒 What Happened To The Uk Prime Minister And Why His Stance On Social Media Arrests Flipped So Dramatically In 2012, as Director of Public Prosecutions, Keir Starmer proudly declared himself a guardian of free speech. In that now-infamous video he insisted: “Where a communication is merely offensive... principles of free speech require a high threshold, and dictate that a prosecution is unlikely to be in the public interest.” Today, Prime Minister Starmer presides over a regime that has racked up around 12,000 arrests tied solely to social media posts. The numbers are so grotesque that even Russia and China suddenly look like bastions of free speech by comparison. The hypocrisy is breathtaking. Many on X are no longer asking politely — they’re outright declaring that Starmer has been compromised. Whether it’s political cowardice, shadowy external influence, or naked authoritarian instinct, the man who once set a high bar for prosecution now jails people for hurting feelings online. He still trots out the same tired lines about “protecting children” and preventing disorder after the 2024 riots. But the latest escalation is his determined push for brand-new laws specifically targeting “Islamophobic” content. Critics say this is not about hate — it’s about criminalising legitimate public concern and dissent over mass migration, the rapid demographic changes, growing Islamic influence in public life, grooming gang scandals that were long ignored, and the general state of the country. What many see as valid political criticism and free debate is now being re-labelled as illegal “Islamophobia” to shut it down. What started as emergency measures after unrest has quietly morphed into a broader, relentless expansion of censorship dressed up in ever-changing justifications. The old Keir is nowhere to be seen. The contrast is damning.