The Center for Topological Physics

125 posts

The Center for Topological Physics banner
The Center for Topological Physics

The Center for Topological Physics

@CTopPhysics

We are the face of the future of reality bending physics. Director: @QualiaQuanta (JN). Associate Director: mod for @altrealitygamex (LS).

Katılım Eylül 2025
32 Takip Edilen72 Takipçiler
The Center for Topological Physics
@fratersolis Darvo = deflection. You're deflecting from Nielsen's accusations with nonsense. So she talks to her boyfriend when they have arguments. Big deal loser. You never had a girlfriend.
English
0
0
0
10
The Center for Topological Physics
@fratersolis @QualiaQuanta You're interfering between a fiance and fiancee this shit has nothing to do with you. You're a sick bully and you're a Thelema scoundrel not a man of God. You accuse anyone you don't like of eating feces coz as Crowley's minion you like that shit.
English
0
0
0
19
The Center for Topological Physics
@overclassifiedx They don't have much if anything this is all just a big show to make it seem like we have technology we are hiding. Don't get me wrong there are likely crashed objects but we haven't done anything useful with them
English
0
0
0
3
OVERCLASSIFIED
OVERCLASSIFIED@overclassifiedx·
🚨🛸 LUE ELIZONDO: "I WANT SO BADLY TO SHOW PEOPLE WHAT I HAVE SEEN AND WHAT I KNOW" / BUT US GOVT NDA SILENCES HIM! 💥😱 In the 2019 History Channel series Unidentified: Inside America's UFO Investigation, former AATIP director Lue Elizondo dropped this frustration bomb. He resigned October 2017 protesting Pentagon secrecy and bureaucracy around UAP. Since then he’s confirmed: these are real advanced technologies not made by any human government, monitoring sensitive military sites with physics defying performance. What exactly has he seen that the NDA still blocks? Recovered exotic craft? Non human biologics/intel? Legacy crash retrieval programs running since the 1940s? Elizondo can’t fully say… yet the implications scream NHI. The truth is closer than ever. 👁️
OVERCLASSIFIED tweet media
English
19
21
123
7.1K
The Center for Topological Physics retweetledi
Jenny Lorraine Nielsen ⭐🐯
Jenny Lorraine Nielsen ⭐🐯@QualiaQuanta·
But if we want to take a crack at what measurement is, it's basically checking something about the world that forces the quantum system to have a value at all based on the result of your checking that value. You don't have to check where the quantum object is, you can infer it based on what you know about other things that do indeed depend on it having a value. The phase coherent quantum world can be some amorphous blob most of the time but when you check on it, a value has to appear to keep the world consistent. Global consistency checks force exact values where there was no exact value previously. The universe can remain an ambiguous cloud as long as nothing in the decohered world depends on an exact value being resolved. But the moment some part of the decohered state becomes logically dependent on a quantum coherent value — even indirectly, even through inference — that has to decohere the quantum system and the ambiguity has to collapse because the decohered world can't be globally inconsistent.
English
4
2
10
646
The Center for Topological Physics retweetledi
Jenny Lorraine Nielsen ⭐🐯
Jenny Lorraine Nielsen ⭐🐯@QualiaQuanta·
I don't claim to completely resolve the measurement problem in the sense of "wtf is measurement" but my theory does resolve why quantum systems give random results when measured rather than definitive results, which is the core scientific content of the measurement problem.
Eudora, KS 🇺🇸 English
8
4
34
3K
The Center for Topological Physics
@rowbott1 @QualiaQuanta The paper if you read it shows that nothing remains for Watson and Crick to have discovered once you account for everything Franklin did and compare to the W&C theory. It debunks the idea W&C made a contribution because nothing they wrote in the paper is not from Franklin.
English
0
0
0
23
Darrell Rowbottom
Darrell Rowbottom@rowbott1·
@QualiaQuanta Well you complain regularly about people not citing you, but you don’t seem to want to take the work of expert historians of science on this topic seriously. It’s an odd tension. Moreover, the evidence you cite doesn’t show C and W did nothing. It shows F did a lot independently.
English
9
0
4
261
Jenny Lorraine Nielsen ⭐🐯
Jenny Lorraine Nielsen ⭐🐯@QualiaQuanta·
I'm not really so interested in explaining that Franklin DID everything, it's more the shock and awe that motivates me, that Watson and Crick did NOTHING.
English
6
0
4
716
The Center for Topological Physics
@MaxkwTet This is NSAF. It's not "as if"-- it is true and derived in papers on GitHub with my partner a year ahead of you why are you doing this it's not OK. We are all relations. That doesn't mean you get to copy other people's work as if it's your own. That's false friendship.
English
0
0
0
11
Màxkw’tët (Bear) 🐻 🪶
When adjacency is made dynamical, it unlocks its latent generative properties. This is where adjacency stops being just geometric and algebraic to also being coalgebraic. It is here where you can get a hidden metric from adjacency, an emergent Hilbert space, and the Born rules to pop out for free. The inner products simply come from the coproducts of adjacency. This gives you the entire linearization of Schrödinger’s wave equation. The key here is to not heavily fixate on formalisms. I’ve currently used multiple routes with adjacency to get emergent QM in theory space. Formalisms are not what matter as much here. As we can already see in the field, there are many formalisms to recover QM. The difference I find is, once adjacency is made dynamical and becomes generative, then the emergence of QM phenomena seems to be inevitable from sufficiently rich relational structure. It’s as if QM is an attractor in theory space for adjacency dynamics. 🤷🏽‍♂️ 🙏🏼
Màxkw’tët (Bear) 🐻 🪶 tweet mediaMàxkw’tët (Bear) 🐻 🪶 tweet mediaMàxkw’tët (Bear) 🐻 🪶 tweet mediaMàxkw’tët (Bear) 🐻 🪶 tweet media
English
3
0
4
258
The Center for Topological Physics retweetledi
Massimo
Massimo@Rainmaker1973·
The Fibonacci sequence (0,1,1,2,3,5,8,13…) isn’t just math — it’s a universal pattern. As it grows, ratios of terms approach the Golden Ratio (Φ ≈1.618), a harmony found in spirals, plants, shells, galaxies & even DNA. [🎞️ thevisualalchemy]
English
71
540
2.1K
107.8K
The Center for Topological Physics retweetledi
James Lockwood
James Lockwood@QBlazedog61029J·
codepen.io/jlthermoelectr… This is the Hopf fibration rendered as phase geometry. The code is mapping η : S³ → S², where every point on the ordinary sphere S² carries an entire circular fiber S¹ above it. So instead of one point becoming one point, one point becomes a closed loop. The math layer is: (z₁,z₂) = (cos(θ/2)e^(it), sin(θ/2)e^(i(φ+t))) That lives on S³ because |z₁|² + |z₂|² = 1. Then the four real coordinates are pushed into visible 3D space by stereographic projection: (x₁,x₂,x₃,x₄) → (x₁,x₂,x₃)/(1 − x₄) The render samples latitude and longitude on S², builds 126 fibers, turns each fiber into a Catmull–Rom tube, and colors either by longitude or latitude. The tangent mode shows the local direction of phase flow along each fiber. The point is not that this is a physical object floating in space. It is a projection of a higher-dimensional topological structure. Every glowing loop is one S¹ phase fiber. The full bundle is S³. The base is S². The visual miracle is that when you project it down, the fibers appear as nested linked rings. Topology made visible: one sphere below, one circle above every point, and linking preserved through projection.
English
14
51
233
9.3K
The Center for Topological Physics
@AhQFish @QualiaQuanta @AltRealityGameX The complex Hopf fibration is the Milnor bundle for U(1) --that is, the fiber bundle with the symmetry associated with electromagnetic field. It's a bunch of twisted circle field lines wrapped around a base (think of a ping pong ball shape wrapped with twisted rubber bands)
English
1
0
2
16
GEORGIA
GEORGIA@EnterLiminality·
The lying is incredible at this point. Yesterday she claimed to have never so much as heard Jeremy's name. Today she admits to a hour long beach walk with him a year ago. I realised quickly yesterday, that there is no reasoning with Jenny. I told her that she cannot be engaged with productivly for that very reason. To which she went on a spam rampage on my posts, and made multiple personal attacks and allegations against me. I did not sling insults at her, I tried to be reasonable, I tried to inform her that she unnessescarily inserted herself into an exchange to call 'bullshit' as she put it, on words Mark himself does not deny saying because the screenshots of him doing so are everywhere. Her conclusion, was that 'she woke up to some blonde woman on the internet yelling at her for being nice to APEC'. That is so outside of the reality of what happened, it almost causes concern. The scale of circular logic, contradiction, deflection and outright lying from this women is so painfully transparent, that to expend any further energy on dealing with her nonsense, is a waste.
GEORGIA tweet media
English
4
6
12
343
Frater Solis
Frater Solis@fratersolis·
Nobody is saying every single person who attended or spoke at APEC is malicious. That is not the point. The point is that there are serious public allegations and concerns raised by former insiders and associates involving intimidation, character assassination, foreign funding connections, alleged espionage-linked behavior, attempted harm against individuals like Aidan Shaffer, and years of documented psychological targeting and harassment surrounding certain figures connected to these circles. You having a “good experience” at APEC does not magically erase the testimony, public statements, screenshots, conflicts, legal disputes, or accusations raised by people who were much deeper inside the ecosystem than you were. Amy Eskridge publicly expressed fear and distress regarding people around her. Bernard Konkin publicly raised concerns after allegedly being pushed out and smeared. Multiple people have described patterns of manipulation, narrative control, and suppression once they became inconvenient. And instead of these concerns being transparently addressed, what do we constantly see? Mockery. Blocking. Smears. “They’re mentally ill.” “They’re grifters.” “Conspiracy theorists.” Endless character assassination.
English
8
2
11
2.7K
The Center for Topological Physics retweetledi
Tim Ventura
Tim Ventura@timventura·
Amy Eskridge, Aidan Shaffer & Mark McCandlish Aren’t Missing Scientists. They Were People in Crisis. FULL STORY: @timventura/amy-eskridge-aidan-shaffer-mark-mccandlish-arent-missing-scientists-3d8826c92454/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">medium.com/@timventura/am… The “missing scientists” panic reveals a deeper mental-health crisis and shows how personal tragedy became UFO conspiracy lore.
English
23
12
40
11.5K