Caffe' Satoshi

5.5K posts

Caffe' Satoshi banner
Caffe' Satoshi

Caffe' Satoshi

@CaffeSatoshi

Small shots. Bitcoin only. No noise, Data driven. Do not copy my trades. Do your own research

Katılım Ağustos 2021
431 Takip Edilen8.3K Takipçiler
Caffe' Satoshi
Caffe' Satoshi@CaffeSatoshi·
$500,000,000 Minted in USDC mint.
English
0
0
0
106
Caffe' Satoshi
Caffe' Satoshi@CaffeSatoshi·
This time it feels like Bitcoin is back
English
0
0
3
484
CJK
CJK@CJKonstantinos·
SMALL Bitcoin gets you BIG house 1 $BTC = $60K = $300K financing 2 $BTC = $120K = $600K financing 3 $BTC = $180K = $900K financing Get your house keys immediately. Up to 50% of $BTC works for you. Borrow from 3-6% APR. No margin call risk. No liquidation risk. Use Bitcoin today to upgrade your quality of life and standard of living. Benefit tomorrow from Bitcoins upside. 30% CAGR = debt free in 8 years 15% CAGR = debt free in 14 years That's Bitcoin Powered Finance Build Wealth Smarter. 🟠⚡️🏠
Peoples Reserve@PeoplesReserve

Want to buy a $500K home but don't have enough $BTC for 1:1? Enter Bitcoin Mortgage Reserve (BMR) Contribute just 20% ($100K) to $BTC escrow. Get home financing low as 3% APR at Diamond tier. Instead of paying PMI, a sunk cost that only protects the lender, your Bitcoin becomes an equity engine designed to help pay off the debt faster. At 15% $BTC CAGR: debt-free around year 14. At 30% $BTC CAGR: debt-free around year 8. At 60% $BTC CAGR: debt-free around year 5! A 30-year mortgage no longer has to mean 30 years of debt ⚡️ Build Wealth Smarter. Platform is live. Join waitlist here👇

English
18
39
343
36.2K
Hiker
Hiker@OSUFanBigTime·
@CaffeSatoshi The rising price of bitcoin due to electrical costs is inflation. It’s no different than the rising costs to transport goods due to the rising costs of gasoline. It’s all inflationary
English
1
0
0
10
Caffe' Satoshi
Caffe' Satoshi@CaffeSatoshi·
📣 Hear me out: Electricity prices going up all around the world (due to an energy shock brought by Iran war), will mean that Bitcoin miners incur more expenses to mine 1 Bitcoin. Thus, the Bitcoin price will have to go up as it never went below the average Mining price
English
1
0
5
949
Hiker
Hiker@OSUFanBigTime·
@CaffeSatoshi Are you talking about the Bitcoin price or the mining price? If the price of mining goes up then the Bitcoin price will go up. Don’t tell anyone of this dilemma as Bitcoin is supposed to be immune to inflation
English
1
0
0
11
Caffe' Satoshi
Caffe' Satoshi@CaffeSatoshi·
On live TV Sen. Lummis just said the CLARITY Act will be introduced in the next few days targeting a Senate floor vote the week of July 20. "It's very important that we get this bill across the finish line before the August recess." She stated. Right now the polymarket odds are extrenely undervalued at 38% Get in now in this undervalued market : polymarket.com/event/clarity-…
Caffe' Satoshi tweet mediaCaffe' Satoshi tweet media
English
0
0
1
441
Hiker
Hiker@OSUFanBigTime·
@CaffeSatoshi You said, “the Bitcoin price will have to go up”
English
1
0
0
13
Caffe' Satoshi
Caffe' Satoshi@CaffeSatoshi·
@CJKonstantinos Anyone going into debt thinking it's going to end well is crazy. Debt is worse than gambling.
English
0
0
0
32
CJK
CJK@CJKonstantinos·
There is a balance between debt and equity. To maximize efficiency you need both. Imagine a company that couldnt pull forward revenues to expand supply and service demand. My favorite power of bitcoin equity is that it maintains its value (1 btc = 1 btc) while the debt held against it is diluted in real terms. This creates a massive advantage for the borrower versus only securing debt with your promise of expended time & energy.
English
1
0
0
63
Hiker
Hiker@OSUFanBigTime·
@CaffeSatoshi What? That’s inflation and Bitcoin is immune to inflation
English
1
0
1
14
CJK
CJK@CJKonstantinos·
@CaffeSatoshi The same way you pay a regular mortgage, with your cash flow. No such thing as a free lunch. If dont earn money to service a debt, you shouldn't take out a debt. Finance 101.
English
1
0
0
133
Caffe' Satoshi
Caffe' Satoshi@CaffeSatoshi·
I now believe this is the REAL reason the US is attacking Iran 👇 The first Bitcoin war. What if all this stuff with Trump threatening to bomb Iran’s power grid… isn’t really about nukes or “sending a message”? What if it’s about killing their Bitcoin mining? Because Iran has figured out how to print money that sanctions can’t touch. Like, they’ve got around 700,000 mining rigs running on state-subsidized electricity so cheap, they can mine a Bitcoin for like $1,000. Think about that. The IRGC is basically running a $7.8 billion shadow economy off of crypto. Last time the U.S. took a swing at their grid, the global hashrate dropped 15% overnight. Overnight. Now Trump’s out here talking about a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve. His own son launches a massive U.S. mining operation. And publicly he’s yelling “America will be the crypto capital of the world.” But you don’t become #1 by competing with a rogue state that mines cheaper than everyone on Earth. You bomb their cheap electricity back to the Stone Age. Seriously, think about it. While everyone’s obsessing over centrifuges and news headlines, the real fight is over Bitcoin dominance. Iran’s grid goes dark, their rigs go dark, and suddenly U.S. miners, plus the Trump family’s own operation, have zero competition at scale. Makes you wonder
Caffe' Satoshi tweet mediaCaffe' Satoshi tweet media
English
6
1
32
1.8K
Caffe' Satoshi
Caffe' Satoshi@CaffeSatoshi·
Cooler-than-expected inflation Kevin Warsh can cut rates now
English
0
0
0
421
Caffe' Satoshi
Caffe' Satoshi@CaffeSatoshi·
🚨 US June CPI just dropped: 3.5% YoY (beat expectations of 3.8%) and core at 2.6%! Cooler-than-expected inflation = less pressure on the Fed to hike. This is fuel for Bitcoin and risk-on environment incoming as rate cut hopes rise. $BTC to the moon? 🌕
English
0
0
5
622
Caffe' Satoshi
Caffe' Satoshi@CaffeSatoshi·
Billionaires already leaving California, most setting up in San Francisco to avoid the new "California Billionaire Tax"
English
0
0
0
386
Caffe' Satoshi
Caffe' Satoshi@CaffeSatoshi·
Softer inflation expected. (official data to be released in less than 30 minutes)
English
0
0
2
685
₿lackwidow 🕷
₿lackwidow 🕷@blackwidowbtc·
@CaffeSatoshi Can't help but notice that myself Wouldn't call these dangerous, but they are largely useless They don't really show more than what we can already see with the candles
English
3
0
2
448
Caffe' Satoshi
Caffe' Satoshi@CaffeSatoshi·
John Bollinger, the inventor of the Bollinger bands, said he went long on Bitcoin on the 6th May 2026, just before Bitcoin crashed further towards 60k-65k. Presumably John Bollinger should have been using his tools (bollinger bands) to the best, since he invented them! This continues to confirm what I have been saying for a long time: how useless (and actually dangerous!) the Bollinger bands are. Cannot tag John B. since he banned me for pointing this out. 🤷
Caffe' Satoshi tweet media
English
5
2
36
5.7K
Caffe' Satoshi
Caffe' Satoshi@CaffeSatoshi·
Caffe' Satoshi@CaffeSatoshi

THE TRUTH ABOUT ADAM BACK AND THE EPSTEIN CONNECTION Did he really go to the island and was he involved in anything illicit? 👇 The article that shows the truth based only on EVIDENCE. Adam Back, the Bitcoin developer and Blockstream CEO, has been fully exonerated from any wrongdoing in the latest Jeffrey Epstein document dump, with no evidence tying him to the disgraced financier’s criminal activities. Newly unsealed files confirm Back was invited in 2014 to meet Epstein in St. Thomas, near the infamous Little Saint James island, as part of early fundraising discussions for Blockstream. Epstein’s $500,000 investment came through a fund with Joi Ito and was later divested by the company over potential conflicts. Travel arrangements placed Back and co-founder Austin Hill in the US Virgin Islands for a legitimate business trip April 17-20. While Epstein referenced “Andy Back on my island” in one email, there is zero proof Back visited Little Saint James itself or participated in any illicit behavior. Back has consistently stated that Blockstream severed all ties and maintains “no direct nor indirect financial connection” with Epstein or his estate. No flight logs to the island, victim statements, or court records implicate him in Epstein’s sex-trafficking operation. The Bitcoin community has rallied around the veteran cypherpunk, dismissing online speculation as overblown drama. Early contributor Luke Dashjr’s calls for resignation have been brushed off by supporters as unrelated to any proven facts. Epstein, who died in 2019 while awaiting trial, cultivated relationships across tech and finance for years after his 2008 conviction. Back’s brief professional overlap appears limited to standard investor outreach common in Silicon Valley at the time. “No crimes, no victims, no case,” a crypto insider told The Post. “Adam Back has spent decades building Bitcoin infrastructure with integrity. This is a nothingburger.” THE EVIDENCE provides a clean bill of health on the core allegations. As more Epstein files emerge, they continue to highlight the financier’s web of questionable contacts, without staining Back’s reputation. @adam3us (tagged so he can read and reply if he feels the need to do so).

English
0
0
0
22
Caffe' Satoshi
Caffe' Satoshi@CaffeSatoshi·
It's interesting that Adam Back opposes BIP-110, because his own work helped shape one of Bitcoin's core ideas. Long before Bitcoin existed, Adam Back invented Hashcash, a proof-of-work system designed to combat email spam. The concept was simple but elegant: don't ban spam, make it economically expensive. Legitimate users barely notice the cost, while mass spammers suddenly face a significant financial burden. Satoshi Nakamoto considered Hashcash so important that it became one of the foundational building blocks referenced in the Bitcoin whitepaper. In fact, Adam Back was the first person Satoshi contacted before publishing Bitcoin, specifically to verify the Hashcash citation. This is why Adam Back's opposition to BIP-110 is philosophically consistent. Hashcash never tried to decide which emails were "good" or "bad." It didn't censor content. It simply used economic incentives to make abuse expensive. Likewise, Bitcoin's blockspace is already protected by a market. If someone wants to fill blocks with arbitrary data, they must compete by paying transaction fees. Those fees are earned by miners and ultimately strengthen Bitcoin's security budget. The market, not protocol-level content filtering, determines what gets included. Adam Back has argued that BIP-110 attempts to solve a problem by introducing consensus restrictions where fee economics already provide an incentive-based mechanism. He has also warned that making protocol changes without broad consensus risks harming Bitcoin's credibility and setting an undesirable precedent. @adam3us
Caffe' Satoshi tweet media
English
34
21
147
13.1K