DeanO

@Kevin_Allen98 That actually backs what I am saying, had there been less competition he would of won even more quick. Plus what I said was he went from Physically not completing matches to a physical beast! I don't believe he doped just comparing examples

@CallusDean FYI, Novak's competition at 18-19 was not 2 yrs younger Carlos or 35+ yr old grandpa At 18-19, Novak had to face peak Federer, Nadal, Murray, Delpo, and all those giants. Yet, as a teen he was already reaching multiple finals and won slams+Masters Comparing Doper to Novak??😂🤡

Don't forget - the Clostebol (likely to mask PEDs) and the rigging of balls, draws, roofs, courts, schedules, fake MTOs, etc., so that the so-called "Italian granite" can win anything

@Kevin_Allen98 ok he is a doper cause you say so, go present your studies at a university maybe they give you a degree in science just by your research

@CallusDean There are so many who have won atp matches at 17. Did they become as big as Sinner. Dude, pls stop acting stupid or naive. Even you know this is impossible and the guy is a total doper.

@Kevin_Allen98 so at 18: 1 QF, at 19: 2 4th rounds, at 20: 3 QF, at 21: 2 fourth rounds and a semi...ok that is not gradual progress at all! 😆😆

@CallusDean This was Sinner's profile pre-2024 for someone who is dominating at levels higher than Big 3. Best GS result = SF (end of 2023) For such record-breaking talent, he should have already won 1-2 slams, made multiple SFs/finals, won 4-5 Masters, ATF Finals. But Guess what?? NONE?!!

@Kevin_Allen98 ok so winning atp matches at 17 is not talent cause an article was published in 2024. ok if you say so

@CallusDean This was written in 2024. Hope you're not dumb 🤦‍♂️ He was not a supreme talent. He had the same rise like Vacherot. No one even expected him to be a top 10, let alone break Big 3 records. The guy barely could crack a slam SF until end of 2023 (or right before his doping came out)

@Kevin_Allen98 you didn't even read what i said!

@CallusDean * Novak couldn’t dominate beyond a year * Rafa struggled outside clay * Federer ruled grass in a weak era But 🇮🇹 Sinner—out of nowhere—(like Vacherot winning Shanghai) dominates everything on Big 3-scale on all surfaces? Give me a fkn break!! 🚩🚩Red flags all around. 🚩🚩

@Kevin_Allen98 what does publish date have to do with it? just read the article, does the publish date change that he was a talent at a young age? wow!

@CallusDean Look at the published date 🤦‍♂️🤡 It says June 10, 2024 Sinner was not even a name considered in top 3 until end of 2023 or Italian 🇮🇹 takeover. Yet, he had 3 straight year domination - which was not even possible for Big 3. Guess who failed 2 doping tests too?

@Kevin_Allen98 for the record i don't believe Nole doped, just using your logic to prove a point

@Kevin_Allen98 not true, he was around 21 or 22 when he started wining which is the average time the body matures. I remember Djokovic could not even finish matches multiple times, then he went to the fittest player on tour in a short time. Acc to you he doped then if that is wat u base on

@Kevin_Allen98 atptour.com/en/news/sinner… or was he full of drugs at barely 17? where do you come up with your facts? you just think of something on the spot and its a fact?

@CallusDean Sinner was not even a talent, not even a surface-specific talent. After 2023, he's broke Big 3 records and dominated all surfaces+tournaments nonstop. Not even Big 3,nor young talents like Carlos, Rafa, Novak (who were touted future stars at 18-19) were capable of such domination

@Kevin_Allen98 If more evidence comes out I am open to all possibilities (would you?), but for now with what we know the evidence points to accidental contemination with no performance gains

@Kevin_Allen98 I guess this sums it up, theoretacally its possible but dumb to try (super high risk, very low reward). U will continue to believe that he doped cause you want to & theoretically possible. 90% of the scientists believe otherwise. I believe that it is possible but highly unlikely

@Kevin_Allen98 ok so it says it changes the overall profile but now ask it if it reduces the overall amount? so if someone takes 2 grams of a PED and a billionth of a gram of Clostebol, the tests will only show 1 billionth of a gram of Clostebol?

@CallusDean It will not reveal any info (not even if used as a masking agent, due to misuse risks). Such info is blocked in AIs now Your question: Is it possible nowadays? Yes, just as it was possible 5-10 yrs ago. Here is another AI reply as of today (where they've not hidden/blocked info):

@Kevin_Allen98 You don't have to tell it how to do it. The question is if its possible nowadays. Its also what I asked you all along. If you just looked at my question and answer that this would have been a lot quicker.

@CallusDean This screenshot was from ChatGPT itself. Nowadays, all AIs are trained not to give any advice/info about how any substance can be used as a masking agent (for safety purposes). So you will not find that answer even if it can be done. Look at what it says..

@Kevin_Allen98 This is exactly what i mean, its from a few years ago and its already telling you that using it as a masking agent is impossible as testing science is improving. You have the answer.

@CallusDean This is what ChatGPT or any AI used to say few years ago. They have now altered all those as a means to prevent such info from being available publically. So yes, clostebol has been used as masking agent as it can alter the detectability of other PEDs

@Kevin_Allen98 ...use bias or emotion. In less than a minute it will gather infromation that will take us weeks & months to research. We clearly are using bias & emotions to research especially if such a link you posted is used as an argument. Check & see what gpt says

@Kevin_Allen98 The screenshots are about clostebol directly &not a masking agent. The link is an interesting read but nothing scientific, the WADA scientist also said that as a cream it is not performance enhancing. The best method is to ask gpt. It will search the entire internet & will not...

@Kevin_Allen98 is there some source from recent years that you can share that says PEDs in small doses will be masked in tests by clostebol? Can you answer this one? or is this one of those trust me bro moments?

@CallusDean The effect of any PED depends on the substance, dose, frequency, training, and the individual. There isn’t a universal “X weeks = advantage" rule. I don't understand what you mean by how long? The effects can be seen within weeks (depending on substance)

@Kevin_Allen98 is there some source from recent years that you can share that says PEDs in small doses will be masked in tests by clostebol? Also how long do you need to microdose on PEDs to gain advantages? Sinner had approx a test a month that year, hence it has to be less than 4 weeks

@CallusDean He can take the powerful PEDs in small microdoses too, carefully timed and they don't show up in tests because of masking agents. Masking agent reduces detectability, while the PED enhances performance. That's why they or diuretics exist.

@Kevin_Allen98 so you are saying he took clostebol in small amounts and at the same time he took stronger PEDs at the same time for performance gain? And the small amount of clostebol got detected but the stronger PEDs did not?

@CallusDean It's obvious! To get off the hook with a contamination excuse 1. Easy deniability 2. The main metabolite has a short detection window, sometimes only showing up in the tail-end of its metabolic lifespan (20-30 hrs), particularly after dermal contact 3. Available over-the-counter

@Kevin_Allen98 Even your screenshot says that there were huge advancements in the last 5-10 years. Small amounts are traceable & consitantly so. Why would someone use Clostebol as a masking agent if it is traceable?

@CallusDean It was also possible in the past, not just a couple of years ago. From where did you get this wrong info?