Cameron Goodhead

1.2K posts

Cameron Goodhead banner
Cameron Goodhead

Cameron Goodhead

@CamGoodhead

PhD Student @CEGDurham studying effects of rewilding on habitat structure🌳 & microclimate 🌡️| Keen climber, surfer & wildlife photographer 📸

Durham, England Katılım Kasım 2018
1.5K Takip Edilen1.1K Takipçiler
Cameron Goodhead retweetledi
Guy Shrubsole
Guy Shrubsole@guyshrubsole·
So @TheGreenParty now have 4 seats - as many as the revolting Reform party are forecast to get. So why in god’s name is @BBCNews rabbiting on about Reform still and not talking about extraordinary Green performance??
English
1.2K
1.7K
9.6K
400.8K
Cameron Goodhead retweetledi
Politics UK
Politics UK@PolitlcsUK·
🚨 NEW: The Green Party have successfully won all four of their target seats, despite an original exit poll prediction of just two
English
65
2.2K
27.3K
1.3M
Cameron Goodhead retweetledi
Damian Carrington
Damian Carrington@dpcarrington·
Climate experts were increasingly saying that keeping heating below 1.5C is near impossible, yet it remains the global goal. So I asked hundreds of top IPCC scientists what they thought. What they said shocked even me… 🧵 1/n #ClimateCrisis
English
146
2.3K
4.7K
1.3M
Cameron Goodhead
Cameron Goodhead@CamGoodhead·
A fun return to my old stomping grounds in the stunning Bodmin Moor temperate rainforests at Cabilla Cornwall last month. So good to be back! @MerlinHanbury
Cameron Goodhead tweet mediaCameron Goodhead tweet mediaCameron Goodhead tweet mediaCameron Goodhead tweet media
English
1
0
20
442
Cameron Goodhead retweetledi
Nick Deere
Nick Deere@NicolasJDeere·
Thrilled to share our new @DICE_Kent research on fire impacts - hot off the press🔥 in @PNASNews Working with @BorneoNature & using 16-years of data, we examined the ecological impacts of fire and potential for recovery in Indonesia's tropical peatlands🧵1/10
Nick Deere tweet media
English
1
16
45
5.7K
Cameron Goodhead
Cameron Goodhead@CamGoodhead·
@AndrewGilruth @stuartpengs @turbotechdog I agree it doesnt tell full picture. But doesn't need to be a hard accept/reject. We can acknowledge that it can provide insights into differences in local biodiversity, but loses meaning comparing environmentally different sites eg grouse moor v hay meadow, UK v Switzerland etc
English
1
0
0
58
Andrew Gilruth
Andrew Gilruth@AndrewGilruth·
@stuartpengs @CamGoodhead @turbotechdog So all you need is one pair of more species at a site to be ‘better’… that does not tell us the full picture. Hence my point. Either we accept this way of counting biodiversity or we don’t. Can’t have it both ways.
English
3
0
0
129
Tom Wright
Tom Wright@turbotechdog·
Often wonder about this. I’ve been to other countries and seen no wildlife at all. Is it calculated as a % of the perceived wildlife pre man? 🫎🦬🦭
Carwyn J. Thomas@CarwynJThomas

@philip_pbm339 Coming from a farming family I sympathise with farmers. But we do live in the most nature depleted country in Europe & bringing in diversity to non productive areas should be something that should be done. But this needs to be done with farmers & for them to be paid a fair wage.

English
14
1
12
11.5K
Cameron Goodhead
Cameron Goodhead@CamGoodhead·
@AndrewGilruth @Alexander_Lees @stuartpengs Not at all. But as has been continuously highlighted, we shouldn't be comparing environmentally different countries (like the blog does), but instead with what has been lost compared to baselines within the country (eg the biodiversity intactness index)
English
0
0
2
41
Alex Lees
Alex Lees@Alexander_Lees·
I thought about replying to this misleading biodiversity value statement by @AndrewGilruth but @stuartpengs had already thoroughly debunked it:
Alex Lees tweet mediaAlex Lees tweet mediaAlex Lees tweet media
English
7
14
86
9.1K
Cameron Goodhead
Cameron Goodhead@CamGoodhead·
@AndrewGilruth @stuartpengs @turbotechdog Right I may stop here then as you’re clearly not reading what I am saying. What I said is that comparing species richness between environmentally similar sites is valid. It is fine to compare, say, RSPB Minsmere to surrounding areas. It is not fine to compare to an alpine meadow.
English
1
0
2
93
Cameron Goodhead
Cameron Goodhead@CamGoodhead·
@AndrewGilruth @stuartpengs @turbotechdog It is definitely more valid when eNGOs say that their site has X species more than the surrounding landscape, rather than saying that because Switzerland has less fish than the UK we are actually doing great for biodiversity.
English
1
0
1
138
Cameron Goodhead
Cameron Goodhead@CamGoodhead·
@AndrewGilruth @stuartpengs @turbotechdog I'm not saying species count is a useless metric. It can be useful - although still is not the only one we need. I more meant the way the data were used in the blog is very flawed. It also becomes more flawed when the differences between compared sites increase e.g. btw countries
English
1
0
0
85
Cameron Goodhead
Cameron Goodhead@CamGoodhead·
@AndrewGilruth @stuartpengs @turbotechdog There's loads more issues with it and is the reason it is a mere blog post and not an actual published dataset.. Very ironic that you are using this to bash eNGOs for being misleading with data.
English
0
0
1
48
Cameron Goodhead
Cameron Goodhead@CamGoodhead·
@AndrewGilruth @stuartpengs @turbotechdog 3) The data doesn't account for any differences in monitoring resources across countries. Eg Slovenia is down as only have 400 plant species - compared to neighbours Austria (2,578), Croatia (4,288). UK has excellent monitoring and reporting schemes.
English
1
0
1
61