BVVD
673 posts


@CaptainPRICE531 @Justice53_07_27 普锐斯那个破车在美国人嘴里就是不会开车瞎寄吧乱开的煞笔司机的代名词,刻板印象就是开普锐斯的都是性饥渴脑子轴人缘差的nerd
车机跟智障一样
后来特斯拉一出来加上现在的补贴力度,都买特斯拉去了
中文


又是一个实战党。
迷信美军的实战,就好比在说一个天天在幼儿园殴打小朋友,但是全身都在走下坡路的60岁恶霸肯定比一个30岁天天去健身房打拳的1米9,220磅的壮汉厉害一样。
请问,美国空军和哪个五代机实战过?Top Gun里不算。
美国空军和六代机演习对抗过么?
哦,美国六代机只在PPT上啊,那没事了。
美军拦截过高超么?噢,没有高超的靶弹啊,打扰了。
美国所谓的实战不过是在青铜局炸鱼,在幼儿园殴打小朋友,和臭棋篓子下棋,这种实战经验只会让你越来越菜,就像乌克兰的顾问吐槽美军在中东的高价值雷达几个月不挪地方等着挨炸,用8发爱国者拦截一枚导弹然后被第二枚导弹炸成渣一样。
中国军事专家在揣摩美军数据时候确实从来没有正确过,因为中国向来强调的都是料敌从宽,演习里给美军的数据总是大大超过现实里面美军的能力:
比方说什么射程120公里的AIM-120导弹,需要99A击中2次才算摧毁的M1A2 SEPV3,上来就用战术核弹还有电磁压制的蓝军,装备妥善率100%的对手。结果一打伊朗,噢,原来你连300架对地攻击机都凑不出来啊?
x.com/Justice53_07_2…
而美军的推演就完全反过来,总是给对方上各种各样莫名其妙的debuff。
就好比美军对台湾战争的军推,限制大陆只能使用东部战区,导弹数量有限,美军只有冲绳基地被打,关岛基地基本无伤,300架空优机都凑不齐的情况下还能抢夺制空权,B-2全数出动打LRASM,还要求解放军莫名其妙在没有取得制空制海权的情况下强渡海峡,这不是在推演,这是为了赢学的自我欺骗。这还是最接近客观的2025年的一次推演,以前那些更离谱的我就不说了。
实战更像一面镜子,你要是不打伊朗,全世界就不知道美国有多弱。
x.com/Justice53_07_2…

BADGUY@Bad_guy_89
@Justice53_07_27 事實証明,沒實戰過,只靠數據,永遠是模擬猜測。 中國實戰也是演習,終究不是拼傷亡。 按中國軍事專家那些揣測數據分析的,基本沒一個對的。 因為沒有實戰數據作為參考,所以沒準過。 伊朗,委內瑞拉,包括現在還在打的烏俄戰爭,哪有預測準過?
中文

China is now putting the lives of the men and women of our military at risk. Truly outrageous, but also predictable.
msn.com/en-us/news/wor…
English

对对对,之前被开的杀狗那个国土安全部长用几亿买飞机就为了在空中和自己情夫打炮,2分钟成本500刀的广告用了2亿刀。
東方來@fromorient2023
這是真正的愛國者! 皮特.赫格塞斯,現任戰爭部長,年薪$25.6萬;原年薪$230萬; 珍妮.皮羅:現任華盛頓D.C.聯邦檢察官,年薪$19.8萬;原年薪$500萬; 肖恩.達菲; 現任交通部長,年薪$25.3萬,原來年薪$100萬; 他們的個人利益處於棄高求低狀,僅此即得出結論,他們是真正的愛國者。
中文

🇨🇳🇫🇷China Executed a French National for Drug Trafficking: Here’s the Real Context
China executed a 62-year-old French national, Chan Thao Phoumy, for drug trafficking. Sentenced to death in 2010 after a major meth ring was busted in Guangdong, over fifteen years on death row before the sentence was carried out.
France is predictably “deeply concerned.” The usual statements came out, rights violations, anti-death penalty rhetoric, calls for clemency. Beijing’s response was short and to the point: drug crime is everyone’s problem, foreigners are treated exactly the same as locals and the law applies equally to everyone.
Now, before the usual outrage cycles kick in, it’s worth understanding why China holds this position so firmly. This isn’t some arbitrary authoritarian quirk, it’s national memory that runs incredibly deep.
The Opium Wars (1839–1860) weren’t ancient history here. They were the original Western lesson. British gunboats forced opium into Chinese ports, turned millions into addicts, hollowed out the economy and kicked off a century of humiliation. That scar tissue runs deep. Beijing remembers exactly what happens when you let narcotics flood in: social collapse, lost sovereignty, generational damage.
Fast-forward to today and the CPC’s zero-tolerance stance is pure realpolitik, protect public order, keep the streets functional, stop the cartels before they metastasise. They execute for large-scale trafficking because the alternative is the fentanyl-ravaged mess you see elsewhere.
And let’s be honest about one thing: it works. Walk around any Chinese city at night and you don’t see the open-air overdose scenes, needle parks, or cartel turf wars that scar parts of the West. Compare that to America’s opioid crisis, hundreds of thousands dead, entire towns hollowed out, or Europe’s creeping cocaine and meth problems. China’s strict laws, swift enforcement and cultural memory aren’t “barbaric.” They’re the reason you don’t have those problems here.
Moral of the story, loud and clear:
If you’re a foreigner in China, respect the damn laws. Especially on drugs. Traffic, smuggle, or deal and the consequences are final. You’re a guest in someone else’s house, play by their rules or accept the outcome.
Sovereignty isn’t optional. Neither is deterrence.


English
























