Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Kenyan universities have spent decades losing student marks, ignoring complaints, summoning students to boardrooms to scold them for having the audacity to seek justice, and then acting surprised when those same students walked into court and walked out with money. Here is your scorecard.
Case 1: Owuor Mboya vs Kenyatta University (2024)
Owuor was a Bachelor of Music student who completed his studies in October 2021 and was set to graduate in December 2021. Despite fulfilling all academic requirements, his name was excluded from the graduation list due to unposted marks in two units; Guitar Skills and Theory of Aural Skills. Over the next two years, he wrote to the Deputy Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs, sought help from the Commission on Administrative Justice, and was ignored at every turn. He then missed a fully funded Master's scholarship at Sheffield University in the UK because he had no degree certificate to present. He went to court. Justice Lawrence Mugambi ordered Kenyatta University to pay him KSh 1,400,000 for violating his constitutional rights to education, fair administrative action, dignity, and legitimate expectation, and ordered the university to bear all legal costs. A Sheffield scholarship gone. KU's money gone too.
Case 2: Nyambura Kimani vs Kenyatta University (2025)
Nyambura enrolled at Kenyatta University in September 2009, completed her coursework by December 2013, and could not graduate because of missing marks in multiple units including CAT marks for UCU 104 that her lecturer simply refused to release. She went to the university to resolve the matter. Instead, she was paraded before lecturers in a boardroom and chastised for attempting to sue. The university then refused to withdraw the unit, specifically because she had chosen to seek legal redress. You read that correctly: they punished her for going to court by making her situation in court worse. It did not work. Justice Mugambi ordered the university to pay her KSh 850,000, ruling that its failure to release her marks was irrational, unconstitutional, illegal, an abuse of power, and a breach of legitimate expectation. The boardroom intimidation cost KU dearly.
Case 3: 21 Students vs Technical University of Kenya (2012–2026)
In 2012, a lecturer at TUK failed to submit marks for a compulsory mathematics examination sat by 72 diploma students in Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering. The scripts disappeared. The lecturer never returned them. The university took no urgent action. Twenty-one students had their graduation delayed by a full year. They told the court that missing their graduation ceremony made them look like failures in the eyes of their families, friends, and wider society. They sued. They won. The Court of Appeal, in a judgment delivered just this week by Justices Daniel Musinga, Mumbi Ngugi and Francis Tuiyott, upheld the constitutional violation finding while reducing individual compensation from KSh 148,764 to KSh 50,000 each, a total payout of KSh 1,050,000 across 21 students. Fourteen years from missing scripts to final judgment. Kenya's courts move at their own pace. But they do arrive.
The constitutional foundation beneath all three cases is the same: Article 43(1)(f) of the Constitution guarantees education as a fundamental right. Article 47 guarantees fair administrative action.
#MissingMarks #StudentRights
English
