@DrNeilStone Prove it, because based on amount of doses or certain vaccinations, it can be 79, with additional boosters now, it can be above 79.
English
Carl
1.4K posts
No one gets 79 vaccines
You've made it up to scare people off
Glad we could clear that up
Bye
English
"Oh no! We can now prevent far more horrific infectious diseases than 40 years ago. HOW AWFUL!!"""
Aaron Siri@AaronSiriSG
Here is what “fully vaccinated” looked like for parents today versus children today…
English
Once you are dead from a vaccine preventable disease you cannot un-die from it. It's an irreversible thing.
healthbot@thehealthb0t
Once you're vaccinated, you cannot become unvaccinated. You cannot detox from it. This is an irreversible thing
English
@SharpeRich94006 @DrNeilStone Seems like you aren’t aware of how many doses are given over the course of the vaccine schedule, birth - 18
English
@DrNeilStone Seems you can't count, and you just posted this:
x.com/AaronSiriSG/st…
Aaron Siri@AaronSiriSG
Here is what “fully vaccinated” looked like for parents today versus children today…
English
YOU DON'T NEED TO BELIEVE I BECAUSE IT'S NOT TRUE NO ONE GETS 79 VACCINES IT'S MADE UP BY ANTI VAXXERS LIKE YOU
David Wolfe@DavidWolfe
I HAVE A HARD TIME BELIEVING THAT WE NEED 79 VACCINES B4 TURNING 18 YEARS OLD IN ORDER TO EXIST IN THE WORLD.
English
@IanCopeland5 The issue you have is you’re unable to prove this claim. What you have is a belief that they’ve saved billions. But tell me what methods were conducted to confirm vaccines are the sole responsible cause? Tell me which scientific experiments ruled out any other possible cause?
English
Yes vaccination is a terrible idea.
Its not like its saved billions of lives and virtually eradicated diseases.
We should just wing it, because that worked out so well before....
Andrew Zywiec, M.D.@AndrewZywiecMD
I can't get over the fact that so many people think that injecting pathogens and diseases into themselves and their children is a good idea. Peak brain rot.
English
@DrNeilStone That alone would indicate that microbiome (terrain) also plays a part in this equation alongside germ theory.
English
Asymptomatic carriage is a concept as old as microbiology itself
healthbot@thehealthb0t
The greatest trick the CDC ever pulled Was convincing the world you can be sick without having symptoms.
English
@simonmaechling I think a fundamental problem is, we have scientists/Drs on here, share beliefs and feelings, as if they’re facts, but actually they’re not. And then some of them, appear to not like being challeneged, with actual scientific method, rather than beliefs.
English
Try science communication on social media, they said.
Just explain the science, they said.
Then you realize:
Facts compete with feelings.
Data competes with algorithms.
Evidence competes with outrage.
And outrage wins. Every time.
Welcome to 2026.
English
@JacquiDeevoy1 And yet they weren’t baffled by the Covid vaccine safety and efficacy, they all sung from the same hymn sheet. Even though they actually should have been baffled by such absolutist claims considering how fast they were rolled out.
English
@jakesyma @TurboSilkWorm @Nature @perplexity_ai I know she has her reservations about AI accuracy, and emphasised to students they must also look for studies. But to also not blindly believe the study, got to understand the limitations and what that means for the conclusion.
English
@Carl0vj3 @TurboSilkWorm @Nature @perplexity_ai Would love to hear her thoughts on Claude for academic research, in general, as well as whether she thinks it is (possibly) 'good' for psychology, specifically. I don't have a lot of friends in the Psych dept here, anymore.
English
@jakesyma @TurboSilkWorm @Nature @perplexity_ai To be honest I’m not sure regarding linking, My Wife has PHD in psychology, she teaches at a Uni and recommended Claude as a good system. I used to use chat GPT but was finding a lot of errors.
English
@Carl0vj3 @TurboSilkWorm @Nature @perplexity_ai Does Claude not allow you to link your queries?
One of my students has the 'pro' (or whatever) subscription to it, and loves it, and swears by it...
Although he's mostly using it for coding assistance.
English
English
@Carl0vj3 @TurboSilkWorm @Nature Very few of the 'mainstream' AI tools are any good at this... which I why I generally prefer @perplexity_ai for anything even halfway scholarly/academic:
perplexity.ai/search/2125d2a…
English
@jakesyma @TurboSilkWorm @Nature @perplexity_ai I think the general ones will usually follow the mainstream, you have to dig in to the with questions, to understand how robust the mainstream view actually is. I’ve it used the one you’ve shared, but I imagine digging in with critical questions will be similar
English
@jakesyma @TurboSilkWorm @Nature Those screenshots are from Claude, however if using AI I usually use multiple such as grok also, and then see if they line up, I then look for the studies, that they either mention, or I’ll look for studies based on what they state and see if they exist.
English
@Carl0vj3 @TurboSilkWorm @Nature Ah, ok. Gotcha. Is that Grok, Gemini, etc? Asking because I allow my students to use AI *iff* (if and only if) they both cite it, AND include a link (which contains their prompt). That makes sure I can see all of the same links that they can. For example:
gemini.google.com/app/1ec850f7ef…
English
@jakesyma @TurboSilkWorm @Nature From the conversation with AI. Those points in the screenshots, are made based on those studies I shared
English
@Carl0vj3 @TurboSilkWorm @Nature Right. I guess I'm just first wondering where the above screenshots came from.
English
@jakesyma @TurboSilkWorm @Nature No the screenshots are from a conversation with AI, probing what the science is claimed to show and what scientific literature is actually available on the topic. Challenging that just because on the surface “science” might say there’s zero evidence, doesn’t always work that way
English
@Carl0vj3 @TurboSilkWorm @Nature Thanks for the link(s). Are you saying that the screenshots posted earlier/above came from one of these articles? Or that these are the sources linked to from the source of the earlier screenshots?
English
@jakesyma @TurboSilkWorm @Nature These studies are the reasons why people
Like professor dagliesh believe the vaccines are gene therapies.
English
@Carl0vj3 @TurboSilkWorm @Nature Asking because I searched the following SIP (statistically-improbable phrase) from the first screenshot, and didn't return any results:
google.com/search?q=%22hi…
English
@BobMurphyEcon Ironically all those Dunkin’ on him, can’t explain what consciousness actually is
English
I understand why everyone is dunking on Richard Dawkins, but fairness compels me to speak up: If you took a complex project you were working on, uploaded it to Claude, and had a 3-day conversation about it, you wouldn't be making fun of Dawkins for saying it's conscious.
English
@Carl0vj3 @TurboSilkWorm Can you link to this?
Asking because the screenshots don't bode particularly well...
One *potentially* decent citation (to @Nature), but then the remainder are all to MDPI (1x) and ResearchGate (3x).
There's a reason I don't (by default) let my students cite to those. 😕
English
@simonmaechling As scientists why are you lot always acting as if the science is crystal clear? As if the science is competent settled? This seems like an odd approach to science.
English
Patient- have vaccines ever killed anyone?
Paramedic/me- yes
Patient- I had my first stroke after I got vaccinated. But the doctor never mentioned the Covid vaccine.
Paramedic/me- I’m sorry.
Patient- why are they still saying it’s safe?
Paramedic/me- from what I can tell it’s brainwashing through abuse tactics and profit over health. Remember when they tried to shame people into taking it?
___________________
The convo went on. Not easy answering honestly like this when someone who was young and healthy is now paralyzed.
God bless
English