David Carless

7.7K posts

David Carless banner
David Carless

David Carless

@CarlessDavid

Professor @hku_education, Visiting Professor @SurreyIoE. PFHEA. #feedbackliteracy #assessment #feedback

Hong Kong Katılım Kasım 2014
1.1K Takip Edilen7.1K Takipçiler
David Carless retweetledi
sidmartin
sidmartin@smartinmot2014·
#edtech "three recommendations for teachers in promoting feedback seeking(..): model #feedback seeking and uptake; embed feedback seeking within the curriculum; develop relational climates of openness and trust for feedback seeking" More 👇🏻 scape.edu.hku.hk/feedback-seeki…
English
0
4
7
331
David Carless retweetledi
sidmartin
sidmartin@smartinmot2014·
#edtech How can I promote feedback seekers 👉🏻 "if we want students to be pro-active participants in #feedback processes, it helps if they see teacher role models of generating and using feedback information" scape.edu.hku.hk/feedback-seeki…
English
0
2
5
387
David Carless
David Carless@CarlessDavid·
@smartinmot2014 Research on feedback over the last 20 years suggests that in mass undergraduate higher education "deep, empathetic, and contextual features of human feedback" were seldom feasible 🙄
English
1
0
1
84
sidmartin
sidmartin@smartinmot2014·
#edtech "The study advocates for a hybrid approach, leveraging the scalability of AI while retaining the deep, empathetic, and contextual features of human #feedback" #abstract" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…
English
1
0
2
125
David Carless retweetledi
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD@acagamic·
All rejected papers share one common flaw: a weak discussion section. I know because I used to write them too. If you're stuck on the discussion section, wondering how to tie it all together, this is for you:
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD tweet media
English
9
199
1.1K
65.5K
David Carless retweetledi
Dr Andrew Huang 黄延祺
Dr Andrew Huang 黄延祺@DrAndrewHuang·
Great to meet with @CarlessDavid yesterday in Hong Kong to talk about feedback and the development of expertise. He offered the observation that medicine, architecture and teaching are the fields most interested in feedback.
Dr Andrew Huang 黄延祺 tweet media
English
0
1
10
387
David Carless retweetledi
sidmartin
sidmartin@smartinmot2014·
#edtech "It is a must-read for educators, researchers, and academic developers in higher education who will benefit from a guide to feedback research and practice that addresses well recognised challenges in relation to assessment and feedback" Not only higher education 😉
sidmartin tweet media
English
0
1
8
289
David Carless retweetledi
sidmartin
sidmartin@smartinmot2014·
#edtech "fostering constructive #feedback environments that provide actionable information and acknowledge students’ prior achievements encourage students’ autonomy to seek feedback" More 👇🏻 scape.edu.hku.hk/how-do-student…
English
0
6
9
1.2K
David Carless retweetledi
Razia Aliani
Razia Aliani@RaziaAliani·
Your paper isn't getting rejected because your research is bad. Here's what actually gets papers rejected ⤵️ Your literature review is outdated Copying and paraphrasing old reviews? Editors spot this instantly. They want fresh citations from the last 2-3 years. You're working on exhausted topics When 1000+ papers already exist on your topic, your work needs something genuinely new. First movers get published. Fast followers get cited. Your sample is too small or convenient Student samples? Snowball sampling? Convenient sampling? Desk rejection. Premier journals demand robust methodology. No theoretical contribution Data without theory = rejection. Your findings need to advance how we understand the phenomenon. You're defending instead of revising Getting a revise-and-resubmit is rare (5-7% of submissions). Treat reviewer comments like gold. Implement them. Don't defend. The 3 things that changed my acceptance rate: → Mixed methods over single studies → Multiple experiments in one paper → Including co-authors with complementary expertise Publishing isn't about being perfect. It's about being strategic! What's been your biggest publishing challenge? 1/6
Razia Aliani tweet media
English
15
266
1K
72.7K
David Carless retweetledi
Belinda Hui-Ling Zhou
Belinda Hui-Ling Zhou@belindazhouhl·
👏Our new article on student feedback seeking highlights the potential of combined monitoring & inquiry. 😀Many thanks again for the valuable support from @CarlessDavid and @JuusoNieminen #d1e128" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…
English
0
6
11
581
David Carless
David Carless@CarlessDavid·
Assessment can and should be for learning. At its best, it should be energizing and motivating.
English
0
0
8
482
David Carless
David Carless@CarlessDavid·
@fake_journals Embed a citable sound-bite in the title, abstract, introduction and discussion
English
0
0
2
69
Publishing with Integrity
Publishing with Integrity@fake_journals·
Give me one idea to ETHICALLY increase citations to your articles.
English
5
0
1
1K
David Carless retweetledi
Sal Consoli
Sal Consoli@sal_consoli·
New from the Cambridge Elements series I edit: “How to Use Generative AI in Educational Research” (J. Roe) A timely, practical guide to integrating GenAI thoughtfully into educational research; balancing innovation & ethics. 📖 Free access for 2 weeks: 🔗 doi.org/10.1017/978100…
English
2
20
38
3.1K